5 Barbarian Multiclass Characters (You'll Never Expect)


Pathfinder First Edition General Discussion


As anyone who's seen my posts knows, I like characters that are hard to classify when you look at them. Also, I love multiclass characters. So, with those two facts in mind, I present 5 Barbarian Multiclass Characters (You'll Never Expect).

Now, it's possible, and even likely, that folks here have seen and done some of these before. However, these are the combinations I've found that get the most raised eyebrows, or people who try to tell you that you can't, but which can't find a single rule barring the combination. Hope you enjoy!

Silver Crusade

4 people marked this as a favorite.

*reads list of "You'll Never Expect*

... you don't play a lot, do you?


I have a raging paladin and raging warpriest, plans for a raging monk, raging cleric, raging magus, basically raging anything that wants to hit something.


Chess Pwn...how do you manage the raging Paladin and Monk? Is there an archetype that removes either the Lawful restriction on Paladins or Monks? Or, I suppose there could be a way to allow a Barbarian to be Lawful.

Liberty's Edge

Six!


Pathfinder Maps, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

There are a race trait (for Aasimars) and a couple of archetypes (Martial Artist and one from Occult Adventures) that permit Monks to be non-lawful.

Bloodragers and VMC Barbarians can be lawful.


Pathfinder Starfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I thought that the Alchemist was one of the common multi-class combinations with Barbarian since the mutagen bonus to Strength and Rage bonus to Strength stack.

As for the Swashbuckler multiclass, Bloodrager works a lot better for that! They even have Versatile Weapon on their spell list so you can activate a wand for it.

Silver Crusade

@BretI, it is.


As well, there is no penalty whatsoever for being an ex-monk.


VMC Barbarians?


I use bloodrager.

but there are a few monk archetypes that let them be neutral. martial artist and karmic are the ones I know of.

paladin can get it by having the archetype that gets domain and going rage.

Scarab Sages

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I prefer undead summoning shadowdancer paladins to mess with expectations.

Dark Archive

Imbicatus wrote:
I prefer undead summoning shadowdancer paladins to mess with expectations.

Explain how you can get away with doing this? Summoning undead is an evil act, and creating such should case the paladin to fall.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
JonathonWilder wrote:
Imbicatus wrote:
I prefer undead summoning shadowdancer paladins to mess with expectations.
Explain how you can get away with doing this? Summoning undead is an evil act, and creating such should case the paladin to fall.

neither the shadowdancer nor the Occultist abilities are necessarily evil.


so summoning your ancestors to do battle against the forces of evil? or giving the dead a second chance to exact revenge against the evil that killed them is wrong even though it would put their restless souls to rest? communing with the dead is not evil. ripping the souls from their rest and enslaving them is evil. Aragon (lord of the rings), Mulan (Disney), Simba (Disney), the lady from the last Mummy summons a horde of undead to do battle with the bbeg, and Richard Rahl (wizards first rule), are all evil then. Richard is even a cannibal does that make him doubly evil? where one culture sees evil another sees heritage and spiritual practice. necromancy is not good nor is it evil. its like the force,it can be used by both sides good and evil. then there is what the sideromancer said are occultists evil for communing with the spirits of the dead?


The undead that Aragorn uses are already awake and causing trouble. Anyone taking the path he took were set upon by those undead. What Aragorn did was to proclaim his lineage, and offer a way for the undead to redeem themselves and thus be laid to rest.

While hiring evil mercenaries might be questionable, it is not an evil act.

/cevah


Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber

damn you neal with your click bait!


Pathfinder Maps, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
Krell44 wrote:
VMC Barbarians?

Variant Multiclassing, from Pathfinder Unchained.

Silver Crusade

That's what private browsing is for.


Really. only Swashy was unseen much.
Then I remember Urban Barb or Savage Techno.


Rysky wrote:

*reads list of "You'll Never Expect*

... you don't play a lot, do you?

To answer your question, I've played for about 10 years. However, many of the combinations I mention are the ones that people will ban, or argue against, because, "that's not how it's supposed to work." The objections are rarely mechanical; many players have archetypal images in their head, and when you go a different way with a class or mix, they get a brain bend. So I point out, whenever I can, there are more options than many of us think.

I once had someone argue for nearly half an hour that rogues had to be criminals, and that they couldn't be lawful. Said person then dug through the entire book, and half a dozen online resources, before admitting he was operating off of a personal opinion, rather than what was actually written in the game itself.

Silver Crusade

Neal Litherland wrote:
Rysky wrote:

*reads list of "You'll Never Expect*

... you don't play a lot, do you?

To answer your question, I've played for about 10 years. However, many of the combinations I mention are the ones that people will ban, or argue against, because, "that's not how it's supposed to work." The objections are rarely mechanical; many players have archetypal images in their head, and when you go a different way with a class or mix, they get a brain bend. So I point out, whenever I can, there are more options than many of us think.

I once had someone argue for nearly half an hour that rogues had to be criminals, and that they couldn't be lawful. Said person then dug through the entire book, and half a dozen online resources, before admitting he was operating off of a personal opinion, rather than what was actually written in the game itself.

So it's not "never expect" but "not allowed", from experience then.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Rysky wrote:
Neal Litherland wrote:
Rysky wrote:

*reads list of "You'll Never Expect*

... you don't play a lot, do you?

To answer your question, I've played for about 10 years. However, many of the combinations I mention are the ones that people will ban, or argue against, because, "that's not how it's supposed to work." The objections are rarely mechanical; many players have archetypal images in their head, and when you go a different way with a class or mix, they get a brain bend. So I point out, whenever I can, there are more options than many of us think.

I once had someone argue for nearly half an hour that rogues had to be criminals, and that they couldn't be lawful. Said person then dug through the entire book, and half a dozen online resources, before admitting he was operating off of a personal opinion, rather than what was actually written in the game itself.

So it's not "never expect" but "not allowed", from experience then.

I gotta agree with Rysky here; these are all pretty common. There's far better choices you could have gone for here. I mean seriously, starting off with Rogue/Barb? This article reads like it was written by someone relatively new to the system to the point where I'm almost shocked you didn't list fighter too.

Scarab Sages

The Sideromancer wrote:
JonathonWilder wrote:
Imbicatus wrote:
I prefer undead summoning shadowdancer paladins to mess with expectations.
Explain how you can get away with doing this? Summoning undead is an evil act, and creating such should case the paladin to fall.
neither the shadowdancer nor the Occultist abilities are necessarily evil.

In fact, the shadow companion summoned by the shadowdancer is explicitly the same alignment as the shadowdancer. The shadow they summon is LG.


Pathfinder Maps, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

The current party in my game has two characters with one level of rogue each. Both are lawful good -- in fact, they are the only lawful good party members.

One of them was my character. When she decided she needed thieves' tools, she went shopping for an "archeologist's kit" -- after all, she had no plans to do any "thieving".

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / General Discussion / 5 Barbarian Multiclass Characters (You'll Never Expect) All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in General Discussion