Jiggy for Rules Historian

[Talonhawke]

The now official thread to hopefully get Jiggy to recap all your favorite debates from old thread.

[Jiggy]

Don't do this. It will only end in tears.

[Thefurmonger]

Talonhawke wrote:

The now official thread to hopefully get Jiggy to recap all your favorite debates from old thread.

Seconded.

[Cheapy]

Oh oh oh! Do the Sunder thread.

[BretI]

His avatar already has a sharpened pencil at the ready.

[The Dark Seer]

Jiggy wrote:

Don't do this. It will only end in tears.

It is too late...

[Cosmo Cultist]

I don't know what's going on in this thread but I heard mention that there will be tears so I came to add to my collection.

[Talonhawke]

After the Sunder thread I wanna hear the tale of using two weapons without TWF.

EDIT: Why did we get and FAQ hit......Are we trying to make it fully official?

[Conman the Bardbarian]

So is this supposed to be like an ask Jiggy thread where we ask him to do searches for us or do we just keep going about it the usual way of posting something that's wrong hoping he'll see it and look up our answer that way?

[Kobold Catgirl]

...how did you get an FAQ hit? Did this thread start in another forum?

Jiggy, please recap for me the thread discussing rules on the overlong nature of the forums!

[Master Pugwampi]

Ooh! Ooh! Discuss the merits and faults of the BAB over THACO!

[Freehold DM]

Why are we faqing this?

[Feros]

Freehold DM wrote:

Why are we faqing this?

I suspect someone is trying to be clever or else is completely missing a lot of details.

[Pirate Captain]

Yarr, I suppose ye can say yonder crew be gettin' Jiggy with it.

[Cao Phen]

Pirate Captain wrote:

Yarr, I suppose ye can say yonder crew be gettin' Jiggy with it.

You are not the Smith of Will, so you have no right to get with the Jiggy.

[Scavion]

Feros wrote:

Freehold DM wrote:

Why are we faqing this?

I suspect someone is trying to be clever or else is completely missing a lot of details.

I was trying to be clever. I apologize.

[Kobold Catgirl]

You must have been clever to manage to FAQ an un-FAQable post.

I tried to join you, but they don't accept kobold votes apparently.

[Scavion]

Kobold Cleaver wrote:

You must have been clever to manage to FAQ an un-FAQable post.

I tried to join you, but they don't accept kobold votes apparently.

Well I don't mean to toot my own horn but-

Wait you can't vote? Man this site is racist.

[Sissyl]

Who cares what gobbos and kobbos think? =)

[Cheel Vorastrix]

I am goink to turn ze northeazt into a znowglobe.

[Jiggy]

*blinks*

[Master Pugwampi]

Jiggy wrote:

Don't do this. It will only end in tears.

Damn it, this hasn't ended in tears yet! We're not doing enough!

Slackers! :P

[lucky7]

I have tears of joy. Does that count?

[LazarX]

"If asked, I shall not answer, If faqed, I shall not respond."

-- Jiggy S. Truman.

[lucky7]

I keep reading F A Q phonetically, and it's making me giggle.

[Scavion]

LazarX wrote:

"If asked, I shall not answer, If faqed, I shall not respond."

-- Jiggy S. Truman.

But if the FAQ goes through, the PDT will have to make a decision on whether or not Jiggy is the Rules Historian.

[LazarX]

Scavion wrote:

LazarX wrote:

"If asked, I shall not answer, If faqed, I shall not respond."

-- Jiggy S. Truman.

But if the FAQ goes through, the PDT will have to make a decision on whether or not Jiggy is the Rules Historian.

Only if you reach the 100,000 faqed mark that would require an official response.

[Scavion]

LazarX wrote:

Scavion wrote:

LazarX wrote:

"If asked, I shall not answer, If faqed, I shall not respond."

-- Jiggy S. Truman.

But if the FAQ goes through, the PDT will have to make a decision on whether or not Jiggy is the Rules Historian.

Only if you reach the 100,000 faqed mark that would require an official response.

You heard em Masses! Get clickin.

[LazarX]

5 down, 99,995 to go.

[Talonhawke]

Dammit Jiggy get in here and start telling stories like an old man. you know the Back in my day..... kind.

[Jiggy]

Was there something in particular you wanted to hear? And why are you asking for stories in a thread whose title sounds like a petition for some sort of formal office?

[Talonhawke]

I didn't think the title through...... Still cheapy was in first so start with your recollection of the sunder thread.

[Tacticslion]

THIS MUST NOW BE A THING. JIGGY, WHAT YOU HAVE UNLEASHED IS AN UNRELENTING DEVOTION TO SEE YOU SUFFER AS YOU HAVE MADE ME-

Oh! A nickle!

* goes off and fixes a bowl of cereal with a shiny new kind of crud-encrusted nickle *

[Jiggy]

Tacticslion wrote:

THIS MUST NOW BE A THING. JIGGY, WHAT YOU HAVE UNLEASHED IS AN UNRELENTING DEVOTION TO SEE YOU SUFFER AS YOU HAVE MADE ME-

That almost sounds like you're gonna start an Ask Jiggy thread as some kind of revenge for my starting an Ask Tacticslion thread.

[Tacticslion]

Is... isn't that this thread? No? DANG it, ADD-and/or-Dyslexia! You two know how much you confuse me 'bout stuff!

[Jiggy]

Talonhawke wrote:

I didn't think the title through...... Still cheapy was in first so start with your recollection of the sunder thread.

Actually, I don't even know what thread he means. Or what I'm supposed to say about it.

[TimD]

Jiggy wrote:

Talonhawke wrote:

I didn't think the title through...... Still cheapy was in first so start with your recollection of the sunder thread.

Actually, I don't even know what thread he means. Or what I'm supposed to say about it.

I would guess the sunder with use as an attack rather than its own separate attack action similar to the wackiness of vital strike rather than being able to utilize iterative attacks and attacks of op with sunder...

... but that's just a guess...
<.<
>.>
<.<

I'll ... just... go back to my off-topic lurk mode now...

-TimD

[Talonhawke]

If not that one the infamous TWF thread about off hands when not using TWF

[Jiggy]

Talonhawke wrote:

If not that one the infamous TWF thread about off hands when not using TWF

I remember the one that prompted this FAQ. But what do you want me to say about it?

[Talonhawke]

This whole thing stemmed from you sufficient break down of a previous thread on an issue about the same thing where you gave a detailed history of how it all got discussed.

[Tacticslion]

Jiggy wrote:

Talonhawke wrote:

If not that one the infamous TWF thread about off hands when not using TWF

I remember the one that prompted this FAQ. But what do you want me to say about it?

... said Jiggy, like a boss.

EDIT: corrected for ninja kobolds...

[Jiggy]

@Talonhawke—So... the idea is for people to mention past forum threads and then just have me write recaps of them?

Is that entertaining in some way? The event you cite where I did this before had a specific reason, and unfortunately it was a somewhat unpleasant reason. I hope that's not what we're going for here; I'd much rather have my own proper "Ask" thread than have a dedicated poo-flinging thread.

Or does having me recap old arguments provide some sort of entertainment value?

EDIT: This is, in fact, the reason for my very first post in this thread.

[Water Boy]

Yes. To everything.

Especially the poo flinging!

Then everyone will need WATER! I WIN!

[Jiggy]

Water Boy wrote:

Especially the poo flinging!

Then everyone will need WATER!

What, because wet poo is the best poo...?

[Talonhawke]

Well I found the recap a quick refresh of things. If preferred I'll flag a post asking for an official name change to the ASK Jiggy Thread. You are one of the many people who has driven my enjoyment of the forums over the years. And repeatedly have been the guy who can quickly find and obscure quote and references in threads. No offense was meant.

[Water Boy]

Jiggy wrote:

Water Boy wrote:

Especially the poo flinging!

Then everyone will need WATER!

What, because wet poo is the best poo...?

OF COURSE!

[Jiggy]

Talonhawke wrote:

If preferred I'll flag a post asking for an official name change to the ASK Jiggy Thread.

I'm not sure the mods would be interested in renaming this thread for you. If you really want a thread to ask me questions in, wouldn't the simplest way be to just start one?

Quote:

No offense was meant.

Oh I wasn't taking offense; I was just saying that I'm not interested in trying to recreate what happened before on purpose.

[Tacticslion]

Jiggy, did you know that I often look at that scroll your avatar has as if it were a Mohawk-like Pompadour?

[Vlaeros]

Jiggy, do you know if you're psychic yet?

[Jiggy]

We're doing this? It looks like we're doing this. If we're doing this, can I at least have a proper, traditionally-titled, not-salvaged-from-an-existing-thread, "Ask" thread?

That's...
*puts on sunglasses*
...all I ask.