| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Dahar...
| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
For that, you shall be sent to your room to await a through spanking.
That brings me to my next question: Does any of this justify the rogue player drinking the GM's milk?
Promise? :D
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Really? If you want truly monstrous threads, Last one to post wins recently passed 15.000 posts. If Picard doesn't like 140 of this... just think how he'd like that...
| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
So what happens if you have a female Kitsune or Catfolk as a party member, they're in heat, and the Eidolon has the Scent evolution - does the Eidolon get a will save to avoid ravishing your party members, or does it just happen?
Whee, managed to link yet another questionable thread into this one!
The save DC is just too damn high.
Really? If you want truly monstrous threads, Last one to post wins recently passed 15.000 posts. If Picard doesn't like 140 of this... just think how he'd like that...
Just look at the Avalon Chronicles on the Play-By-Post forum. 70,000 posts and going. That game scares me sometimes.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Monk Succubus. That way "Acrobatics" is a class skill, and Grappling is even more obvious against an Eidolon.
Easy!
Does that actually count? I mean, that was a list of classes that I could immediately think of ways for them to get kinky with class features
Like I said, there's a blatant imbalance here!
I once ran a socially-backward gnomish summoner whose sole intention in being a summoner was to summon a fantastical humanoid female creature for procreational purposes.
Is that optional, according to RAW? Or does it really matter?
Just curious.
Do Eidolons have mortal bodies? That's the important question.
|
| 3 people marked this as a favorite. |
Do Eidolons have mortal bodies? That's the important question.
Even a mortal/outsider divide isn't a definite barrier to cross-procreation. See the origins of most planetouched and all the half-celestials/fiends running around.
Technically, even the sky isn't the limit for such possibilities with eidolons. And now I'm imagining some summoner convincing her eidolon husband to accept an mpreg evolution so she doesn't have to go through it.
"Look, it's perfectly sensible. Seahorses do it and nobody says anything about them!"
"Okay honey, fine. But can you shift some evolutions over to pain immunity?"
"You're not losing the Fabio hair, so don't even."
Flirting isn't a sin...enjoy it is.
|
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Mikaze teases? That must mean teasing isn't a violation of the paladin code! Woo :DTeases.Promise? :DFor that, you shall be sent to your room to await a through spanking.
That brings me to my next question: Does any of this justify the rogue player drinking the GM's milk?
That seemed more an accusation than a statement of intended action.
I can, however, confirm that paladins can and do tease. In good fun for all involved, of course.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
"You're not losing the Fabio hair, so don't even."
Another quote-win. So many in this thread!
| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Thinking about it, I feel this is somehow comparable to my psion hooking up with her psicrystal (who was also her aunt). To be fair though, the psicrystal started it.
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
If I wind up statting up a Succubus Tetori, I will place all blame on you.Monk Succubus. That way "Acrobatics" is a class skill, and Grappling is even more obvious against an Eidolon.
Easy!
*Points to profile*
You rang?And I of course have Acrobatics maxed.
| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
"Why is the android Eidolon "Fully Functional" ?"
"Erm. Well.. I ahh uhm.....
| 6 people marked this as a favorite. |
"Why is the android Eidolon "Fully Functional" ?"
"Erm. Well.. I ahh uhm.....
For accuracy of course! :D
EDIT: And let's be real here. If you're going to create what amounts to a fully functional nervous system and you didn't give the android the option of utilize it in a pleasurable way, you'd be kind of a jerk creator.Adventurer: "You know, you're awfully cranky,"
Frustrated Android Adventurer: "You would be too,"
Adventurer: "Hey, look, I don't think less of you for not being a real human, and you shouldn't either,"
Frustrated Android Adventurer: "...It doesn't matter. I just want to find a genie and get my wish granted,"
Adventurer: "But you don't have to! You don't have to wish to be human!"
Frustrated Android Adventurer: "I don't want to be human you idiot, I want a functioning G-spot!"
Adventurer: "Err...you...oh...ohhhh-kay," "Okay, well let's get going. Our quests clearly align in motivation!"
Frustrated Android Adventurer: (o_O) "How could our quests clearly align in motivation?"
Adventurer: "I was going to wish to find a hot babe adventuring companion, but now I think I'll just need to wish for the stamina to keep up with an android,"
Frustrated Android Adventurer: "You--what!? Who ever said--" (O//O)
EDIT 2: Androids are sexy. (^.^)
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Oh yeah, Happy Valentine's Day, Eidaloids. :3
| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Yeah, like God in Dogma. :P
EDIT: The writer of Dogma apparently forgot that angels purportedly porked a bunch of sexy human ladies and that's how we got aasimars giants.
| 3 people marked this as a favorite. |
Greetings from the Wizard Most Wild, everyone! I, Pezler the Polychromatic, have been scouring the multiverse to answer these oddly fascinating questions! Here's what I've found so far:
1) Can eidolons have sex? Yes.
2) Do eidolons WANT to have sex? Yes!
3) With you? No.
That baby bump she's displaying most likely isn't yours, sport. Eidolons might be faithful to you on this plane of existence, but once they're dismissed...... I'm so sorry for you.
| 6 people marked this as a favorite. |
Greetings from the Wizard Most Wild, everyone! I, Pezler the Polychromatic, have been scouring the multiverse to answer these oddly fascinating questions! Here's what I've found so far:
1) Can eidolons have sex? Yes.
2) Do eidolons WANT to have sex? Yes!
3) With you? No.
That baby bump she's displaying most likely isn't yours, sport. Eidolons might be faithful to you on this plane of existence, but once they're dismissed...... I'm so sorry for you.
Honey, why does the baby look like the Planar Mailman?
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
For accuracy of course! :D
EDIT: And let's be real here. If you're going to create what amounts to a fully functional nervous system and you didn't give the android the option of utilize it in a pleasurable way, you'd be kind of a jerk creator.
How so?
| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Ashiel, I clearly need to hang out with you more. You seem to have the inside track on all the neatest and weirdest things.
I am afraid there is no rules support for procreation in the base pathfinder rules.
In fact, all beings met in a pathfinder based universe pop into existence, for they are assumed to exist and therefore must exist for all time henceforth.
I am afraid there is no rules support for procreation in the base pathfinder rules.
In fact, all beings met in a pathfinder based universe pop into existence, for they are assumed to exist and therefore must exist for all time henceforth.
... until such time as their character sheets are destroyed. Likenesses bearing similar, if not identical, names may be created, but are never the same person.
this thread is slowly drifting away from eidolon centrism and just in general strange things that would want sex.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I am afraid there is no rules support for procreation in the base pathfinder rules.
In fact, all beings met in a pathfinder based universe pop into existence, for they are assumed to exist and therefore must exist for all time henceforth.
... aaaaaaaaaaaaactually...
(Also.)
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Dorcus did the research, everybody!
So, at this rate, we'll have an eidolon sorcerer bloodline, and then eventually half-eidolons. Maybe a monk archetype where they can use their ki points to manifest eidolon evolutions? The possibilities are endless...and disturbing.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I'd say that Catholicism allows for a separation of procreation and sex. In fact, the Immaculate Conception kind of calls for one. We should probably steer away from too much discussion of real world religions in this thread though. On the other hand, I wonder what the clergy of Erastil and Shelyn would think. Calistria and Urgathoa might have interesting ideas too. Asmodeus might say you get what's in your contract.
| 8 people marked this as a favorite. |
Honey, why does the baby look like the Planar Mailman?Greetings from the Wizard Most Wild, everyone! I, Pezler the Polychromatic, have been scouring the multiverse to answer these oddly fascinating questions! Here's what I've found so far:
1) Can eidolons have sex? Yes.
2) Do eidolons WANT to have sex? Yes!
3) With you? No.
That baby bump she's displaying most likely isn't yours, sport. Eidolons might be faithful to you on this plane of existence, but once they're dismissed...... I'm so sorry for you.
He delivers.
| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
He delivers.Honey, why does the baby look like the Planar Mailman?Greetings from the Wizard Most Wild, everyone! I, Pezler the Polychromatic, have been scouring the multiverse to answer these oddly fascinating questions! Here's what I've found so far:
1) Can eidolons have sex? Yes.
2) Do eidolons WANT to have sex? Yes!
3) With you? No.
That baby bump she's displaying most likely isn't yours, sport. Eidolons might be faithful to you on this plane of existence, but once they're dismissed...... I'm so sorry for you.
Plus, his package is infinite.
| 3 people marked this as a favorite. |
You know, I had almost forgotten about Ninja Scroll and a certain woman who was apparently a brood mistress summoner whose eidolons were all serpentine.
|
|
| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
I once ran a socially-backward gnomish summoner whose sole intention in being a summoner was to summon a fantastical humanoid female creature for procreational purposes.
Is that optional, according to RAW? Or does it really matter?
Just curious.
Walks into thread.
Opens mouth to speak.
Closes it.
Rubs temples.
Reads the OP's post.
Opens mouth again.
Closes it and sighs.
Leaves.
Can we leave out religious debate? :)
Just kinda afraid of where that usually goes.
On most forums(and these are sadly not an exception) bringing that into the conversation very rarely doesn't dissolve into faith bashing and general badness. :(
I know no one ever intends for it to, but I just want to be proactive and see that it doesn't.
I like this thread. It's funny and I'd really like to keep it lighthearted. :/