A sorcerer is an arcane caster. For purposes of your bloodline power (which is your familiar,)you are considered to be a sorcerer two levels lower than your class level.
This isn't an official ruling, but it is a fair interpretation of the rules.
Levels in spellcaster and 'caster level' are totally separate things that are not interchangeable. Spellcaster levels often give you caster levels, but not always (see prestige classes) and some feats/traits can boost your caster level independently. Don't even think about caster levels: the feat does not mention them.
As for the feat prereqs, you would not be able to take improved familiar as a druid if you had a familiar via some method that didn't involve arcane spellcaster levels. However, Eldritch Heritage lets you count as sorcerer level -2 when it comes to using your familiar. Sorcerer levels are arcane spellcaster levels and should thus logically count towards the feat prereqs. A DM could potentially rule otherwise if he was feeling especially mean, so make sure your VC is on board with this.
I'm assuming you are a LN Druid, by the way?
Ok, as a DM I would allow these shenanigans.
Now, as a rules person, my two cents buy a different story.
You qualify to take Improved Familiar. Unfortunately, the feat requires arcane caster levels, which you do not have. The Eldritch Heritage stuff you were pulling gives you an effective sorcerer level of Character -2, exclusively for the purpose of scaling the abilities of your bloodline powers (in this case, your familiar).
From a straight rules look, you can take the feat, but it provides you no benefit, you can't get that imp, since you have no arcane caster level, making it so you cannot obtain any of the options from the feat's chart.
Still, I would allow you your imp, since it's pretty badass to get your hands on a familiar without it coming from a class ability.
If this is for a game that isn't PFS, you'll just have to talk to your GM. Even if there were an "official" ruling, any GM can say "Well I think it should work this other way" and what he/she says goes. But you could easily make the case that a sorcerer level is an arcane caster level. If it were me, I'd let you do it.
Strictly speaking, though, this would not work. The wording of Eldritch Heritage says "For purposes of using that power, treat your sorcerer level as equal to your character level – 2, even if you have levels in sorcerer." Note that it does not mention qualifying for feats. You only have an effective sorcerer level for "using that power."
|
| 1 person marked this as FAQ candidate. |
I did some digging and found these links to previous discussions on this same topic:
Eldritch Heritage (Arcane) and Improved Familiar
Eldritch Heritage Feat Line and Divine Casters.
Spell-like abilities and Improved Familiar / Eldritch Heritage
Level 9 Rogue with Eldritch Heritage (Arcane) eligible for Improved Familiar?
Ultimate Magic Improved Eldritch Heritage... What the?
Improved Familiar + Eldritch Heritage (arcane) question. PFS Rules.
Improved Familiar for non-arcane?
After reading through all of these, I was genuinely surprised by the lack of a consensus. The two positions seem to be:
1) Yes, you could take Improved Familiar, because you count as a Sorcerer (which is an arcane spellcaster), and
2) No, you couldn't take Improved Familiar, because you don't actually have an arcane caster level.
So, perhaps a legitimate FAQ request is in order.
An "official" ruling might fly in Pathfinder Society (assuming all the mechanics involved here are PFS legal), but at any other table the GM's rule is law. There's no golden ticket.