If you're a blight druid, worshipping the God of the End Times, I'd just use desecrate.
Law and Chaos are often under-served (because the basic assumption is Good(ish) PCs against Evil(ish) villains), but it could be safe to look at it as similar to Channel Energy. If you're neutral on the Good/Evil axis and so is your deity, then pick one and stick with it.
|
Yeah, sadly, I am often traveling with an assortment of good characters and priests, (PFS org play) and if I start throwing around desecrates, I am eventually going to raise their ire, (and they are more likely to stop me from exercising my rights to claim temples for Groetus. So far I have held off the lawful priests by maintaining that fallen temples are the rightful property of Groetus, and therefor their law forbids them from stopping me.)
So I really wanted a chaotic version.
Hmmm... I'm thinking the spell names could be Organize and Randomize. But obviously, they don't exist yet, so nothing for PFS.
I also notice that one of the material components for these spells is (un)holy water.
Unfortunately, that might be hard for the law/chaos axis. Lawful water is an ice cube, and chaotic simply involves you knocking over the cup.
Boiling water or even steam or gaseous water would work for chaos water under that paradigm.
Boiling water or even steam or gaseous water would work for chaos water under that paradigm.
Paradigm? Logic? Sense? No. Now it is all spilled milk. (edit- also no consistency with one's own words)
*tip milk* CHAOS FOR LIFE!
Yeah, sadly, I am often traveling with an assortment of good characters and priests, (PFS org play) and if I start throwing around desecrates, I am eventually going to raise their ire, (and they are more likely to stop me from exercising my rights to claim temples for Groetus. So far I have held off the lawful priests by maintaining that fallen temples are the rightful property of Groetus, and therefor their law forbids them from stopping me.)
Groetus doesn't have a formal religion or organized church, so how does he have a rightful claim to any temple, fallen or otherwise? And "exercising rights" is the kind of thing those lawful priests would be doing, seems a bit odd for a mad prophet of a god of oblivion to be worrying about his legal rights.
But as to your original question, there is no chaotic/lawful equivalent to consecrate/desecrate (or hallow/unhallow, which is probably what you want long term). You could try consecrating formerly evil temples and desecrating formerly good temples, to emphasize that they are truly abandoned and fallen.
|
|
Niel doesn't actually care about the rules of churches, but if they are going to spend all that time telling him that he has to follow the law, then he will give them laws that he likes. And he has a holy book right here that says that the natural order of the world is that just as when a man falls his bones go to Pharasma and his flesh rots and goes to Groetus, when temples fall, their flesh decays and becomes Groetus'. The fact that his holy book is pieced together from mad scraps and ramblings doesn't make it any less holy.
The thing about chaos, is that Niel doesn't have a problem being a hypocrite if doing so forces the lawful priest to either do what he want or be a hypocrite... Cause Chaos Cheats, and the ultimate chaos is to use the law to break the law.
as for hallow / consecrate, thats really too bad. I guess I am just stuck.
|
I brainstormed a bunch of stuff for potential books on spells and effects of lawful and chaotic magic (and divine and 'anti-divine' magic) for SGG, but it kind of fell through.
Those alignments have been mostly ignored throughout the history of the game (witness the Paladin, paragon of Law and Good, who has exactly *nothing* to do with powers related to law or opposing chaos, being all about evil vs. good), which is kind of funky for a game system originally having only the two alignments, Law and Chaos.
Ideally, a consecrate or hallow (or holy word/smite/aura) type spell should stand alone, and have effects keyed on whether or not one is compatible with the faith and alignment of the caster, instead of their being a 'good consecrate' and an 'evil consecrate' and a 'chaotic consecrate' and a 'lawful consecrate.' A LG cleric of Iomedae should be able to make an area sacred to her goddess both a good and lawful consecrated area, while a CE cleric of Lamashtu should cast the exact same spell to consecrate and make holy an area of ground with her patrons power, benefitting chaotic and evil types and penalizing good and lawful types.
A 'desecrate' or 'unholy ground' type spell, on the other hand, should cut off an area of ground from holy forces (good or evil) and penalize divine spellcasting in the area. (Perhaps creating some sort of 'divine static' that forces divine spellcasters to make a concentration check to cast spells and making divine agent outsiders like celestials and fiends in the area feel distinctly unwelcome?)
But that's not what 'consecrate' or 'desecrate' do anyway. They just buff or hinder undead (because positive energy and negative energy are non-aligned forces like fire or cold, that are inexplicably limited to good and evil), and even if the undead is a holy ghost of a paladin showing up to offer guidance to her descendants, or tell them how to fight evil like she did back in old country, she's going to be 'blessed' by evil desecrate, and cursed by good consecrate, because the gods are just amazingly stupid at times.
You could suggest a house rule that Consecrate is an unaligned spell that creates a connection with the caster's deity, whomever that deity might be, and Desecrate is an unaligned spell that breaks whatever connection might exist - which is much closer to what the words "consecrate" and "desecrate" actually mean.
(One of my pet peeves about Paizo is their frequent misuse of religious terms. "Church" and "cathedral" being the worst.)
Stuff like 'sacred' and 'profane' and 'holy' and 'unholy' and 'blasphemy' come to mind, as well. If you pee on an altar of Asmodeus, in a game world where he's an actual *god,* it doesn't matter that he's evil. By the definition, you are profaning a holy place.
And then there's the hilarity that this bad use of language has led to actual rules nonsense, like a sacred bonus from a cleric of Iomedae being unable to stack with a sacred bonus from a cleric of Torag (because they are both sacred), *but* both being able to stack juts fine with a profane bonus from a cleric of Urgathoa (because no matter how much a god she is, her 'sacred' bonuses have a different word, for no reason at all, and can stack with good guy 'sacred bonuses')...
There should have been only one descriptor for holy magic, regardless of the alignment of the gods involved, and another descriptor for 'anti-divine' magic, that is actually 'profane,' in that it is opposed to all that is sacred or holy or important to the gods, defying and countering all godly forces and magic (whether it be from Sarenrae or Rovagug).
Yet more fertile ground for a third-party to tread, with spells, class features, etc. based around either non-aligned 'divine power' (like the stuff that shows up in a flame strike) that doesn't trouble itself with holy/unholy, sacred/profane mislabels *or* anti-theistic gods-defying features and magics all about countering the machinations of outsiders meddling with the mortal races.
