|
Potion Glutton
You gulp down potions with unsettling speed.
Prerequisite: Worshiper of Urgathoa.
Benefit: You can drink potions, elixirs, or other potables
as a swift action without provoking attacks of opportunity.
Normal: Drinking potions is a move action that
provokes attacks of opportunity.
--> Q: since when drinking a potion is a move instead of a standard action?
--> Q: since when drinking a potion is a move instead of a standard action?
Maybe they were thinking about Accelerated Drinker?
|
|
--> Q: since when drinking a potion is a move instead of a standard action?Maybe they were thinking about Accelerated Drinker?
I take that trait for almost all my PCs, which is why I'm wondering if I've been wasting a trait (i.e. if they've changed the potion drinking rule in Ultimate Combat or some other previous book...)
Irori's Sentinel boon gives 1/day true strike or 3/day haste. Shouldn't it be the other way around?
p. 240 Shield of the Dawnflower, Greater
this spell has a deity of Sarenrae but Shield of the Dawnflower in Inner Sea World Guide has no deity restriction.
Is this what was intended?
There is no restriction to the spells besides basic ones like clerics casting opposite alignment spells the deity next to the spell name is just whose followers the spell originated from.
| 6 people marked this as a favorite. |
"devout worshiper" is judgement call?
"Requiring the GM to make a judgement call" is "errata"?
p. 248 Altar of Norgorber
"false alibi*" why is there an *?
The sidebar on page 7 explains Paizo's standard reference notation for asterisks and superscripts. It's the system they've been using since the Advanced Player's Guide.
p. 108: Unlike most of the listed deities, the first boon for sentinels of Norgober doesn't specify an "or" among the granted SLAs, which would imply that sentinals of Norgober get all of the listed SLAs rather than a choice of one from the list.
Probably a mistake, but I can't say for sure.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
She's not really an elven deity. "Some elves, particularly mages with teleportation abilities, pay homage to Alseta as the goddess of teleportation or the patron of elf gates. While widespread formal worship of Alseta is uncommon among elves, small shrines to the Welcomer can be found near elf gates, and her holy symbol is sometimes carved on lintels."
In the same way that Calistria is a VERY common deity for elves, but is not listed as an "elven" deity on the table.
p. 288 The First Blade
with AC mod of "+20 armor", no gear and standard treasure how is this value so high?
Because it has an armor bonus, not a natural armor bonus, because it's armor, not natural armor.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Because it has an armor bonus, not a natural armor bonus, because it's armor, not natural armor.p. 288 The First Blade
with AC mod of "+20 armor", no gear and standard treasure how is this value so high?i know
usually the armor is listed in the Gear or Treasure section
Because it's a living suit of armor, not a piece of armor you can wear. Monsters don't always have to fit into neat little boxes.
Because it's a living suit of armor, not a piece of armor you can wear. Monsters don't always have to fit into neat little boxes.Because it has an armor bonus, not a natural armor bonus, because it's armor, not natural armor.p. 288 The First Blade
with AC mod of "+20 armor", no gear and standard treasure how is this value so high?i know
usually the armor is listed in the Gear or Treasure section
Can't be worn, or can't be worn safely?
Developer
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Can't be worn, or can't be worn safely?
Can't be worn any more than you can swim in a water elemental. If a GM wanted to allow a PC to wear the armor that used to be First Blade, then it's up to that GM how that would work. But First Blade isn't wearing armor (thus it's not listed in its gear); it is the armor.
|
Developer
|
| 5 people marked this as a favorite. |
minor formatting - semicolon between "Defensive Abilities" and "DR" not comma
Copy-editing errors of this sort do not require errata, and they don't need developer comment or clarification to make the game playable. While we cringe at every minor error that makes its way past our dragnet of editorial eyes, is it really that vital that you point something this minor out? Is that missing semicolon really worth someone's time to correct or acknowledge, as opposed to the myriad other tasks on the editorial staff's agendas?
Would this be the appropriate place to ask if Glorious Heat was written as it was intended to be? It reads now that it heals for half of the character level, instead of healing based on the level of spell used. Should we be using the books latest printed wording, or the wording given here?
p. 328-9: Table of the Outer Gods lists Nyarlathotep twice: once as "The Black Pharaoh" and once as "The Crawling Chaos." (Both are valid titles in Lovecraft's writings, IIRC.)
The domains listed are similar, with a difference:
Black Pharaoh has: Chaos, Evil, Knowledge, Magic and Trickery.
Crawling Chaos has: Chaos, Darkness, Evil, Knowledge, Magic.
Their subdomains, favored weapons, symbols, colors, and sacred animals are likewise different.
Was one line supposed to be for a differnt Outer God? Or does Nyarlathotep have two different divine aspects?
|
Was one line supposed to be for a differnt Outer God? Or does Nyarlathotep have two different divine aspects?
They've stated that was intentional in, I believe, the product thread.
The following is a little bit in need of either FAQ or Errata:
On p. 275, under the Spawn of Rovagug subtype is the following ability:
Regeneration (Ex) All spawn of Rovagug possess regeneration, and no form of attack can suppress this regeneration; they regenerate even if disintegrated or slain by a death effect. If a spawn of Rovagug fails a save against an effect that would kill it instantly, it rises from death 3 rounds later with i hit point if no further damage is dealt to its remains. It can be banished or otherwise transported as a means to save a region, but a method to kill Spawn of Rovagug has yet to be discovered.
Is the bolded text rules or flavor? To put it another way, is the Spawn dead for mechanical purposes during those three rounds, and thus an acceptable and valid target for spells like Animate Dead and Soul Bind? It doesn't seem like that's the intent given several other parts of the ability, but the wording makes it really hard to tell.
p. 328-9: Table of the Outer Gods lists Nyarlathotep twice: once as "The Black Pharaoh" and once as "The Crawling Chaos." (Both are valid titles in Lovecraft's writings, IIRC.)
The domains listed are similar, with a difference:
Black Pharaoh has: Chaos, Evil, Knowledge, Magic and Trickery.
Crawling Chaos has: Chaos, Darkness, Evil, Knowledge, Magic.Their subdomains, favored weapons, symbols, colors, and sacred animals are likewise different.
Was one line supposed to be for a differnt Outer God? Or does Nyarlathotep have two different divine aspects?
Two different divine aspects, was mentioned in Carrion Crown 4/6 Wake of the Watcher (and that he/she/it has more).
Would this be the appropriate place to ask if Glorious Heat was written as it was intended to be? It reads now that it heals for half of the character level, instead of healing based on the level of spell used. Should we be using the books latest printed wording, or the wording given here?
Shameless bump for clarification?
p. 286
The Grim White Stag is missing the "herald" subtype.
p. 322
The empyreal lord Damerrich's name seems to be misspelled. It should have one em and two ars.
p. 313
The sarcovalts are described in the text as being "horse-sized" and "enormous", but are listed in the stat block as "Tiny". Which is it?
p. 313
The sarcovalts are described in the text as being "horse-sized" and "enormous", but are listed in the stat block as "Tiny". Which is it?
They're Tiny. I don't know why the read-aloud text says "horse-sized" (perhaps I meant "housecat-sized").
The word "enormous" in the main description means "enormous as compared to a normal housefly." Because it's Tiny.
P. 298
The Arcanotheign seems to be missing his "extraplanar" subtype. It is, after all, a native of the Maelstrom, and that's pretty extraplanar.
p. 313
The sarcovalts are described in the text as being "horse-sized" and "enormous", but are listed in the stat block as "Tiny". Which is it?They're Tiny. I don't know why the read-aloud text says "horse-sized" (perhaps I meant "housecat-sized").
The word "enormous" in the main description means "enormous as compared to a normal housefly." Because it's Tiny.
Thanks for clearing this up, Sean, despite no longer being on the company dole. I love the idea of the divine servitors.
Thanks! I can't remember if the servitor concept was the idea of one specific person (Wes, Jacobs, or myself) or a combination of our ideas. But I like how they turned out, and add some unique flavor to each deity's priests, without bloating the summon monster lists with new critters from every monster book...
|
Developer
|
Would this be the appropriate place to ask if Glorious Heat was written as it was intended to be? It reads now that it heals for half of the character level, instead of healing based on the level of spell used. Should we be using the books latest printed wording, or the wording given here?Shameless bump for clarification?
Yeah, this is the perfect example of why making errata calls on books we don't normally reprint on the message boards is something we try not to do. If we ever reprint the problematic material, it's easy to overlook clarifications and errata made to the original months or years earlier.
The feat should heal a number of hit points equal to the level of the spell cast.
This will be reflected in future printings of Inner Sea Gods should we do them.
|
Developer
|
p. 211 Eerie Sense
"Prerequisites: Ability to cast detect undead or detect evil as
a spell or spell-like ability"I have detect undead in my spell book but chose not to memorize it today, do I have the feat?
I had detect undead in my spell book but it has been lost/destroyed, do I have the feat?
I'm able to cast 1st wizard spells, that is I "have the ability", but don't have the spell in my spell book, can I have the feat? (a nit pick around meaning of "ability" I know)
I have a magic item that can cast detect undead, can I have the feat?
I realize this comment is old, but I'm currently notating errata in my copy of the book for a potential future printing and figured I could clarify this while I'm at.
A wizard who has the spell in his spell book "has the ability to cast the spell" unless that spell has been somehow removed from his spell list (such as for a Thassilonian caster, though none of them have divination as an opposition school).
The issue of what happens if the book is lost or destroyed is a different issue, that I'd honestly leave up to the GM, but I would generally err on the side of not eliminating the feat unless you were just sort of ignoring the fact that a major component of your class were missing and not actively working to replace or recover it.
A sorcerer or oracle who doesn't know one of the requisite spells can't use the feat.
If you have access to a spell solely through a magic item, it's the magic item that has the ability to cast the spell (even if it's worded such that it allows the wearer to cast the spell x times a day). Just like you'd lose the benefits of Improved Two-Weapon Fighting if you lost your belt of incredible dexterity +4 and you no longer met the prerequisites, the same would be true of this feat.
p261 Boots of the Earth: Doesn't list how many times per day it can be used.
If I were to edit this item, I would suggest limiting it to 3 times per day, lasting up to 1 minute each (though moving them would throw it off).
Just caught another:
P. 328
The orc god of slavery, Lanishra, is listed as having the Leadership domain. Leadership is a subdomain. The other domains/subdomains seem to be in order.
Again P. 328
Verex has Chaos as both a domain and a subdomain. He must really like chaos!
Very minor, P.328 again.
In Yog-Sothoth's entry the Darkness and Chaos domain are in reverse alphabetical order.