If I gave fighters these extra feats at 1st level what could possibly go wrong?

Homebrew and House Rules

Ok, I'm considering giving fighters these feats for free at 1st level;

Combat Expertise, Power Attack, all the improved combat manoeuver feats.

For a bit of background, I don't allow actions as an attack of opportunity if they themselves provoke an attack of opportunity.

So, what could go wrong with this idea?

You get an all-fighter party?

What are you doing to balance this out wit the other classes?

Pathfinder Maps Subscriber

What about the other martial classes like rangers, barbarians, paladins, etc. ?

Will Rogues and Bards get Weapon Finesse / Combat Expertise for free ?

1 person marked this as a favorite.

It would make a one level fighter dip an extremely good idea for any martial focused character. After that they can go into something else like Ranger for skill points, spells, etc.

Liberty's Edge

It is too much.

I understand that you are trying to avoid the whole AOO chain craziness that can sometimes happen, but I don't think that is the way to go.

I would simply suggest limiting the AOO chain to one AAO for each combatant (so a max of two per attack sequence). This would be for all classes.

Don't give it at level 1 give it at later levels may be an extra one at level 5,10,15,20. Which is good bonus for people who want to play strait fighter, or a character vested in the class. As to what Matthew says will be a problem people will just dip into the class to pick up a quick two feats. you could make it even more interesting by maybe having that extra bonus feat ignore all pre requs. or it does not have to be a combat feat. this could allow for fighter to make up for lack of skill by taking skill focus in something, or some other feat. you have to play with it and find a balance.

Grand Lodge

I have the same idea on Combat Expertise and Power attack, making these feats attack options that any one can use... assuming BAB, and stat requirements are met.

Improved manuever feats are too strong. Simply make it that failed manuevers trigger the AoO.

Something similar but less powerful:
Fighters count as having Power Attack and Combat Expertise for the purpose of feats which require them as prerequisites.
At every even level, the fighter can pick one combat manoeuver. They do not provoke attacks of opportunity when using this manoeuver.

Maybe take a milder approach; give everyone a bonus feat at 2nd level, in addition to anything they get from their class. Then judge the results.

rather than go this route... I'd make up a list of professions and associated weapon proficiencies, traits, and a feat to represent their background. Let the players choose your "kit"(substituting class proficiencies, 2 traits, a feat, 2+2 skill points(INT points not included)) or self design using standard rules for their class proficiencies, 2 traits, a feat, and 2 skill points. I'd have the kit give 2 extra skill points to sweeten the deal (why the 2+2 earlier).

This way you are not going too far off from standard rules and that should lessen the impact of any changes or upset class balance.
Wizards or Clerics could choose the kits and start out as "Trained Militia" or "Church Trained"... and it would mean something.

The key is to not make too many kits. Start in a city or walled city and make up 10 or so and that's it. See how it works out.

Thanks for the replies guys.

Matthew - I did not even consider level dipping mainly because I don't allow it at my table and rarely allow multi classing. I could see how this would be a problem.

SlimGauge - The only other martials that see play at our table are barbarians, rogues and rangers (I run a core only game at the moment as I don't have the time to keep on top of the other rules). All seem to rock, but I'm guessing that probably has much to do with our MGF play style! The last monk we saw in play was about 10 years ago, paladin around 20 years ago and the only bard we ever had was over 30 years ago when they were practically impossible to get (1st edition)!

darkwarrior - As a DM I dream of an all fighter party. Just think, the BBEG could actually monologue without being closed down before he has time to even open his mouth! Do you really think this that imbalanced? The Fighter can hit harder, less accurately, be harder to hit but less accurate, or have a slightly better chance at pulling off a combat manoeuver without exposing himself to a ripost. It does not seem too good even for 1st level, but you may see something I am missing.

RedDog - I like your thinking, however we are happy with the ban on AOO chaining, it's just never worth the hassle.

KainPen - I really wanted to grant the bunce at first level, but maybe it could be something you lose should you ever multiclass? Explanation - Faffing around with spells and wotnot does not leave you enough time to keep up your battle training?

Barbarian Player: "WTF? What am I doing when fighty boy is training?"
DM: "Having psychotherapy"

Ummm, the rational behing my idea needs more polishing I think.

Helaman & Calybos - I just want to give the 'tickle' to fighters at the moment.

Azothath - I never liked kits in 2nd edition (outside of Al-Qadim setting) so I cannot see myself doing this. It would also be a bugger to implement in herolab!

Perhaps giving the bunce at higher fighter levels would be good. Something like at nth level (probably 4th) fighters never provoke AOO when using combat manoeuvers and give them power attack and combat expertise for free at 1st, which you lose should you ever multiclass (unless you actually take the feat). Or maybe swap that around.

What do you think?

See the "Kirthfinder" thread. He did something similar and it works.

When giving things to Fighters, I suggest asking yourself if it makes them more powerful than Wizards, Clerics or Druids.

I thought about this and I reckon you could give Fighters:

A bonus feat at every odd level and two bonus feats at every even level
4 skill points per level
d12 hit points
no stat prerequisites for combat feats
the choice of 10 class skills

and full casters would still be more powerful, though Fighters may start to hedge out Rangers and Barbarians.

In our game, anyone with a Strength of 13+ automatically gets Power Attack, anyone with a Dexterity of 13+ automatically gets Deadly Aim and anyone with an Intelligence of 13+ automatically gets Combat Expertise. It has worked out just fine. We've also combined the Improved and Greater combat maneuver feats which has, in turn, served to make them actually viable in-game.

Also, if a creature with reach makes an attack with a natural weapon against a creature without reach, and that attack would provoke an AoO (as with the style feat Snake Fang or the Rage Power Come and Get Me), then the AoO goes off. In other words, even if I have reach, I have to put myself within range of your AoO to make an attack with a natural weapon, and during that time, I'm vulnerable to your pre-emptive counter-attack.

Shadow Lodge

If you want an all fighter party, tell your players that.

Personally I think that would be an interesting campaign if you only had martials and no spellcasters (and I play primarily arcane casters).

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber

Your game with explode in a fiery carnage of rules fragments and torn character sheets, killing all within a 40ft radius.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Homebrew and House Rules / If I gave fighters these extra feats at 1st level what could possibly go wrong? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Homebrew and House Rules