In case you missed it, Round 2's twist is about the River Kingdoms, one of the "countries" in Golarion.
In previous years, we've given the Top 32 competitors a free copy of the campaign setting PDF (The Inner Sea World Guide for the previous competition). We're doing that this year, too.
Also, because of the River Kingdoms requirement, we're giving them a free PDF of Guide to the River Kingdoms.
Now, this means that if you make it into the Top 32, you'll automatically have the reference material you need.
But you may not want to wait until then, just so you have a bit of a head start on designing your archetype.
I'm not trying to pressure you to buy a PDF you may get for free. I am trying to prevent people from buying a PDF now, getting into the Top 32 in January, and being annoyed that they spent money on a PDF they'd be getting for free.
So... the decision is up to you, we just wanted everyone to be fully informed about the situation.
Very cool and thanks for the head's up. Trying to decide whether I want to buy it now or wait...
Awesome. Free stuff is always nice.
There's nothing wrong with getting a free. pdf copy of a book you already own! Portability.....having multiple LEGAL copies for your table...supporting a company you love...there's no downside!
Thanks, I own both (I'll be surprised if my item makes the top 32, but less surprised than at this time yesterday).
GAH. Absolutely NONE of the archetypes I've prepped so far fit the River Kingdoms. grrrrrrrrr. Curse you, twist of the fates!
On the other hand, I'm super excited about the double PDF feature for the top 32! Yay! I hope I make it!
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Thanks for the heads up! Luckily I already have my hard copy here at home from running Kingmaker last year. I'd still love to have a pdf for my tablet though.
Now I'm all excited to see what folk come up with for their River Kingdom archetypes.
Hahaha, I have the River Kingdoms PDF already, so what's my motivation?
3 people marked this as a favorite.
|
To win a contract to write a Pathfinder module.
Plus getting in the Top 32 is a path to women (or men, if that's your interest) and riches!
4 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Hmm, yes, I'll ask my wife which one we're aiming for, are these women (or men) handy around the house?
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Yeah I bought this a while back. I've been living and breathing the River Kingdoms for a good long while. Between my item and this twist I'm feeling pretty fantastic.
Zahir ibn Mahmoud ibn Jothan wrote: Hmm, yes, I'll ask my wife which one we're aiming for, are these women (or men) handy around the house? I'm not sure what Jacob is talking about, we have yet to see this manifest around our house and my husband was in the Top 16 last year too. Maybe Jacob snagged them all?
I don't understand how River Kingdoms affect the archetype design. Could someone enlighten me?
It has to be appropriate for the setting. So, for example, a Mwangi jungle fighter, whose style is based on the deadly Charua-ka inhabitants of that continent, wouldn't make sense for this competition (even if it were an awesome archetype).
Jacob W. Michaels wrote: It has to be appropriate for the setting. So, for example, a Mwangi jungle fighter, whose style is based on the deadly Charua-ka inhabitants of that continent, wouldn't make sense for this competition (even if it were an awesome archetype). Thanks, that example was very illustrative, so an archetype generic for most settings will be OK, right?
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
edduardco wrote:
Thanks, that example was very illustrative, so an archetype generic for most settings will be OK, right? generic probably wont cut it, They are looking for something that would be found more commonly in, or originate from the area
Yeah, I don't know anything specifically about the River Kingdom. I want to buy he PDf, but then again, I don't know if I'll advance and I won't be able to start a new adventure until my group finishes all 6 chapters of Curse of the Crimson Throne.
Wait...is Korvosa in the River Kingdom by any chance??
Nope. It's in Varisia. Think Kingmaker.
edduardco wrote: Thanks, that example was very illustrative, so an archetype generic for most settings will be OK, right? My feeling is a generic would be risky. I don't think it would be disqualified, but I think it would be downgraded by the judges and probably the voters. That said, if it was cool enough to overcome that, you could still advance.
Personally, I would try for something much more intrinsically linked to the region.
Pendin, remember if you advance, you'll get a free pdf of the book. If you have the ISWG, that might be good enough to start giving you some ideas (I made a list of a dozen things to think about just from reading that River Kingdoms entry last night).
Dang thanks Sigz. I haven't run or played Kingmaker yet.
Jacob W. Michaels, the ISWG? Oh wait...Inner Sea World Guide...I understand now.
I don't have it yet. I'll check it out though. Thanks!
You can also look at the Pathfinder Wiki, though obviously that's not as good a source.
I do love River kingdoms... I'm making a campaign in it right now.
But I have to admit, I never thought about a River Kingdoms specific archetype.
Time to work on it
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
There are many little kingdoms within the River Kingdoms. Your archetype might be for Timon or Daggermark or one of the tiny ones mention in the Guide... it doesn't have to be designed for the RK as a whole.
Being in the middle of Kingmaker right now, and closely following the Pathfinder Online project, this turns much of the fear I had about round 2 into excitement.
A twist that favors stuff I know fairly well? Sweet!
Out of the archetypes I've prepped so far, one fits very thematically - perhaps so thematically to come off as uninspired. The other fits in fairly well, but doesn't have as strong a connection.
Hmm... interesting. I might end up making a new one.
RonarsCorruption wrote: Being in the middle of Kingmaker right now, and closely following the Pathfinder Online project, this turns much of the fear I had about round 2 into excitement.
A twist that favors stuff I know fairly well? Sweet!
See, and our group is prepping a Kingmaker campaign for as soon as we finish Runelords, so I'm hoping the GM will let us use the River Kingdoms Archetypes that show up in the competition!
Ok some ideas comes to mind... some that come pretty detailed but are pretty obvious (to the point that several other people will do the same exact archetype) and some not obvious at all but ... I still don't know how to develop it.
Just to know... how do you deal with two contestant with the same concept? you consider the best one for advancement or they both suffer in the decision for being too obvious?
Two people came up with nearly the same concept in last year's monster round (Sidhe Lord vs Sidhe Noble)
The later rounds are done by public vote, so the only penalty is that the matching concepts are inevitably compared to each other.
HerosBackpack wrote: Two people came up with nearly the same concept in last year's monster round (Sidhe Lord vs Sidhe Noble) What Heros doesn't mention is that neither advanced. Now in at least my case (the sidhe noble), it's because it wasn't good enough and I don't think it'd have advanced even if there weren't also a sidhe lord entered.
If you look at the last Archetype round a couple years ago, you'll also see a few very similar designs (I believe there were a few con men and a couple knife fighters). The parallel designs are likely going to be compared to each other, though if both are very good they could certainly advance; they could also easily split the vote.
If it were me, I'd try for something unique -- go for a home run every swing, not something safe/obvious enough that someone else may submit something similar. (Of course, I never thought someone else would submit a sidhe monster when I did it last year, so it's hard to tell with these parallel design problems.)
I actually had an idea, then saw the twist and thought it wouldn't work. Then realized how to twist the twist so it would work (in a not stretching it way). Then... realized that we can't make racial archetypes! Woe. Is. Me.
Hmmm ... River Kingdoms -- time to drag out some resource materials (which just happen to be what the prize is ...)
Of course, there is that little step of getting through to the Top 32 ... :)
Oh ... and Merry Xmas all :)
NGP
Jacob W. Michaels wrote: If you look at the last Archetype round a couple years ago, you'll also see a few very similar designs (I believe there were a few con men and a couple knife fighters). The parallel designs are likely going to be compared to each other, though if both are very good they could certainly advance; they could also easily split the vote.
If it were me, I'd try for something unique -- go for a home run every swing, not something safe/obvious enough that someone else may submit something similar. (Of course, I never thought someone else would submit a sidhe monster when I did it last year, so it's hard to tell with these parallel design problems.)
I anticipate one of two things happening:
1) No one submits any assassin, bandit, deposed noble, escaped slave, First World, forbidden god, gladiator, mercenary, and/or pirate archetypes because folks are trying to avoid doing the obvious archetypes, or...
2) Lots of people submit assassin, bandit, deposed noble, escaped slave, First World, forbidden god, gladiator, mercenary, and/or pirate archetypes because folks are trying to prove themselves by doing the obvious archetypes in new and interesting ways.
How about an archetype that fits into the River Kingdom...but purposefully takes part(s) of the ethos/freedoms/generalities and flies in the face of those...and hence why they are adventurers.
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Eric Morton wrote: Jacob W. Michaels wrote: If you look at the last Archetype round a couple years ago, you'll also see a few very similar designs (I believe there were a few con men and a couple knife fighters). The parallel designs are likely going to be compared to each other, though if both are very good they could certainly advance; they could also easily split the vote.
If it were me, I'd try for something unique -- go for a home run every swing, not something safe/obvious enough that someone else may submit something similar. (Of course, I never thought someone else would submit a sidhe monster when I did it last year, so it's hard to tell with these parallel design problems.)
I anticipate one of two things happening:
1) No one submits any assassin, bandit, deposed noble, escaped slave, First World, forbidden god, gladiator, mercenary, and/or pirate archetypes because folks are trying to avoid doing the obvious archetypes, or...
2) Lots of people submit assassin, bandit, deposed noble, escaped slave, First World, forbidden god, gladiator, mercenary, and/or pirate archetypes because folks are trying to prove themselves by doing the obvious archetypes in new and interesting ways. Wow, you made a long list but missed the most obvious archetype of all (in my mind)--Oak Steward. I expect three of them, unless this post makes people not do it.
Rogue Eidolon wrote: Eric Morton wrote: I anticipate one of two things happening:
1) No one submits any assassin, bandit, deposed noble, escaped slave, First World, forbidden god, gladiator, mercenary, and/or pirate archetypes because folks are trying to avoid doing the obvious archetypes, or...
2) Lots of people submit assassin, bandit, deposed noble, escaped slave, First World, forbidden god, gladiator, mercenary, and/or pirate archetypes because folks are trying to prove themselves by doing the obvious archetypes in new and interesting ways. Wow, you made a long list but missed the most obvious archetype of all (in my mind)--Oak Steward. I expect three of them, unless this post makes people not do it.
I was under the impression that Oakstewards would be a racial archetype (human-only or just non-elf) or a prestige class (since the Oakstewards are an actual organization, not a character trope).
For those who might not know the Pathfinder Chronicles setting that well, I would point out the River Kingdoms page on PathfinderWiki as a good place to start. Some of the information there is frustratingly vague or incomplete, but it's got more than enough to provide inspiration for any number of archetypes, I think.
Sean K Reynolds wrote: There are many little kingdoms within the River Kingdoms. Your archetype might be for Timon or Daggermark or one of the tiny ones mention in the Guide... it doesn't have to be designed for the RK as a whole. What about the Kingmaker AP? Since that essentially is in the River Kingdoms, could we create an archetype based off information from the Stolen Lands via Kingmaker AP?
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
The Stolen Lands are part of the River Kingdoms, so yes.
If we win and we already have these PDFs, do we get the option to gift them to others to spread the cheer?
No. It's just easier on our end to add the PDFs to the Top 32 accounts and be done with it.
By the way, make sure your account has your current email address! If you make it into the Top 32, we send out a notification email to the address associated with your account. Sure, you can check the announcement on Tuesday, but it doesn't hurt to have your email address there, just in case hundreds of people refreshing the site to see the announcement slows... everything... down...
I already own it!! :) And it is GREAT by the way!!! :)
In the event I make it through I used the wiki for my rough draft and will use the pdf for polish. ;-)
I want to say thank you to Paizo for the two .pdf files. I was given the 3.5 Golarion guide for helping out with Ascension of the Drow back in the day, and having this sweet updated version is great. I'm already a winner!
Shouldn't the alternates get the free PDFs too?
Turin the Mad wrote: Shouldn't the alternates get the free PDFs too? Got mine today. (Thank you Paizo!) However, it was couple hours after I submitted my archetype. Fortunately, I had access to a friend's copy of the Guide to the River Kingdoms so it's all good.
Recent threads in General Discussion
|