|
I haven't seen many Summoner or Paladin complaint threads recently (on Over Poweredness) this month.Let's figure out something new to complain about.
I nominate rogues. We haven't complained about rogues in a while.
My only issue with the paladin is that Smite Evil overcomes all DR, regardless of alignment. It's like they don't even need magic weapons for a while.
My issues with the summoner is just a ton of base rules that it breaks, making it more difficult to run/play the character.
Let's figure out something new to complain about.
I nominate rogues. We haven't complained about rogues in a while.
Nah, let it be something new-new...
I know! Time to babble how the mythic rules are underpowered/overpowered/nothing like we want/nothing like we expected/power creep/nerf/design your own complaint!
Nerf wizards.
My only issue with the paladin is that Smite Evil overcomes all DR, regardless of alignment. It's like they don't even need magic weapons for a while.
This issue I agree with. Even my party's paladin player agrees that is it bit over the top. She hadn't any serious competition in damage department since the Barbarian dropped out of the party due to time constraints.
Oh, whatevs. If you want to try to play netcop and play the ad hominem game, be my guest. Too bad that there isn't a ignore option on this messageboard, it would be highly useful. Too bad you've decided to go from "court jester" to "board inquisitor".
"Is the subject loyal enough to the status quo? Is he, issss heeeeee?!?!"
Aw, damn, now I'll forever picture Gorbacz as Nic Cage. "Not the bees!"
I'm content with laughing at Gorbacz's hypocrisy rather than getting ticked off at the guy.
Why waste my energy raging when I can laugh at him instead? :3Also, I love the expectations people have from the "Monk lovers" here.
Really mature making such assumptions about people you barely know. Assuming you know them at all.
Oh, whatevs. If you want to try to play netcop and play the ad hominem game, be my guest. Too bad that there isn't a ignore option on this messageboard, it would be highly useful. Too bad you've decided to go from "court jester" to "board inquisitor".
"Is the subject loyal enough to the status quo? Is he, issss heeeeee?!?!"
Aw, damn, now I'll forever picture Gorbacz as Nic Cage. "Not the bees!"
I'm content with laughing at Gorbacz's hypocrisy rather than getting ticked off at the guy.
Why waste my energy raging when I can laugh at him instead? :3Also, I love the expectations people have from the "Monk lovers" here.
Really mature making such assumptions about people you barely know. Assuming you know them at all.
THIS ARE INTERWEBS!!! MATURITY FOR SUCKAHS!!
|
|
Let's figure out something new to complain about.
I nominate rogues. We haven't complained about rogues in a while.
Nah, let it be something new-new...
I know! Time to babble how the mythic rules are underpowered/overpowered/nothing like we want/nothing like we expected/power creep/nerf/design your own complaint!
One of my players found a really annoying combo from Ultimate Equipment.
He has the item that allows a character with sneak attack to withdraw as a move action if a sneak attack is successful. Then he has another item that when he withdraws, he turns invisible for 3 rounds. The problem seems to be that it doesn't say as per the spell, and therefore doesn't imply attacking out of it breaks invisiblility. I ruled it would, because I'm sure PFS won't let that combo go without control.
The problem seems to be that it doesn't say as per the spell, and therefore doesn't imply attacking out of it breaks invisiblility. I ruled it would, because I'm sure PFS won't let that combo go without control.
I always figured that was the rule, and greater invisibility not doing so was the exception, personally. Attacking breaks inviz, unless you're using the spell that specifically specifies it doesn't.
The problem seems to be that it doesn't say as per the spell, and therefore doesn't imply attacking out of it breaks invisiblility. I ruled it would, because I'm sure PFS won't let that combo go without control.I always figured that was the rule, and greater invisibility not doing so was the exception, personally. Attacking breaks inviz, unless you're using the spell that specifically specifies it doesn't.
Yup. If it says invisibility then it should follow the rules for invisibility aside of exceptions noted.
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Nerf wizards.Buff commoners.
Commoners should have a class feature called Mob that allows a group of them to take on Swarm traits.
Commoners should have a class feature called Mob that allows a group of them to take on Swarm traits.Nerf wizards.Buff commoners.
Considering Commoners in my games are statless blobs with 1 HP, this can pretty much happen anyway. It's kind of like a bunch of critters getting crammed together into something that's actually worth putting stats on.
Commoners should have a class feature called Mob that allows a group of them to take on Swarm traits.
WotC has done all the work for you! There's a Mob template in the 3.5 Dungeon Master's Guide II, and one of the sample Mobs is a CR 8 Mob of Humans :)
|
Oh, whatevs. If you want to try to play netcop and play the ad hominem game, be my guest. Too bad that there isn't a ignore option on this messageboard, it would be highly useful. Too bad you've decided to go from "court jester" to "board inquisitor".
"Is the subject loyal enough to the status quo? Is he, issss heeeeee?!?!"
Aw, damn, now I'll forever picture Gorbacz as Nic Cage. "Not the bees!"
I'm content with laughing at Gorbacz's hypocrisy rather than getting ticked off at the guy.
Why waste my energy raging when I can laugh at him instead? :3Also, I love the expectations people have from the "Monk lovers" here.
Really mature making such assumptions about people you barely know. Assuming you know them at all.
Laughing is a waste of energy, too :)
I'm content with laughing at Gorbacz's hypocrisy rather than getting ticked off at the guy.
Why waste my energy raging when I can laugh at him instead? :3
Sorry, I still get angry at stuff like that. Who needs the stress?
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I'm content with laughing at Gorbacz's hypocrisy rather than getting ticked off at the guy.
Why waste my energy raging when I can laugh at him instead? :3Sorry, I still get angry at stuff like that. Who needs the stress?
Shrinks. No stress = no job.