Wei Ji the Learner |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Full Disclosure: I've gamed with Bahb before, and I GM'd and HQ'd for events that he coordinated. He was Really Good at that job.
There's two theories here off the top of my head:
1) He knows a lot of people from OrgPlay, and he's seen how Paizo 'makes it's sausage' at conventions. That could explode catastrophically if it's pushed especially given current circumstances with a lack of trust with Paizo.
2) He's been suspended before, for correctly calling Paizo on some of their shadier shenanigans for years before this. Silencing the voice would send up a lot of warning bells and for good reason.
Lately, though, it seems as if he's fallen into an information silo and has been walking down the talking points.
Cindy Robertson |
5 people marked this as a favorite. |
Has anyone heard about the trans character that is in West Side Story? Apparently, they are re-envisioning Anybodys (the tomboy) as a trans man. They did a lot of research first to make sure that the character fits into 1957. Then they hired a trans masculine actor to play the part. The actor said that it was nice not having to educate the production team on transgender issues.
keftiu |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |
I picked up cyberpunk 2077 on sale yesterday, and had a (really welcome) shock (I had forgotten that the game had nudity) when I got to the "choose your genitals" part of the character creator.
This is the first time in a video game where I could create an explicitly trans character.
I hate to bear some bad news, but the Cyberpunk devs were repeatedly transphobic in marketing and elsewhere leading up to release. They’re really rough on queer issues.
Freehold DM |
10 people marked this as a favorite. |
I GOT A NEW JOB!!!!!
Freehold DM |
Tender Tendrils wrote:I hate to bear some bad news, but the Cyberpunk devs were repeatedly transphobic in marketing and elsewhere leading up to release. They’re really rough on queer issues.I picked up cyberpunk 2077 on sale yesterday, and had a (really welcome) shock (I had forgotten that the game had nudity) when I got to the "choose your genitals" part of the character creator.
This is the first time in a video game where I could create an explicitly trans character.
That's strange. I thought the issue was the trans fetishization? Or was that an in game thing?
keftiu |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
keftiu wrote:That's strange. I thought the issue was the trans fetishization? Or was that an in game thing?Tender Tendrils wrote:I hate to bear some bad news, but the Cyberpunk devs were repeatedly transphobic in marketing and elsewhere leading up to release. They’re really rough on queer issues.I picked up cyberpunk 2077 on sale yesterday, and had a (really welcome) shock (I had forgotten that the game had nudity) when I got to the "choose your genitals" part of the character creator.
This is the first time in a video game where I could create an explicitly trans character.
That was one of many things: https://www.polygon.com/2020/12/4/22058784/cyberpunk-2077-marketing-cd-proj ekt-red-transphobia
Tender Tendrils |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
I had heard there where issues with cyberpunk (which is part of why I didn't buy it at full price) but it is still nice to be able to make a trans character.
Pretty much every tv series I have watched has had some instance of transphobia in it, usually confined to a single episode that I have to skip, and video games often have the same issue. I take things on a case by case basis - sometimes I make compromises, sometimes I don't. For example, I am currently watching the x-files series for the first time (am partway through season 8) and I skipped the episode called "Gender Bender", then you have Archer, with which I skip every episode because they are all transphobic.
I wish I could be completely uncompromising on this stuff, but transphobia is so pervasive that it creeps into almost everything and I have to pick my battles.
edit: one day I will watch Archer again though - I want to go through each episode and make an actual tally of all of the transphobic/sexist/etc jokes in it, because somehow people don't notice the transphobia in it?
Umbral Reaver |
8 people marked this as a favorite. |
A core part of cyberpunk by allocishet white writers is the fear of the 'other', as represented by cybernetics. See how often cyberpunk stories angst over the loss of humanity or the soul when someone gets a robot arm.
Transphobia slides in with effortless ease. The fear of body modification was already there. This is more of the same to them.
Kobold Catgirl |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
In my opinion, nobody--least of all queer people--should ever be forced to justify simply taking personal joy in a work of media. I decided not to bring up the criticisms I'd heard of Cyberpunk for that reason.
We have very little un-messy media that actually has interesting or daring trans representation. I'll take Venus Envy's actual trans main character over She-Ra's "oh, we envisioned Perfuma as trans, but it never came up" any day of the week. I'll take But I'm A Cheerleader over two background characters in Avengers Endgame kissing any day of the year.
It's okay to criticize it, but, like... I don't like derailing someone else's fun with "oh, that work has problems". I've been trying to break that habit myself. I don't think this should be a space where we have to feel insecure or defensive about the media we enjoy.
I really like She-Ra, and I don't think their handling of Perfuma was problematic. It was a creator headcanon that they didn't want to try to capitalize off of because they didn't manage to get a trans voice actress or make it explicit, and I respect that.
Rannik |
In my opinion, nobody--least of all queer people--should ever be forced to justify simply taking personal joy in a work of media. I decided not to bring up the criticisms I'd heard of Cyberpunk for that reason.
We have very little un-messy media that actually has interesting or daring trans representation. I'll take Venus Envy's actual trans main character over She-Ra's "oh, we envisioned Perfuma as trans, but it never came up" any day of the week. I'll take But I'm A Cheerleader over two background characters in Avengers Endgame kissing any day of the year.
It's okay to criticize it, but, like... I don't like derailing someone else's fun with "oh, that work has problems". I've been trying to break that habit myself. I don't think this should be a space where we have to feel insecure or defensive about the media we enjoy.
I really like She-Ra, and I don't think their handling of Perfuma was problematic. It was a creator headcanon that they didn't want to try to capitalize off of because they didn't manage to get a trans voice actress or make it explicit, and I respect that.
Wait, who was kissing who?
Paul Watson |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
It was Endgame but wasn’t even on screen. One guy in the post-blip support group CaptainAmerica was running was talking about his date, and how it was going really well, and that he hoped he’d see him again. That was it. It wasn’t long enough to be a “blink and you’ll miss it” thing.
Tender Tendrils |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
In my opinion, nobody--least of all queer people--should ever be forced to justify simply taking personal joy in a work of media. I decided not to bring up the criticisms I'd heard of Cyberpunk for that reason.
Thank you, all of that backlash kind of made me feel icky. I sometimes enjoy problematic things (hey, for example, D&D and Pathfinder!), but I do it with an awareness of how it is problematic and I pick my battles. As an Asexual, Autistic, Trans person, I sometimes have to take my representation where I can get it (such as Star Trek's Commander Data for being coded as Autistic, despite the problems with the "Robots are always coded as Autistic" thing) for all 3 of those things, warts and all.
Heck, most of the original queer representation was really problematic (such as Lesbian Pulp Fiction, from when morality codes meant that the only way to write lesbian characters was in books like "Satan was a Lesbian". But those books where still really valuable to many queer people, despite their problems.)
This year I chose the recent (and ongoing) drama with Paizo as my hill to die on, refusing to buy their products until they publicly acknowledged the transphobia stuff, and leaving the forums until they started banning transphobes. I am not going to purchase the Absalom book, and have been fighting all of the bigots still on the forums. I can only do that with so many things however, and video games aren't a space where I have the energy to fight that fight with.
keftiu |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |
To be clear: I wasn't trying to condemn anyone playing or liking Cyberpunk. I prefer to know when something I'm consuming is made by jerks, because it sucks to be surprised with later on, and the issue didn't get a lot of mainstream reporting.
Pretty much all media is problematic, and the lines we draw are our own.
keftiu |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
The thing about autistic rep is that it's usually terrible when neurotypical writers intentionally write a character as autistic, and better when they *accidentally* write a character in a way that autistic people see and take hold of as their own.
This is me clinging to every single robot character I can get my hands on.
Tender Tendrils |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |
The thing about autistic rep is that it's usually terrible when neurotypical writers intentionally write a character as autistic, and better when they *accidentally* write a character in a way that autistic people see and take hold of as their own.
Yeah, this is the main difference between say, Sheldon from the Big Bang Theory and Commander Data from Star Trek.
It's super unfair though that we usually only get good representation when someone unintentionally codes a nonhuman character (an alien or robot) as autistic.
And honestly, it would really benefit most neurotypical writers in general to understand Autism better - things like theory of mind are incredibly foundational to writing good characters of any kind.
Kobold Catgirl |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |
I'm not the hugest Entrapta/Abed Nadir/Dina fan at times, if anyone here's a She-Ra/Community/Dumbing of Age fan. Sometimes it has this weird fetishistic vibe of, like, "It's okay to be autistic!... in fact, aren't autistic people kind of more enlightened? If only we could possess their wisdom and clarity." It feels, at times, a little infantilizing. Entrapta deserved to be held accountable for her choices--she sided with some very bad people for some understandable-but-still-bad reasons, and did very bad things--but the narrative never reckoned with this because she wasn't viewed as fully responsible for her actions like, say, Catra was.
Cindy Robertson |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Umbral Reaver wrote:The thing about autistic rep is that it's usually terrible when neurotypical writers intentionally write a character as autistic, and better when they *accidentally* write a character in a way that autistic people see and take hold of as their own.Yeah, this is the main difference between say, Sheldon from the Big Bang Theory and Commander Data from Star Trek.
It's super unfair though that we usually only get good representation when someone unintentionally codes a nonhuman character (an alien or robot) as autistic.
And honestly, it would really benefit most neurotypical writers in general to understand Autism better - things like theory of mind are incredibly foundational to writing good characters of any kind.
The only sorta saving grace with Sheldon is that they never said that he has autism and the creators have explicitly said that he's not on the spectrum.
Tender Tendrils |
6 people marked this as a favorite. |
Tender Tendrils wrote:The only sorta saving grace with Sheldon is that they never said that he has autism and the creators have explicitly said that he's not on the spectrum.Umbral Reaver wrote:The thing about autistic rep is that it's usually terrible when neurotypical writers intentionally write a character as autistic, and better when they *accidentally* write a character in a way that autistic people see and take hold of as their own.Yeah, this is the main difference between say, Sheldon from the Big Bang Theory and Commander Data from Star Trek.
It's super unfair though that we usually only get good representation when someone unintentionally codes a nonhuman character (an alien or robot) as autistic.
And honestly, it would really benefit most neurotypical writers in general to understand Autism better - things like theory of mind are incredibly foundational to writing good characters of any kind.
He is so heavily coded that the creators saying that either come across as just saying that to get out of trouble, or being irresponsibly ignorant about how they coded the character.
The thing with coding (especially coding that heavy) is that you need to be aware of it as an author, and have to take responsibility for it even if it was unintentional, because audiences are going to take potentially harmful stuff away from it whether you intend it or not.
That isn't to say that authors need to be perfect and catch every bit of coding in their writing, just to say that they need to make a good faith effort to be aware of it and responsible about how things are coded, which I don't think the creators of Big Bang Theory did.
Freehold DM |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
** spoiler omitted **
interesting.
Very interesting.
Cori Marie |
We've been crying all day, and everywhere I look there are reminders of him, despite taking care this morning as soon as we got home from the vet at 4 AM to put all of his things out of sight. Instead I just see the empty place where his bed should be. Or I go to the bathroom and see the lack of a bathroom mat because I threw it away because he was laying on it when he started
I just. God. It hurts.