John Napier 698 |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Freehold DM wrote:Please don't listen to FHDM. He's not talking sense.Rennaivx wrote:Missed me being stuck in a foot-high snow drift trying to get to work. I'm so over winter...*takes assorted hugs*send your snow to me
Actually, he makes perfect sense, once you understand his real motivation. You see, what he really wants to do is re-enact the Battle of Hoth, with Y-Wings instead of Snowspeeders.
feytharn |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
feytharn wrote:John Napier 698 wrote:Good for those that protested. These AFD thugs sound just like another bunch Neo-N**I idiots.Unfortunatly, they are - unfortunatly they managed to get almost 25% of the votes in one of our federal states :-(Well, I know the type. There are hundreds of groups of similar idiots here in the States. Sometimes, I wish that there was an alternate universe where we could send all these idiots, where they could act out all of their apocalyptic fantasies and leave the rest of us out of it.
I haven't told you this, but when I was in the Army, I was posted at Bad Kissingen, in Bavaria.
It is just a bit disheartening. I grew up in a country where pretty much everybody but a very fringe group seemed to agree that the NS regime was horrible and the Neo-Nazis were Scumbags. Now they are working their back into the heart of our society.
When I was 17, I was beaten to a pulp by a group of Nazi skinheads, probably because my hair was too long or because I was seen hanging around with punks. Recently, when I told somebody about that during a political discussion to emphasize my dislike of ultra right wing groups, he seriously asked me if I was sure they were Nazis, because that behavior was unusual for them. I was speechless.
John Napier 698 |
John Napier 698 wrote:feytharn wrote:John Napier 698 wrote:Good for those that protested. These AFD thugs sound just like another bunch Neo-N**I idiots.Unfortunatly, they are - unfortunatly they managed to get almost 25% of the votes in one of our federal states :-(Well, I know the type. There are hundreds of groups of similar idiots here in the States. Sometimes, I wish that there was an alternate universe where we could send all these idiots, where they could act out all of their apocalyptic fantasies and leave the rest of us out of it.
I haven't told you this, but when I was in the Army, I was posted at Bad Kissingen, in Bavaria.
It is just a bit disheartening. I grew up in a country where pretty much everybody but a very fringe group seemed to agree that the NS regime was horrible and the Neo-Nazis were Scumbags. Now they are working their back into the heart of our society.
When I was 17, I was beaten to a pulp by a group of Nazi skinheads, probably because my hair was too long or because I was seen hanging around with punks. Recently, when I told somebody about that during a political discussion to emphasize my dislike of ultra right wing groups, he seriously asked me if I was sure they were Nazis, because that behavior was unusual for them. I was speechless.
Well, over here, most Police are armed. Just the presence of Police in the area will cause all but the most violent Neo-Nazi Skinheads to have second thoughts, like maybe having a cake in the oven.
Drejk |
John Napier 698 wrote:It is just a bit disheartening. I grew up in a country where pretty much everybody but a very fringe group seemed to agree that the NS regime was horrible and the Neo-Nazis were Scumbags. Now they are working their back into the heart of our society.feytharn wrote:John Napier 698 wrote:Good for those that protested. These AFD thugs sound just like another bunch Neo-N**I idiots.Unfortunatly, they are - unfortunatly they managed to get almost 25% of the votes in one of our federal states :-(Well, I know the type. There are hundreds of groups of similar idiots here in the States. Sometimes, I wish that there was an alternate universe where we could send all these idiots, where they could act out all of their apocalyptic fantasies and leave the rest of us out of it.
I haven't told you this, but when I was in the Army, I was posted at Bad Kissingen, in Bavaria.
If you think its dumb, what will you say about Neo-Nazis groups growing in the very country they tried to erase, joined by great-grandkids of people they enslaved?
*sigh*
feytharn |
feytharn wrote:John Napier 698 wrote:It is just a bit disheartening. I grew up in a country where pretty much everybody but a very fringe group seemed to agree that the NS regime was horrible and the Neo-Nazis were Scumbags. Now they are working their back into the heart of our society.feytharn wrote:John Napier 698 wrote:Good for those that protested. These AFD thugs sound just like another bunch Neo-N**I idiots.Unfortunatly, they are - unfortunatly they managed to get almost 25% of the votes in one of our federal states :-(Well, I know the type. There are hundreds of groups of similar idiots here in the States. Sometimes, I wish that there was an alternate universe where we could send all these idiots, where they could act out all of their apocalyptic fantasies and leave the rest of us out of it.
I haven't told you this, but when I was in the Army, I was posted at Bad Kissingen, in Bavaria.
If you think its dumb, what will you say about Neo-Nazis groups growing in the very country they tried to erase, joined by great-grandkids of people they enslaved?
*sigh*
*sigh* indeed :-(
Freehold DM |
Freehold DM wrote:Please don't listen to FHDM. He's not talking sense.Rennaivx wrote:Missed me being stuck in a foot-high snow drift trying to get to work. I'm so over winter...*takes assorted hugs*send your snow to me
is okay, CH, we can get some snow over your way too.. I won't hog it all.
CBDunkerson |
7 people marked this as a favorite. |
There are hundreds of groups of similar idiots here in the States. Sometimes, I wish that there was an alternate universe where we could send all these idiots, where they could act out all of their apocalyptic fantasies and leave the rest of us out of it.
They already live in an alternate universe.
Unfortunately, it physically overlaps with our own.
John Napier 698 |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
John Napier 698 wrote:There are hundreds of groups of similar idiots here in the States. Sometimes, I wish that there was an alternate universe where we could send all these idiots, where they could act out all of their apocalyptic fantasies and leave the rest of us out of it.They already live in an alternate universe.
Unfortunately, it physically overlaps with our own.
Well, then. We must find the portal they're coming through and use my *patent pending* Hyperdimensional Quantum Stabilizer!
Uncle Teddy |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
CBDunkerson wrote:Well, then. We must find the portal they're coming through and use my *patent pending* Hyperdimensional Quantum Stabilizer!John Napier 698 wrote:There are hundreds of groups of similar idiots here in the States. Sometimes, I wish that there was an alternate universe where we could send all these idiots, where they could act out all of their apocalyptic fantasies and leave the rest of us out of it.They already live in an alternate universe.
Unfortunately, it physically overlaps with our own.
So you won't be needing my Illudium Pu-36 Explosive Space Modulator?
John Napier 698 |
John Napier 698 wrote:So you won't be needing my Illudium Pu-36 Explosive Space Modulator?CBDunkerson wrote:Well, then. We must find the portal they're coming through and use my *patent pending* Hyperdimensional Quantum Stabilizer!John Napier 698 wrote:There are hundreds of groups of similar idiots here in the States. Sometimes, I wish that there was an alternate universe where we could send all these idiots, where they could act out all of their apocalyptic fantasies and leave the rest of us out of it.They already live in an alternate universe.
Unfortunately, it physically overlaps with our own.
Actually, yes. We'll need to funnel the power through an eleven-dimensional resonance chamber to regulate the output for the stabilizers.
Cthulhusquatch |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
People were worried about Pence when it comes to LGBT rights. Well, looks like the first bit of major damage he has done was for the education system... he was the tie-breaker in confirming Betsy DeVos as education secretary. He doesn't have to be president to cause damage. Ugh. That's not going to bode well for LGBT students.
Wonderful...................
thejeff |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
I personally find it interesting that the Secretary for Education isn't an educator. Is our Republic turning into a Plutocracy ( Rule by the wealthy )?
Didn't go to public school. Doesn't send her kids to public school. Has no connection whatsoever with the system she's now in charge of.
Which may explain why she's so concerned about protecting it from grizzlies.
John Napier 698 |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |
John Napier 698 wrote:I personally find it interesting that the Secretary for Education isn't an educator. Is our Republic turning into a Plutocracy ( Rule by the wealthy )?She'd also count for a Theocracy as well.
It would seem so. So much for the separation of Church and State. Well, at least nobody's explicitly stating that they're going to feed The Constitution into a paper shredder, yet.
Jessica Price Project Manager |
6 people marked this as a favorite. |
Cthulhusquatch wrote:It would seem so. So much for the separation of Church and State. Well, at least nobody's explicitly stating that they're going to feed The Constitution into a paper shredder, yet.John Napier 698 wrote:I personally find it interesting that the Secretary for Education isn't an educator. Is our Republic turning into a Plutocracy ( Rule by the wealthy )?She'd also count for a Theocracy as well.
They're not going to announce that. No one announces that sort of thing, at least until they've so brutalized the populace's perceptions that the populace can no longer recognize what they're doing.
Generic Villain |
It would seem so. So much for the separation of Church and State. Well, at least nobody's explicitly stating that they're going to feed The Constitution into a paper shredder, yet.
The Separation of Church and State is not in the Constitution. The closest the latter has is the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment, which states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
Thomas Jefferson mentioned that there should be a wall between church and state in a letter to the Danbury Baptists. This has no Constitutional bearing, however, except as occasionally echoed in certain court cases. There are plenty of examples when courts happily ignored this not-a-rule as well, however (Lynch v. Donnelly, 1984; Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist, 1973).
Jessica Price Project Manager |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |
John Napier 698 wrote:
It would seem so. So much for the separation of Church and State. Well, at least nobody's explicitly stating that they're going to feed The Constitution into a paper shredder, yet.The Separation of Church and State is not in the Constitution. The closest the latter has is the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment, which states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
Thomas Jefferson mentioned that there should be a wall between church and state in a letter to the Danbury Baptists. This has no Constitutional bearing, however, except as occasionally echoed in certain court cases. There are plenty of examples when courts happily ignored this not-a-rule as well, however (Lynch v. Donnelly, 1984; Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist, 1973).
No, but what there is is a metric crapton of SCOTUS opinions adding bricks to that wall. It's not the high wall it used to be, but most precedent for separation still stands.
thejeff |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
John Napier 698 wrote:They're not going to announce that. No one announces that sort of thing, at least until they've so brutalized the populace's perceptions that the populace can no longer recognize what they're doing.Cthulhusquatch wrote:It would seem so. So much for the separation of Church and State. Well, at least nobody's explicitly stating that they're going to feed The Constitution into a paper shredder, yet.John Napier 698 wrote:I personally find it interesting that the Secretary for Education isn't an educator. Is our Republic turning into a Plutocracy ( Rule by the wealthy )?She'd also count for a Theocracy as well.
Control of a few more state legislatures and they can just call a Constitutional Convention and change the damn thing, pretty much at will.
Generic Villain |
No, but what there is is a metric crapton of SCOTUS opinions adding bricks to that wall. It's not the high wall it used to be, but most precedent for separation still stands.
Debatable. The closest thing to a SCOTUS decision affirming Separation of C&S is Reynolds v. United States (1878), wherein a law against bigamy was ruled as being constitutional. The majority opinion brought up the Danbury letter and noted: "Coming as this does from an acknowledged leader of the advocates of the measure, it may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the amendment thus secured."
There are notable exceptions.
In Holy Trinity Church v. United States (1892), Justice Brewer noted in his decision that "These, and many other matters which might be noticed, add a volume of unofficial declarations to the mass of organic utterances that this is a Christian nation.” This was dicta, though is still used to argue that America is a Christian nation to this day. In Zorach v. Clauson (1952), Justice William O. Douglas wrote that “We are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being,” as well as, “When the state encourages religious instruction or cooperates with religious authorities, it follows the best of our traditions.”
Other anti-separation of C&S SCOTUS cases include McGowan v. Maryland (1961), Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist (1973), Marsh v. Chambers (1983), Lynch v. Donnelly, (1984), and Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002).
I could also note several pro-separation SCOTUS cases: McCollum v. Board of Education Dist. 71 (1948), Torcaso v. Watkins (1961), Engel v. Vitale (1962), Epperson v. Arkansas (1968), and Allegheny County v. ACLU (1989).
My point, though, is that the question of Separation of Church and State is far from a settled issue in this country. Any wall - whether physical or theoretical - can be breached with enough time and pressure, and until this particular Wall is included as a Constitutional amendment (something that will never happen), it is nothing more than jurisprudence.
Jessica Price Project Manager |
Generic Villain |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Yeah, sorry. I was so close to trying for law school that I was studying for the LSAT at one point. Love discussions like that.
Anyway back on topic: if you're worried about losing your civil liberties, whatever those may be, than consider the next four years a call to arms. We were on the politically winning team for eight years - that's over now, but fortunately we can adapt. Remain vigilant, educate yourself, send your Congressmen an email or phone call (not sure who they are or how to contact them? Just enter your zip code here), and if you have time, become politically active. See if there's an Indivisible group in your area. If there isn't one? Found one yourself.
Most importantly, don't despair. Never despair.
Cthulhusquatch |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Sorry, it was my fault.
Okay, Jessica, Generic Villain: This is subject—however fascinating—hugely off-topic and not in the spirit of this thread, and undermines the sense of support and reassurance this thread is largely built around. At this point, if you want to continue the discussion, please take it to a new thread.
The Raven Black |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Et encore plein de hugs :-)
This also helps me remember the light, so I wish to share it with all here :
Sometimes in our lives
We all have pain, we all have sorrow.
But if we are wise,
We know that there's always tomorrow.
Lean on me when you're not strong
I'll be your friend, I'll help you carry on
For it won't be long
'Til I'm gonna need somebody to lean on.
John Napier 698 |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Okay, Jessica, Generic Villain: This is subject—however fascinating—hugely off-topic and not in the spirit of this thread, and undermines the sense of support and reassurance this thread is largely built around. At this point, if you want to continue the discussion, please take it to a new thread.
Since I was a part of the discussion, I also apologize. After I spent years defending our country, and begin to see things fall apart, well, it frightens me. Talking is the only way I know how to deal with it. But I don't know how much good it does, since I feel that nobody listens. Anyway, I'm sorry for earlier.
Crystal Frasier Developer |
6 people marked this as a favorite. |
Crystal Frasier wrote:Okay, Jessica, Generic Villain: This is subject—however fascinating—hugely off-topic and not in the spirit of this thread, and undermines the sense of support and reassurance this thread is largely built around. At this point, if you want to continue the discussion, please take it to a new thread.Since I was a part of the discussion, I also apologize. After I spent years defending our country, and begin to see things fall apart, well, it frightens me. Talking is the only way I know how to deal with it. But I don't know how much good it does, since I feel that nobody listens. Anyway, I'm sorry for earlier.
No one really needs to apologize. There aren't any hurt feelings. We just try to keep the theme of this thread supportive and focused on queer issues. There's talk about politics lately, specifically because queer people have been turned into a political hot-potato lately, but the goal is mutual protection and support. Debating pure law is cool, but belongs elsewhere.
CrystalSeas |
13 people marked this as a favorite. |
I want to report some wonderful news:
Last night, after 20 years of trying the Pride Center in Jackson Michigan prevailed in convincing the city council to add 'sexual orientation' to the Human Rights ordinance.
In doing all their homework and their work on this, they managed to flip a council member who had voted no every time this issue came up in all 20 of his years on council (including at first reading two weeks ago), to a 'yes' last night, with the final vote at 5-2 in favor. (it's been defeated several times in the last 20 years with a 3-4 vote on the final reading).
Here are some pictures of the event. The most amazing 2 minutes of public hearing time were the pastor who laid a curse on council that would go into effect if they passed the ordinance.
81 year old man performs rap during his 2 minute public speaking slot
Rysky would have loved it at the end: here are lots and lots of pictures of all the hugs being given at 12:30 in the morning. You can see me in one of them.
(The supporters were using ASL signs for 'applause' as a way to force the police to only interact with the rowdy 'against' crowd. The only 'crowd control' measures were used against them, not the near silent 'for' crowd.
And I must say it was a very effective technique, because every time someone spoke in favor, there was a forest of hands and arms waving, which was much more impressive than applause. Council could literally see the support)
Love Wins
Mark Thomas 66 RPG Superstar 2009 Top 16 |