Police yourselves. Please have higher standards for what is worthy of a post.


Website Feedback

101 to 145 of 145 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Paizo Employee Senior Software Developer

15 people marked this as a favorite.

I guess I should point out that the new favorites feature will probably over time reduce the number of "+1" posts.

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber

It's an awesome feature Gary. Thanks for bringing it to us.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
TriOmegaZero wrote:
It's an awesome feature Gary. Thanks for bringing it to us.

+1!

... Wait...

Silver Crusade

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Oooh shiny.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Polski Ninja wrote:
Kieblasa tastes best with mayo.

Witch kielbasa? There is so much of them.

If having to pick I would actualy save mayo for cheese and add ketchup to kielbasa, generally. But if given option I would put both mayo and ketchup.

The Exchange

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Drejk wrote:
Witch kielbasa?

A new sausage-based archetype for the Witch? Or merely a new form of the Cook People hex? :)


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Uhh, what?


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Gary Teter wrote:
I guess I should point out that the new favorites feature will probably over time reduce the number of "+1" posts.

Oh great and powerful PMG, how possible is it to have the list of favoriting peeps show in a floating popup so it doesn't navigate away from the post? Maybe with a link at the top of the popup to view the post in the manner it does now?


2 people marked this as a favorite.

So now we see the PMG's motivation for treating this thread so seriously... it was perfect timing for the release of this feature.

Maybe... too perfect.

I think the OP is the PMG's sockpuppet. I'd better report this to... oh right.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I just 'favorited' everyone on this page because you're all funny and I am a whore.

It would've been easier to say '+1', and I would've been able to look at myself in the mirror afterwards....


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Companion, Maps Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
Gary Teter wrote:
I guess I should point out that the new favorites feature will probably over time reduce the number of "+1" posts.

+1

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Justin Franklin wrote:
Gary Teter wrote:
I guess I should point out that the new favorites feature will probably over time reduce the number of "+1" posts.
+1

+2


Callous Jack wrote:
Justin Franklin wrote:
Gary Teter wrote:
I guess I should point out that the new favorites feature will probably over time reduce the number of "+1" posts.
+1
+2

+3


Patrick Curtin wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Justin Franklin wrote:
Gary Teter wrote:
I guess I should point out that the new favorites feature will probably over time reduce the number of "+1" posts.
+1
+2
+3

-1

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Evil Lincoln wrote:
Patrick Curtin wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Justin Franklin wrote:
Gary Teter wrote:
I guess I should point out that the new favorites feature will probably over time reduce the number of "+1" posts.
+1
+2
+3
-1

x4

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber
Callous Jack wrote:
Evil Lincoln wrote:
Patrick Curtin wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Justin Franklin wrote:
Gary Teter wrote:
I guess I should point out that the new favorites feature will probably over time reduce the number of "+1" posts.
+1
+2
+3
-1
x4

-x


1 person marked this as a favorite.
TriOmegaZero wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Evil Lincoln wrote:
Patrick Curtin wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Justin Franklin wrote:
Gary Teter wrote:
I guess I should point out that the new favorites feature will probably over time reduce the number of "+1" posts.
+1
+2
+3
-1
x4
-x

+ √2


2 people marked this as a favorite.

The fact is, most of us do police ourselves on these boards, as we do elsewhere.

Your (the OP) problem is not that the people here do not police themselves, but the fact that you want YOUR beliefs enforced upon the rest of the collective.

The mere idea that WE should police ourselves to YOUR taste, is completely ridiciolous.

Sure, you might think certain posts are worthless, and many times many of us will agree with you. But for every one of those times I'll guarantee you there are one or more people who don't.

Once you accept that, you'll see I'm right and you are wrong.

(forgive me if this has already been mentioned, but while I do disagree with the OP in principle, I just couldn't be bothered to read all the replies ;) )

The Exchange

If we police ourselves to stop frivolous posting, are we officially 'fun police'... or merely 'special constables' in the fun police..? :)

'Ello

'Ello

'Ello

What's all this then, eh?

Grand Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber

Man. If we didn't police ourselves, this place would be a hellhole.


OP, you're impersonating an officer!

Nothing more to see, move along, folks.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Evil Lincoln wrote:
+ √2

Now, now, no need to get irrational.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
another_mage wrote:
Evil Lincoln wrote:
+ √2

Now, now, no need to get irrational.

So, he's the Chaotic Evil Lincoln?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

What if I didn't "ooooh" but the new release gave me a chubby?

Can I post that?

Scarab Sages

Gorbacz wrote:
Just to annoy the OP, I'll make an "ooh, shiny" post in every new product announcement in this batch.

+1 oooh!

Legendary Games, Necromancer Games

Chris Ballard wrote:
.

+1


Evil Lincoln wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Evil Lincoln wrote:
Patrick Curtin wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Justin Franklin wrote:
Gary Teter wrote:
I guess I should point out that the new favorites feature will probably over time reduce the number of "+1" posts.
+1
+2
+3
-1
x4
-x
+ √2

SPOON!


Read the first page of this thread and saw how it was going so skipped to the end.

Question: What the hell is a FAWTLY thread? What is FAWTLY and why don't I have one?


Gururamalamaswami wrote:

Read the first page of this thread and saw how it was going so skipped to the end.

Question: What the hell is a FAWTLY thread? What is FAWTLY and why don't I have one?

Some guy created a thread objecting to how long threads are. So Paizonians being Paizonians, it quickly turned into the mother of all threads. It grew so long that it had to be broken into part 2,3 and so on, otherwise it drags down the servers kicking, lagging, and screaming.

This is the original forums are way too long thread.

Fawtl was not, however, the first post to break the forums by getting too long, I believe that was first achieved on Heathansson's (aka Spanky the Leprechaun) PBP.


Hops in *drops pellets* hops out.


ZenithTN wrote:
golem101 wrote:
I prefer to express my appreciation, encouragement and enthusiasm for the writers, developers and designers work. Thanks.
Send them a personal note/email/text. There are alternatives.

And you can scroll past the posts that have no interest for you. There are alternatives.

For now, you want short posts to not be posted. What will be next on your list of things not to be posted? Sorry, but this forum is for a wild variety of people (some of whom express themselves differently), not just you.

Scarab Sages

Sebastian wrote:
Studpuffin wrote:
Motion to move this thread to Off-Topic because it will soon end up that way anyway.

Motion is out of order. Read the damn bylaws - no thread may be moved to the Off-Topic section until and unless Aberzombie (including any of his aliases) has responded to it.

Motion to censor Studpuffin for improper meeting procedure.

Sorry, been busy.

Mmmmm......brainnnnnnnsssssss

Edit: And for the reocrd, the OP can kiss my skinny, decaying ass. I'll make my posts as short/long, and/or meaningless as I'd like to.

Liberty's Edge

Pathfinder Pawns, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

Hehe, the OP is probably none too pleased with the proliferation of "dot" posts that I'm seeing in these parts now.

Dot! lol.

Oh and yes, please add me to the list of "whatev"s in regard to the OP.

Whatev.

Liberty's Edge

Kellendil wrote:

The fact is, most of us do police ourselves on these boards, as we do elsewhere.

Your (the OP) problem is not that the people here do not police themselves, but the fact that you want YOUR beliefs enforced upon the rest of the collective.

The mere idea that WE should police ourselves to YOUR taste, is completely ridiciolous.

Sure, you might think certain posts are worthless, and many times many of us will agree with you. But for every one of those times I'll guarantee you there are one or more people who don't.

Once you accept that, you'll see I'm right and you are wrong.

(forgive me if this has already been mentioned, but while I do disagree with the OP in principle, I just couldn't be bothered to read all the replies ;) )

+1


ProfPotts wrote:
If we police ourselves to stop frivolous posting, are we officially 'fun police'?

No, that's the "no fun police'.

I'm in the Fun Police. The laws of humour WILL be enforced. People not having fun will be laughing gassed.


Kruelaid wrote:
Evil Lincoln wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Evil Lincoln wrote:
Patrick Curtin wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Justin Franklin wrote:
Gary Teter wrote:
I guess I should point out that the new favorites feature will probably over time reduce the number of "+1" posts.
+1
+2
+3
-1
x4
-x
+ √2
SPOON!

SPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONGUAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARD!


another_mage wrote:
Evil Lincoln wrote:
+ √2

Now, now, no need to get irrational.

* √-1


ronaldsf wrote:

Hehe, the OP is probably none too pleased with the proliferation of "dot" posts that I'm seeing in these parts now.

Dot! lol.

The problem I have is with dot posts is that I'm on the net so long that I can't write a dot without adding com.com

It's really hard sometimes.com


KaeYoss wrote:
another_mage wrote:
Evil Lincoln wrote:
+ √2

Now, now, no need to get irrational.

* √-1

You are so unreal.


xorial wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:
another_mage wrote:
Evil Lincoln wrote:
+ √2

Now, now, no need to get irrational.

* √-1
You are so unreal.

Let us not make this issue more complex.


pres man wrote:
xorial wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:
another_mage wrote:
Evil Lincoln wrote:
+ √2

Now, now, no need to get irrational.

* √-1
You are so unreal.
Let us not make this issue more complex.

I can't imagine what you mean by this.


This is my only line...


Useless fluff to pad the thread length.

101 to 145 of 145 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Paizo / Website Feedback / Police yourselves. Please have higher standards for what is worthy of a post. All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.