James Jacobs Creative Director |
James Jacobs wrote:With the exception of "elven" or "dwarven" (not "elf" or "dwarf"), correct?For our Pathfinder style, the word "orcish" is a grammatical error itself, by the way.
We don't use "-ish" at the end of any of our races to make adjectives. We generally just use the name of the race.
Yeah. Hence my use of the word "generally."
Sean K Reynolds Contributor |
hogarth wrote:Yeah. Hence my use of the word "generally."James Jacobs wrote:With the exception of "elven" or "dwarven" (not "elf" or "dwarf"), correct?For our Pathfinder style, the word "orcish" is a grammatical error itself, by the way.
We don't use "-ish" at the end of any of our races to make adjectives. We generally just use the name of the race.
... which is another style thing we inherited from WotC. :)
James Jacobs Creative Director |
In any event... this conversation has outlived its usefulness. Our method of using he/she pronouns isn't going to change, and I'm not interested in seeing this particular argument continue here. If you want to argue about it still, I suppose you can restart the thread down in the off-topic part of the messageboards... but I strongly recommend you don't.
The OP's original question was answered almost immediately--the us of "he" in that part of the book was nothing more than a typo that has been logged for correction in the next printing fo the book.
In any event, thread shut down in three... two... one.