Page 114 of the Inner Sea World Guide lists Ilizmagorti's population as being 20,500, while the inside cover of Cities of Golarion states it to be 10,500. Is the former figure a typo or an upgrade?
Many thanks
If this has already been mentioned please delete this.
On page 104, the map shows Kalsgard on the southern shore of the Rimeflow River, while the text speaks of the city being on the northern shore.
Just my 2 cp.
This is such a minor issue...
But Harmonic Spell has "bardic music" as a prerequisite.
Which doesn't exist anymore.
Creative Director
|
possible errata page 47 and 49. Page 47 suggests that Kazavon nearly united the orc tribes into an unstoppable force, but page 49 under Scarwall paints the impression that he was working against the Orcs to wantonly destroy them (for the Ustalavic border count) left and right (or south and east as the book states).
Not errata. Kazavon did nearly unite the orc tribes, but only after he was sent to destroy them by Ustalav. We were deliberately vague and sketchy on the Kazavon details since that whole element is such a huge and well-documented portion of an Adventure Path.
|
Maybe I'm off base here, but it really seems to me that the description of Field Plate and it's stats do not match up.
Then --> Field Plate: 1,200gp, +7 AC, +1 Dex, –5 Armor Check, 35% Spell Failure, 20ft Movement (base 30ft), 15 ft (base 20ft), 50 lbs
Shouldn't it read as follows?
For comparison...
As written, there is no difference between Banded Mail and Field Plate except Field Plate costs 1,000gp more. The description suggests a more meaningful difference.
Is the Golarion calendar in the current correct, as I believe it is changed from previous calendars? The "old" calendar system used 12 30-day months if I'm not mistaken (and is reflected in the wiki) while the "new" calendar uses one similar to our own (with 28-day, 30-day, and 31-day months). Which is correct and, if the latter, why the change? Thanks!
|
This is such a minor issue...
But Harmonic Spell has "bardic music" as a prerequisite.
Which doesn't exist anymore.
It's not that minor a point - it took me quite some time to find out that this was simply the old (Beta?) name for what is now called "bardic performance", and not some (undefined) musical subset of bardic performances.
As my bard only has Perform(Oratory), this was quite a big deal for me!
Hopefully anyone else who is as confused as I was will find this post helpful.
Just found another:
...Almas is Andoran’s capital. Situated at the mouth of the Andossan River
According to the map on the following page, Almas is now on the mouth of the Andoshen River. The mention of the Andossan (which does not appear on the Folio map either) seems to be an artifact from earlier times (it also appears in the "Campaign Setting", "Guide to Absalom", and the "Guide to Darkmoon Vale"). The Andoshen River appears in "Andoran, Spirit of Liberty", the PFS scenario "Web of Corruption", and "City of the Fallen Sky".
EDIT: The Andossan is again referred to on the following page.
Here's another question, this time regarding the Hold of Belkzen.
P. 47 of the ISWG states that the first defensive border between the Hold and Lastwall (the Sunwall) was built in 3827 after the defeat of the Whispering Tyrant and the establishment of Lastwall. It is said to have stood for "hundreds of years".
The second border was constructed by a General Harchist (at an unnamed date) and lasted only "half as long", falling in 4237 AR. On p. 60 of "Skeleons of Scarwall" this border is referred to as "Harchrist's Blockade" (sic).
The third border is called the Hordeline, and was built nearly 300 years later in 4515 AR, and was overrun at a yet unnamed date, whenever the current border between the two countries was set.
So what is my question? Well, the entry for Trunau on p. 49 of the ISWG states that the Hordeline was breached 200 years ago, which seems to contradict the original statement on the previous page, stating that it was built about that same time.
It seems there is some confusion on whether the dates for the Hordeline refer to when it was built or when it was created. The Sunwall date is pretty clearly a "built on" date, as that coincides with the end of the Shining Crusade. The date for Harchist's Blockace (the "r" in the name on p. 60 of PF11 seems to be a typo) seems to be a "fell on" date, while the 4515 date of the Hordeline is the one that is in question. P. 47 of the ISWG seems to indicate that it was the "built on" date, while P. 49 seems to say it was the "fell on" date. Which is correct?
Is the Golarion calendar in the current correct, as I believe it is changed from previous calendars? The "old" calendar system used 12 30-day months if I'm not mistaken (and is reflected in the wiki) while the "new" calendar uses one similar to our own (with 28-day, 30-day, and 31-day months). Which is correct and, if the latter, why the change? Thanks!
I'm guessing that you are looking at the Calendar article, which is in serious need of updating. The new calendar is mentioned in the Absalom Reckoning article (which follows the ISWG). I'm guessing the change was made so that Absalom Reckoning fits in with our own calendar, since Paizo keeps advancing the "current year" date" with our own.
P. 47 of the ISWG states that the first defensive border between the Hold and Lastwall (the Sunwall) was built in 3827 after the defeat of the Whispering Tyrant and the establishment of Lastwall. It is said to have stood for "hundreds of years".
Oh, and I'm guessing this date is possibly wrong in the text. Although the lich was defeated in 3827, the war did not officially come to an end until the following year. See p. 36 of the ISWG. It's possible that the construction of the Sunwall started before the founding of Lastwall, but it seems unlikely, no?
p.281 The Low Templar PrC capstone says:
"...he gains a planar cohort ... as if he had taken the Leadership feat."
and then
"If he replaces his cohort gained from the leadership feat with the planar cohort, the maximum level equivalent for his planar cohort equals the templar's class level -1, rather than -2."
The former says nothing about using his *class level*; Leadership uses *total character level*. Thus the latter is a significant nerf (as a Low Templar is guaranteed to have at least 5 levels in other classes).
So either the planar cohort should be based off class level in the first place (unlikely, as this would be of very limited use), or the latter should be amended to read total character level.
Been a while, but ...
P. 266 of the ISWG states that Citadel Dinyar is located near the "headwaters of the River Iseld", but the Inner Sea Poster Map Folio shows this to be the "River Keld". Hmmm.
Found something very minor:
The sorting in the "other languages" section on p. 251 is slightly off. "Gnoll" is sorted in the wrong place.
Two of them, both of which seem to be mistakes, but aren't totally clear on how they actually work:
p. 108: Unlike most of the listed deities, the first boon for sentinels of Norgober doesn't specify an "or" among the granted SLAs, which would imply that sentinals of Norgober get all of the listed SLAs rather than a choice of one from the list.
p. 116: Pharasma's section lists Exalted boons before Evangelist, while the other deites all list the boon prestige classes in alphabetical order. Not sure if this means that the who sections are switched, or if it's just the titles that are switched, and thus the boons listed as Pharasma's Exalted boons are actually meant to be her Evangelist ones, and vice-versa.
Hmm, a year-and-a-half since the last post. Either we've found all the hiccups or no one is reading this book anymore ;)
P. 86 states that the archmage Nex disappeared "a few centuries" after the departure of the Maharajah Khiben-Sald from Jalmeray. This contradicts what is printed on p. 35, which states that in 563 AR, Khiben-Sald spends a decade on the island, and in 576 AR he disappears.
Also on p. 87, it states that the Vudrani returned to Jalmeray in 2822 AR, "more than a millennium after the departure of Maharajah Khiben-Sald". If he arrived in 563 AR, that's technically more than a millennium, but more accurately it's more than two millennia.
|
Pg. 294 - Covetous aura
This spell was reprinted and updated in the Rise of the Runelords: Anniversary Edition book. In it, this spell was removed as a bard/skald 5 spell, and instead became a witch 5 spell. It's uncertain if the omission of it being a bard/skald spell was intentional or not.
Also, the spell's mechanics were updated in that book. In the spell's description, delete the fourth, fifth, and sixth sentences (the three sentences before the one that starts with "Rumors hold..."). Replace them with the following:
"Each time a covetous aura duplicates a spell effect, the remaining duration of the covetous aura is reduced by a number of rounds equal to the spell level of the spell effect that is duplicated."
|
|
Seems petty, but Low Templer prestige class, pg 281
* table shows "Live to Fight Another Day" being gained at level 5;
* text description says "At 6th level".Which, if either, is correct?
It seems the official correction is to change the ability description to say it's gained at 5th level.
Source: The Pathfinder Society Campaign Clarifications page found here.