
lisamarlene |
5 people marked this as a favorite. |

We're finishing up book 5 of Ruins of Azlant tomorrow.
Now WW and Hermione are arguing with each other over who gets to run the next game after we finish the AP in a few months; Hermione wants to run a homebrew game, and WW wants to run some classic Greyhawk, converted for Fate system.
All I know is, after two years, it will be good to be a player again.

Freehold DM |

Freehold DM wrote:The game world seems to be heading away from humanocentricity.It's definitely getting furry.
Too many years of too many disruptive players demanding to be an overpowered/painfully silly race and acting stupid in game has me leery of such a move. But I guess the world has changed.

Freehold DM |

We're finishing up book 5 of Ruins of Azlant tomorrow.
Now WW and Hermione are arguing with each other over who gets to run the next game after we finish the AP in a few months; Hermione wants to run a homebrew game, and WW wants to run some classic Greyhawk, converted for Fate system.All I know is, after two years, it will be good to be a player again.
why converted to FATE?

lisamarlene |

lisamarlene wrote:why converted to FATE?We're finishing up book 5 of Ruins of Azlant tomorrow.
Now WW and Hermione are arguing with each other over who gets to run the next game after we finish the AP in a few months; Hermione wants to run a homebrew game, and WW wants to run some classic Greyhawk, converted for Fate system.All I know is, after two years, it will be good to be a player again.
::shrug::
He likes it. I don't know why, I know nothing about it.
captain yesterday |

captain yesterday wrote:Too many years of too many disruptive players demanding to be an overpowered/painfully silly race and acting stupid in game has me leery of such a move. But I guess the world has changed.Freehold DM wrote:The game world seems to be heading away from humanocentricity.It's definitely getting furry.
I can understand that.
They also have versatile heritages (for any ancestry) like changelings, dhampir, Aasimar, Duskwalkers, and Tieflings.
New ancestries are Catfolk, Kobolds, Orcs, Ratfolk, and Tengu.

Freehold DM |

Freehold DM wrote:lisamarlene wrote:why converted to FATE?We're finishing up book 5 of Ruins of Azlant tomorrow.
Now WW and Hermione are arguing with each other over who gets to run the next game after we finish the AP in a few months; Hermione wants to run a homebrew game, and WW wants to run some classic Greyhawk, converted for Fate system.All I know is, after two years, it will be good to be a player again.
::shrug::
He likes it. I don't know why, I know nothing about it.
suspicious freehold is suspicious...

Freehold DM |

Freehold DM wrote:captain yesterday wrote:Too many years of too many disruptive players demanding to be an overpowered/painfully silly race and acting stupid in game has me leery of such a move. But I guess the world has changed.Freehold DM wrote:The game world seems to be heading away from humanocentricity.It's definitely getting furry.I can understand that.
They also have versatile heritages (for any ancestry) like changelings, dhampir, Aasimar, Duskwalkers, and Tieflings.
New ancestries are Catfolk, Kobolds, Orcs, Ratfolk, and Tengu.
its funny too because of my love for Spelljammer and its inordinately silly/incredibly overpowered races. But there were so many blatant warnings written over a lot of early spell jammer work that it was pretty obvious what a player was meant to play and what they were meant not to play.

The Vagrant Erudite |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

lisamarlene wrote:why converted to FATE?We're finishing up book 5 of Ruins of Azlant tomorrow.
Now WW and Hermione are arguing with each other over who gets to run the next game after we finish the AP in a few months; Hermione wants to run a homebrew game, and WW wants to run some classic Greyhawk, converted for Fate system.All I know is, after two years, it will be good to be a player again.
Because it's a story-centric system that is actually (virtually) impossible to min-max, with inter-party world creation, a (legally) free PDF, and tons of support for multiple settings.
Or I would guess that's the reasoning.

Drejk |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Freehold DM wrote:lisamarlene wrote:why converted to FATE?We're finishing up book 5 of Ruins of Azlant tomorrow.
Now WW and Hermione are arguing with each other over who gets to run the next game after we finish the AP in a few months; Hermione wants to run a homebrew game, and WW wants to run some classic Greyhawk, converted for Fate system.All I know is, after two years, it will be good to be a player again.
::shrug::
He likes it. I don't know why, I know nothing about it.
Its very arbitrary, and "convince/bargain/plea/whine to the GM that you can do it, have access to it, know the right NPC" is basically a core mechanic.

lisamarlene |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

lisamarlene wrote:Its very arbitrary, and "convince/bargain/plea/whine to the GM that you can do it, have access to it, know the right NPC" is basically a core mechanic.Freehold DM wrote:lisamarlene wrote:why converted to FATE?We're finishing up book 5 of Ruins of Azlant tomorrow.
Now WW and Hermione are arguing with each other over who gets to run the next game after we finish the AP in a few months; Hermione wants to run a homebrew game, and WW wants to run some classic Greyhawk, converted for Fate system.All I know is, after two years, it will be good to be a player again.
::shrug::
He likes it. I don't know why, I know nothing about it.
Lmao.

NobodysHome |

captain yesterday wrote:Too many years of too many disruptive players demanding to be an overpowered/painfully silly race and acting stupid in game has me leery of such a move. But I guess the world has changed.Freehold DM wrote:The game world seems to be heading away from humanocentricity.It's definitely getting furry.
Oh, gods, does that bring back painful memories!
Every player in Runequest playing an INT 21, DEX 21 dwarf.
Every healer in Pathfinder playing an aasimar life oracle.
And on, and on, and on...
Just, "If I need to fulfill this role in the party, I am playing this race, and this class, and taking these feats in this order, so there will be no variety whatsoever, ever, in the PC I play."
It does get boring to GM. Very quickly.
FULL DISCLOSURE: For GothBard's game I indeed had a character concept that required my being an aasimar life oracle. So GothBard said, "No elemental resistances. No darkvision. No aasimar-specific feats except for the wings that go with your backstory. No aasimar class bonuses."
And even with that she was a darned powerful life oracle, but I really tried to work with my GM so she wasn't ridiculous.

Orthos |

I don't get to play often, so my list is limited. I've had:
Tiefling Inquisitor [Sin Eater/Preacher] (pbp)
Illumian Paladin/Crusader
Naga (homebrew ver) Sorcerer [Crossblooded]
Suli Barbarian [Masquerade Reveler] (pbp)
Gnome Witch (pbp)
Sylph Magus [Bladebound/Kensai] (pbp)
Arachne (homebrew race) Paladin
Halfling Witch
Dwarf Barbarian [Invulnerable Rager] (pbp)
Harpy (homebrew ver) Zealot
Leanai-dubh (homebrew race) Monk [Zen Archer]
Changeling Oracle (pbp)
Fetch Summoner (not unchained) [Shadow Caller] (one shot)

The Vagrant Erudite |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

The "everyone plays this combo" problem is a system issue, not player.
If the game didn't punish players for wanting an unusual group composition or class/race mix, maybe people wouldn't look for weird corner cases to fill in gaps they lacked.
Another point for "why FATE"
...Or classless systems in general, frankly.

captain yesterday |

Paladin and paladin-like classes like Cleric, Oracle, Inquisitor, Crusader, Warder, Zealot, etc. tend to be my favorite classes.
For Pathfinder Classic my favorite classes are the occult classes, followed by the APG classes. I haven't used a CRB class in years.
For Starfinder my favorite classes are Solarian, Mechanic, Envoy, and Biohacker ("That's DOCTOR Biohacker to you!").
I actually do like the cleric and champion in Pathfinder 2 and have been seriously tempted to trying out either one. Though I think my favorite classes are Rogue, Oracle, Alchemist, Investigator, and Barbarian.
Druid and Ranger also look like a lot of fun.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

captain yesterday wrote:Assassins no longer have an evil alignment requirement.But do they get spells?
I hope not. The one time I tried to create an assassin character in PF1, I just could not bring myself to use that PrC. I re-skinned a ninja instead. The ninja mechanics are way more assassin-y than the actual assassin PrC.

captain yesterday |

Limeylongears wrote:I hope not. The one time I tried to create an assassin character in PF1, I just could not bring myself to use that PrC. I re-skinned a ninja instead. The ninja mechanics are way more assassin-y than the actual assassin PrC.captain yesterday wrote:Assassins no longer have an evil alignment requirement.But do they get spells?
It is an archetype and all archetypes are class neutral so if you want to make a wizard-assassin that's entirely up to you.

Limeylongears |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Thoughts/prayers/positive waves requested.
My sister - with a long history of serious and debilitating lung issues - has been diagnosed with COVID. So far, her condition is mild, but her risk of complications is very high. We really needed her not to get this.
And you shall have them. Best wishes to her, and I sincerely hope she pulls through.