
Tacticslion |

Tacticslion wrote:Also, same question for the cost of rings of wizardry. I have worked out a formula but I’m curious if there is something else that I missed. Thanks! You guys are all awesome!Pretty sure that one was ad hoc.
Intentionally responding - and getting dressed - yeah that’s what I thought. If you break it into cost instead of price, a hint of a formula kind of emerges (with a price increase and an increase to the amount increased every two) but it’s definitely an imposed formula rather than a proven one.

Vanykrye |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Vanykrye wrote:Tacticslion wrote:Rules question: what is the base formula for an orange prism ious stone?
That is, what is the price for that +1 bonus and how was it derived?
It seems like I should know this. I even kind of remember this conversation once. I cannot find it at all.
That one might be a bit more ad hoc.
Usual formulas for static bonus would be things like "bonus squared times a constant". Slotless items are then doubled.
If that's the case, to get a 30k market value, it would be something like this:
Slotless (the double cost part): 30k/2 = 15k
+1 caster level (bonus squared times a constant): 1*1*15k = the remaining 15kAgain, I don't know that's *exactly* what they did, but it tends to follow the common theme.
Yeah that’s the ad hoc formula I first came up with - but it seemed small for what it was, and it leaves me questioning where the 15 came from in the first place. EDIT: to be clear I had been turning this around for a bit before heading to FaWtL. I came up with the “15*weapon” pretty exclusively as a “shirt and swift” joke idea for FaWtL, but this was about the best formula I could come up with. Thanks!
EDIT: I mean, the CL is 12, so that’s not it. It’s just a weird and arbitrary system and with a sample size of exactly one, it’s hard to get a general formula. I just didn’t know if anyone has seen a discussion about it or developer notes on it. Or if they could show me something I’m missing! But having a second person come up with the squared bonus is, at least, a useful metric to ensure that I wasn’t way off base for some reason.
Assuming they didn't ad hoc it, then probably because it's a relatively very high number. Weapons use bonus squared times 2000. Armor is 1000. Stat bonus is 1000. It could be that they are going with the Spell Resistance model as well, where it's a flat number, then doubled for being slotless.

NobodysHome |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

His modules are famed for being hard and deadly, as I recall - I think it’s a call back to a slightly older style of adventure writing. He is hailed for it, I think. Has a popular fanbase - probably because it calls upon older styles of play to inform itself. But! That’s just a guess.
(Also, even by shutting them down, he does, at least, address various difficult PC abilities rather than writing a thing that ignores them and is then flabbergasted when they use them; that has to count for something, even if his style doesn’t align to preference!)
Well, I think at this point I should just say, "I disagree with the philosophy that in order to make things hard and deadly, you must break the rules and/or disable character abilities. I also disagree with single-tracking the PCs," and leave it at that.
Both the Runewell in Rise of the Runelords and Scarwall in Curse of the Crimson Throne show excellent ways to get around those nasty PCs without a blanket, "Rocks fall, some of your abilities no longer work," statement.
EDIT: The funniest part being that Crimson Throne was pretty much a, "Rocks fall, some of your abilities no longer work," event, but it was so well done that the PCs found it visceral and believable.

Tacticslion |

Tacticslion wrote:His modules are famed for being hard and deadly, as I recall - I think it’s a call back to a slightly older style of adventure writing. He is hailed for it, I think. Has a popular fanbase - probably because it calls upon older styles of play to inform itself. But! That’s just a guess.
(Also, even by shutting them down, he does, at least, address various difficult PC abilities rather than writing a thing that ignores them and is then flabbergasted when they use them; that has to count for something, even if his style doesn’t align to preference!)
Well, I think at this point I should just say, "I disagree with the philosophy that in order to make things hard and deadly, you must break the rules and/or disable character abilities. I also disagree with single-tracking the PCs," and leave it at that.
Both the Runewell in Rise of the Runelords and Scarwall in Curse of the Crimson Throne show excellent ways to get around those nasty PCs without a blanket, "Rocks fall, some of your abilities no longer work," statement.
EDIT: The funniest part being that Crimson Throne was pretty much a, "Rocks fall, some of your abilities no longer work," event, but it was so well done that the PCs found it visceral and believable.
Yeah, no, I’m not really disagreeing with you, just pointing out his relative popularity and one of its guessed-at sources. :)

Tacticslion |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

NobodysHome wrote:That at least has redeeming qualities, unlike the sequel.captain yesterday wrote:You can add Return to Witch Mountain to the list of movies that haven't aged well.OMG. Try watching the original Highlander. It's excruciating.
NO SUCH FILM EXISTS, SIR, AND YOU SHALL APOLOGIZE FOR THE LIBEL. THE SERIES SKIPS STRAIGHT TO FILM THREE AND THAT IS HOW MATH WORKS.
(I mean, film three wasn’t great, mind, but it was better! ... uh, than something that doesn’t exist!)

NobodysHome |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

On a *total* side note, there's always a bit of sadness around tax time when you end up being far too right for your tastes.
"So... last year I owed about $2000, and this year I put in an extra $3000, but our adjusted gross income is about $3000 higher. That's a wash, so calculate the tax credit from the solar, and that should be about it..."
And I calculated the credit from my solar and was within $50 of my final refund.
I was hoping to be at least a little wrong.

NobodysHome |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Limeylongears wrote:Cheesy 80s sword and sorcery films are my special favourite.
I haven't seen 'Highlander'... but I will.
Oh it’s a wreck. I love it, mind, but it’s a right terrible(-y awesome) film!
(I also love Hudson Hawk, so.)
The Fifth Element for the win! I love that terrible movie!

lisamarlene |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Orthos wrote:They are a pain in the ass to take care of (especially if you don't get top of the line) and they're only good for one thing.captain yesterday wrote:If you ever have to get someone you hate (and I mean, really, really hate) a present, get them a pizza stone.Okay, gotta ask why. If only because my parents have one and they love it.
Disagree. Once you've got it well seasoned, it's no more a pain than cast iron.
And, in addition to pizza, it's perfect for biscuits, scones, and tuna melts. Which I'm not crazy about, but my kids love.(I've used mine three times in the past week.)

Tacticslion |

"Oh, them. From Philadelphia."
LOLOLOLOLOL-SEE IT'S FUNNY BECAUSE HE'S FOOOOOOOOOOOREIGN
I still laugh about that at times, I'm afraid. Well, that, and "I AM NOT MAD; I AM AN AN-GER-REE, AN-GER-REE SCIENTIST!" which... I honestly forget literally everything about whatever cartoon that comes from, except that. I may be a bad person for that.

Orthos |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Well, that, and "I AM NOT MAD; I AM AN AN-GER-REE, AN-GER-REE SCIENTIST!" which... I honestly forget literally everything about whatever cartoon that comes from, except that. I may be a bad person for that.
The villain Doctor Gangrene from the Attack of the Killer Tomatoes cartoon.

Tacticslion |

Tacticslion wrote:Well, that, and "I AM NOT MAD; I AM AN AN-GER-REE, AN-GER-REE SCIENTIST!" which... I honestly forget literally everything about whatever cartoon that comes from, except that. I may be a bad person for that.The villain Doctor Gangrene from the Attack of the Killer Tomatoes cartoon.
Dang it, I'm listening to the theme song now. In my heeeeaaaad

Scintillae |

"Oh, them. From Philadelphia."
LOLOLOLOLOL-SEE IT'S FUNNY BECAUSE HE'S FOOOOOOOOOOOREIGN
I still laugh about that at times, I'm afraid. Well, that, and "I AM NOT MAD; I AM AN AN-GER-REE, AN-GER-REE SCIENTIST!" which... I honestly forget literally everything about whatever cartoon that comes from, except that. I may be a bad person for that.
...I think it's this. I have no idea why I remember this existing.

Ragadolf |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Age-Shmage!
ALL of the old, 80's-era movies are STILL awesome!
Their very cheesy-ness enhances their lifespan exponentially!
I proved this (to myself, if no one else) a few years ago. I was recovering from surgery, (OUT D@%M CANCER!) and discovered that netflix had/has a treasure trove of old (admittedly some very bad) 80's sci-fi and fantasy flicks.
I watched them ALL. (OK< all that I could find, and watch until my eyes hurt from staring at the dang TV all day. Did I mention that Surgery sucks?!?) ;P
Including some I had never seen or even heard of before. :D
My favorite that (probably) hasnt aged well (OR at least hasnt aged as well as maybe some others) is Flash Gordon.
;)
SO bad, its GOOD!

Ragadolf |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

This just in, the rules are made up and the points don't matter. We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread.
Oi vay, this. Yes.
'They' even have admitted that the original items were merely priced half-hazardly, befitting how rare 'they' thought the items should be. And 'they' simply kept the same basic classification of said items when 'they' updated it to new editions/versions of the game.;P
And the 'current' rules, (havent read 2nd PF ed yet) are so confusing,... simple items cost a fortune, but creative items that actually break rules and action economy are affordable?!?!?
O_o
THIS, is why I only rarely try to design my own magical toys. ;)

Tacticslion |

I dig.
You dig.
He digs.
She digs.
We dig.
They dig.It's not a great poem, but it is pretty deep.
That said, I prefer something more uplifting.

captain yesterday |
5 people marked this as a favorite. |

Tsk.
Actually unrelated to either of the two links above: a musician you've enjoyed disappears for a few years and you find out shortly after re-finding him that it's because he released a few (since-deleted) actively awful things. Sigh.
On the flip side, you find an artist you haven't listened to in years (Everlast) only to find out he's actually one of your friends (Vanykrye).

Vanykrye |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Tacticslion wrote:On the flip side, you find an artist you haven't listened to in years (Everlast) only to find out he's actually one of your friends (Vanykrye).Tsk.
Actually unrelated to either of the two links above: a musician you've enjoyed disappears for a few years and you find out shortly after re-finding him that it's because he released a few (since-deleted) actively awful things. Sigh.
You keep saying that and eventually someone is going to believe you.
EDIT: Who are you going to say I am once I shave?

captain yesterday |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

captain yesterday wrote:You keep saying that and eventually someone is going to believe you.Tacticslion wrote:On the flip side, you find an artist you haven't listened to in years (Everlast) only to find out he's actually one of your friends (Vanykrye).Tsk.
Actually unrelated to either of the two links above: a musician you've enjoyed disappears for a few years and you find out shortly after re-finding him that it's because he released a few (since-deleted) actively awful things. Sigh.
That's also why I tell everyone I look like Brad Pitt from Legends of the Fall.
Even though I look more like Antonio Banderas (according to my kids).

Freehold DM |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Freehold DM wrote:Tacticslion wrote:THUNDERSNOOOOOOOOOWFreehold DM wrote:STOP HOGGING ALL THE SNOWJust thought you'd like to know it's snowing in Breath of the Wild, like, right now. During a lightning storm. It's beautiful, really.I have actually driven through /in a Thundersnowstorm.
it is,... Not as much fun as it sounds.
O_o
For the 'Young me driver', coming back from visiting a girlfriend who lived outside of the main city, it was particularly terrifying. ;P
young you driving?
I thought they only had horses back then, with those new tangled stirrup things?

Freehold DM |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Tacticslion wrote:Assuming they didn't ad hoc it, then probably because it's a relatively very high number. Weapons use bonus squared times 2000. Armor is 1000. Stat bonus is 1000. It could be that they are going with the Spell Resistance model as well, where it's a flat number, then doubled for being slotless.Vanykrye wrote:Tacticslion wrote:Rules question: what is the base formula for an orange prism ious stone?
That is, what is the price for that +1 bonus and how was it derived?
It seems like I should know this. I even kind of remember this conversation once. I cannot find it at all.
That one might be a bit more ad hoc.
Usual formulas for static bonus would be things like "bonus squared times a constant". Slotless items are then doubled.
If that's the case, to get a 30k market value, it would be something like this:
Slotless (the double cost part): 30k/2 = 15k
+1 caster level (bonus squared times a constant): 1*1*15k = the remaining 15kAgain, I don't know that's *exactly* what they did, but it tends to follow the common theme.
Yeah that’s the ad hoc formula I first came up with - but it seemed small for what it was, and it leaves me questioning where the 15 came from in the first place. EDIT: to be clear I had been turning this around for a bit before heading to FaWtL. I came up with the “15*weapon” pretty exclusively as a “shirt and swift” joke idea for FaWtL, but this was about the best formula I could come up with. Thanks!
EDIT: I mean, the CL is 12, so that’s not it. It’s just a weird and arbitrary system and with a sample size of exactly one, it’s hard to get a general formula. I just didn’t know if anyone has seen a discussion about it or developer notes on it. Or if they could show me something I’m missing! But having a second person come up with the squared bonus is, at least, a useful metric to ensure that I wasn’t way off base for some reason.
reaches for shotgun

Freehold DM |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Vanykrye wrote:NobodysHome wrote:That at least has redeeming qualities, unlike the sequel.captain yesterday wrote:You can add Return to Witch Mountain to the list of movies that haven't aged well.OMG. Try watching the original Highlander. It's excruciating.NO SUCH FILM EXISTS, SIR, AND YOU SHALL APOLOGIZE FOR THE LIBEL. THE SERIES SKIPS STRAIGHT TO FILM THREE AND THAT IS HOW MATH WORKS.
(I mean, film three wasn’t great, mind, but it was better! ... uh, than something that doesn’t exist!)
I paid money to see Highlander Endgame in theatres.
...
I will leave it at that.

Freehold DM |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Age-Shmage!
ALL of the old, 80's-era movies are STILL awesome!
Their very cheesy-ness enhances their lifespan exponentially!I proved this (to myself, if no one else) a few years ago. I was recovering from surgery, (OUT D@%M CANCER!) and discovered that netflix had/has a treasure trove of old (admittedly some very bad) 80's sci-fi and fantasy flicks.
I watched them ALL. (OK< all that I could find, and watch until my eyes hurt from staring at the dang TV all day. Did I mention that Surgery sucks?!?) ;P
Including some I had never seen or even heard of before. :DMy favorite that (probably) hasnt aged well (OR at least hasnt aged as well as maybe some others) is Flash Gordon.
;)
SO bad, its GOOD!
I met the actor who played him
My god. What an a!%~#$@.

Tacticslion |

Tacticslion wrote:Vanykrye wrote:NobodysHome wrote:That at least has redeeming qualities, unlike the sequel.captain yesterday wrote:You can add Return to Witch Mountain to the list of movies that haven't aged well.OMG. Try watching the original Highlander. It's excruciating.NO SUCH FILM EXISTS, SIR, AND YOU SHALL APOLOGIZE FOR THE LIBEL. THE SERIES SKIPS STRAIGHT TO FILM THREE AND THAT IS HOW MATH WORKS.
(I mean, film three wasn’t great, mind, but it was better! ... uh, than something that doesn’t exist!)
I paid money to see Highlander Endgame in theatres.
...
I will leave it at that.
I will say, as far as crossing the two series over, it was definitely not the worst way they could handle it. Had some pretty good and interesting moments, too.
Kell, though. He was just... inexplicable. Plot holes galore!
... it was better than The Source? Yes? No? Maybe?
Also, I just learned that eleven years ago the series was primed for a remake which... never happened. I don't know how I feel about that.

NobodysHome |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

I think I just overthink things.
For both Clone Wars and the Highlander series, all I could think was, "Any character I come to like in this series will die by violence within the next 25 years."
And it was such a depressing thought that I didn't want to watch either series because I didn't want to become attached to characters I knew were going to die horribly.

Tacticslion |

I think I just overthink things.
For both Clone Wars and the Highlander series, all I could think was, "Any character I come to like in this series will die by violence within the next 25 years."
And it was such a depressing thought that I didn't want to watch either series because I didn't want to become attached to characters I knew were going to die horribly.
That's super-fair, but it's also exactly the point (or at least a part of it) of both series - the tragedy is part of the story.
For immortals it was fascinating to see them laugh, hang out, and share a party. They're old companions, friends, and fellows. Who will eventually (and soon by the start of the first film) have to kill each other.
For the Clone Wars, it's a tragedy in progress - we know it ends poorly, but it is about the, "how?" and, "why?" that we follow, rather than for the, "what?"

Ragadolf |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |

Ragadolf wrote:Freehold DM wrote:Tacticslion wrote:THUNDERSNOOOOOOOOOWFreehold DM wrote:STOP HOGGING ALL THE SNOWJust thought you'd like to know it's snowing in Breath of the Wild, like, right now. During a lightning storm. It's beautiful, really.I have actually driven through /in a Thundersnowstorm.
it is,... Not as much fun as it sounds.
O_o
For the 'Young me driver', coming back from visiting a girlfriend who lived outside of the main city, it was particularly terrifying. ;Pyoung you driving?
I thought they only had horses back then, with those new tangled stirrup things?
HORSES?!?
Horses were new fangled. We all thought they were only a fad!
And only the rich brats,... erm, 'well-to-do' had them.
When I was a lil' wizard, I had to HIKE to Wizard school.
It was 10 miles, through 5'-10' of snow,
Uphill,
Both ways! 'There and back again!'
;P