Deep 6 FaWtL


Off-Topic Discussions

172,351 to 172,400 of 281,125 << first < prev | 3443 | 3444 | 3445 | 3446 | 3447 | 3448 | 3449 | 3450 | 3451 | 3452 | 3453 | next > last >>

2 people marked this as a favorite.

*Gets dressed*

Gah! I burned my tongue earlier on hot tea. And now, I've got a pimple on the tip that is driving me to distraction.


Freehold DM wrote:
The teacher showed us tricks and ways of doing things that made multiplication and division very easy.

This is the nature of math.

Freehold DM wrote:
Then, the next year, the following teacher demanded we do things her way, and ground out of us the way we had learned it the year previous, saying we were wrong if we dit it any way other than she did.

Mmmmmmmmmmmeh. Sounds like a harsh teacher.

Freehold DM wrote:
If we ever found a way to answer a questions that was different than the way she wanted, we were wrong.

This is wrong. Likely, though, it was trying to show you the methodology of shortcuts and faster ways for when you would (inevitably) be timed.

Freehold DM wrote:
If we didn't show our work, we were wrong.

This is partially wrong, but understandable. You need to show your work. It really should have been (at worst) partial credit, unless you were in late Highschool and college. That said, as NH demonstrated, there are reasons for why (in later grades) showing your work is necessary to the point they will count it wrong if you do not.

Freehold DM wrote:
And if we got the answer wrong, we were wrong. That last was understandable, but still.

This is right. As you have noted.

Freehold DM wrote:
This repeated as time went on.

Yeah, you had a really bad year with a single teacher who believed the best method of teaching you was toughing it out. It's not always a bad method of teaching things (and can be quite necessary), but it does not work with all students, and it simply wrecked what faith you had in it.

The thing about math is that there are a ton of processes, and thus a ton of methods to get correct answers, but only a few of them are valid at any given time. Knowing the logic behind it can let you do anything... slowly; but there are certain paths that will get you there much, much faster, and sometimes might even be necessary compared to "conventional" (basic) methods. Again, if you understand the logic, you'll probably be fine for most purposes, but for some problems you'll never actually complete your processes before the heat death of the universe.

My guess is that you got caught up in the sometime troubling changeover from basic processes into more advanced ones and were never taught the basics or whys behind those processes.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Tacticslion wrote:
Yeah, for me it was a religion professor.

That must have really sucked for you.

...And to totally rub it in your face, the three religion courses I was forced to take -- was pursuing my engineering degree at the time, had already been thru one complete liberal arts program, and had no interest in religion courses -- turned out to be a lot of fun, thanks to some very fun and passionate professors.

Full disclosure though, I did not even try to read St Augustine's Confessions. Sparknotes FTW, and I still scored the highest grade on the final paper we wrote about it! It helped that I was about ten years older than most of the other students, and had earned a degree in English the first time thru college. :)


3 people marked this as a favorite.
lynora wrote:

Well, there's the difference between you and me. :)

I always developed a profile of my teachers within the first week and answered all questions on papers and tests based on what they wanted to hear. Got great grades. I learned when I was 8 that there's no point trying to convince adults of anything. You just have to learn how to tell them what they want to hear and then they leave you alone. (My poor incompetent psychologist was trying to teach me social skills. She was woefully unprepared for coping with very smart children. On the other hand, it was an important life lesson, if not the one she was trying to teach.)

Welcome to the wonderful world of being an '80s punker, where our God-given duty was to demonstrate to adults the wrongness of their thought processes.

Very stubbornly. And obnoxiously. With beer, spikes, and steel-toed boots.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Tequila Sunrise wrote:
Tacticslion wrote:
Yeah, for me it was a religion professor.

That must have really sucked for you.

...And to totally rub it in your face, the three religion courses I was forced to take -- was pursuing my engineering degree at the time, had already been thru one complete liberal arts program, and had no interest in religion courses -- turned out to be a lot of fun, thanks to some very fun and passionate professors.

Full disclosure though, I did not even try to read St Augustine's Confessions. Sparknotes FTW, and I still scored the highest grade on the final paper we wrote about it! It helped that I was about ten years older than most of the other students, and had earned a degree in English the first time thru college. :)

I won't get into any details. FaWtL, and also I actually generally respect the man.

But let's just say that proving a man's doctoral thesis incorrect by rambling about the logical inconsistencies in the various assertions of the author of our required reading book (which, unbeknownst to me was his book by him that was his doctoral thesis) prooooobably didn't win me any brownie points.

He's a good man. I (unintentionally, but still) embarrassed him in front of the class. ... more than once.

>.>

I, uh... I definitively earned a C4lyfe in said class.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
captain yesterday wrote:
I had to spruce up the place so the maintenance guy could fix the furnace (which decided to stop working yesterday)...

I blame your excessive hippie sex life.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
lynora wrote:

I got a new feather mattress topper and a feather duvet and a feather pillow for my bed. (I had to replace the blanket and pillow because stuff happened....wash cycles went horribly wrong kind of thing, and I'm trying to put off getting a new mattress too, so, anyhow) and it is glorious.

Of course now I have to fight the urge to crawl into bed and sleep for a week, which is extra tempting when it's so very, very fluffy!

We are living in that paradise right now. Real down duvet, real feather pillows, and a new Goth duvet cover. The calico went from never entering our room to never getting off our bed until the fluffernutter chases her off at bedtime.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Freehold DM wrote:

That said, answer a math question differently than the teacher wants, and you're just wrong.

Then, the next year, the following teacher demanded we do things her way, and ground out of us the way we had learned it the year previous, saying we were wrong if we dit it any way other than she did. If we ever found a way to answer a questions that was different than the way she wanted, we were wrong. If we didn't show our work, we were wrong. And if we got the answer wrong, we were wrong. That last was understandable, but still.

This repeated as time went on.

Canonically bad teachers. And a LOT of them.

If the method is technically correct and the problem did not explicitly state a method, then the student is correct. Sorry, teachers. Deal.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
lynora wrote:

I got a new feather mattress topper and a feather duvet and a feather pillow for my bed. (I had to replace the blanket and pillow because stuff happened....wash cycles went horribly wrong kind of thing, and I'm trying to put off getting a new mattress too, so, anyhow) and it is glorious.

Of course now I have to fight the urge to crawl into bed and sleep for a week, which is extra tempting when it's so very, very fluffy!

moves lynora to top of the list


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Only in retail or food service would they try to call you on the last day of your vacation to ask you to work.

I wonder if anyone has ever said yes when they do that.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Probably if the caller implied strongly that a "no" answer would result in.... consequences.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Orthos wrote:
Probably if the caller implied strongly that a "no" answer would result in.... consequences.

I tried that, they still call and ask.

I even told them to stop calling and asking, but that only worked for a while.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I mean the employer. As in, "if you don't come in during your vacation, we're going to find an excuse to fire you".


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Oh I don't worry about that, it's nearly impossible to find someone else that can lift 80 lbs.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Yeah unfortunately most other people in that position are more replaceable. >_>

I might be a teensy bit bitter about a similar situation.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Orthos wrote:

Yeah unfortunately most other people in that position are more replaceable. >_>

I might be a teensy bit bitter about a similar situation.

We can be bitter buddies!


4 people marked this as a favorite.
NobodysHome wrote:
Orthos wrote:

Yeah unfortunately most other people in that position are more replaceable. >_>

I might be a teensy bit bitter about a similar situation.

We can be bitter buddies!

So, which of you is Grump and Not-So-Grump?


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Scintillae wrote:
NobodysHome wrote:
Orthos wrote:

Yeah unfortunately most other people in that position are more replaceable. >_>

I might be a teensy bit bitter about a similar situation.

We can be bitter buddies!
So, which of you is Grump and Not-So-Grump?

What is this "Not-So-Grump" of which you speak?

Does not compute.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
NobodysHome wrote:
Scintillae wrote:
NobodysHome wrote:
Orthos wrote:

Yeah unfortunately most other people in that position are more replaceable. >_>

I might be a teensy bit bitter about a similar situation.

We can be bitter buddies!
So, which of you is Grump and Not-So-Grump?

What is this "Not-So-Grump" of which you speak?

Does not compute.

Hey, I'm Grump.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Tacticslion wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
The teacher showed us tricks and ways of doing things that made multiplication and division very easy.

This is the nature of math.

Codswallop. The nature of math is a teacher screaming at you until you stroke their glans by doing things the way they want. Even other math teachers will tell you this.

tacticslion wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
Then, the next year, the following teacher demanded we do things her way, and ground out of us the way we had learned it the year previous, saying we were wrong if we dit it any way other than she did.
Mmmmmmmmmmmeh. Sounds like a math teacher.

fify

tacticslion wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
If we ever found a way to answer a questions that was different than the way she wanted, we were wrong.
This is wrong. Likely, though, it was trying to show you the methodology of shortcuts and faster ways for when you would (inevitably) be timed.

Yes, demanding I learn a new way of doing things in a handful of weeks that contradicts what I have been taught over the course of a year is really going to accomplish that. /s

tacticslion wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
If we didn't show our work, we were wrong.
This is partially wrong, but understandable. You need to show your work. It really should have been (at worst) partial credit, unless you were in late Highschool and college. That said, as NH demonstrated, there are reasons for why (in later grades) showing your work is necessary to the point they will count it wrong if you do not.

This never flew with me. If the answer is right, it's right. I can understand suspicion of cheating to an extent, if it is a test. But someone being wrong even though they got the right answer sticks in my throat.

tacticslion" wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
And if we got the answer wrong, we were wrong. That last was understandable, but still.

This is right. As you have noted.

Freehold DM wrote:
This repeated as time went on.
Yeah, you had a really bad year with a single teacher who believed the best method of teaching you was toughing it out. It's not always a bad method of teaching things (and can be quite necessary), but it does not work with all students, and it simply wrecked what faith you had in it.

More like it does not work. Full stop.

tacticslion wrote:

The thing about math is that there are a ton of processes, and thus a ton of methods to get correct answers, but only a few of them are valid at any given time. Knowing the logic behind it can let you do anything... slowly; but there are certain paths that will get you there much, much faster, and sometimes might even be necessary compared to "conventional" (basic) methods. Again, if you understand the logic, you'll probably be fine for most purposes, but for some problems you'll never actually complete your processes before the heat death of the universe.

My guess is that you got caught up in the sometime troubling changeover from basic processes into more advanced ones and were never taught the basics or whys behind those processes.

bantha poodoo.

If it gets you the right answer, it's valid. Is it practical? Maybe not, but it is no less valid.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Orthos wrote:
I mean the employer. As in, "if you don't come in during your vacation, we're going to find an excuse to fire you".

been there before professionally. Fought my boss tooth and nail on that one and told him he was free to fire me but I would make his life hell in the exit interview. Never came up again.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Freehold DM wrote:
If it gets you the right answer, it's valid. Is it practical? Maybe not, but it is no less valid.

I'm pretty sure this is how we set logic on fire and start roasting marshmallows.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Man. My anti authoritarian buttons have been pressed today.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Scintillae wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
If it gets you the right answer, it's valid. Is it practical? Maybe not, but it is no less valid.
I'm pretty sure this is how we set logic on fire and start roasting marshmallows.

Hershey is making a new candy bar for the first time in 40 years.

I want to make Smores with it.

You want a smore?


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Freehold DM wrote:
Man. My anti authoritarian buttons have been pressed today.

*poke* *press* *push* *fold* *spindle* *mutilate*


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Freehold DM wrote:
Scintillae wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
If it gets you the right answer, it's valid. Is it practical? Maybe not, but it is no less valid.
I'm pretty sure this is how we set logic on fire and start roasting marshmallows.

Hershey is making a new candy bar for the first time in 40 years.

I want to make Smores with it.

You want a smore?

Nah, I want math.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

Can you tell the kids are leveling up so I'm just sitting here Paizo'ing?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Do help Irwin out.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Take greater fortitude! Take greater fortitude!!

Or was that iron will...

Take weapon finesse! Take weapon finesse!!


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Just as I said. Freehold has a full-on hate of Math.


Freehold DM wrote:
The teacher showed us tricks and ways of doing things that made multiplication and division very easy.
Tacticslion wrote:

This is the nature of math.

Freehold DM wrote:
Codswallop. The nature of math is a teacher screaming at you until you <nope>

If the teacher managed to show you these tricks, it is in the nature of the thing s/he showed you, else said tricks wouldn't work.

Freehold DM wrote:
Then, the next year, the following teacher demanded we do things her way, and ground out of us the way we had learned it the year previous, saying we were wrong if we dit it any way other than she did.
tacticslion wrote:
Mmmmmmmmmmmeh. Sounds like a math teacher.
Freehold DM wrote:
fify

You did not.

Freehold DM wrote:
If we ever found a way to answer a questions that was different than the way she wanted, we were wrong.
tacticslion wrote:
This is wrong. Likely, though, it was trying to show you the methodology of shortcuts and faster ways for when you would (inevitably) be timed.
Freehold DM wrote:
Yes, demanding I learn a new way of doing things in a handful of weeks that contradicts what I have been taught is really going to accomplish that. /s

I believe you may have misinterpreted what I was saying.

I was saying that it was wrong of the teacher to do this.

Freehold DM wrote:
If we didn't show our work, we were wrong.
tacticslion wrote:
This is partially wrong, but understandable. You need to show your work. It really should have been (at worst) partial credit, unless you were in late Highschool and college. That said, as NH demonstrated, there are reasons for why (in later grades) showing your work is necessary to the point they will count it wrong if you do not.
Freehold DM wrote:
This never flew with me. If the answer is right, it's right. I can understand suspicion of cheating to an extent, if it is a test. But someone being wrong even though they got the right answer sticks in my throat.

Nope. That's a failure, entirely.

"I think that you're a human, (because pickles are lime-flavored.)" is clearly stupid and wrong, despite the fact that you are, in fact, human.

Freehold DM wrote:
And if we got the answer wrong, we were wrong. That last was understandable, but still.
tacticslion" wrote:
This is right. As you have noted.
Freehold DM wrote:
This repeated as time went on.
tacticslion" wrote:
Yeah, you had a really bad year with a single teacher who believed the best method of teaching you was toughing it out. It's not always a bad method of teaching things (and can be quite necessary), but it does not work with all students, and it simply wrecked what faith you had in it.
Freehold DM wrote:
More like it does not work. Full stop.

If it did not work, we'd not be talking now.

tacticslion" wrote:

The thing about math is that there are a ton of processes, and thus a ton of methods to get correct answers, but only a few of them are valid at any given time. Knowing the logic behind it can let you do anything... slowly; but there are certain paths that will get you there much, much faster, and sometimes might even be necessary compared to "conventional" (basic) methods. Again, if you understand the logic, you'll probably be fine for most purposes, but for some problems you'll never actually complete your processes before the heat death of the universe.

My guess is that you got caught up in the sometime troubling changeover from basic processes into more advanced ones and were never taught the basics or whys behind those processes.

Freehold DM wrote:

bantha poodoo.

If it gets you the right answer, it's valid. Is it practical? Maybe not, but it is no less valid.

It is not.

Example two: "(Because I like cotton candy,) I believe the text in this forum is black on a white background."

The method for attaining a "correct" assertion (black text on a white background) has no bearing on that assertion.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
John Napier 698 wrote:
Just as I said. Freehold has a full-on hate of Math.

I often found math to be incredibly frustrating.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Scintillae wrote:
Do help Irwin out.

LOL. He didn't show up for the level-up party, so there was a mysterious complete and utter ninja rebuild to make him an invisible death machine.

Of course, now that I've touched him, Deady will be sure to get him killed, which'll be entertaining as well.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Scintillae wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
Scintillae wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
If it gets you the right answer, it's valid. Is it practical? Maybe not, but it is no less valid.
I'm pretty sure this is how we set logic on fire and start roasting marshmallows.

Hershey is making a new candy bar for the first time in 40 years.

I want to make Smores with it.

You want a smore?

Nah, I want math.

to each their own.

eats delicious Smores


1 person marked this as a favorite.
John Napier 698 wrote:
Just as I said. Freehold has a full-on hate of Math.

do I really hate math? Or do I love freedom?

Throw off your Euclidean shackles!! Power to the people!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Scintillae wrote:

Tomorrow will be fun.

"Why did you take points off? I got it right!"
"Remember when I said I'd take off points if you didn't use complete sentences? And see where the directions say use complete sentences?"
blank stares

I thought those were optional rules.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
captain yesterday wrote:

Only in retail or food service would they try to call you on the last day of your vacation to ask you to work.

I wonder if anyone has ever said yes when they do that.

That's one reason why I don't answer my phone when work calls, regardless of whether I'm on vacation or not. Leave a voicemail, I'll call back if I feel like it. If not, I'll tell you later that "I was busy and didn't check my phone until it was way to late to come in. Sorry."


2 people marked this as a favorite.
captain yesterday wrote:

Take greater fortitude! Take greater fortitude!!

Or was that iron will...

Take weapon finesse! Take weapon finesse!!

Metamagic feats for the non-casters!

Seriously, though, why don't the metamagic feats have a prerequisite "Must be able to cast spells"?


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Game tonight was rough. My dice still hate the Samurai, but decided to hate some other people tonight as well. In the first encounter, 5 2nd level PCs took on a 2nd level rogue and 3 1st level warriors. Amidst an incredible amount of missing (the orc rogue and the melee fighter PC spent about 7 rounds paired off without hitting either one a single time), I did manage to knock the Samurai down to 0 hp. Other PCs took a few hits, bu not too much. Then the second encounter. Oh, boy. So the setup in the book is that there are 3 houses being looted, with 4 orcs in each house (standard orcs from the bestiary, just mixed up the weapons a bit so it wasn't all falchion all the time). The group is now up to 6 PCs (one player was late, and another was busy). The book says that the orcs in any given house will not activate unless triggered by the PCs, and have a -6 Perception to notice the PCs if they do anything that might trigger them. So, most of the group goes to fight the orcs from one of the houses, while the rogue decides it would be a great idea to use her rope to improvise a tripwire at one of the doors of a second house. She rolled terrible for her stealth, and one of the orcs in the house rolled a nat 20 on it's perception, so YAY!! 4 more orcs are triggered into the fight. Two of them grab the rogue and start taking her off for unspecified nastiness, while now 6 orcs are swarming 5 PCs (one PC was trying to help free the rogue). By the time it was all over, I had killed the melee fighter (dropped below 0hp, then coup de graced, taking him to -35hp), killed the bard (was at 3hp, critted by a greataxe for 24 damage), knocked the cavalier and samurai unconscious (stabilized at -4 and -9, respectively), the rogue was at 2hp, and the ranged fighter was untouched.

Fun fact: the bard was the only spellcaster in the party. The player thinks he wants to make a paladin to replace it, possible with an archetype to replace spellcasting with something else. The player of the dead fighter is thinking ranger or barbarian. So, the party will almost certainly be without any magic users or healers. YAY!


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Sorry, I didn't realize that would be such a wall of text.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Tequila Sunrise wrote:
Tacticslion wrote:
Yeah, for me it was a religion professor.

That must have really sucked for you.

...And to totally rub it in your face, the three religion courses I was forced to take -- was pursuing my engineering degree at the time, had already been thru one complete liberal arts program, and had no interest in religion courses -- turned out to be a lot of fun, thanks to some very fun and passionate professors.

Full disclosure though, I did not even try to read St Augustine's Confessions. Sparknotes FTW, and I still scored the highest grade on the final paper we wrote about it! It helped that I was about ten years older than most of the other students, and had earned a degree in English the first time thru college. :)

You didn't miss anything.

I went to a Catholic university that made us read the full text of everything. I grew to hate Augustine and his stupid pear more than reason should allow.


5 people marked this as a favorite.

Today was fun. I ended up staying an hour late at school because I had an emergency meeting with my daughter's teachers over a behavior incident today, and *then* I had to go out to run all the damned school shopping errands, and then come back and take care of the rabbit, and by then I'd worked yet another ten-hour day and I was so angry that I forced my poor children to listen to me rage-sing along to the Hamilton soundtrack in the car.
They fell asleep.
And then I woke them up and made them tacos.
And since mad can only last so long, after I put my son to bed, I sat up with my daughter going through my random box of old photos because she wanted a picture of Grandpa to take to class for the Dia de los Muertos celebration she argued her teacher into having tomorrow. (Why, I have no idea. We're Polish/Scottish/Danish. No Mexican anywhere. But she's obsessed.) She chose one of my dad doing one of his favorite Stupid Human Tricks, i.e. feeding bits of frozen hot dog to seagulls out of his hands. He would hold the hot dog up in the air and the seagull would swoop down and grab it.
I longed for the day he would lose an actual finger, the smug bastard.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Some highlights of the game:

When the rogue and the fighter were unable to hit each other, they were fighting in what was basically a tent, so every time they missed we said they were cutting ventilation holes in the canvas because it was too stuffy inside there.

Before the rogue blew her stealth check, she saw the orcs looting the house. One of the orcs held up a dress and asked the others "Blue flowery dress make Thokk look pretty?" and then tried to pull the dress on over his weapons and armor, tearing it up in the process.

The melee fighter was tripped by a thrown bola. He then proceeded to kill an orc while prone by chopping upwards through the testicles with his longsword.

Unfortunately, then the dice turned against the PCs and things got a lot less fun.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
NobodysHome wrote:
lynora wrote:

I got a new feather mattress topper and a feather duvet and a feather pillow for my bed. (I had to replace the blanket and pillow because stuff happened....wash cycles went horribly wrong kind of thing, and I'm trying to put off getting a new mattress too, so, anyhow) and it is glorious.

Of course now I have to fight the urge to crawl into bed and sleep for a week, which is extra tempting when it's so very, very fluffy!

We are living in that paradise right now. Real down duvet, real feather pillows, and a new Goth duvet cover. The calico went from never entering our room to never getting off our bed until the fluffernutter chases her off at bedtime.

*sends a bigger company of kobold ninjas to steal NH's bed, mattress, spare laptops, computer, GB computer, and Impii computers as well*

*drinks tea wondering where the previous team of kobold ninjas is*


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Freehold DM wrote:
John Napier 698 wrote:
Just as I said. Freehold has a full-on hate of Math.

do I really hate math? Or do I love freedom?

Throw off your Euclidean shackles!!

You know that's a much deeper level of math than the one you are frothing at? Don't you?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
lisamarlene wrote:
Tequila Sunrise wrote:
Tacticslion wrote:
Yeah, for me it was a religion professor.

That must have really sucked for you.

...And to totally rub it in your face, the three religion courses I was forced to take -- was pursuing my engineering degree at the time, had already been thru one complete liberal arts program, and had no interest in religion courses -- turned out to be a lot of fun, thanks to some very fun and passionate professors.

Full disclosure though, I did not even try to read St Augustine's Confessions. Sparknotes FTW, and I still scored the highest grade on the final paper we wrote about it! It helped that I was about ten years older than most of the other students, and had earned a degree in English the first time thru college. :)

You didn't miss anything.

I went to a Catholic university that made us read the full text of everything. I grew to hate Augustine and his stupid pear more than reason should allow.

I read Confessions and wasn't impressed either. Hadn't finished the last chapter or so because of the lack of time before exam and hadn't have motivation to return to it afterwards.

Fun fact: during the exam, the teacher asked me about "the hatchet". I froze trying to recall theological significance of the hatchet for Augustine, only to realize after few moments (and a helpful question from the teacher) that it was biographical reference. I made a facepalm in front of the teacher and then told the story of Augustine's friend.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
lisamarlene wrote:
And since mad can only last so long, after I put my son to bed, I sat up with my daughter going through my random box of old photos because she wanted a picture of Grandpa to take to class for the Dia de los Muertos celebration she argued her teacher into having tomorrow. (Why, I have no idea. We're Polish/Scottish/Danish. No Mexican anywhere. But she's obsessed.)

You got your answer right here - Day Of The Dead is a big thing here (though celebrated differently than the Spanish or Mexican one). Going to visit the graves and all such. (which I should do today as I didn't go yesterday because of waking up with a sore-ish throat).

I am not the one to promote Adam Mickiewicz usually, but if you can get second part of Dziady (though I don't know if there is an English translation), it described a mix of pagan/Christian rites.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Apparently, if you stood in the porch of the church at midnight on the 31st of October, you'd either see all the shades of the people who were going to die in the following year walk past, or the image of the person you were going to marry. Or both, if you were really unlucky.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

It's alive! It's ALIIIIIIIIIIVE!

I've always wanted to say that.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

FaWtL Challenge: Finish this sentence non-obscenely:

"Paizo's web site goes down more often than..."

172,351 to 172,400 of 281,125 << first < prev | 3443 | 3444 | 3445 | 3446 | 3447 | 3448 | 3449 | 3450 | 3451 | 3452 | 3453 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / Deep 6 FaWtL All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.