Elmo explains the national debt


Off-Topic Discussions


Perfect.

This is, of course, unsustainable. This is why the economy is not recovering, and why so many people remain out of work. Too much productive capacity is being funneled into an unproductive government sector and debt payments. Interest rates will remain low for only so long, once they shoot up, the government will be trapped.


It's why if we ever start a war/argument/annoyance/etc that China doesn't agree with we auto-lose.

Our move: Start $*^@
Their move: Fine. We're cashing all these bonds with your name on them. Pay up.
Our move: ::societal collapse::
Their move: ::win::

We owed more in terms of percentages after WW2 but at least then we owed it to our own citizens. That way the gov't was allowed to be dicks and tell people to screw off when they tried to cash their war bonds.

Today we don't have that fall-back. We cannot be dicks anymore. We have to play nice and truth be told that's not a thing that comes naturally to America.


Brilliant. But I think it should have been the Count.


Yep. That is the truth. ~sighs~


I'd like to see it with the actual numbers.

There is no way the US GDP per capita was ~$15,000 in 1990.


Nebulous_Mistress wrote:

It's why if we ever start a war/argument/annoyance/etc that China doesn't agree with we auto-lose.

Our move: Start $*^@
Their move: Fine. We're cashing all these bonds with your name on them. Pay up.
Our move: ::societal collapse::
Their move: ::win::

We owed more in terms of percentages after WW2 but at least then we owed it to our own citizens. That way the gov't was allowed to be dicks and tell people to screw off when they tried to cash their war bonds.

Today we don't have that fall-back. We cannot be dicks anymore. We have to play nice and truth be told that's not a thing that comes naturally to America.

Um why on earth would we pay up in these circumstance? Seems to me the Chinese would get to suck a trillion dollar loss.


The Forgotten wrote:
Nebulous_Mistress wrote:

It's why if we ever start a war/argument/annoyance/etc that China doesn't agree with we auto-lose.

Our move: Start $*^@
Their move: Fine. We're cashing all these bonds with your name on them. Pay up.
Our move: ::societal collapse::
Their move: ::win::

We owed more in terms of percentages after WW2 but at least then we owed it to our own citizens. That way the gov't was allowed to be dicks and tell people to screw off when they tried to cash their war bonds.

Today we don't have that fall-back. We cannot be dicks anymore. We have to play nice and truth be told that's not a thing that comes naturally to America.

Um why on earth would we pay up in these circumstance? Seems to me the Chinese would get to suck a trillion dollar loss.

Because that would destroy any chance of getting a future loan from most countries in the world, leaving the debit spending unsustainable?


Dies Irae wrote:
The Forgotten wrote:
Nebulous_Mistress wrote:

It's why if we ever start a war/argument/annoyance/etc that China doesn't agree with we auto-lose.

Our move: Start $*^@
Their move: Fine. We're cashing all these bonds with your name on them. Pay up.
Our move: ::societal collapse::
Their move: ::win::

We owed more in terms of percentages after WW2 but at least then we owed it to our own citizens. That way the gov't was allowed to be dicks and tell people to screw off when they tried to cash their war bonds.

Today we don't have that fall-back. We cannot be dicks anymore. We have to play nice and truth be told that's not a thing that comes naturally to America.

Um why on earth would we pay up in these circumstance? Seems to me the Chinese would get to suck a trillion dollar loss.
Because that would destroy any chance of getting a future loan from most countries in the world, leaving the debit spending unsustainable?

Plus China would turn off the tap of goods flowing into our country. WalMart would die immediately, and the price of everything would skyrocket since we have no factories set up anymore to create the various widgets we use in life.

Of course the flip side is that Chinese manufacturing would suffer greatly as well. But my money is on them sucking it up a lot better than we would. Call it a hunch...

The Exchange

Just think. THe only way for the USA to come out of this situation alive is to Loan my lunar State 2 billion-billion so we can dump it in the US space Industry as colonization Contracts. Americans get Engineering Jobs and massive growth for a century, and your economy gets taxes with which it can pay off its foreign loans without going to China and Arabic financiers for more.

I get Lunar State and you get good economy. :)


It's time to mass produce those tin foil hats.

The Exchange

Urizen wrote:
It's time to mass produce those tin foil hats.

Gallileo says your backwards cult can wear all the tin hats it wants, but the Earth still revolves about the Sun and no amount of tin hats will change that.

Elmo for President! Better Red than Dead!


is it time for a new collar? Did the old one chafe? Have you been to the vet lately? Do you have all your shots up to date? Flea bath?

The Exchange

The Crimson Jester, Rogue Lord wrote:
is it time for a new collar? Did the old one chafe? Have you been to the vet lately? Do you have all your shots up to date? Flea bath?

Elmo for Tyrant! Bert for Secret Police!


yellowdingo wrote:
The Crimson Jester, Rogue Lord wrote:
is it time for a new collar? Did the old one chafe? Have you been to the vet lately? Do you have all your shots up to date? Flea bath?
Elmo for Tyrant! Bert for Secret Police!

The Count for Secretary of the Treasury! Big Bird for Secretary of State!

"From our street to yours!" A vote for Sesame Street is a vote for new beginnings!

Dark Archive

Nebulous_Mistress wrote:
yellowdingo wrote:
The Crimson Jester, Rogue Lord wrote:
is it time for a new collar? Did the old one chafe? Have you been to the vet lately? Do you have all your shots up to date? Flea bath?
Elmo for Tyrant! Bert for Secret Police!

The Count for Secretary of the Treasury! Big Bird for Secretary of State!

"From our street to yours!" A vote for Sesame Street is a vote for new beginnings!

We have always been at war with the Electric Company.


Sorry Serious questions -

Who were your Presidents 1999 - 2003?


The 8th Dwarf wrote:

Sorry Serious questions -

Who were your Presidents 1999 - 2003?

Bill Clinton from 93-01

George W. Bush 01-09
Why?


Threadjack Gestapo wrote:
Nebulous_Mistress wrote:
yellowdingo wrote:
The Crimson Jester, Rogue Lord wrote:
is it time for a new collar? Did the old one chafe? Have you been to the vet lately? Do you have all your shots up to date? Flea bath?
Elmo for Tyrant! Bert for Secret Police!

The Count for Secretary of the Treasury! Big Bird for Secretary of State!

"From our street to yours!" A vote for Sesame Street is a vote for new beginnings!

We have always been at war with the Electric Company.

.

Loved the Electric Co.

Spiderman, Spiderman,
Does whatever a spider can
Spins a web, any size,
Catches thieves just like flies
Look Out!
Here comes the Spiderman.

Is he strong?
Listen bud,
He's got radioactive blood.
Can he swing from a thread
Take a look overhead
Hey, there
There goes the Spiderman.

In the chill of night
At the scene of a crime
Like a streak of light
He arrives just in time.

Spiderman, Spiderman
Friendly neighborhood Spiderman
Wealth and fame
He's ingnored
Action is his reward.

To him, life is a great big bang up
Whenever there's a hang up
You'll find the Spider man.


The Crimson Jester, Rogue Lord wrote:
The 8th Dwarf wrote:

Sorry Serious questions -

Who were your Presidents 1999 - 2003?

Bill Clinton from 93-01

George W. Bush 01-09
Why?

From the end of 98 to the beginning 03 income was greater than debt.

The correlation being that the administration at that time was doing something right.... Then again correlation is not causation.


The 8th Dwarf wrote:
Then again correlation is not causation.

EATING ICE CREAM MAKES YOU VIOLENT!


Dies Irae wrote:
The 8th Dwarf wrote:
Then again correlation is not causation.
EATING ICE CREAM MAKES YOU VIOLENT!

EATING PURPLE ICE CREAM MAKES YOU VIOLET!


The 8th Dwarf wrote:
The Crimson Jester, Rogue Lord wrote:
The 8th Dwarf wrote:

Sorry Serious questions -

Who were your Presidents 1999 - 2003?

Bill Clinton from 93-01

George W. Bush 01-09
Why?

From the end of 98 to the beginning 03 income was greater than debt.

The correlation being that the administration at that time was doing something right.... Then again correlation is not causation.

Well cutting spending was part of it. Cutting regulations was another. We have had several artificial balloons in our markets because of this. Also check out what was cut. It was by no means the pork.

Liberty's Edge

The 8th Dwarf wrote:
The Crimson Jester, Rogue Lord wrote:
The 8th Dwarf wrote:

Sorry Serious questions -

Who were your Presidents 1999 - 2003?

Bill Clinton from 93-01

George W. Bush 01-09
Why?

From the end of 98 to the beginning 03 income was greater than debt.

The correlation being that the administration at that time was doing something right.... Then again correlation is not causation.

The Iraq War started in '03. Added a chunk to the budget.

Liberty's Edge

Pathfinder Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
houstonderek wrote:
The 8th Dwarf wrote:
The Crimson Jester, Rogue Lord wrote:
The 8th Dwarf wrote:

Sorry Serious questions -

Who were your Presidents 1999 - 2003?

Bill Clinton from 93-01

George W. Bush 01-09
Why?

From the end of 98 to the beginning 03 income was greater than debt.

The correlation being that the administration at that time was doing something right.... Then again correlation is not causation.

The Iraq War started in '03. Added a chunk to the budget.

Such a shame everyone involved added it to the budget without, you know, adding a way to pay for it to the budget. Without the unfunded war costs, would there still be a surplus?

Liberty's Edge

Paul Watson wrote:
houstonderek wrote:
The 8th Dwarf wrote:
The Crimson Jester, Rogue Lord wrote:
The 8th Dwarf wrote:

Sorry Serious questions -

Who were your Presidents 1999 - 2003?

Bill Clinton from 93-01

George W. Bush 01-09
Why?

From the end of 98 to the beginning 03 income was greater than debt.

The correlation being that the administration at that time was doing something right.... Then again correlation is not causation.

The Iraq War started in '03. Added a chunk to the budget.
Such a shame everyone involved added it to the budget without, you know, adding a way to pay for it to the budget. Without the war costs, would there still be a surplus?

Considering the war cost something like $144 Billion for Iraq in FT '04, and the deficit was nearly $413 billion, then, no, there would not have been a surplus. That was also the year that Medicaid was expanded with the drug subsidy for seniors, the "War on Terror" was at its peak, we spent our largest amount in aid around the world (tsunami relief, AIDS relief and malaria/dengue fever eradication in Africa, etc), and Republicans were earmarking money to every corner of the known universe. And don't forget there was a little war going on in Afghanistan as well.

The years before and after until 2008 would have registered small deficits (relatively speaking) or broken close to even without the war expenditures.

I picked '04 since it was the worst year in terms of a budget deficit under Bush.

Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / Elmo explains the national debt All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Off-Topic Discussions
Deep 6 FaWtL
Weird News Stories
Good New Stories
Did you know...?
Ramblin' Man