Ms. Pleiades |
Resurrecting this thread after having played in this scenario because it warrants the commentary. The map design was quite excellent, but the entire scenario lacks in any meaningful skill check (at least within 3-4), and the "climax" was taking so long all our players and GM were getting delirious and fatigued by the end of it.
Darius Silverbolt Venture-Agent, Virginia—Hampton Roads |
Ms. Pleiades |
This scenario is just big long action scene. Personally I like this one a lot but I find it more useful / meaning to run part 1 and 2 together if time allows.
Given the length of both parts, the arc does no favors in lending itself to that attempt.
Come to think of it, the first part was gobsmackingly skills-poor as well, but at least the fights were better paced and there were characters to interact with.
Darius Silverbolt Venture-Agent, Virginia—Hampton Roads |
PolydactylPolymath |
** spoiler omitted **
As for the Summoner encounter, opening negotiations by accusing her blackmail in front of a bar full of supportive patrons doesn't exactly start things off on the right foot for peaceful resolution. Your words matter, not just your dice rolls. Speaking of which, the DC to turn a Hostile target indifferent is 25+ Cha mod—in case of Lura Ichon, that makes 28. As it stood, I let your check result of 24 shift her to unfriendly, which is why she asked you to leave her establishment rather than setting her Eidolon on you. At which point your group attacked. It would actually have been possible to avoid the fight entirely by simply keeping a low profile in the bar and covertly searching it for the antidote. Perhaps aided by a Bard's Fascinate to distract nearby observers.
Ms. Pleiades |
As for Ichon, I used a diplomacy check announcing her great charity to the bar patrons. GM discretion rules being as they are, I guess I'm alright with that being interpreted as blackmail?
Although the disguise part allowing different checks makes for Part I being better than the individual experience.
Ms. Pleiades |
Ms. Pleiades wrote:** spoiler omitted **Right, it was Diplomacy to gather information, not Kn: Local. My mistake. But seriously, cut the snark. We both know that your party (not pointing fingers at anyone in particular) flung accusations first, then tried to backpetal.
Clearly at this point something is either being added or subtracted from a text conversation. I hope we can have an in-person conversation next session to bury any hatchets.
tchrman35 |
I found a new danger in this game today: Life Link.
What do you suppose would happen if the life oracle in the group was the one who was carrying the controller? What do you suppose would happen if he had life link up on the whole party when he went Tony Stark on that gorilla?
It very nearly happened today. Fortunately, a couple of other players were like, "No, shiny! I want it!" and it ended up in the spellsword's bag instead.
But I wonder...I could have ended up with a dead oracle on my hands!
Aduaitam |
Running it tonight, and I'm just not sure how the Angazhani is supposed to match even one monolith! The golem automatically hits unless rolling a 1, bypasses the boss's DR and has crazy damage, while the gorilla has a decent chance to hit only because its stat block seems to have been improperly calculated? At the very least, it has a maximum amount of ~16 non-crit damage on the golem per turn if it hits all attacks with maximum damage rolls for each.
Aduaitam |
Well, I ran it! Angazhani went down in a good three turns, the golem instantly breaking grapple and not even dropping to half health. The first golem. Of four. My player still had fun with the role, but felt it to be almost anticlimactic. "Like putting Gurren Lagann in Pacific Rim." Frankly, the wraiths were a larger threat... Still, suppose the final note is that my players had a good time and felt the intensity of breaking an epic siege.