I don't know about the rest of you but...


Off-Topic Discussions

51 to 85 of 85 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

To carry it all the way through, wouldn't it need to be Rimmer Ffom?

Scarab Sages

Moff Rimmer wrote:
I guess sometimes I think too hard.

That's ok. Thinking makes the brain stronger, which makes it taste better.

drools

Brainnnnnssss..........

Scarab Sages

Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
To carry it all the way through, wouldn't it need to be Rimmer Ffom?

Remmir Ffom would be it.


Thanks for the assist.


Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
To carry it all the way through, wouldn't it need to be Rimmer Ffom?

Yes?


Why do people always think opposites are EEVEIL?

Scarab Sages

Well, that didn't take long......


Aberzombie wrote:
Well, that didn't take long......

I could have fun with this one. Thanks for the idea.

Scarab Sages

Melborp on.


Dr. Mairkenstein wrote:
Why do people always think opposites are EEVEIL?

Well. Some of us kind of are.


Actually, that kind of looks like me with my hat off.


Hieron Dreimalgroßen wrote:
Actually, that kind of looks like me with my hat off.

I thought that was just part of your head.


Ambrosia Slaad wrote:
Bah! In my day, we used to have to rename winsock.dll to get on the Web. We used to log onto local BBSes with text-only interfaces and command lines... and we did it at 2400 baud... both ways, in the snow! You youngsters!

Like!


Treppa wrote:
Studpuffin wrote:
Treppa wrote:
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:
Studpuffin wrote:
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:
Bah! In my day, we used to have to rename winsock.dll to get on the Web. We used to log onto local BBSes with text-only interfaces and command lines... and we did it at 2400 baud... both ways, in the snow! You youngsters!
*perches to listen to Grambrosia Slaad's story*
I'm not that old... my parents just didn't understand all the possible trouble 10-12 yro me could possibly get into online (but thankfully didn't).
Sadly, I remember with delight the upgrade from 300 to 1200 baud. And not as a child. *sigh*
No way, it must've moved at about a letter a minute!
Not in line mode it didn't! 300 wasn't bad, but 1200 flew!!

I remember being the coolest kid in the local scene when I got a USR 9600 HST ahead of the rest of my fellow geeks. They laid down palm fronds at my feet.


Crimson Jester wrote:
CourtFool wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:

Is this acceptable?

3E is better than 4E.

Hero pwnz!!1!!shift+1
+1

:)


Sharoth wrote:

~flings mud at Bitter Thorn~ I can too play nice! ~sticks my tongue out at you~

~GRINS~

Aack! My eyes! The goggles, they do nothing!


bugleyman wrote:
Orthos wrote:


The more I experience the world, the more I'm finding I'd simply rather not know.

I think the "good old days" is less a desire for a never-existent world where these problems didn't exist and rather a desire to go back to where we didn't know about them. And boy do I sympathize. The world has become too small, for lack of a better term; too easy to know or think we know everything that's going on. There's many days where I simply wish to be able to go back to not knowing anything about the world beyond the borders of my hometown except for the occasional snippet about some celebrity, the President, or other tidbit one might catch over the news before changing the channel.

We - or I, at least - didn't know what was happening in the next state much less in a country halfway across the world, and there's more than once that I've thought we were better off that way. There is such a thing as knowing too much.

+1 Insightful

Ignorance is way over rated as the path to happiness.


Bitter Thorn wrote:
Ignorance is way over rated as the path to happiness.

A happy ending and being ignorantly blissful simultaneously isn't necessarily a bad thing. Is it?

Liberty's Edge

Urizen wrote:
Bitter Thorn wrote:
Ignorance is way over rated as the path to happiness.
A happy ending and being ignorantly blissful simultaneously isn't necessarily a bad thing. Is it?

You mean Mr. Magoo?


Studpuffin wrote:
Urizen wrote:
Bitter Thorn wrote:
Ignorance is way over rated as the path to happiness.
A happy ending and being ignorantly blissful simultaneously isn't necessarily a bad thing. Is it?
You mean Mr. Magoo?

That wasn't my first thought, but yeah.


Bitter Thorn wrote:
bugleyman wrote:
Orthos wrote:


The more I experience the world, the more I'm finding I'd simply rather not know.

I think the "good old days" is less a desire for a never-existent world where these problems didn't exist and rather a desire to go back to where we didn't know about them. And boy do I sympathize. The world has become too small, for lack of a better term; too easy to know or think we know everything that's going on. There's many days where I simply wish to be able to go back to not knowing anything about the world beyond the borders of my hometown except for the occasional snippet about some celebrity, the President, or other tidbit one might catch over the news before changing the channel.

We - or I, at least - didn't know what was happening in the next state much less in a country halfway across the world, and there's more than once that I've thought we were better off that way. There is such a thing as knowing too much.

+1 Insightful
Ignorance is way over rated as the path to happiness.

And yet some days I simply don't care.


Urizen wrote:
Bitter Thorn wrote:
Ignorance is way over rated as the path to happiness.
A happy ending and being ignorantly blissful simultaneously isn't necessarily a bad thing. Is it?

I actually think it's a very bad thing. A happy ending is fine. Nobody wants misery. Blissful ignorance? Nope. Being ignorant for reasonable and practical reasons that you can't much help is understandable. We're not all going to be physicists or mathematicians.

But to sit down and say gosh, you wish you just never knew? That's Blue and Orange morality in my book, at best.

The Exchange

Yawn!


Samnell wrote:
Urizen wrote:
Bitter Thorn wrote:
Ignorance is way over rated as the path to happiness.
A happy ending and being ignorantly blissful simultaneously isn't necessarily a bad thing. Is it?

I actually think it's a very bad thing. A happy ending is fine. Nobody wants misery. Blissful ignorance? Nope. Being ignorant for reasonable and practical reasons that you can't much help is understandable. We're not all going to be physicists or mathematicians.

But to sit down and say gosh, you wish you just never knew? That's Blue and Orange morality in my book, at best.

Disagree. Especially in the internet age. There are things that one really is best off not seeing or knowing. That said usually such things only exist to be disgusting and I make it a point not to learn about or view anything whose reason d'etre is to be vile.

Dark Archive

Samnell wrote:
But to sit down and say gosh, you wish you just never knew? That's Blue and Orange morality in my book, at best.

... Yes, yes ... The Beast must be Fed ...


Samnell wrote:
Urizen wrote:
Bitter Thorn wrote:
Ignorance is way over rated as the path to happiness.
A happy ending and being ignorantly blissful simultaneously isn't necessarily a bad thing. Is it?

I actually think it's a very bad thing. A happy ending is fine. Nobody wants misery. Blissful ignorance? Nope. Being ignorant for reasonable and practical reasons that you can't much help is understandable. We're not all going to be physicists or mathematicians.

But to sit down and say gosh, you wish you just never knew? That's Blue and Orange morality in my book, at best.

Samnell, we're probably talking about two different things here. ;0)


Jeremy Mac Donald wrote:
Disagree. Especially in the internet age. There are things that one really is best off not seeing or knowing. That said usually such things only exist to be disgusting and I make it a point not to learn about or view anything whose reason d'etre is to be vile.

I give you an example of a site that fits this paradigm.

Spoiler:
www dot thatsphucked dot com

I refuse to hyperlink it. You're on your own, folks.


It's sort of amusing the two different conversations that are going on here... or, the debate and the... I can't think of a name for it.

In my opinion, it's best to search out knowledge, but for the sake of knowledge, and there are some things that really aren't worth knowing, or at least remembering. Also, if people use knowledge simply to make themselves look superior, that really gets on my nerves.

Dark Archive Bella Sara Charter Superscriber

You know what they say, opinions are like a+$#@%!s.

But mine smells like skittles.


Mr. Fishy disagrees with the horse his ass does not smell of skittles. It smells of laffy taffy and shame.

Dark Archive Bella Sara Charter Superscriber

Mr.Fishy wrote:
Mr. Fishy disagrees with the horse his ass does not smell of skittles. It smells of laffy taffy and shame.

gold clap

Shadow Lodge

Mr.Fishy wrote:
Mr. Fishy disagrees with the horse his ass does not smell of skittles. It smells of laffy taffy and shame.

I stay well clear of the horse's ass so I have no idea what he smells like.


The smelly bastard is on both sides of Mr. Fishy. Mr. Fishy has no choice.


Urizen wrote:


Samnell, we're probably talking about two different things here. ;0)

That's possible.

Urizen wrote:
Jeremy Mac Donald wrote:
Disagree. Especially in the internet age. There are things that one really is best off not seeing or knowing. That said usually such things only exist to be disgusting and I make it a point not to learn about or view anything whose reason d'etre is to be vile.

I give you an example of a site that fits this paradigm.

** spoiler omitted **

I don't see any reasonable objection to the site, and I went and loaded it and everything. I can think of aesthetic objections, but such trifles are not worthy of concern and can't possibly exalt ignorance over knowledge.


Did someone say they had skittles?

51 to 85 of 85 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / I don't know about the rest of you but... All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Off-Topic Discussions