Thread topics that can get you baned


Off-Topic Discussions

101 to 150 of 210 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>

Gene wrote:
!!! BANE'D !!!

That link is full of awesome.

Spoiler:

As for katanas, I believe they should deal 1d10 damage (plus modifiers for strength bonus) and require exotic weapon proficiency. They should provide a +1 bonus to attack due to their masterwork quality and in all other ways be equivalent to a masterwork bastard sword, except in name and shape.

Ninjas should not be allowed to carry katanas and instead should use the ninja-to. The ninja-to should be a 1d6 slashing weapon with the Deceptive Draw ability and otherwise have the same mechanics as a shortsword and should not have an inherent masterwork quality in its craftsmanship. The ninja-to should use a full-length scabbard and require the exotic weapons proficiency feat for non-ninjas, but be included on the ninja's list of proficient weapons. The ninja-to scabbard's extra length may be used to store shurikens, smoke pellets, a dagger, or other miscellaneous supplies that can fit in the space.

Deceptive Draw: A weapon with this ability can be used to deny a target its Dexterity bonus to AC if an attack is made with it in the same round it is drawn from its matching scabbard while the attacker is within melee range of the target and so long as the enemy has not seen the attacking character in combat with the weapon before. (The full-length scabbard deceives the victim into thinking the sword takes longer to draw than it does.) This denial of the DEX bonus to AC is enough to allow a ninja character to gain Sudden Strike against the victim for the duration of the round in which the weapon was drawn in melee. Note that this benefit does not function if the weapon is drawn as part of another move action unless that action is from one threatening square to another for the same target. For this reason, the Quick Draw feat is recommended for characters who wish to make use of the weapon's Deceptive Draw capability.

(The Deceptive Strike property would also allow for Sneak Attacks rather than Sudden Strikes, but the conditions for a Sudden Strike are harder to meet than those for a Sneak Attack.)

Heh. But that's just my take on it. (I have no idea if ninjato is posted somewhere, that's just what I made-up based on the Wikipedia entry for the weapon.)


It is clear no one has posted the real topics that get you banned.
Come on, do it, I double dare you.


Gene wrote:
!!! BANE'D !!!

That link is full of awesome.

Spoiler:

As for katanas, I believe they should deal 1d10 damage (plus modifiers for strength bonus) and require exotic weapon proficiency. They should provide a +1 bonus to attack due to their masterwork quality and in all other ways be equivalent to a masterwork bastard sword, except in name and shape.

Ninjas should not be allowed to carry katanas and instead should use the ninja-to. The ninja-to should be a 1d6 slashing weapon with the Deceptive Draw ability and otherwise have the same mechanics as a shortsword and should not have an inherent masterwork quality in its craftsmanship. The ninja-to should use a full-length scabbard and require the exotic weapons proficiency feat for non-ninjas, but be included on the ninja's list of proficient weapons. The ninja-to scabbard's extra length may be used to store shurikens, smoke pellets, a dagger, or other miscellaneous supplies that can fit in the space.

Deceptive Draw: A weapon with this ability can be used to deny a target its Dexterity bonus to AC if an attack is made with it in the same round it is drawn from its matching scabbard while the attacker is within melee range of the target and so long as the enemy has not seen the attacking character in combat with the weapon before. (The full-length scabbard deceives the victim into thinking the sword takes longer to draw than it does.) This denial of the DEX bonus to AC is enough to allow a ninja character to gain Sudden Strike against the victim for the duration of the round in which the weapon was drawn in melee. Note that this benefit does not function if the weapon is drawn as part of another move action unless that action is from one threatening square to another for the same target. For this reason, the Quick Draw feat is recommended for characters who wish to make use of the weapon's Deceptive Draw capability.

(The Deceptive Draw property would also allow for Sneak Attacks rather than Sudden Strikes, but the conditions for a Sudden Strike are harder to meet than those for a Sneak Attack.)

Heh. But that's just my take on it. (I have no idea if ninjato is posted somewhere, that's just what I made-up based on the Wikipedia entry for the weapon.)


DoveArrow wrote:
Kobold Cleaver you have been 'baned.'...
Kobold Cleaver wrote:

DoveArrow, you have been 'dubed as annoying'

;) ...

Now now, you two. Behave yourself Kobold Cleaver, you rougish scamp. Can't you see she's blushing (or maybe that's a little too much rogue on her cheeks)?


Kobold Cleaveer, you have been 'duded' as ornery.

Reason: For failing to fail your failure of... you smell!

Date when dude will be released: When you've thought long and hard about what you've done.


DoveArrow wrote:
Kobold Cleaveer, you have been 'duded' as ornery.

{sips White Russian} Congrats KC! I didn't know they Dude-d dudes... must be like a knighthood or something.

DoveArrow wrote:
Date when dude will be released: When you've thought long and hard about what you've done.

Hey man, don't put me in the pokey -- I didn't do anything wrong. I'm only here 'cause these nihlist poodles broke in and peed on my rug.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Kobold Cleaver wrote:

DoveArrow, you have been 'dubed as annoying'.

There is another 'b' in dubed, Kobald Cleever.

;-)


Pathfinder Companion Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

I wonder if this would get me banned...

*strips naked and runs in circles around the thread*

Weeee...!!!

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Hugo Solis wrote:

I wonder if this would get me banned...

*strips naked and runs in circles around the thread*

Weeee...!!!

Flagged and baned.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2009 Top 8

Callous Jack wrote:
Hugo Solis wrote:

I wonder if this would get me banned...

*strips naked and runs in circles around the thread*

Weeee...!!!

Flagged and baned.

You mean 'flaged and baned'.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Tarren Dei wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Hugo Solis wrote:

I wonder if this would get me banned...

*strips naked and runs in circles around the thread*

Weeee...!!!

Flagged and baned.
You mean 'flaged and baned'.

Curses! One-uped by TD!


Pathfinder Companion Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

Hey, watch that flag, that ain't no flag hole!


Hugo Solis wrote:

Hey, watch that flag, that ain't no flag hole!

~Flags the Frog~ Take that you vile fiend!


Pathfinder Companion Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
Sharoth wrote:
Hugo Solis wrote:

Hey, watch that flag, that ain't no flag hole!

~Flags the Frog~ Take that you vile fiend!

I better not wind the flames anymore...


Hugo Solis wrote:
Sharoth wrote:
Hugo Solis wrote:

Hey, watch that flag, that ain't no flag hole!

~Flags the Frog~ Take that you vile fiend!
I better not wind the flames anymore...

~drags the Frog off to the Chatroom to abuse him in public~

Sovereign Court Contributor

How about this for getting one bane'd: making fun of people's choice of avatar.

"Your avatar is stupider than you because..."
"Five retardo-f&#%k avatars that are way cooler than yours..."

etc.


Tarren Dei wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Hugo Solis wrote:

I wonder if this would get me banned...

*strips naked and runs in circles around the thread*

Weeee...!!!

Flagged and baned.
You mean 'flaged and baned'.

No, I think he meant flogged and baned.

RPG Superstar 2012

1 person marked this as a favorite.
GAAAHHHH wrote:
Tarren Dei wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Hugo Solis wrote:

I wonder if this would get me banned...

*strips naked and runs in circles around the thread*

Weeee...!!!

Flagged and baned.
You mean 'flaged and baned'.
No, I think he meant floged and baned.

Fixed it for you. :)

Silver Crusade

"Which Paizo employees have you slept with?" doesn't seem to be working. I may have to try "The bigoted joke thread" or "Why women shouldn't be dungeon masters."


Celestial Healer wrote:
"Why women shouldn't be dungeon masters."

Yeah. As someone who frequented the Astrid's Parlor messageboard, I think I'd have to flame the heck out of you for that one. ;)


Hugo Solis wrote:

*strips naked and runs in circles around the thread*

Weeee...!!!

Humps Hugo Solis' naked leg.


DoveArrow wrote:
Celestial Healer wrote:
"Why women shouldn't be dungeon masters."
Yeah. As someone who frequented the Astrid's Parlor messageboard, I think I'd have to flame the heck out of you for that one. ;)

Yeah, well, chicks is dumb.


Topic: Why Pathfinder RPG is full of Fail (examples provided)
Topic: Why Did Paizo Quality Tank? (exposition on money grubbing upper management)
Topic: The Truth Behind the Silencing of Vomit Guy (Paizo facism rears its ugly head)
Topic: Lisa Stevens, Unable to Play Nice (communist sympathizer and CEO)
Topic: Species Discrimination: Why Paizo Hates Camelids


Pathfinder Companion Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
CourtFool wrote:
Hugo Solis wrote:

*strips naked and runs in circles around the thread*

Weeee...!!!

Humps Hugo Solis' naked leg.

Should had seen that one coming...


CourtFool wrote:
Humps Hugo Solis' naked leg.
Hugo Solis wrote:
Should had seen that one coming...

Could be worse... as a frog, you still have three legs ready with no waiting

{blows dog whistle to summon more Poodles}

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
CourtFool wrote:
Topic: Lisa Stevens, Unable to Play Nice (communist sympathizer and CEO)

I knew it!


Callous Jack wrote:
CourtFool wrote:
Topic: Lisa Stevens, Unable to Play Nice (communist sympathizer and CEO)
I knew it!

I have a list!


Thread topics:

Spoiler:
"Why the Republicans will ultimately fail"
"Republican hypocrisy"
"Why Democrats are a bunch of wimpy tree-hugging hippies"
"Democratic corruption"
"I hate George Bush"
"I hate Nelson Mandela"
"I hate _____ (insert name here)"
"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA (the useless trying to break the forums with holding down a key in your post thread)"
"Wizards of the Coast sucks"
"The swearing thread"
"Gays are abominations"
"Politics are immoral"
"Let's blow up DC!"
"How to make your own bomb"
"Easy ways to commit homicide"
"How to kill yourself"
"The orgy thread"
"_______ (insert game here) sucks"
"Anyone who doesn't speak American needs to go to another site"
"Should Paizo get ads?"

See ya after my temp ban.


PRPG's Rejection of Gygaxian Naturalism


3.75: The Money Grab


Why Gamists Are Destroying the Hobby

Dramatists: Community Theatre Dropouts or Bunch of B!tchy Little Girls?

Simulationists: The Great 'Realism' Debate


Why [insert martial art OP took at the Y] is better than [randomly select some other martial art]

Any thread concerning the damage of a particular fire arm.


Mr. Controversy wrote:

Thread topics:** spoiler omitted **

See ya after my temp ban.

Wow, I killed that dead.

Liberty's Edge

Haven't been baned yet, though. The thread got killed though, gratefully.

Silver Crusade

Mr. Controversy wrote:
Mr. Controversy wrote:

Thread topics:** spoiler omitted **

See ya after my temp ban.
Wow, I killed that dead.

I have to admit, I wouldn't have thought that that would create such a huge mess of the messageboards (and I know you didn't either).

Edit: That was an awfully quick thread-locking, though.

Liberty's Edge

I succeeded in getting a thread baned, but it's not really that cool. I keep worrying that I'll be perm baned.

Liberty's Edge

Celestial Healer wrote:
Mr. Controversy wrote:
Mr. Controversy wrote:

Thread topics:** spoiler omitted **

See ya after my temp ban.
Wow, I killed that dead.

I have to admit, I wouldn't have thought that that would create such a huge mess of the messageboards (and I know you didn't either).

Edit: That was an awfully quick thread-locking, though.

It was nowhere near fast enough. Like 5 minutes at least. I wonder how Teter mods at night.

Edit: Not that I'm advocating any nighttime attempts to screw up the boards.

The Exchange

Gark the Goblin wrote:
I succeeded in getting a thread baned, but it's not really that cool. I keep worrying that I'll be perm baned.

I doubt it. That was annoying, but not ban-worthy unless you did it multiple times on purpose.

and sorry I got mouthy about it, but I was having a bit of a time figuring out hw to post anytohing.)

Scarab Sages

Hugo Solis wrote:
Humps Hugo Solis' naked leg.
Should had seen that one coming...

If you look down, you should be able to...

Silver Crusade

Gark the Goblin wrote:
Celestial Healer wrote:
Mr. Controversy wrote:
Mr. Controversy wrote:

Thread topics:** spoiler omitted **

See ya after my temp ban.
Wow, I killed that dead.

I have to admit, I wouldn't have thought that that would create such a huge mess of the messageboards (and I know you didn't either).

Edit: That was an awfully quick thread-locking, though.

It was nowhere near fast enough. Like 5 minutes at least. I wonder how Teter mods at night.

Edit: Not that I'm advocating any nighttime attempts to screw up the boards.

There. I just bumped a whole load of Off-topic threads so that yours isn't in the fold anymore, and it shouldn't throw off anyone's screens unless they actually open the full list of OTD threads.

Liberty's Edge

Celestial Healer wrote:
Gark the Goblin wrote:
Celestial Healer wrote:
Mr. Controversy wrote:
Mr. Controversy wrote:

Thread topics:** spoiler omitted **

See ya after my temp ban.
Wow, I killed that dead.

I have to admit, I wouldn't have thought that that would create such a huge mess of the messageboards (and I know you didn't either).

Edit: That was an awfully quick thread-locking, though.

It was nowhere near fast enough. Like 5 minutes at least. I wonder how Teter mods at night.

Edit: Not that I'm advocating any nighttime attempts to screw up the boards.
There. I just bumped a whole load of Off-topic threads so that yours isn't in the fold anymore, and it shouldn't throw off anyone's screens unless they actually open the full list of OTD threads.

Yeah, Teter cut the title down to 4 "A"s. Thanks for the effort though.

Silver Crusade

Gark the Goblin wrote:
Celestial Healer wrote:
Gark the Goblin wrote:
Celestial Healer wrote:
Mr. Controversy wrote:
Mr. Controversy wrote:

Thread topics:** spoiler omitted **

See ya after my temp ban.
Wow, I killed that dead.

I have to admit, I wouldn't have thought that that would create such a huge mess of the messageboards (and I know you didn't either).

Edit: That was an awfully quick thread-locking, though.

It was nowhere near fast enough. Like 5 minutes at least. I wonder how Teter mods at night.

Edit: Not that I'm advocating any nighttime attempts to screw up the boards.
There. I just bumped a whole load of Off-topic threads so that yours isn't in the fold anymore, and it shouldn't throw off anyone's screens unless they actually open the full list of OTD threads.
Yeah, Teter cut the title down to 4 "A"s. Thanks for the effort though.

On the recent posts column to the left he did, but not on the full list... you still had to scroll way to the right to find the most recent post on the various threads.

Liberty's Edge

Ah. I'm not going to quote anymore, because I'm too lazy to delete the other stuff before posting.


Hi all.

Spoiler:

Topic: Why all you role-playing gamers are going to (insert your H*ll).

Topic: Why you shouldn't try a human autopsy on some one who is still alive...

Topic: How to destroy the world in 3 days.


Topic: How to Kill mercilessly and Enjoy it!

Liberty's Edge

Anyone seen Mairkurion lately? Maybe he got temp baned.


This thread is getting a little scary.


Sexual applications for a d4.


Xabulba wrote:
Sexual applications for a d4.

As I was saying.

Shadow Lodge

Hello, and welcome to the Church Thread of St. Elmo, patron saint of all ridiculous.

Spoiler:
This post has been brought to you today by the number 9 and the letter A.

101 to 150 of 210 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / Thread topics that can get you baned All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.