Is this place going to flaming hell?


Website Feedback

101 to 135 of 135 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Dark Archive

If you get on the 'warned' list, a popup should occur when you submit a post of the blue 'Paizo Golem' with a warning that 'I'm watching you! Play nice, or I crush your post!'

See, up there in the left-hand corner? Doesn't it look like he's crushing a post even now?

Sovereign Court

It would be better if he were crushing a dwarf.

Liberty's Edge

Pathfinder Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

Can we vote on who the golem should be crushing?

Maybe it should be the avatar image of the person posting?

EDIT: This would actually be a bad idea, IMHO. Can you imagine people acting up just to see the golem working?

Scarab Sages

Set wrote:

If you get on the 'warned' list, a popup should occur when you submit a post of the blue 'Paizo Golem' with a warning that 'I'm watching you! Play nice, or I crush your post!'

See, up there in the left-hand corner? Doesn't it look like he's crushing a post even now?

I've always thought it looked like he was charging a Kamehameha attack. New spin-off OTD thread!


Joshua J. Frost wrote:
This entire thread causes me serious consternation.

Wow.

As I started this whole thread, I´m somewhat overwhelmed about the direction it has taken. It seems that I hit a nerve. Much has been said about the possible reasons for the late unpleasantness (now where do I have that term from again...?) plagueing these boards. Perhaps an overeagerness to make ones voice heard led to the current situation, but whatever the reason, the effect is felt sharply, and not only by me, it seems.

To point it out, I applaud paizos open playtest and the results it yields. It is the chance that never has been given to the gamer community to take part in forming the new game.

If you call 'em all, there are of course a few rotten apples in the mix. For me, these spoil much. I did reduce my participation in part due to time constraints, but in part due to the tone that seemed to increase here. I don´t think that my contributions have been meaningful at all, but if many others think and act the same, something is going to be lost.

This thread indicates that this may be true. What´s more, it is a place I found myself at home, and others seem to feel the same. It is of course paizos decision, and paizos alone what do do - if anything - about it, but I hope that the decisions go in the direction of keeping these boards nice. If my opinion sounded like I wanted to push paizo in a certain direction, I did not make myself understood like I wanted to.

I don´t buy the argument "hey, this is the internet, get over it". This amounts to "hey, I insist on being a rude (insert colorful expletive here), and I don´t care the hell if someone is offended by it. So, move on if you can´t stand it, and let me own this place." That is what this argument is about IMO - a cheap excuse for rude behaviour. Rude behaviour is something I find unneccessary and childish, and while I´m no angel myself in this regard, I try to constrain myself and expect as much from others.

Stefan

Scarab Sages

Charles Evans 25 wrote:

Although I can see I'm probably disastrously naive in thinking that humour/comic-opera 'punishments'* could solve problems.

*Mikado, 'A more humane Mikado, never did in Japan exist....'

"He is the very model of a PostMonster General,

For posters who are animal, vegetable and mineral.
He travels o'er the boards, plucking flames that they generate,
And hands them off to trolls, so they painfully incinerate!
"

(...and if they do incinerate, I guess that would be truly great...)

(tune by Gilbert and Sullivan)


Snorter wrote:
Charles Evans 25 wrote:

Although I can see I'm probably disastrously naive in thinking that humour/comic-opera 'punishments'* could solve problems.

*Mikado, 'A more humane Mikado, never did in Japan exist....'

"He is the very model of a PostMonster General,

For posters who are animal, vegetable and mineral.
He travels o'er the boards, plucking flames that they generate,
And hands them off to trolls, so they painfully incinerate!
"

(...and if they do incinerate, I guess that would be truly great...)

(tune by Gilbert and Sullivan)

:D


The solution: add an Ignore Poster function.

Seriously. I stopped posting months ago because I was being cyber-stalked from one thread to another by a number of posters.

Heck, I don't even lurk in a thread when I see those specific posters enter a thread because I know the discourse is about to get ugly.

I've been on cheesy little personal forums who do it, so I know it is technically possible. I also know that once you can exclude those guys from your personal view, the overall discourse improves because you can't be baited anymore.

Best of luck to you guys.

Scarab Sages

K wrote:

The solution: add an Ignore Poster function.

Seriously. I stopped posting months ago because I was being cyber-stalked from one thread to another by a number of posters.

Heck, I don't even lurk in a thread when I see those specific posters enter a thread because I know the discourse is about to get ugly.

I've been on cheesy little personal forums who do it, so I know it is technically possible. I also know that once you can exclude those guys from your personal view, the overall discourse improves because you can't be baited anymore.

Best of luck to you guys.

But we could all just be mature and use our own internal "Ignore Poster" button. And when I say all of us, I do mean all of us. Some of us do it already, some don't.

By the way, welcome back K. I hope you stick around this time.


Stebehil wrote:

Is this place going to flaming hell?

Perhaps. Too many lonely boy spending all their life at Paizos homepage and grinding all 'opposition' down.


This thread has taken an upturn, thanks to Gilbert and Sullivan.

So many possibilities.
"Make the punishment fit the crime..."
"He is a Pai-zo-an!"


It always amazes me the musical knowledge displayed by Paizonians. :)


K wrote:

The solution: add an Ignore Poster function.

Well, the problem are multiple. It's not only a matter of the people who are "overly aggressive to get their points across". I can take that, but it's also the problem of people not respecting others an a broader plane.

- he, we don't agree with you and we spend half our life on this thred so your opinions are wrong, wrong, wrong.

Our DM has allready left and I have allready left at least 4 threads.
I admite I'm not a saint, but things are realy getting bad.

I really recognise: I can't even go into the Beta threads because I feel my voice isn't heard"

A sane thread starts. Let's say the [Design Focus] Paladin Upgrade. People contribute, People who do not always share the same opinions, but it's OK. People with different viewpoint get along.
You come back after 3 days and now the thread has over 300 posts and it's the same peolpe saying the same thing over end over again. And once in a while they use the thread to praise each other.
And if anyone not with a high cool factor is posting he/she is grinded down quick and effectivlly OR ignored.

What's also tiering are all the plain stupid arguments. Yes, I'm not suppose to call arguments studpid. But stuff like:
Fighters suck cause the can't cast meteor swarm.
Or Tanks suck cause the can't fight flying, invisible foes.
Or Paladins suck, because my Paladin with an 11 strength score don't do well in my playtest.
Perhaps fighters suck or perhaps they don't. But saying they suck because the don't cast meteor swarm is just plain stupid.
And perhaps Paladins suck, but a Paladin with a 11 strength score suck.
And playing a half ork Paladin is going to be hard, isn't it? Can you blame the Paladin Class if you pick att half ork especially if he has a low str and char score, right? I'm new at this, and I have already capitulated.
Too many people taking the f out of fun.
Even people like Krome seem gentle. OK he is a bit blunt sometimes, but not agressive and he's usually to the point. He almost always answer a reply and he can change his opinion.
I really like people who anser a reply, not just ignoring the reply or try to make people seem stupid or small.

And tiring are also the flock that again and again make their agenda noticed in every thread. They want their favorite class or race or feats to get better so the pick every thread to be their playground. And in the process crippeling other classes or races.

I even seen stuff like: Your English suck, so f*ck of.
Nice?

Sovereign Court

TomJohn, it seems to me that most of that stuff is completely unmoderateable and also, in any case, inevitable (and some of it, I would argue, isn't even bad). The Mods might be able to make people play nice to some extent (including by excluding those that don't) but people pushing their interests is human nature (and, in any case, what one sees as a flaw can have tendrils in all sorts of places). Last of all, people are just having discussions, but with tens or hundreds of others involved they're going to meander and return to places visited before. Indeed, that's not necessarily a bad thing given that it can draw more people in, unless you want everyone to have to read every thread...


TomJohn, you make some very good points, and many that I agree with, whether anything can be directly addressed or not.


Bagpuss wrote:

TomJohn, it seems to me that most of that stuff is completely unmoderateable and also, in any case, inevitable (and some of it, I would argue, isn't even bad). The Mods might be able to make people play nice to some extent (including by excluding those that don't) but people pushing their interests is human nature (and, in any case, what one sees as a flaw can have tendrils in all sorts of places). Last of all, people are just having discussions, but with tens or hundreds of others involved they're going to meander and return to places visited before. Indeed, that's not necessarily a bad thing given that it can draw more people in, unless you want everyone to have to read every thread...

Perhaps your right perhaps your not. Anyway, "human nature" isn't always OK. And repeating the same stuff again and again isn't OK.

"The mandatory(?) addition to any Beta thread posting:
Please consider that this thread is simply about posting one's opinion on beta rules.
Repeating one's point over and over again and/ or trying to proselytise others
a) doesn't make one's point any more or less true,
b) is likely to decrease attractiveness of this thread to many board readers who would otherwise like to contribute and could enrich the thread by adding new point of views and innovative proposals,
c) is unlikely to impress those who watch over the rules (i.e. Paizo ;-))"


d) might be coercing others to do the same thing because they would feel that their opinion might be drowned otherwise.

Honestly I've a hard time not to bump threads and repeating some complaints and thoughts whenever it is convenient. Especially when it comes to some of the obscurities and issues me and others see with cleric domains. ... Wait, damn! I've done it right now *slaps his fingers*

Also I really really detest the polemic, dismissive and uppish posting habits of a few posters on these boards. Especially one person really knows how to push peoples buttons ...


Tholas wrote:

d) might be coercing others to do the same thing because they would feel that their opinion might be drowned otherwise.

Yes, oh so true.

:-)
Tholas wrote:


Also I really really detest the polemic, dismissive and uppish posting habits of a few posters on these boards. Especially one person really knows how to push peoples buttons ...

I know the feeling

:-)

Sovereign Court

No, it's going to the hell where you have five minutes to get to your office but you're stuck eternally in stop and go traffic, with no radio or AC in 90% weather.

Liberty's Edge

Josh / Stebehil / most other people on this thread seem to share my opinion.

When I joined Paizo (late '06, I believe), there were maybe a hundred regular posters on the boards. Things were civil, there were very few clashes about rules, and everything was bright and shiny.

As people have joined, with all the great new people have come a proportionate number of righteous a+#+$~*s- still the same percentage, but by virtue of the number of people, more jerks. Whether overt trolls (.Chatdemon Rich) or just highly intelligent, extremely opinionated jerks (our friend Sammy-boy), they are still a major nuisance to the rest of us.

And the worst part is that there is no way to get rid of them short of turning the Paizo messageboards into an exclusive club. I wish someone could just sit down with these people in realspace, and talk to them about why they need to stop making everyone else miserable. *sigh*...

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2009 Top 8

Tholas wrote:
Also I really really detest the polemic, dismissive and uppish posting habits of a few posters on these boards. Especially one person really knows how to push peoples buttons ...

Awww, Sebastian's not that bad.

Sovereign Court

Tarren Dei wrote:
Tholas wrote:
Also I really really detest the polemic, dismissive and uppish posting habits of a few posters on these boards. Especially one person really knows how to push peoples buttons ...
Awww, Sebastian's not that bad.

Hehe. :)

Scarab Sages

Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
This thread has taken an upturn, thanks to Gilbert and Sullivan.

<takes a bow>

Liberty's Edge

The Eldritch Mr. Shiny wrote:
As people have joined, with all the great new people have come a proportionate number of righteous a&#%@@#s- still the same percentage, but by virtue of the number of people, more jerks. Whether overt trolls (.Chatdemon Rich) or just highly intelligent, extremely opinionated jerks (our friend Sammy-boy), they are still a major nuisance to the rest of us.

And here I thought I was flying under the radar... ;)

Sam


Tholas wrote:


Honestly I've a hard time not to bump threads and repeating some complaints and thoughts whenever it is convenient.

Remeber, it's not quantity, but quality that counts. If you need 50 posts in each thread to get your message across, you don't really have a stong case. You're just hitting your head against a brick wall (or some other poor persons head) using variations on the same theme. If Jason Bulmahn can't see through these people he is stupid.

- I don't think Jason Bulmahn is stupid.
And if you need 400 post all over Paizo repeating the same stuff over and over again, disguising your agenda by changing topic, your not enthusiastic, you got a serious sick need for attention, attention and victory.
Yes the locust swarm is leaving nothing but a wasted land, and their victory.

Keep your head cool.
Their tactic might change, sometimes it's vague ansers/posts, sometimes it's trivializing people, sometimes it's Us and Them , but it's the same urge for attention and victory.
Remember, quality not quantity counts.
vague argumensts = vaguet theory.
Don't let them get to you, don't let them grind you down.

Liberty's Edge

Samuel Leming wrote:
The Eldritch Mr. Shiny wrote:
As people have joined, with all the great new people have come a proportionate number of righteous a&#%@@#s- still the same percentage, but by virtue of the number of people, more jerks. Whether overt trolls (.Chatdemon Rich) or just highly intelligent, extremely opinionated jerks (our friend Sammy-boy), they are still a major nuisance to the rest of us.

And here I thought I was flying under the radar... ;)

Sam

Wrong Sam, man, sorry. I was referring to:

Spoiler:
Samuel Weiss

Liberty's Edge

The Eldritch Mr. Shiny wrote:

Wrong Sam, man, sorry. I was referring to:

** spoiler omitted **

I've never seen that guy act up, but then there are many forums here I don't visit often.

I figured you were probably talking about the guy that's on a crusade to fool everyone into thinking he's actually smart. He may be named Sam for all I know.

Sam


K, I could not agree more. It did not happen here, but on another forum, during the entire 4e/3.5 war. A thread was posted by an avid 3.5 supporter asking folks oppinions on 4e game experiences and comparisons. A few posters stated that they would not be going 4e because they had vast libraries of 3.5 and the conversion to 4e it not at all smooth. Three other posters started laying into them big time. 4e was more like a religion to them, they could not understand why someone would not convert. Mind you, htis was three months prior to the actual 4e release. It was violent. Anyway, long story -- short, I got involved and ever since that time; this one guy stalks me there. I cannot make a post without him popping up to attempt to argue. It doesnt matter what the subject is. Needless to say, I dont post there anymore. Few folks do anymore. The forum is slowly dying, left in the hands of the flamers. Sad really.


TomJohn wrote:


Remeber, it's not quantity, but quality that counts. If you need 50 posts in each thread to get your message across, you don't really have a stong case. You're just hitting your head against a brick wall (or some other poor persons head) using variations on the same theme. If Jason Bulmahn can't see through these people he is stupid.
- I don't think Jason Bulmahn is stupid.

Of course not, but he is just one person with a ton-of-work in front of him. Probably he can't take more than a glancing look at any thread, especially those that don't have a lot of replies or smell of something he'd already decided.

TomJohn wrote:


Yes the locust swarm is leaving nothing but a wasted land, and their victory.

I bet there are quite a few people that are only in for the "I mentioned it first and Jason picked it up, so it's my rule!" bragging 'rights'.

TomJohn wrote:


Don't let them get to you, don't let them grind you down.

It's probably too late for that. But that's ok, because this is no MMO where Uberguilds have leeway to talk/threaten the company into 'fixes'. The Paizo staff in general and Jason in particular are way to experienced to to take any of the more outlandish suggestions seriously and I just have some minor concerns that I'm pretty sure will be addressed anyway.

Honestly I never GM'ed 3.5 nor played a character beyond level 12. Before the Pathfinder RPG announcement my GM asked me not to visit the Paizo boards because it doesn't hold much interest for players and even the topics might contain major AoW campaign spoilers. So basically I'm just a normal player with an interest in the rules, especially the ones that affect the conversion of the cleric that I am currently playing in our AoW campaign. I try my best not to let my personal preferences color my postings, discuss only things I know something about and stay out of discussions that revolve more around ego feeding than the rules. I know I'm not doing well on the last part and I'm not sure on the first and second.

Tarren Dei wrote:
Tholas wrote:
Also I really really detest the polemic, dismissive and uppish posting habits of a few posters on these boards. Especially one person really knows how to push peoples buttons ...
Awww, Sebastian's not that bad.

I think Sebastian is funny and doesn't take himself too seriously, so personally I've no problem with his style of posts. Of course I've never seen the pre-Bella Sara Sebastian in action...


Tholas wrote:


Honestly I never GM'ed 3.5 nor played a character beyond level 12. (...) So basically I'm just a normal player with an interest in the rules (...)

Funny, I find the game is at it's best between level 6 and 13. I find all this:

"Well at level 20 this class suck; well armor suck if you are a melee caharcter with a dex score of 32; well at level 17 wizards can cast XXX", really boring.

How many of these people have actually played a character from level 1 to level 20 using the Beta-rules?

You put it nice:

Tholas wrote:


It gives me the creeps when I see discussions that look suspiciously like a good cop bad cop play where people use constructed scenarios to justify their rattling at the very foundations of the game.

I have read some of your posts. It's nice to read intelligent posts.

Tholas wrote:


Of course not, but he [Jason] is just one person with a ton-of-work in front of him. Probably he can't take more than a glancing look at any thread, especially those that don't have a lot of replies or smell of something he'd already decided.

Sad but probably true.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2009 Top 8

Tholas wrote:
I think Sebastian is funny and doesn't take himself too seriously, so personally I've no problem with his style of posts. Of course I've never seen the pre-Bella Sara Sebastian in action...

I was joking and Sebastian would know it if he bothered to look in here. ;-) I feel honoured to be on Sebastian's favoured enemies list and even petitioned to have my rank increased.

More seriously, do we really need to have a thread where we name names and make a list of obnoxious posters? We know who they are if we have seen them in action.


CourtFool wrote:
Joshua J. Frost wrote:

As I have a brain and make full use of it, I'm aware of the difference between humor and not humor.

Your response above? Not humorous.

I apologize.

Hey Master... We miss you... :(

Sovereign Court

Tarren Dei wrote:
More seriously, do we really need to have a thread where we name names and make a list of obnoxious posters? We know who they are if we have seen them in action.

*shifty look*

Scarab Sages

Callous Jack wrote:
Tarren Dei wrote:
More seriously, do we really need to have a thread where we name names and make a list of obnoxious posters? We know who they are if we have seen them in action.
*shifty look*

That Callous Jack fellow sure is a trouble-maker.


This is an interesting topic, took long enough to reach the end though...I'm not going to be melodramatic, but I am leaving these boards. I don't expect to be missed either.

First it was 4E, then it was the same 3 or 4 ignorant fools that can't keep their contempt for a dissenting opinion in check. I would have thought it would be obvious when the same poster gets multiple threads modded or locked. I won't name names, because this entire thread is about the same (again) three or 4 people.

To answer the OP, yes, it IS going to flaming hell. The mods are afraid (yes afraid) that heavier handed moderation will chase some of their precious fanbase away. I don't disagree, it is what it is.

I'm no angel, and have toed the line a time or two myself, but I'm tired of it. I'm abandoning this place. Good luck paizo, and I hope crusader of logic is consumed, slowly, by rabid fire ants.


Donny_the_DM wrote:
To answer the OP, yes, it IS going to flaming hell. The mods are afraid (yes afraid) that heavier handed moderation will chase some of their precious fanbase away. I don't disagree, it is what it is.

For everyone else: deciding you're done with the boards and then creating sock puppet account after sock puppet account to explode at one poster with whom you disagree is a quick way to receive the ban hammer. The quoted poster above chose to do so and we, the frightened moderators, banned him.

This behavior is unacceptable and unwelcome on our boards. Regardless of how you feel about a poster, flag the posts you feel violate our TOS and let us handle it.

The flagging system, by the way, is the single most awesome thing Gary has ever created as it gives us a quick snapshot of how the boards are doing. Use it, love it, keep the boards civil.


I have thrown him into the Rancor pit, sir!

The Exchange

Tholas wrote:
I think Sebastian is funny and doesn't take himself too seriously, so personally I've no problem with his style of posts. Of course I've never seen the pre-Bella Sara Sebastian in action...

He was pretty much the same but with a more authoritative avatar and some self-respect.....

;P


You guys do what ya have to. And ya the flag system was a great ideal.


Flag system, "BOOYAH!"

Thanks Gary!

Liberty's Edge

Kruelaid wrote:

Flag system, "BOOYAH!"

Thanks Gary!

I want to echo this. BOOYAH!

Dark Archive

Captain Kid Rime wrote:
I have thrown him into the Rancor pit, sir!

We have a rancor pit? Why was I not informed?

The Exchange

Kevin Mack wrote:
Captain Kid Rime wrote:
I have thrown him into the Rancor pit, sir!
We have a rancor pit? Why was I not informed?

Damn guys, now he knows about it so we'll never get him into the pit....

Sovereign Court

Aberzombie wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Tarren Dei wrote:
More seriously, do we really need to have a thread where we name names and make a list of obnoxious posters? We know who they are if we have seen them in action.
*shifty look*
That Callous Jack fellow sure is a trouble-maker.

Me? Why I was standing here, doin' nuthin...

*runs away*

Dark Archive

Fake Healer wrote:
Kevin Mack wrote:
Captain Kid Rime wrote:
I have thrown him into the Rancor pit, sir!
We have a rancor pit? Why was I not informed?
Damn guys, now he knows about it so we'll never get him into the pit....

Are you kidding I would probably eat the rancor

101 to 135 of 135 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Paizo / Website Feedback / Is this place going to flaming hell? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.