How I feel about the Pathfinder RPG

[Brian Kovich]

Uriel393 wrote:

My gaming looks something like this...

30% HARP
20% Pathfinder
40% Boardgames/ Non-CCG card games - Arkham Horror, Dungeon Twister,Tannhäuser, Runebound,Citadels, Dust etc...
10% Miniatures Games - Confrontation, Hordes
-Uriel

My gaming looks like this...

50% HARP
50% GUINNESS

And whatever game we happen to be playing at the time.

Brian

[Aarontendo]

Ixancoatl wrote:

Are you assuming any of them are actually having sex?

Eh I have a huge nerdy gaming collection and I get it plenty. Of course being in Asia a white man can't really but help that! ;p

If they're not, hopefully their characters are. Not with each other though that gets creepy.

[Uriel393]

Brian Kovich wrote:

Uriel393 wrote:

My gaming looks something like this...

30% HARP
20% Pathfinder
40% Boardgames/ Non-CCG card games - Arkham Horror, Dungeon Twister,Tannhäuser, Runebound,Citadels, Dust etc...
10% Miniatures Games - Confrontation, Hordes
-Uriel

My gaming looks like this...

50% HARP
50% GUINNESS

And whatever game we happen to be playing at the time.

Brian

Thank You, Thank ou! He'll be here all week folks...passed out in the corner, no doubt. Mmm...Guiness.

-Uriel

[Uriel393]

Aarontendo wrote:

Ixancoatl wrote:

Are you assuming any of them are actually having sex?

Eh I have a huge nerdy gaming collection and I get it plenty. Of course being in Asia a white man can't really but help that! ;p

If they're not, hopefully their characters are. Not with each other though that gets creepy.

Yeah, some of us do just fine, thanks...Sheesh.

-Uriel

[Uriel393]

Sunderstone wrote:

Brent Stroh wrote:

Is it possible to discuss Pathfinder on it's own merits without making it a popularity contest? Or even worse, trying to start crap between two different messageboards?

Is it possible to talk about Pathfinder on the Pathfinder board, or do we have to continually bring 4E into it?

^this.

Im not sure what the op wanted to accomplish here either.

Hey! I just looked at the ENWorld post, read the Beta changes listed, and saw my suggestion for the Sorcerer Abyssal (From Intimidation, which they already had...to Know:The Planes). Woohoo! See, and who says Paizo doesn't listen to their players. Well, nobody...but still.

-Uriel

[Mark Rennick]

Brent Stroh wrote:

Joela, does every thread you start have to reflect some sort of ongoing drama between Pathfinder and 4E?

Is it possible to discuss Pathfinder on it's own merits without making it a popularity contest? Or even worse, trying to start crap between two different messageboards?

I don't understand how many people miss the point that this isn't a black and white issue - 4E doesn't have to lose for Paizo to win. Paizo doesn't have to lose for 4E to win. Both companies have slightly different target markets. Where the markets overlap, it's not a problem, because people are allowed to buy and play more than one game.

Is it possible to talk about Pathfinder on the Pathfinder board, or do we have to continually bring 4E into it? Do you periodically hit Macintosh-centered boards and stir up crap about Windows Vista, too?

Thank you!

How about a thread that doesn't care about 4E! I love Pathfinder!

[Shadewest]

Brian Kovich wrote:

My gaming looks like this...

50% HARP
50% GUINNESS

And whatever game we happen to be playing at the time.

Brian

Change that Harp to Bass and I'd say you're on the right track.

Right now I'm playing 4E, because that's that game that's being run. I'm DMing Pathfinder A3, though.