um Question about images? can you post direct images on theses boards and if so how?
Lol... I'm surprised that people are actually posting in the thread. Neat!!
Ultradan
What are we doing!
I've posted nothing on that thread, therefore I win!
So how many masochists are there? You know who you are
I took a "personality quiz" the other day & it said I was a hedonist but heck, who doesn't have masochistic tendency's sometimes? :o)
take the veil cerpin taxt
take the veil cerpin taxtYou must have been phlegmatic in stature
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPeSbITit5U
Two word game threads I have thought of but haven't started:
Thousand word game (or just post one picture).
One letter game.
take the veil cerpin taxtYou must have been phlegmatic in stature
nah just sounds cool
|
So how many masochists are there? You know who you areI took a "personality quiz" the other day & it said I was a hedonist but heck, who doesn't have masochistic tendency's sometimes? :o)
Thanx for the stimulating psych profile, but I was refering to the actual thread for which this is a commentary...
My better half is a English teacher!
My better half is a English teacher!The shoemaker's son has no shoes!!!
Sad indeed! she constantly has to correct me! and when she finds me game notes and stuff I gotta do homework!
9ok
Wow. Now THAT'S a mighty big slice o' pi.....Kudo's to Dirk and Shiny.He memorized it.
I cut-and-pasted it.
Who's smarter now?
Where's the site where you found that. I want to memorize more!
Two word game threads I have thought of but haven't started:
Thousand word game (or just post one picture).
One letter game.
I wanted to start the n-word game (reference to Sebastian's name for the various games), but 0 beat me to it.
Is it sad that I continued reading the spoilers even after I knew I found everything (all 3 on the last one, with about ten left after the third. I "showed" all of those.)?
|
|
You definitely get tagged as a masochist...Yeah... me too.
x=((-b)±sq.rt.(b^2-4ac))/(2a)I'm trying to remember what the name of this equation is.
I do remember having it written covertly on a slip of paper inside the cover of my calculator. :)
But, what is it? I can't remember...
the quadratic theorem, you lesser geek
Director of Sales
|
the quadratic theorem, you lesser geekYou definitely get tagged as a masochist...Yeah... me too.
x=((-b)±sq.rt.(b^2-4ac))/(2a)I'm trying to remember what the name of this equation is.
I do remember having it written covertly on a slip of paper inside the cover of my calculator. :)
But, what is it? I can't remember...
Oh yeah...
*slinks away to nurse the wounded nerd-pride*
;)
|
the quadratic theorem, you lesser geekYou definitely get tagged as a masochist...Yeah... me too.
x=((-b)±sq.rt.(b^2-4ac))/(2a)I'm trying to remember what the name of this equation is.
I do remember having it written covertly on a slip of paper inside the cover of my calculator. :)
But, what is it? I can't remember...
Oh yeah...
*slinks away to nurse the wounded nerd-pride*
;)
Um, actually it's the quadratic formula. Theorem implies a formula that needs to be proven or a rule -- this is neither.
Again, not sure what the point is -- still need to check out the zero word game...
|
|
x=((-b)±sq.rt.(b^2-4ac))/(2a)I'm trying to remember what the name of this equation is.
I do remember having it written covertly on a slip of paper inside the cover of my calculator. :)
But, what is it? I can't remember...
More specifically, it finds the value of x assuming that you have a, b, and c in the following equation --> ax^2 + bx + c = 0
|
|
Quadratic formula... I always hated that thing.
This formula makes parabolas, right?
A quadratic equation -- ax^2 + bx + c = y -- is what "makes" parabolas. If you make y=0 and apply the quadratic formula, you get the values of x where the parabola crosses the x-axis.
It's been a little over 20 years since I looked at this stuff, so if you want more of an explanation, I will have to do a little more research. ;)
|
|
Quadratic formula... I always hated that thing.
This formula makes parabolas, right?A quadratic equation -- ax^2 + bx + c = y -- is what "makes" parabolas. If you make y=0 and apply the quadratic formula, you get the values of x where the parabola crosses the x-axis.
It's been a little over 20 years since I looked at this stuff, so if you want more of an explanation, I will have to do a little more research. ;)
NNNnnnnggghhh. I remember that evil little thing from high school math, and it STILL gives me the shivvers.
NNNnnnnggghhh. I remember that evil little thing from high school math, and it STILL gives me the shivvers.Quadratic formula... I always hated that thing.
This formula makes parabolas, right?A quadratic equation -- ax^2 + bx + c = y -- is what "makes" parabolas. If you make y=0 and apply the quadratic formula, you get the values of x where the parabola crosses the x-axis.
It's been a little over 20 years since I looked at this stuff, so if you want more of an explanation, I will have to do a little more research. ;)
:( Damn Math... *runs to a corner* Math bad.. Exam urrrrgggg
Zilly isn't it!
Loomis laughs
A colorful death
A unpleasant swim
A red headed girl falls
Streams of beer
The falling winners of yesterdays race
Moon pies and lawyers
Love bird fly!
Hayride of fire
A gardener all high
Scarecrow women
Lustful red light
Kiss the flower
Barking dogs cry for war
Old man mows his carpet
She makes noises with her knees
Someone call the boogieman
|
|
Loomis laughs
A colorful death
A unpleasant swim
A red headed girl falls
Streams of beer
The falling winners of yesterdays race
Moon pies and lawyers
Love bird fly!Hayride of fire
A gardener all high
Scarecrow women
Lustful red light
Kiss the flower
Barking dogs cry for war
Old man mows his carpet
She makes noises with her knees
Someone call the boogieman
Two by two, Hands of Blue...
|
|
a = b = 1
a*b == a^2
a*b-b^2 == a^2-b^2
b(a-b) == (a+b)*(a-b)
b == a+b
1 == 1+1
1 == 2
Ok, this is incorrect. If you are going to have math, at least make it right...
If you have b(a-b), a-b = 1-1 = 0. Now you have b*0 which should equal 0. For some reason, you have 1-1 = 1. The same logic can be applied to the other side. Ultimately you end up with 0 = 0 which is correct if not ultimately useless.
Sorry -- done ranting...