Marc Radle |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |
The New Paths Compendium is on Paizo's Top Ten Downloads From Other Companies list for the third week in a row! :)
That is truly awesome!!
Also, we've addressed a couple small issues that have been reported - an updated PDF should be available sometime this week hopefully (not sure how long it takes for updated PDFs to make it to all the various PDF store sites). A free errata sheet should also be available sometime later this week for download as well.
Marc Radle |
Be sure to check out the new class preview - the Tinkerer!
Master inventors, builders, and engineers, tinkerers are experts with all manner of mechanical contraptions and devices. With their custom-built clockwork companions always close by, tinkerers are well suited and well equipped for almost every contingency!
Click the link above for the full class preview (and awesome art!)
And, in case you missed it, we also did a preview for the Skin-Changer.
Wolfgang Baur Kobold Press |
DungeonmasterCal |
We did start at first level and everyone has leveled up by now, this being the end of the 2nd adventure now. Everyone is having fun so far and the NPC:EE classes are working out really well. The Warlock player caught on very quickly (she's not played RPGs since the late 80s) and contributed a lot to the game. The Priest and Spell-less Ranger were also perfect fits.
I ended up with only 6 players as one of the long distance players is deep in the throes of the flu. We unanimously agreed he should stay home.. lol. We also turned it into a chili supper before the game started, so there was a pretty good time to be had by all.
Marc Radle |
We did start at first level and everyone has leveled up by now, this being the end of the 2nd adventure now. Everyone is having fun so far and the NPC:EE classes are working out really well. The Warlock player caught on very quickly (she's not played RPGs since the late 80s) and contributed a lot to the game. The Priest and Spell-less Ranger were also perfect fits.
I ended up with only 6 players as one of the long distance players is deep in the throes of the flu. We unanimously agreed he should stay home.. lol. We also turned it into a chili supper before the game started, so there was a pretty good time to be had by all.
Wow, sounds like a ton o' fun! :)
Marc Radle |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Check out the new NPC class preview: the Warlock!
What do you get from a strange and unholy union between the witch, the wizard… and Elric? You get the warlock, that’s what!
DungeonmasterCal |
It was. The game was rather short because one of the players was still recovering from the flu (he had it really badly. Even though the virus left him two weeks ago he was still really weak and feeling drained). I could tell he wasn't feeling well so I found a good spot to stop for the session. We'll continue in two weeks.
The Priest's player is strongly considering the Skin Changer as his back up character should the Priest fall in battle. So far he's done a good job of staying out of the way of any dangers and buffing the party. His healing mojo also saved the party's bacon once. The Warlock's player fell into step quickly and contributed to the battles perfectly, using Dread Bolts and sword to equal effectiveness. The player of the Spell-less Ranger is the 11 year old daughter of the Priest's player and while she didn't do much because she's sometimes kind of shy did roleplay it to the hilt. The classes are a hit with my group!
Marc Radle |
It's Wednesday, so we have a new class preview up!
Behold the White Necromancer (and more awesome art :) !!
You can also check out previews of the:
Skin-Changer, Tinkerer, and Warlock
Marc Radle |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
It's Wednesday, and that means another new class preview!
Ever want to play a spell-using, kick-ass archer right from 1st level??
Introducing the mystic archer, one more of the 12 new and expanded Pathfinder Roleplaying Game classes in the recently released hardcover edition of the New Paths Compendium.
Dedicated to mastery of the bow, a mystic archer seamlessly blends the damage-dealing potential of arcane magic with the deadly skills of an archer, using spells to enhance her natural abilities.
Check out the rest of the mystic archer class preview HERE including one of my FAVORITE pieces of art from the book (it's really cool!)
Be sure to also check out our previous class previews:
White Necromancer
Skin-Changer
Tinkerer
and
Warlock
Wolfgang Baur Kobold Press |
Nectarian |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I really love this book, can't wait play either of those classes, but I have a strange question. There's an Archetype for the priest called the Guarded Priest (in the pdf the bookmark is called Guarged Priest, but I'm quite sure the d is correct) which has an eidolon that "must be within one step of the guarded priest it is sent to protect" when it comes to alignment.
As the Priest himself is allowed to deviate one step from his/her deity, are you suggesting a priest of a good deity can be protected by an evil eidolon (or the other way round, chaotic-lawful... you know the drill)?
Marc Radle |
I really love this book, can't wait play either of those classes, but I have a strange question. There's an Archetype for the priest called the Guarded Priest (in the pdf the bookmark is called Guarged Priest, but I'm quite sure the d is correct) which has an eidolon that "must be within one step of the guarded priest it is sent to protect" when it comes to alignment.
As the Priest himself is allowed to deviate one step from his/her deity, are you suggesting a priest of a good deity can be protected by an evil eidolon (or the other way round, chaotic-lawful... you know the drill)?
Hey there! Thrilled to hear you like the book!!!
Interesting question ...
As you say, a priest’s alignment must be within one step of her deity’s, along either the law/chaos axis or the good/evil axis.
The guarded priest archetype grants a guardian eidolon, which must take the agathion, angel, archon, azata, daemon, demon, or devil base evolution / form (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Pathfinder Unchained). A guardian eidolon’s alignment must be within one step of the guarded priest it is sent to protect (so a neutral good guarded priest, for example, can have a neutral good, lawful good, or chaotic good guardian eidolon).
As you point out, a priest with the guarded priest archetype could (in theory) worship a lawful good god; the guarded priest could be lawful neutral; and then his guardian eidolon could be lawful evil.
Having said that, I think that should be the exception, not the norm, and should be subject to GM approval. If you assume that the guarded priest's deity is in all likelihood who sends the guardian eidolon to protect the guarded priest in the first place, it seems unlikely that a lawful good god would send a lawful evil guardian eidolon. It is possible, but th GM should certainly require an excellent and compelling in-game reason for such a thing to occur.
For the vast majority of cases, a guarded priest's guardian eidolon should be pretty close to the priest and/or the priest's deity.
Hope that helps!
OH!! If the bookmark in your PDF does not say 'Guarded Priest' then it sounds like you need to download the updated PDF!!!
Nectarian |
Nectarian wrote:I really love this book, can't wait play either of those classes, but I have a strange question. There's an Archetype for the priest called the Guarded Priest (in the pdf the bookmark is called Guarged Priest, but I'm quite sure the d is correct) which has an eidolon that "must be within one step of the guarded priest it is sent to protect" when it comes to alignment.
As the Priest himself is allowed to deviate one step from his/her deity, are you suggesting a priest of a good deity can be protected by an evil eidolon (or the other way round, chaotic-lawful... you know the drill)?
Hey there! Thrilled to hear you like the book!!!
Interesting question ...
As you say, a priest’s alignment must be within one step of her deity’s, along either the law/chaos axis or the good/evil axis.
The guarded priest archetype grants a guardian eidolon, which must take the agathion, angel, archon, azata, daemon, demon, or devil base evolution / form (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Pathfinder Unchained). A guardian eidolon’s alignment must be within one step of the guarded priest it is sent to protect (so a neutral good guarded priest, for example, can have a neutral good, lawful good, or chaotic good guardian eidolon).
As you point out, a priest with the guarded priest archetype could (in theory) worship a lawful good god; the guarded priest could be lawful neutral; and then his guardian eidolon could be lawful evil.
Having said that, I think that should be the exception, not the norm, and should be subject to GM approval. If you assume that the guarded priest's deity is in all likelihood who sends the guardian eidolon to protect the guarded priest in the first place, it seems unlikely that a lawful good god would send a lawful evil guardian eidolon. It is possible, but th GM should certainly require an excellent and compelling in-game reason for such a thing to occur.
For the vast majority of cases, a guarded priest's guardian eidolon should be pretty close to the priest and/or...
Thanks so much for your answer, it's great to see authors active in the communit. I'm so sorry to bother you again with the guarded priest, but I'm not quite sure (although the post above kind of empowers my view) how the Eidolon works. Should I just look into Pathfinder Unchained, take every feature you get as the summoner (except the noted ones) at the same level as the Summoner gets it, with evolution points and so on as described in unchained and "ignore everything in the Advanced Players Guide, or is there something left from APG? I'd say having most of the clerics/priests abillities plus the Eidolon with a subtype (which is considerable stronger than the base-form of APG) is strong enough, and the reduction in evo-points should be more than fine, but I'm really not sure, because that's more of a balancing thing, which is something I'm lacking oversight in.
Marc Radle |
Hey there Nectarian - no bother at all!
The Pathfinder Unchained Summoner is generally considered to be the better, more balanced version of the class and is considered by many to be the defacto official version now. So yes, the Guarded Priest archetype uses the Pathfinder Unchained Summoner and Eidolon 100% (no need to also reference the older version of the Summoner in the APG.
Hope that helps!
If you like, please consider posting a review of the Expanded New Paths Compendium when you have a moment :)
Endzeitgeist |
Part II of my review:
7th level nets speak with the dead for class level rounds, with 9th level and every 2 levels thereafter yielding a cumulative -2 penalty to resist the ability. 9th level also provides lifesight 10 ft., which increases by 10 ft. at 13th level and every 4 levels thereafter. At 11th level, damage-dealing skeletal arms erupting from the ground make for a more macabre form of attack in a 20 ft.-burst, with scaling, properly codified damage and a Ref-save to halve. An additional daily use is gained every 4 levels after 11th. 13th level provides the option to turn incorporeal for a limited number of rounds each day, and at 15th level, the class adds +1/2 class level as a morale bonus to all saves vs. death effects and gets a save, even when such an effect would usually not provide for one. It would be nice to know the DC for non-spell-based death effects, though. Starting at 17th level, the white necromancer can temporarily emit an aura that nets immunity to death effects, energy drain, negative levels, etc. The capstone, unsurprisingly, offers immunity to death effects. The character can also be no longer reduced below 1 by ability score damage/drain and may 1/day cast power word kill, affecting up to 150 hp worth of targets. The white necromancer may also nice per round cast bleed/stabilize as a free action. It should be noted that, RAW, the white necromancer has a unique spell-list, though expanding it should prove o be relatively simple.
As before, we get three archetypes: The grave warden replaces the low level healing touch with 3 + Charisma modifier sanctify corpse, with 10th level allowing the archetype to make it permanent 1/day. Instead of the Turn Undead-angle, the grave warden gets channel energy, but only to damage undead. At 20th level, this ignores channel resistance, if any. Life bond is replaces with detect evil, detect undead, hide from undead, which may be cast a total of 3 + Charisma modifier times per day as a SP. The other transference ability nets a scaling skill boost versus the undead. At 17th level, we get a potent defense-buff aura that can also be empowered by channel energy uses to destroy undead that dare enter it, thankfully with a caveat that makes undead with twice as many HD as the grave warden immune. In essence, this one loses the healer angle and instead focuses on undead destruction. The second one would be the grave bound, who loses the high level protective aura in favor of cold resistance 10, DR 5/- and +4 t saves vs. spells and SPs cast by undead. Unintelligent undead also no longer notice the grave bound unless attacked by him. Life bond, a pretty important ability, is exchanged for an undead companion. These companions share the same basic advancement table and increase in power at 8th, 12th, 16th and 20th level, gaining new abilities depending on their type. There is a complaint here regarding their base stats, though: The zombie, for example, has AC 16, with only +2 natural noted in the brackets. The ghost’s starting AC is 17, but ability-score-wise, should be 15. Some of the ACs note the constituent bonuses, some don’t. This is an inconsistency that could have been caught here. 6 different companions are provided.
Finally, the necrotic healer get better healing touch and a couple of bonus spells and may take negative conditions of others, taken from a fixed list, to suffer for them – RAW, the condition must be suffered for 1d3 rounds or its original duration, whichever is lower. I have an issue with this, as it can be applied to permanent conditions. Instead of communion with the dead, we get enhanced healing (as if Empower Spell’d). 9th level allows for the absorption of wounds/effects that allies suffer from as an immediate action (limited daily uses) and the high-level protective aura is enhanced by lasting + Charisma modifier rounds.
I really like the white necromancer. I still do. At the same time, I like it less than I should. I don’t know, I find myself wishing it had a couple more unique tricks up its sleeve, a bloodline-like component or something like that with different paths for final death, retribution, etc. With the focus on life/self-sacrifice/etc., a kind of buffer/shield-engine would have made sense as well – if you roll HD and roll badly, you’ll be in pain – I definitely suggest contemplating Constitution as highest or second highest ability score. Still, it’s a good class and I stand by my original verdict of 4.5 stars for it, even though grave-bound clearly is the strongest archetype, losing not enough for the power the companion grants. Flavor-wise, the martyr-style scholar of death is nice and easy to grasp and play.
While we’re on the subject of full casters and the like, let’s move on to the priest-class. The priest class receives d6 HD, 4 + Int skills per level and gets 1/2 BAB-progression, good Will-saves and proficiency in only simple weapons. The class begins play with an aura as per the cleric's default and bonus languages include the respective languages of the alignment-related outer planes. Similarly, the restrictions we know regarding opposed alignment spells still apply. A priest draws her spells from the cleric spell list and must prepare them in advance; however, they are not expended upon being cast, instead consuming a spell slot available. The governing spellcasting attribute for the priest would be Wisdom and the priest begins with 1 + 1 spells of first level prepared, +4 orisons. Obviously, as a full caster, she progresses to learn up to 9th level spells and the maximum spells per day per spell level clock in at unmodified 4, with prepared spells capping at 4 + 2 per spell level.
The plusses in the spells known list refer obviously to the domain spells; a priest selects a total of 3 domains from her deity and she gains all of the domain powers and bonus spells of the chosen domains. The priest's spellcasting is also tied to her holy symbol, with which she shares a sacred bond - much like an arcane bond, casting without it becomes problematic, but here's the kicker: The priest may use the holy (or unholy) symbol to cast single-target (excluding mass/communal versions) cure or inflict spells as though they had a range of close instead of touch - which is a huge boon. Back in 3.X literally EVERY cleric in my games had the feat to do just that.
The priest also receives access to channel energy at 2nd level, improving every 3 levels after 2nd by +1d6, though the ability is governed by Wisdom for the class, making it less multiple-attribute-dependent (MAD). 7th level optionally decreases activation action to a move action, at 14th level it may even be executed as a swift action. Since the ability has no per-round cap, that makes channel pretty nova-like and can allow the priest to channel thrice in a round. Yeah, that is problematic and was one of the aspects of the class that should have been addressed for the compilation. 6th level and every 6 levels thereafter net a bonus feat from a nice selection of mostly channel-themed feats, and, as a capstone, the class becomes immune to death attacks and negative levels and may never be reduced below 1 in any ability score. Additionally, the priest remains alive until twice negative Constitution score in hit points is exceeded.
The customization options of the class include so-called divine gifts, which can be used 1/day as a swift action. 10 such gifts are provided and all are available - you don't have to choose. The priest may use the ability, as mentioned, 1/day, but may use it +1/day for every 3 levels beyond first. If a gift enhances a spell, it may only enhance cleric spells and only one gift may enhance each spell. The gifts include CL and DC-increases of the next spell cast, invisibility (that scales up to greater invisibility at 7th level), metamagic enhancements, immediate action rerolls, wings at 5th level, Ac and save bonuses with DR and SR or bursts of raw, damaging divine power...or, well, spell-swapping.
The book provides two archetypes for the priest, the first of which would be the chosen of nature, who gets a modified class skill list and draws spells from the druid spell list. Instead of channel energy, we get nature shape, a variant of wild shape at 2nd level. The ability counts as wild shape for ability interactions and comes with Natural Spell baked into it, but only duplicates increasingly more potent beast shape spells, capping at VI, and unlocks plant shapes at half the value of the beast shapes –i.e. upon unlocking beast shape IV, plant shape II is unlocked. Daily uses increase on a total basis. 6th level’s bonus feat is replaced with constant speak with animals/plants, and the bonus feat of 12th level instead allows the archetype to optionally activate nature shape as a move action. The bonus feat at 18th level is replaced with 1/day foresight, only usable in a natural environment. The second archetype would be the guarded priest, who gets a slightly modified spell list to account for the fact that divine gift is replaced with an unchained summoner’s eidolon that must take the agathion, angel, archon, azata, daemon, demon or devil base evolution. The eidolon may also choose a new 3-point evolution, namely smite evil or good, depending on alignment, using its own Charisma and HD to calculate effects. The evolution may be taken more often to grant additional daily uses.
The priest was and still is a class I always wanted – a full, divine caster that is not a front-line combatant. The issue here is that the cleric already is a full caster, which means that the priest needed something to excel beyond the capabilities of the cleric. The divine gift angle of a deed-like engine is a good idea, though I did wish the class had employed a slightly more rewarding engine here. With the advent of influence mechanics, it would have been nice to add such an angle. The nova-issue hasn’t been addressed, which may necessitate some sort of gentlemen’s agreement. Ultimately, I like the class, but I want to like the concept more than I actually enjoy the execution.
While we’re on the subject of full casters and executions that I don’t like as much as I want to: The theurge is back. The class gets d6 HD, 2 +Intelligence modifier skills per level, 1/2 BAB-progression, proficiency with simple weapons, good Will-saves and prepared spellcasting -arcane spellcasting governed via Intelligence and divine spellcasting governed via Wisdom - both from first level on. A Theurge gets a spellbook and a prayerbook and the latter requires the divine spells to be learned similarly to how arcane spells behave - from scrolls or levels. The superior spell selection of the original iteration has been reigned in somewhat. The class gets Scribe Scroll as a 2nd level bonus feat and 3rd level allows the class to reroll any concentration check, taking the better result.
While first, slots are distinct from another, starting at fourth level, arcane spells may be prepared via divine slots and vice versa, but at a penalty level-wise to the spell prepared, i.e. second level spells need to be prepared as third level spells etc. This may not be done if a spell exists on both spell lists, preventing cheesing, and the ability clarifies the maximum spell level that may be thus prepared via the other casting tradition’s slots. The capstone gets rid of this limitation regarding the spell slot higher (but not the maximum level!) and allows the theurge to add a metamagic feat for free to a spell cast, up to either Wisdom or Intelligence modifier times per day, whichever is higher.
The capstone gets rid of this minor penalty, though. At 5th level, theurges may cast two spells with the same casting time at once - one arcane, one divine, with targets affected by both suffering from a -4 penalty to saves, with the theurge getting +4 to CL-checks to overcome SR with them. This may be used 1/day, +1/day per 6 levels after that.
They also learn to cast a select limited array of spells as SPs, starting at 6th level, where one 1st level spell may be chosen. 9th level and every 3 levels thereafter yield another such SP, with the maximum spell level that may be chosen increasing by +1 as well each time. 8th and 14th level net a bonus feat chosen from a limited list and 9th level nets the wand adept ability, using his own ability scores (Intelligence and Wisdom) to calculate save DCs when using wands containing spells from his spell lists. At 14th level, the higher caster level of theurge or wand is used. To nitpick here, the save-DC-increase should only apply to spells known. The theurge gets no archetypes.
I still don’t like the theurge, even though it has gotten rid of one of its worst offenders regarding spell-list poaching or non-full-casters. A full caster that can cast both divine and arcane spells is a cool concept, and yes, the amount of spells cast (which never increases above 2 arcane + 2 divine per level (+ bonus spells via Intelligence + Wisdom) is severely restricted. This means every spell needs to count. I get that the general restriction on spells-slots is there for balance. I'm not sold, though, that it'll make for a particularly fun playing experience.
Sure, once you hit out your crême de la crême spells, you'll own the game...but what about the other time? Unlike most other classes, the theurge has nothing but spellcasting and will thus resort to wands and staves and scrolls. You’ll be carrying a buttload of spells-in-a-can around since you don't have enough spells for proper utility tricks, proper buffing, proper debuffing - essentially the class is geared very much toward being flashy super-spell nova-heavy. Which you *may* like, but personally, I think the class would have been more rewarding with more casts per day and a more restricted balancing via spells known. So, while the class has gotten rid of its rules-wise problematic aspects, its basic design premise remains: It's a glass pumpgun (also re buffs/debuffs) - two devastating shots and empty. Personally, I'd be not keen as a DM to structure my adventures to "empty" the super spell-arsenal of the theurge or to play one, trying to keep my super-ammo for the big bad boss.
Now all of this sounds negative, but the class per se is not a bad design, it does have its niche in which it will excel, and I’m pretty sure that some folks out there will like how this one plays. While I'm not sold on the place in a regular adventuring group, I do think the theurge will work superbly in 1 on 1-adventures and small groups - especially if the DM modifies adventures accordingly, groups starved for players get essentially divine and arcane in one class without resorting to gestalting - so yeah, the theurge has its niche, though I maintain it could have been more versatile in its use. With the advent of Occult Adventures, an elegant way to balance the two spell lists would have, for example, been a kind of Burn-like engine that activates when switching from divine to arcane and back…or as a general resource to account for more spell slots. So yeah, over all, an improvement over the previous iteration of the class, but still not a class I enjoy or would allow in my game.
Since we’re already neck-deep in casting classes, let’s take a look at one niche that the book devotes two whole classes to: The blaster. The blaster is a popular concept, as evidenced by the gazillion of different options in that regard. One of the earlier incarnations of blasting classes in PFRPG was the Battle Scion, only predated, I believe, by the Archon and Vanguard classes released by Rogue Genius Games (back then Super Genius Games). Much like the vanguard, who was also penned by Marc Radle, the Battle Scion replaces a form of arcane gish, an arcane paladin, if you will.
The Battle Scion gets d10 HD, full BAB-progression, good Fort-and Will-saves, 2 + Intelligence modifier skills per level, proficiency in light, medium and heavy armor, shields and simple and martial weapons AND may cast spells while in armor from the very first level onwards without arcane spell-failure chance - thankfully still specifying regular spell failure chances for spells granted by other classes. Starting at 4th level, Battle Scions get access to arcane spells from the sorcerer/wizard-list of up to 4th level, which they cast as a prepared caster via Intelligence as governing attribute, with a caster level equal to their battle scion level-3. Furthermore, starting at 4th level, they also count as fighter of battle scion level -3 for the purpose of qualifying for fighter-only feats. At 2nd level, the battle scion gets a +1 deflection bonus to AC as well as a +1 insight bonus to hit with force blasts, both of which improve by +1 for every 4 levels beyond 2nd. 3rd level nets Combat Casting as a bonus feat.
What are force blasts? They are basically 60 ft.-range touch attacks that inflict 2d4 damage, +1d4 for every 3 levels beyond 1st. SR applies and they are SPs, but battle scions treat their CL for the purpose of overcoming SR as their class level. The battle scion may emit one such blast 3 + Intelligence modifier times per day as a standard action, making sure that e.g. ranged weapons are not invalidated. That being said, the damage is untyped and a force effect, which is odd – I expected force damage here, but RAW, this would even bypass the very few force resistances out there. Considering the limitations imposed on the ability, I can see it work, though. Starting at 5th level, the class gets the dweomer weapon ability, which allows the battle scion, as a standard action, to focus energy into a weapon, which proceeds to shed light as a torch. The weapon gains a +1 enhancement bonus, which increases by +1 at every 3 levels beyond 5th, capping at +6 at 20th level, but only to the regular maximum of +5. You guessed it: The plusses can be exchanged in favor of special weapon properties and are added to pre-existing properties of the enhanced weapon. The ability lasts for 1 minute and may be used 1/day, +1/day for every 4 class levels beyond 5th. 6th level and every 4 levels thereafter nets a metamagic or combat bonus feat. 7th level increases the Combat Casting bonus to +6, with 11th level improving that to +8. Starting at 11th level, the battle scion may cast a prepared arcane spell (should specify from its own spell list, but oh well) as a swift action, but the spell must have a casting time of 1 standard action or less and the ability may only be used 3 + Intelligence modifier times per day. Starting at 8th level, armor check penalty is reduced by 1, and maximum Dexterity bonus allowed by armor is increased by 1. This bonus further improves at every 4 levels thereafter, and the ability also provides unimpeded movement in medium and heavy armor. The capstone turns the CL and fighter level to full class level and allows for the immediate action casting of a spell when confirming a critical hit.
The class comes with 3 archetypes: First, there would be the bonded scion, who loses the deflection aura and makes his weapon an arcane bonded item and may enhance his bonded weapon. 8th level’s armored maneuvers instead nets a Improved Bonded Object at 5th level. Instead of 6th level’s bonus feat, we get +2 to critical hit confirmation with the bonded weapon, which increases by +1 for every four levels thereafter. Instead of 10th level’s feat, we get the option to use a force blast to temporarily enhance the weapon, making it ghost touch and adding class level to damage versus incorporeal foes. 11th level’s spell tactician benefit is replaced with the option to make the bonded weapon bane, but at a higher damage output. 14th level’s bonus feat is replaced with Awaken Bonded Object. Mostly a numbers game regarding a special weapon. The second archetype is the force blaster, who may use his force blasts as a move action at 2nd level. At 11th level, instead of spell tactician, he may use force blast 3/day as a swift action. 5th level increases the damage of these as if empowered, and the force blasts come with a ranged combat maneuver that may push targets and knock them prone, all at once. This replaces the dweomer weapon. At 6th level, the archetype is locked into a blast-enhancing feat and 10th level’s bonus feat is replaced with the option to fire two blasts per use of force blasts, which upgrades to 3 at 17th level. The third archetype would be the wild scion, who gets Eschew Materials instead of fighter training and has spontaneous spellcasting governed by Charisma. This is a really sucky proposition, considering that none of the other class features are adjusted – suddenly, you also need Charisma, for an archetype that is much too MAD. This one feels like a bad filler-afterthought that hasn’t been contemplated properly.
I wasn’t the biggest fan of the battle scion when it was released, and that hasn’t changed…but even if you liked it, it hasn’t aged well. At all. In a world, where Interjection Games’ ethermagic makes for highly customizable, balanced blasters, and where the big dog Paizo has introduced the versatile, unique kineticist, the battle scion feels a bit off. The fact that the class uses more than full BAB (bonuses granted by class features) for the blasts feels like unnecessary overkill nowadays; touch attacks don’t need a full BAB-class. When taking a look at e.g. vigilante as a relatively recent, versatile and pretty amazing class, the battle scion feels a bit rudimentary. The godblade-weapon-enhancer is a concept that a lot of classes have done in more interesting ways as well. The class isn’t bad per se, mind you – but unlike e.g. spell-less ranger, it hasn’t aged well.
There is a second blaster class herein, one that makes its first appearance in this book. The name should make clear what it’s all about from the get-go: I’m talking about the warlock. Yep, we get a classic blaster-class within this book, so what does the warlock do? The warlock class gets d8 HD, 2 + Intelligence modifier skills per level, proficiency with simple weapons and light armor and the warlock’s bond weapon, ¾ BAB-progression and good Fort- and Will-saves, as well as Intelligence-governed prepared spellcasting of up to 6th level, drawing upon the witch’s spell list. This spellcasting behaves analogue to the arcanist, though. The class has essentially two central angles: The warlock’s bond is a variant bonded weapon and gained at first level. It also acts as the familiar/spellbook substitute for the spell preparation of the class. The means of gaining new spells from e.g. other bond weapons and the like is concisely codified, and learning from scrolls is possible. The general weapon category of the bonded weapon determines a static bonus: The book distinguishes between 4 categories, with axes providing +2 to confirm crits, blades netting +2 to initiative, hammer and flails provide +2 to Fort saves and polearm bonded weapons allow the warlock to shorten his grip as an immediate action and attack adjacent targets at -2 to atk; if a polearm is not a reach weapon, the warlock gains a +1 insight bonus to attack rolls with it. Guess which one I liked best? Yeah, the polearm bonus is neat.
While wielding the bond weapon, the warlock adds Charisma modifier to CMD to resist disarm and sunder and this bonus applies to spells et al. that target the weapon and seek to change it. At 4th level, the warlock may deliver touch spells with it, and at 7th, 12th and 16th level, one of classic magic weapon properties is chosen from a brief list. At 10th level, the weapon awakens, becoming intelligent. Senses and attributes are defined and so are the skills available to the bonded weapon. Also at this level, we gain telepathy with the weapon. 14th level unlocks dark defenses, an ability that provides immunity for the shaken and frightened conditions as well as a +2 morale bonus to Will-saves. As a standard action, you can grant yourself SR equal to 6 + class level for class level rounds. This SR may not be suppressed. At 18th level, the morale bonus granted by dark defenses scales to +4 and the panicked condition is added to the immunity-list. The SR upgrades to 10 + class level. At 20th level, finally, the bonded weapon gets one of the most potent special weapon abilities, once more chosen from a brief list. It should be noted that aforementioned immunities only apply while wielding the bond weapon.
The second defining feature here should not surprise anyone – we get the dread bolt, which may be executed as a standard action. It’s a ranged, single-target blast that targets touch AC and has a range of 60 ft. It inflicts 1d6 force damage and increases that by +1d6 for every two warlock level beyond 1st. 5th level increases the range to 80 ft., and every 5 levels thereafter, the range further increases by +20 ft. Now, I’m not a fan of this being force damage, as the warlock gets infinite dread bolts per day, and force is the most valuable damage type in PFRPG, short of untyped, which is most of the time an oversight anyways. My issue lies within another construct here: Dread bolts “are treated as a weapon for purposes of making multiple attacks at higher levels.” This directly contradicts the activation action, which is a standard action. It also opens up a rather puzzling conundrum: If the activation action is correct and the dread bolt can indeed be executed as a standard action, does that allow for full attacks with dread bolts as a standard action? I assume no, but this aspect really needs polishing. Why do I assume that this is not the case? Beginning at 8th level, a warlock may attack with bond weapon and dread bolts in any combination or order when executing full attacks. This sentence implies that this was not the case before, but depending on how you read the standard action/iterative attack interaction, you get wildly different abilities here. This needs some cleaning up.
2nd level yields +1/2 class level to Knowledge (planes) and Knowledge (arcana). Beginning at 4th level, the warlock gets a +1 deflection bonus to AC and a +1 insight bonus to hit with dread bolts, which both increase every 4 levels thereafter. This ability is not required and feels like needless escalation of numbers, as ¾ BAB-progression mathematically suffices to hit pretty much any CR-relevant touch attack; it’s, in essence the gunslinger/battle scion BAB-overkill for blasting. At 10th level, warlocks btw. add Intelligence modifier to dread bolt damage. At 18th level, the warlock may 1/week contact other plane in a more reliable manner.
At 14th level, the warlock may roll for normal damage when adding a dread bolt transmutation to a dread bolt. What’s that? Well it represents, apart from spellcasting, the customization of the warlock. Beginning at 6th level, you get the first such dread bolt transmutation. As a swift action when hitting a target with a dread bolt, the warlock may activate one such transmutation instead of rolling for damage. Only a single transmutation may be used per round (that is already handled by action economy, so a bit weird), and save DCs are governed by Intelligence, with class level doubling as CL for SP-purposes. Transmutations don’t stack with themselves. This ability may be used 3/day, + 1/day for every 3 levels beyond 6th. So, why is there this caveat regarding per round cap? The capstone lets you execute a transmutation whenever you hit with a dread bolt. I *assume* that this does not get rid of the daily cap of uses, but explicitly stating something to that extent would have helped here.
So, what do these transmutations do? Well, basically, we have hard debuffing here, with bleed, phantasmal killer, negative conditions – you get the idea. There are 20 such transmutations and they are all available, provided that the warlock meets the minimum prerequisites regarding levels. Some of these employ condition scaling (fatigue upgrades to exhausted at 9th level, for example) and there are a couple that will not fit with all games: The agonizing transmutation, for example, causes the target to be staggered for a whopping class level rounds, with a successful save only reducing that to ½ class level. Yep, you heard me. This is a reliable stagger lock that can be taken as soon as 6th level. So yeah, I’m afraid that this fellow won’t get near my game. The class gets a single archetype, the dimensional traveler, who replaces the boost to AC and damage with blasts with 3 + Intelligence modifier swift action dimension doors that are restricted to the warlock. At 4th level, range is 20 ft. and this distance increases by +5 ft. every two class levels after that. Instead of dread bolt transmutations, 6th level yields Dimensional Agility and the bonus granted by the feat scales for the archetype.
So, all in all, as a person, I don’t like this class. It is rather linear and the transmutations are very strong, and pay for that strength with being limited in use. Which means you get a few potent debuffs and then run out – by decreasing the transmutation potency and making them generally available, the class would imho gain appeal. Compared to kineticist and ethermancer etc., the class boils down to the same blasts, with a few spells added. The lack of restrictions on force blasts also bugs me. Compared to what you can do with kineticist (and e.g. N. Jolly’s phenomenal Dimensional Ripper archetype, see Kineticists of Porphyra III), the warlock, to me as a person, is boring and too nova-y regarding the transmutations. Apart from spells, there is also no customization apart from minor bonded weapon tweaks, making the class pretty linear, which annoys me – when all members of a class have pretty much the same capabilities, it tends to bore me fast. This is a personal preference, though, and will not influence the verdict, for what is a huge no-go for me may actually be a feature for a lot of folks out there. Don’t like the kineticist’s burn-engine? Don’t like a ton of moving parts in your class? Just want a foolproof, uncomplicated take on the blaster sans a ton of choices or build options? Well, then you’ll like this class. Just make sure that the GM is aware of the potent debuff-locks and makes a ruling regarding the objectively flawed base bolt engine.
While we’re on the subject of ranged combat specialists, let’s talk about the mystic archer, who gets d8 HD, 2 + Intelligence modifier skills per level, proficiency with simple and martial weapons, light armor and buckler. Spells gained by the class don’t suffer from arcane spell failure when wearing light armor or using a buckler. The class gets full BAB-progression as well as good Fort- and Ref-saves. They begin play with access to prepared arcane spellcasting, governed by Intelligence, but it only scales up to 4th level spells. The class gets +1 to Perception checks and increases the range increment for any bow by +5 ft., with both increasing by a further +1/+5ft at 5th level and every 4 levels thereafter. The class also begin with Weapon Focus for a bow as a bonus feat. Starting at 2nd level, all arrows fired by the class are considered to be magic and silver, and starting at 10th level, they are treated as the alignment of the character for the purpose of bypassing DR. 3rd level and every 3 levels thereafter yields a bonus feat chosen from a specific list. Upon reaching 4th level, the mystic archer may use a standard action to enhance the respective bow with special weapon properties, in a variant of similar enhancements of e.g. the battle scion.
Starting at 5th level, we choose the first archer trick, with another unlocked every 4 levels thereafter. These include dispelling arrows, close combat shots, arrow-based disarming etc. The class only gets 7 to choose from, though – a few more would have been nice. At 7th level, the class gets the imbue arrow class feature, allowing the class to place touch evocation spells upon arrows, with 12th level adding area of effect (emanation and spread only) spells. It should be noted that these still retain some restrictions that prevent cheesing of long casting time spells. This is one of the best ways to handle the concept that I’ve seen so far, but it lacks a crucial piece of information – how do the imbued spells behave regarding critical hits? No idea. 8th level lets you 1/day execute a hail of arrow, targeting 1 character per 3 mystic archer levels in a 60 ft. radius, executing an attack at full BAB against them. Additional daily uses are gained every 4 levels thereafter. 10th level increases critical range, but does not stack with Improved Critical or similar threat range increases, thankfully. Additionally, once per day as an immediate action upon confirming a critical hit with the bow, the mystic archer may increase threat multiplier by 1. At 11th level, we get deliberate aim, which translates to a single full-round action attack, adding ½ class level to atk. At 16th level, this may ignore armor and shield bonuses. At 14th level, we get 1/day phase arrow, which bypasses nonmagical barriers, cover, concealment, armor and shield bonuses as a standard action. An additional daily use is gained every 3 levels thereafter. 16th level nets the option to, as an immediate action, sacrifice a prepared spell to grant herself an insight bonus to atk until the end of her turn. At 19th level, we get penetrating shot, the archer may make a -4 atk versus a creature behind a target successfully crited. Okay, do the special shots à la imbued, any spells laced into the shot etc. apply to the second target as well? No idea. The capstone auto-confirms critical hits and, once per day, as a full-round action, she can fire an arrow that may cause exactly 100 hp damage if it hits and the target fails the DC 23 + Intelligence modifier Fort-save. The class gets no archetypes.
The mystic archer does a lot right, executing the notoriously difficult arcane archer concept rather well. At the same time, the rules-integrity could be a bit better.
The rather notorious savant class introduced in the first New Paths Compendium has received a general overhaul. The new version of the class gets d8 HD, 4 + Intelligence modifier skill points per level, proficiency with simple weapons and light armor, but not shields, as well as ¾ BAB-progression and good Will-saves. The savant chooses an area of interest at 1st level, and does so again at 6th level and every 5 levels thereafter – this means that all savants will pick up all areas of interest by 16th level. Each area is associated with a number of knacks – knacks from the area of interest may be retained longer. What’s a knack in the context of the class? Well, it’s basically a borrowed ability, but requires first that the character scrutinizes a target. As a standard action, the savant can attempt a Perception check to identify a target, with the DC being 5 + the creature’s CR. On a success, the savant gets to know about aspects of the target’s statistics, with an additional aspect known for every 5 by which he exceeds the DC. The savant, upon scrutinizing the target, may gain a number of knacks equal to his maximum number of active knacks, which increases from 3 at 1st level up to 8. Gaining or changing a knack is a free action when scrutinizing, a standard action when consulting the notebook.
Wait, what? Yep, at 2nd level, the savant gets a notebooks, which means that after losing a knack, the savant has 1 hour to pen it down in the book, with the number of knacks that can be maintained in it capping at Intelligence modifier. Some knacks may be gained multiple times at once, allowing for the use of knacks as mini-feat-trees and the like. Fyi regarding feats: The savant has to meet the prerequisites and uses his own level to calculate level-based variables. Some of the knacks, like scrutinizing BAB, refer to a knack bonus, which begins at +1 and increases by +1 every 3 levels thereafter. While the class specifies a maximum spell level for the class, which caps at 5th, there is a potentially HUGE problem with the engine here: The savant can duplicate scrutinized divine and arcane spells. This means that, for as long as your allies have the spell, you can cast it an infinite number of times. Yes, this pretty much is infinite healing/spell-blasting at 1st level. This is a gamebreaker of an issue that immediately should disqualify the class as written RAW for many tables, and one that could have easily been prevented by implementing a simple 1 scrutiny per day per target cap. At 3rd level, advanced knacks are unlocked, providing access to whole spell lists of targets, yielding attribute enhancers, etc. – these only last for Intelligence modifier rounds, minimum 1, though. Some of these advanced knacks do not count towards the limit of active knacks. At 8th level, the savant adds his knack bonus to aid another with a skill from a knack associated with an area of interest. 14th level nets the option to gain a basic knack sans scrutinizing or notebook 1/day. The capstone nets doubled knack bonus when gaining a knack associated with an area of interest…which is needlessly wordy, considering that the savant will have all 4 areas of interest covered at this level. Additionally, knacks associated with the area of interest no longer count towards the maximum. RAW, this translates to infinite knacks. Something, somewhere, in the development of this class went horribly wrong. The area of interest is supposed to increase the duration of knacks, but fails to specify how. The capstone similarly implies that there should have been more areas of interest at one point – unless infinite active knacks are what the goal was.
The book contains the raconteur archetype for the savant, who creates an avatar corresponding to the area of interest,, with Perform (oratory) acting as the skill whose result determines knacks gained via epic storytelling. Yep, this archetype represents something akin to the old savant, but suffers, like the base class, from having a key ability based on a skill, which are notoriously easy to cheese with spells and items. Making that a level-based check would have been more balanced and elegant. The savant was the class I was most stoked for – its revision is really cool, in that it manages to get really, really close to making a really nice Blue mage type of class that bases its powers on foes encountered. System-immanently, this means that class does require a bit of metagaming, but per se, I would not object to that here. However, the rules-chassis has some unfortunate holes in it that seriously need fixing to work properly.
The trickster class presented herein receives d8 HD, 4 + Intelligence modifier skills per level, proficiency with simple weapons plus rapier, longsword, sap, short sword, shortbow, whip light armor and shields (excluding tower shields) and may freely cast spells while only wearing light armor and/or using a shield. The class receives 3/4 BAB-progression as well as good Ref- and Will-saves and gains spellcasting.
Spellcasting of the trickster is slightly more tricky (I'll punch myself later for that one) than you'd expect: The trickster's spellcasting is governed by Intelligence and thus is prepared according to convention. However, spells prepared are not expended upon being cast - instead, the spell slot of the appropriate level is expended. Metamagic is handled as for sorcerers and similar spontaneous casting classes. High Intelligence influences the number of spells a trickster can cast, but not the amount of spell-slots he has - this is pretty important for balance, so bear that in mind. In short, the trickster has somewhat arcanist-y casting.
Tricksters begin play with 4 cantrips known and 2 1st level spells and increase that up to 6 for each spell level, barring 5th and 6th, which cap at 5. 5 is also the maximum spells per day limit. Akin to the alchemist and similar classes, spellcasting caps at spell level 6.
The trickster also receives access to sneak attack and begins play with +1d6, increasing this by +1d6 at 4th level and every 3 levels thereafter. Similarly, at first level, the trickster gains trapfinding. Starting at 3rd level the trickster adds +1 competence bonus to Bluff, Disguise, Escape Artist, Sleight of Hand or Stealth, increasing the bonus by +1 every third level, though the new bonuses gained may be freely distributed among aforementioned skills. 3rd level also nets evasion and 6th, 12th and 18th level provides bonus feats from a limited list. 8th level provides uncanny dodge, 11th level improved uncanny dodge.
At the 5th level, as a standard action, the trickster can cast a spell with a range of touch and deliver it as part of a melee attack, with the restriction of only working in conjunction with spells that have a casting time of 1 standard action or less. If the trickster hits, he also deals sneak attack damage in conjunction with the touch spell. Problematic here: The sneakspell’s damage is doubled on a critical hit, which can result in ridiculous numbers. At least metamagic can’t be applied. Starting at 17th level, a sneakspell that misses is no longer lost.
9th level provides ranged legerdemain, though the ability is thankfully MORE precise than that of the arcane trickster PrC, specifying how far you can propel stolen objects and increasing the required skill ranks to 5. At 14th level, the trickster receives Filch Spell, which allows the trickster to hijack ongoing spells requiring direction (flaming spheres etc.) as a move action 3 + Intelligence modifier times per day. 15th level provides Surprise spells - but unlike the imprecise original take on the ability, this one clarifies from the get-go how it works with magic missiles or AoE-spells. As the capstone, the trickster treats all 1s and 2s of sneak attack as 3s and auto-confirms crits executed with sneak attacks. Additionally, now metamagic feats may be added to sneakspells sans increasing the casting time.
The class has some customizations, in the guise of so-called fortes, which is gained at 2nd level and yields new abilities at 5th and 9th level. The first would be Acrobat, which not only provides skill-bonuses to movement-related skills and eliminates the need for running starts to get the associated bonus. Additional movement while not carrying heavy load or the like and no armor check penalty for Dex-based skills can also be found here. At 5th level, the trickster gains a scaling bonus to AC and CMD and may also act as though under freedom of movement for trickster level round per day, but only for movement purposes. Provided the trickster has at least 10 ft. at 9th level, he can dimension door as part of the move action expended, but, in a unique twist, the total distance he can thus travel is limited and capped with a daily max. The second forte is arcane accomplice, which nets a familiar, though the familiar receives Disable Device and Sleight of Hand as class skills and can deal sneak attack as long as it's within 30 ft. of the trickster - and yes, this means you can basically double-team on your own, greatly increasing the validity of sneak attack, though, for balance's sake, a familiar's sneak attack uses d4s, which proved mathematically feasible in my tests. 5th level goes one step further and nets the familiar all teamwork feats of the trickster as well as AC +2, while 9th level provides basically spring attack for the familiar, but only with regards to delivering harmless touch attacks - and yes, this is more versatile than you'd think.
The third forte is Beguile and provides +1 to DCs and +1 to rolls to overcome SR, scaling by +1 at 5th and 9th level - but only when targeting creatures that would be denied their Dexterity-modifier or that are helpless. At 5th level, when successfully feinting, the target would be denied his Dex-mod to AC for the next melee attack or spell targeting by the trickster, but only when performed on or before his next turn. 9th level decreases the required action to feint to a move action, a swift action if the trickster has Improved Feint.
The fourth forte is Spell Pilfer, which is easily the most unique of the fortes: As an immediate action, the trickster can make a Spellcraft check (DC 15 + spell level) to identify the spell and, if successful, the trickster may attempt to pilfer the spell. The caster receives a Will-save versus 10 + 1/2 trickster class level + Intelligence-modifier to negate the attempt. If the caster fails, he loses access to the spell known or prepared spell, while the trickster temporarily (1/2 class levels, minimum 1) adds the spell to his list of spells known. While the spell is pilfered, the original caster may not cast it, but the trickster may, provided he has an available spell slot. Only one spell (again, VERY important for balance) can be pilfered at a given time - pilfering a second spell, the previous spell immediately reverts to the owner. This ability can be used 3 + Intelligence modifier times per day. It should be noted that tricksters can only pilfer spells they can cast, another VERY important limitation. Now you may have noted that Will-saves are pretty easy for most casters - thus, at 5th level, the trickster's Wisdom modifier is also added to the DC to resist the pilfer attempt. I am usually fiercely opposed to dual attribute-modifiers to anything, but considering that Wisdom is NOT a trickster's crucial stat in any way, in practice, this is less problematic. 9th level allows the trickster to pilfer spells above his casting capacity, but thankfully with the caveat that the trickster can't cast such spells - so no abuse possible. This is a very impressive ability in my book, since it makes spell theft work sans holes in the wording, sans abuse. Love it! I wish this level of care had been extended to some of the other classes that dabble in pilfer/duplication.
The fifth forte would be shadow, which increases CL of shadow school or darkness-descriptor-spells by +1 and it also nets low-light vision and darkvision 30 ft. (Or +30 ft., if the trickster already has darkvision.) 5th level nets something unique - the option to 3 + Intelligence modifier-mod times per day animate shadows of targets to attack them (cool). At 9th level, the trickster can basically hide in plain sight while within 10 feet of a shadow other than his own and at that level, the shadow may use the trickster's sneak attack.
There are two trickster archetypes here, the dual forte and the forte master trickster: Both have diminished spellcasting, but the dual forte trickster replaces the 6th, 12th and 18th level bonus feats with a second forte gained at 6th level, for which he is treated as -4 class levels, a limitation that ends at the capstone abilities. The forte master adds two very potent abilities to each forte, gained at 11th and 14th level, replacing the 12th and 18th level bonus feats. Acrobats can inflict sneak attack when moving more than 10 feet and maintain actions after using dimension door. Arcane accomplices increase familiar potency and may teleport them to an adjacent square 1/day as a swift action. Beguilers get enchantment tricks, shadow masters darkness-related tricks, and spell pilferers may now steal divine spells as well. Big plus: For campaigns that prefer a bit lower power-level than what the rather potent trickster-chassis offers, the pdf has some advice regarding the limitation of spell-lists. I STRONGLY recommend implementing this advice for most campaigns. The trickster is a relatively young and pretty potent class and I still like it.
The final class herein is another new one, the tinkerer. These fellows get d8 HD, 6 + Intelligence modifier skills per level, proficiency in simple weapons, plus hand and repeating crossbow as well as his grenades and light and medium armor, but not shields. Tinkerers get ¾ BAB-progression as well as good Fort- and Ref-saves. Grenades are a tweak on the bomb mechanic – the tinkerer can make up to class level + Intelligence modifier of them per day, and they can’t be stored. The tinkerer need raw materials sans cost, but grenades must be thrown immediately, or they explode for maximum damage. They are thrown splash weapons with a range of 20 ft. and they are treated as weapons for feat purposes. Direct hits inflict 1d6 + Intelligence modifier damage, half of which is bludgeoning, half piercing – nice damage-type codification there! Damage increases by +1d6 every odd level thereafter, but this damage is not multiplied by crits or Vital Strike. Splash damage is equal to minimum damage. At 4th level, the tinkerer adds Intelligence modifier to Disable Device and UMD and may select a skill from a list, gaining +2 competence bonus in the skill and +2 insight to Perception checks pertaining to it. At 8th level and every 4 levels thereafter, the tinkerer adds another skill and increases the bonuses of an existing one by +2. At 14th level, the tinkerer may roll twice on such a skill, taking the better result, up to Intelligence modifier times per day. 18th level nets the option to always take 10 and once per day take 20 in one of them
5th level provides trapfinding and 8th level Master Craftsman, or Gunsmith – the latter obviously only in firearm-using campaigns, though in such a case, the proficiency list should imho be extended from the get-go. Starting at 6th level, the tinkerer may modify up to 3 + Intelligence modifier grenades to have e.g. an increased splash radius, add incendiary cloud, remove squares from the detonation, etc. The capstone gets rid of the daily limit of these improved grenades and similarly gets rid of the daily limit of rolling twice in specialized skills. At 10th level, the tinkerer may suppress mechanical traps and becomes better at disarming them safely – the suppression can provide interesting scenarios. 12th level adds ½ class level to the Perception and Disable Device skill to disarm traps he made, as well to all saves against them.
You may have noted that the class seems to be missing spellcasting. Indeed, while the tinkerer gets mending/make whole SPs, that’s about it – and there is a very good reason for that. You see, this is actually a pet-class that gets a clockwork companion from the get-go. Picture these guys as basically eidolons with the full array of construct immunities, which is brutal. They can be biped or quadrupeds and the book covers a ton of modifications, their evolution analogue, ranging from 1 to 4-points. And yes, e.g. flight has been properly locked behind 5th level. We unfortunately get no archetypes for the class, which is a bit of a pity – I like the non-caster pet-class angle, I like the grenades and this class is easily my favorite among the new ones. All classes get favored class options for a couple of races, with several of the cool Midgard races noted. Each of the classes also comes with a brief sidebar talking about the role of the class in the context of Kobold Press’ fantastic setting.
The archetype chapter also includes some options for other classes: The Black Hat gunslinger, who gets jinxes, the black powder reaver barbarian, the gunfighter, the noble shootist gunslinger, beast-soul, iron staff and clockwork monks as well as paper drake monks, elemental ninjas and the futurist witch. Okay, here, I must address a massive elephant in the room. Notice how I haven’t mentioned psychic magic once? There’s a reason for that – the book does not support the concepts from Occult Adventures (or Pathfinder Unchained), which is a pretty huge flaw as far as I’m concerned and something I wanted to see updated. For example the coilgunner would have made for a great update, now that the Technology Guide has been released…but no, the archetype's not in the book. Among these archetypes, it becomes pretty painfully apparent that such an update would have been smart. Noble shootist begs for swashbucklering; futurist witch for Technology Guide-synergy…and the concept of an elemental ninja has been done so much better by Legendary Games’ damn cool kinetic shinobi hybrid class. It is interesting to note that this chapter does not contain all the old material, and, alas, like the base classes, could have used a freshening up. The book was released in December of last year (2017), so plenty of time after OA and PFU’s release…and in the case of e.g. guarded priest, it is evident that the book *IS* known and that the compendium *DOES* reference it. So yeah, lost chance there.
The book then provides a massive feat-chapter – but I’m not going to go into the details here – this review is already too big. There are Leadership variants to attract beasts or split Leadership in cohort and followers, ricochet shots and the like. Plus, I have already covered the majority of them at one point. Puzzling: No extra grenades feat for the tinkerer, and indeed, the new classes could have used a couple of new and exciting feats here. The books also reprints scaling combat feats, which are per se a good idea, but ultimately, the brief section can’t really implement the concept to yield a universal system. I like this, but this would have been the first thing I’d have cut from the compilation…or expanded to its own sub-chapter/own book. The compilation does include the beloved Death Feats and Flaws, which allow the return from the dead to mean something, granting unique abilities. These still rock hard.
The gear chapter collates the items and magic weapons, including the regalia of Gax as legendary items. We also get a relatively big spell-chapter, which generally sport some evocative visuals, though e.g. arrow of the animal spirit should probably cause typed damage. The combat divinations are probably the coolest aspect, spell-wise – these are mostly low-level swift/immediate action spells intended for characters that have to dive into the fray and still want to cast (sans eating AoOs galore). Pretty much my favorite section in the whole book.
We end with tracking sheets for animal companions, arrows, clockwork companions, favored enemies and terrains, prepared spells, spirit guides, summoned monsters and wild shapes.
Conclusion:
Editing and formatting in the current pdf version are very good on a formal level. On a rules-language level, the book is generally precise and gets intricacies right rather often, but also sports a few rather nasty blunders that hamper rules-integrity of core class abilities. This problem is exacerbated in the print version, alas – as drop-dead gorgeous as it is, I would usually recommend it sans hesitation. But there are more cut copy paste glitches in the print version, hiccups that were in the first compilation reprinted, etc. E.g. the flavor-text of the warlock archetypes references the white necromancer in the print copy. The theurge’s Fort-save has a glitch at level 8…you get the idea. The book should have gotten more careful editing pass before heading off to print. As presented, I’d tentatively recommend print if that sort of thing is less important for you. Otherwise, I’d suggest getting the pdf instead, which has since been cleared of a couple of these hiccups. The artwork inside is beautiful and full-color, with only a few pieces reused from Kobold Press’ classics. The pdf comes fully bookmarked with nested bookmarks for your convenience.
This is the longest review I’ve written in a long while. Marc Radle as the lead designer, with additional content by Ryan Costello Jr., Crystal Frasier, Michael Kortes, John Ling Jr., Ben McFarland, Brian Suskind and Jerall Toi, has delivered an absolutely beautiful book. And there is a lot to like about this book. This does not change, however, that I, personally, was somewhat disappointed by it. Granted, it was billed and intended as a big compilation of the series and it does just that.
However, it does not compile everything. And there was a compilation before it. I really, really hoped that this book would adapt to the changed realities of the game since the first compilation, including e.g. psychic magic for the consideration of spell-pilfering/knacks, Technology Guide and the like – alas, no such luck.
Pathfinder Unchained gets lip-service in a single archetype, while the monk and barbarian-archetypes, to name a few, could have used modified unchained variants that make use of ki powers, skill unlocks, etc. I usually don’t point the like out, but when the KS ran, OA or PFU were not new books. Both changed significantly what folks expect from Pathfinder classes and provided much-beloved engines and character options. The second compilation, alas, disregards these books completely, which is puzzling, considering the thematic overlap of a TON of options herein.
As a person, this particularly saddened me, since I love the emphasis on choice, moving parts, skill unlocks etc. that these books championed. I also was missing the iconic appendix – the sample characters from the 20K stretchgoal for the new classes are not included.
That being said, there is good to be said about he designs herein – the classes presented within universally manage to be pretty easy to grasp. You won’t need to spend a ton of time, figuring out how to build a character with them. You read them once and they’re ready to play. There is value in such easy to grasp designs and the design-tenet of simplicity. While this means that there’s not much in the way of internal differentiation between members of the same class, you may well like that. Unlike e.g. ethermancers or kineticists, you can pretty much run a warlock or battle scion after a cursory read-through. So while this book did not offer that much for *me*, it may well provide exactly what you’re looking for. If you wanted a very easy to grasp blaster, then this offers what you’re looking for.
The book contains several, by now classic classes I absolutely adore –spirit shaman, spell-less ranger, white necromancer…there are many cool options here, but I can’t help but feel like this could have been one for the ages if it redesigned and expanded them. This compilation would have been a great chance to address the priest’s nova-channel, add more divine gifts, fortes, etc., add more spell-less ranger talents to account for the release of the slayer and vigilante, etc. Some of the new class options, while not bad per se, have serious flaws in components of their engines that make them feel like less than what they could have been. The savant, while better than before, nets infinite casting and has some wonky bits in its core engine. Additionally, the new classes get significantly less material – no truly new archetypes; heck, not even the Extra X-class feature feat for grenades. The warlock and tinkerer in particular could have used a couple of new tricks to set them apart from the gazillion other warlock-y or pet classes.
How to rate this, then? See, here things become tricky. Herein lies the reason why this review is such a huge frickin’ beast.
I can see this book work like a 5-star masterpiece for groups that don’t like a lot of nuts and bolts in their classes, that want easy and quick integration. If making a GM-call here and there doesn’t faze you, then the few engine hiccups become less relevant. That being said, if you expected updates for the classes, occult support or complex design-paradigms à la Direlock, Interjection Games, Dreamscarred Press, Everyman Gaming, Lost Spheres Publishing’ shadow weaver, Legendary Games’ kinetic shinobi, etc., then you won’t find these herein.
If, on the other hand, well-made and elegant simplicity is what you’re going for, then you’ll probably adore the vast majority of the material within.
This is why I provided this ridiculous level of detail in my analysis above – so you can judge for yourself whether the classes herein are something you and your group would enjoy. While, as a person, this fell short of what I expected from the second compilation of the series, as a reviewer, I have to take into account that the no-frills, easy to use design-paradigms employed here may well be exactly what you’re looking for.
So yeah, If you’re into classes with a lot of differentiation-options and nuts and bolts to tinker with, then you may end up rather disappointed by this book.
If, however, you’re looking for a book full of classes that are really easy to use and don’t mind the lack of PFU and OA-support, then get this right now, particularly if you don’t already own the constituent pdfs!
Now, I won’t lie – for me, as a person, this book managed to score no higher than 3 stars, due to the reasons discussed above. That being said, this was billed as a COMPILATION of sorts, and as a reviewer, I have an obligation to put aside personal bias regarding design-paradigms and how to handle the act of compiling material - I'd have expected updates and more expansions/revisions. And while the book may not be for *me*, I can see some significant appeal for a lot of tables out there. Hence, I need to account for both stances, which brings me to a median rating of 4 stars. The book is not perfect, but quite a few groups will adore content contained within these pages.
Reviewed first on endzeitgeist.com, then submitted to Nerdtrek and GMS magazine and posted here, on OBS, etc.
Endzeitgeist out.
Fubbles the Baby Cow |
Hi Kobolds, loving the New Paths classes, using the spell-less ranger as my default core Ranger class, and my wife is currently playing an 11th level skin-changer.
We ran into a question about the skin-changer. The Animal Shape (minorO ability says "His options for new forms include all creatures with the
animal type. This ability functions like beast shape I, except as noted". Later additions to the Animal Shape class ability reference Beast Shape II, III, etc.
I read this to mean that the skin-changer can take the form of any creature with the Animal type, and gains abilities of the chosen form as listed in the Beast Shape spells. However, in the Hero Lab file for skin-changers, magical beasts begin to be listed starting at 8th level.
Does Animal Form allow Magical Beasts as well as animals?
Thanks for all your great work!
Marc Radle |
Hi Kobolds, loving the New Paths classes, using the spell-less ranger as my default core Ranger class, and my wife is currently playing an 11th level skin-changer.
We ran into a question about the skin-changer. The Animal Shape (minorO ability says "His options for new forms include all creatures with the
animal type. This ability functions like beast shape I, except as noted". Later additions to the Animal Shape class ability reference Beast Shape II, III, etc.I read this to mean that the skin-changer can take the form of any creature with the Animal type, and gains abilities of the chosen form as listed in the Beast Shape spells. However, in the Hero Lab file for skin-changers, magical beasts begin to be listed starting at 8th level.
Does Animal Form allow Magical Beasts as well as animals?
Thanks for all your great work!
Hey there!
Awesome to hear you are getting so much out of the classes in the New Paths Compendium!
You are reading the ability correctly - Animal Form only allows creature with the Animal type, just as the text says. It does not allow Magical Beasts as well as animals. It sounds like HeroLab is incorrect!
Fubbles the Baby Cow |
Fubbles the Baby Cow wrote:Hi Kobolds, loving the New Paths classes, using the spell-less ranger as my default core Ranger class, and my wife is currently playing an 11th level skin-changer.
We ran into a question about the skin-changer. The Animal Shape (minorO ability says "His options for new forms include all creatures with the
animal type. This ability functions like beast shape I, except as noted". Later additions to the Animal Shape class ability reference Beast Shape II, III, etc.I read this to mean that the skin-changer can take the form of any creature with the Animal type, and gains abilities of the chosen form as listed in the Beast Shape spells. However, in the Hero Lab file for skin-changers, magical beasts begin to be listed starting at 8th level.
Does Animal Form allow Magical Beasts as well as animals?
Thanks for all your great work!
Hey there!
Awesome to hear you are getting so much out of the classes in the New Paths Compendium!
You are reading the ability correctly - Animal Form only allows creature with the Animal type, just as the text says. It does not allow Magical Beasts as well as animals. It sounds like HeroLab is incorrect!
Thanks for the clarification Marc. I appreciate the assist.
Feros |
Thanks for the great review nightflier!
And yes, I think a Pathfinder 2E version of the New Paths Compendium sounds like a great idea! :)
Given the changes to the Ranger, instead of Spell-Less Ranger, could there be a Spell-Using Ranger?
>.>
<.<
:)
Marc Radle |
To be honest, I would prefer continued support for the Pathfinder 1e. I really think that there will be a niche market for 1e products that would allow low-cost pdfs of 10-12 pages much like the original New Paths series.
Completely understood! Believe me, I'm a HUGE Pathfinder 1E fan!
The reality is though ... Pathfinder 1E is no longer the current system, and until 2E comes out and can be evaluated by all the third party RPG companies (which happens this month) you're going to see most (not all, but certainly most) of the the main third party RPG companies ceasing to produce new Pathfinder 1E stuff.
David knott 242 |
Then again -- Anyone making stuff for PF1 now knows that Paizo won't be coming up with anything of their own that could contradict whatever a 3rd party publisher puts out. I think all Paizo has left for 1st edition are the last two volumes of Tyrant's Grasp.
On the other hand, the very first 3rd party products put out for PF2 probably won't age well, as the proper pattern for such things is not yet well established.
nightflier |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
nightflier wrote:To be honest, I would prefer continued support for the Pathfinder 1e. I really think that there will be a niche market for 1e products that would allow low-cost pdfs of 10-12 pages much like the original New Paths series.Completely understood! Believe me, I'm a HUGE Pathfinder 1E fan!
The reality is though ... Pathfinder 1E is no longer the current system, and until 2E comes out and can be evaluated by all the third party RPG companies (which happens this month) you're going to see most (not all, but certainly most) of the the main third party RPG companies ceasing to produce new Pathfinder 1E stuff.
Yeah, I understand that - but what's stopping you publishing for instance a pack of 10 ranger talents in one pdf under your own name, not under KP? Rogue Genius Games model is what I have in mind.
Of course, I'm fully aware that PF 1e will not be supported anymore. TBH, I'm afraid that even 2e will not go well against D&D 5e. It is what it is.