kyrt-ryder |
Review added. Thank you for taking your time to put it up... and for doing it for free.
Should you do a statblock version of this product, know that you're going to have at least one customer willing to pay a modest fee to use it.
Regards,
Ruemere
Pretty good review Ruemere.
Just to add my own thoughts (because I really am not up for a review right now, and there's not much more to say beyond what Ruemere already covered, it is a simplistic sheet after all) I'd like to point out that personally I really like the lack of Data Verification. Far too often I find I'm dealing with houserules or obscure material and verification just throws a cramp in my style because the sheet tries to tell me I'm wrong when I'm not.
So again, thank you for an excellent product WKG.
ruemere |
Pretty good review Ruemere.
[...]I really like the lack of Data Verification. Far too often I find I'm dealing with houserules or obscure material and verification just throws a cramp in my style because the sheet tries to tell me I'm wrong when I'm not.
[... ]
My feelings exactly. It's just that some folks like their applications to be more supportive - and that's why it's in both categories.
The review is hardly worth the praise - just wanted to make the product more visible to target audience.
Regards,
Ruemere
Wicked K Games |
Ruemere, Kryt-Ryder, & R_Chance - You're all very welcome! :D
Review added. Thank you for taking your time to put it up... and for doing it for free.
Should you do a statblock version of this product, know that you're going to have at least one customer willing to pay a modest fee to use it.
Regards,
Ruemere
First off, thank you very much for the review. Not only did I appreciate your words, I also liked that you added thoughts on improvements. :) I'm actually already working on a loot sheet. I also think it's entirely possible that I'll do a stat block version eventually. I've been debating over doing a set for NPCs the last couple days. Also there's a chronicle like sheet in the Advanced Character Portfolio (working on updates).
Wicked K Games |
kyrt-ryder wrote:
Pretty good review Ruemere.
[...]I really like the lack of Data Verification. Far too often I find I'm dealing with houserules or obscure material and verification just throws a cramp in my style because the sheet tries to tell me I'm wrong when I'm not.
[... ]My feelings exactly. It's just that some folks like their applications to be more supportive - and that's why it's in both categories.
The review is hardly worth the praise - just wanted to make the product more visible to target audience.
Regards,
Ruemere
To answer on the data verification.... I've had some experience with it, but I'm merely an amateur when it comes to javascript. As Dark_Mistress pointed out, I'm a not usually one to do things simple. I'd like to do more in the way of auto-calculation and such... but I'm not quite there yet. Both Kryt-Ryder and Ruemere made a valid point on Data Verification, so I'd make sure there was a version without it. :D Hope that helps!
Thorkull |
First off, great sheet -- very neat and clean.
However, I have a couple of terminology nitpicks and a suggestion in the vein of constructive criticism:
1) "BAB" stands for "Base Attack Bonus", so "BAB Bonus" is redundant. Also, there's not really a "BAB Total" in the way you're using it. You should just have "Attack Bonus", and then that gets divided up between melee and ranged.
2) "CMB" stands for "Combat Maneuver Bonus", not "Combat Maneuver Base".
3) It would speed up filling in the sheet if "Trained Only" skills were marked with an asterisk, like on the official sheet. It would save time flipping through the book to look and see if you should put down the total for that skill or not.
None of these will keep me from using the sheet, but they should be easy edits.
Thanks for a great free sheet!