Pathfinder Module: Cult of the Ebon Destroyers (PFRPG) Print Edition

3.80/5 (based on 16 ratings)
Pathfinder Module: Cult of the Ebon Destroyers (PFRPG)

Add Print Edition $13.99

Add PDF $9.99

Non-Mint Unavailable

Facebook Twitter Email

An urban, wilderness, and dungeon adventure for 8th-level characters

A malignant cult has taken root in the mystical and magical realm of Jalmeray. Known and feared throughout distant Vudra, the cult of Dhalavei has expertly destroyed organizations and societies from within for millennia. Now a new sect of the sinister Cult of the Ebon Destroyers has its sights set on Thakur Kharswan of Jalmeray, and the magistrates and bureaucrats behind the throne must hunt down and eliminate the cult before the unthinkable happens. If only there were someone they could trust to behead Dhalavei's cult before the assassins do the same to their beloved ruler…

Cult of the Ebon Destroyers is an adventure for 8th-level characters, written for the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game and compatible with the 3.5 edition of the world’s oldest RPG. In addition to the adventure, this volume also features a brand-new monster and a gazetteer of the city of Niswan, capital of the Isle of Jalmeray.

Written by Matthew Goodall, the winner of Paizo Publishing's RPG Superstar contest, which allows unpublished authors to compete before a panel of celebrity game designers and legions of their peers for the chance to write a Pathfinder Module.

Pathfinder Modules are 32-page, high-quality, full-color, adventures using the Open Game License to work with both the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game and the standard 3.5 fantasy RPG rules set. This Pathfinder Module includes new monsters, treasure, and a fully detailed bonus location that can be used as part of the adventure or in any other game!

ISBN-13: 978-1-60125-317-0

Cult of the Ebon Destroyers is sanctioned for use in Pathfinder Society Organized Play. Its Chronicle Sheet and additional rules for running this module are a free download (240 KB zip/PDF).

Note: This product is part of the Pathfinder Adventure Subscription.

(go to main product page)

Product Availability

Print Edition:

Available now

Ships from our warehouse in 11 to 20 business days.

PDF:

Fulfilled immediately.

Non-Mint:

Unavailable

This product is non-mint. Refunds are not available for non-mint products. The standard version of this product can be found here.

Are there errors or omissions in this product information? Got corrections? Let us know at store@paizo.com.

PZO9529


See Also:



1 to 5 of 16 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>

Average product rating:

3.80/5 (based on 16 ratings)

Sign in to create or edit a product review.

Cult of the Ebon Destroyers Review

5/5

The goal of this module is to stop an evil Vudran cult from taking over. I liked the "Indian"-flavored touches that were present throughout. However, I felt that the last, 10th Level encounter would be a bit too tough for a non-optimized group of 8th Level PCs. PCs can make it easier on themselves if they figure out what special powers and advantages the Big 3 Bad Guys have in advance, before they attack their hidden temple. The encounters are all cinematic set-pieces (no boring 15-by-15 rooms here!); they reminded me of the "Mortal Kombat" movie (which in this case is a good thing).


Perfectly Mechanical Adventure

5/5

I really like this one.
It has very, very well-ordered mechanism for investigation, and battles.
Sidebar is much more helpful to novice DM than Paizo's any other modules.
Villians are all through about everything...it makes sense on reallistic comparison.
Chapter 3-especially boss encounters without rest- are truly brutal, but PCs have many chances to exclude two of them in final battle.

So this is valuable for my full stars.


PFS

3/5

I have played this as part of PFS. I have neither read nor run it.

I enjoyed the challenging encounters and I like investigating but the adventure felt like: go talk to this list of NPCs to proceed and actually figuring anything out was mostly irrelevant.

Due to language barriers most of the players spent the investigative portion of the adventure sitting around bored.

I played an outgoing character with a lot of knowledge and charisma skills and found myself super useful, and personally I had a lot of fun, but the boredom of others dragged me down a bit.


Excellent Flavour, Brutal Combat

4/5

I had the pleasure of playing this mod at the Ruby Phoenix convention in Sydney. I'd travelled from Darwin to attend the con, so I was really stoked that a lot of high quality modules were on offer... including Cult of the Ebon Destroyers.

The lead-in to the mod is excellent. There's a lot of flavour and a real sense of 'you are there' put into the module, with a lot of nice touches like pre-generated divinations and the like. That made my day. It can be frustrating, though... this module has a reputation for being very tough, but the first part really requires a social face, a skill/knowledge type person and someone who can cast divinations. This might suggest that it's a social module where you can bring your "non-combat characters" and have a ball, and for a time it seems like you're right.

Then the combat hits, and wow. It's brutal stuff.

Extremely high AC combat munchkins coming pre-buffed, lots of monks with moderately difficult fort saves (fighter-types need only roll 1s to fail, but there are a lot of them), and you're fighting in their home territory so the terrain is perfectly geared towards maximising their advantages.

We had a very optimized party (although we lacked ranged and/or arcane support) and we couldn't complete the module. We had two PC deaths including our two toughest characters, and the rest of the party were stat-drained/negative levelled to the point they were ineffective.

That said...

The combats are unique. Flavourful. Interesting. And, one must remember, you're fighting a death cult. They're not weak and soft and squishy -- properly run, they should go for the throat at all times, including coup-de-grace and other such things. They're death cultists and should be played appropriately.

The lead-in was extremely flavourful, the roleplaying was excellent, and the overall story remarkable in its execution. I think the only bad thing I have to say about this module is that it needed to decide if it was a social/investigative or a combat-fest... it tried to be both, and while it pulled it off really nicely, you have to bring a fully optimized party to this or you're going to either get stuck in the first half or die horribly in the second.

But what's the point of playing Pathfinder if there's not a chance of death?


5/5

Honestly having played this it was the toughest and most challenging series of games I have played to date in PFS and honestly the most fun I have had, every single challenge was worthy of our team of adventurers and there was no need to hold back for fear of outshining the combats.

The investigation stage was extremely well written and performed masterfully by the GM, with the party having to work together and pool our abilities to accomplish the task.

The Combats were well ran and extremely well built giving me a new appreciation for the capabilities of NPCs, honestly I havent felt this much of a threat to my PC's survival since I started PFS and I would love it if every game felt this challenging.

All in probably among the best hours I have had playing PFS, I will admit if you arent in to serious challenges maybe you should steer clear of this one, but if you want to have a blast against challenges that will test you to your limits this is definately the mod for you.


1 to 5 of 16 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>
101 to 119 of 119 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Grand Lodge

Kyle Baird wrote:

@Thod - Only one character used the paste. They spread out a bit in the forest, and slept in separate tents in the thick of the jungle. The person who took last watch didn't actually want to take watch and chose to sleep. Tracking down the scent to particular tent, somewhat away from the rest of the party and the campfire, would you cast entangle? I didn't CdG of course, and I actually turned my attention to the rest of the party after "waking" DougDoug's character up.

Kyle

Thanks for your answer. I'm in shock !!!

An 8th level adventure. You go through a jungle in a hostile environment - and the group spreads out and doesn't even have a watch?

I would expect such behaviour from a beginner party - but even my Fools Errant group would act in a more survivable way. You don't need a stealth 28 - a stealth 2 is probably sufficient to surprise a sleeping character on his own.

I don't think it can be blamed on the designer if the group acts like that. But if this happens in my game it would sour the whole experience.

I hope I'm not coming over too strong here - but in a situation like this the characters ask - kill me, kill me. I hate as GM to be placed in such a situation where the most appropriate answer is - kill the PC.

Please tell me at least they had alarm spells up or anything else to protect them?

Thod


Spoiler:
ended with trip to temple. Again a well placed spell(deep slumber) took out tiger guy. skipped village and ghost due to time.

3rd session started at temple. After foyer fight the group went to the shrine, which was the best fight ever. Had a player made for disarming. He got a 36 to disarm 6-arms, and the look on his face when I said nope was priceless.Just got better when she then stepped up and said "i'll show you how it's done' and took his adamantine bill. Than the archer shoots an arrow and swat. He really hated that every one had deflection.


Thod wrote:

Please tell me at least they had alarm spells up or anything else to protect them?

Thod

Nope. To be fair they weren't spread "way" out, but even 10-15 in thick jungle is a lot. The person on watch had a +24 perception, but like I said, chose not to stay awake.

This was just after a little inter-party conflict. The paladin didn't react to kindly to the oracle of bones animating the rakshasa. We had a little "hand-waved" PvP, and the group was fractured until the oracle of bones died and her "sister" replaced her.

Grand Lodge

Kyle Baird wrote:
Thod wrote:

Please tell me at least they had alarm spells up or anything else to protect them?

Thod

Nope. To be fair they weren't spread "way" out, but even 10-15 in thick jungle is a lot. The person on watch had a +24 perception, but like I said, chose not to stay awake.

This was just after a little inter-party conflict. The paladin didn't react to kindly to the oracle of bones animating the rakshasa. We had a little "hand-waved" PvP, and the group was fractured until the oracle of bones died and her "sister" replaced her.

Kyle

Thanks for the information. The module isn't good for a disfunctional group that doesn't work together. In this circumstances I do understand a low rating as players and GM wouldn't have as much fun as they should.

I hardly dare to ask - did you do this for your fourth star?

Congratulation by the way.

Thod


Arnwyn wrote:
I absolutely believe that PFS should be entirely ignored when designing Pathfinder Modules.

Even as a PFS player, I agree. Forcing PFS design constraints on the modules would be a poor choice.

Liberty's Edge

Spoiler:

Shadowdancer not to tough. 10' range on shurkins sucked. They than went through the tunnel and came in the back way for the oracle. The ranger than just charged,and with human favorite, and think a crit, she didnt last too long.

Than unto the fight I thought would kill them. Note that with all his spells, it can be a huge hassle to do this encounter. Didnt know till halfway through that displacement and blur both work. It took them awhile to damage him because the images worked. Bad side is that even with +17 on will save I failed against Confusion and so rolled randomly to determine who he would attack when he did. This hurt because kept picking the high AC guy, where if chose would have picked the others off first. Eventaully they slowly beat him down.
I did change one small part, inwhich gave him blink instead of invis, for the contingousy. couse didnt work since his last action was to hit himself, thus knocking himself out.

Over all opinion is that it is too long for 3 sessions of PFS. The sandbox investigation can take up alot of time, and a more experinced Gm will probably make the Temple BBEG's go longer. I liked it alot and had hoped they had fought the wizard first, so had more time than tying to get done for the next use of table.


Pathfinder Card Game, Companion, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber
hogarth wrote:
As far as I can tell, none of Kyle's criticisms were PFS-specific. Of course, there's one notable difference -- under PFS rules he's not supposed to rewrite the module substantially. But personally, I think saying that a module is playable after substantial revision is a backhanded compliment at best and a stinging rebuke at worst.

Note, I think Kyle offered a detailed criticism, which is a good thing. My concern, as I mentioned is if the very nature of a PFS play experience was responsible(not at all/partly/wholly) for the issues presented, and if so, can we identify those. If the issues were not related to PFS play experience, cool, but as I mentioned, it is interesting that two major PFS players offered stinging criticisms. Perhaps that is just a coincidence.

Note x2, I think PFS is great, and I respect the hell out of the effort that Doug and Kyle put into PFS. This is just me making an observation with an interest in simply spurring constructive discussion.


Pathfinder Card Game, Companion, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber
Kyle Baird wrote:

This is why it's important for everyone to publish detailed reviews. Everyone's experience will average out and help generate a better picture regarding the quality of the product.

Everyone also needs to keep in mind that someone who has a negative experience is far more likely to write a review than someone who has an average to positive experience. That's just another reason to be as detailed as possible.

Agreed, and agreed. I should've mentioned that your review was thoughtful and thorough, and much appreciated. I suppose I am looking at my own PFS experience, and having noticed, as with most Living Campaigns, that the play experience is different than that of home play.

Anyway, it is all for the best.

Cheers!


Arnwyn wrote:
Elorebaen wrote:
I would much rather see designers stick with the paradign of normal play then try to cater to a PFS play experience, which, if what I have laid is correct, would make me think that everything created for normal play is not immediately apprpriate for PFS play. Lastly, I think it would be important to know from reviews what sort play experience and party make up.

I entirely agree with this.

The idea that the Pathfinder Modules (not the PFS scenarios) are/could be designed around PFS is very disturbing to me.

I absolutely believe that PFS should be entirely ignored when designing Pathfinder Modules.

+1

GRU

Paizo Employee Creative Director

Just so folks know... the modules are not designed around the Pathfinder Society at all. My assumption for folks who play them for PFS credit is that they're not trying to race through them in 4 hours, either, since some of the modules are pretty complex.


Kyle Baird wrote:
Thod wrote:

Please tell me at least they had alarm spells up or anything else to protect them?

Thod

Nope. To be fair they weren't spread "way" out, but even 10-15 in thick jungle is a lot. The person on watch had a +24 perception, but like I said, chose not to stay awake.

This was just after a little inter-party conflict. The paladin didn't react to kindly to the oracle of bones animating the rakshasa. We had a little "hand-waved" PvP, and the group was fractured until the oracle of bones died and her "sister" replaced her.

you didnt mention this "inner-party-conflict" in your review. Was it the reason the module went not as well as it should? If yes, then maybe you should be fair and correct your low rating or mention your team problem in the review.

Paizo Employee Director of Brand Strategy

I've edited a few posts by moving the contents within spoiler tags. Remember that this is a product discussion page and may be read by people planning on playing the adventure. For detailed discussion of individual encounters, please hide spoilers or take the discussion to the more GM-friendly Pathfinder Modules subforum.

Thanks!


Enpeze wrote:
you didnt mention this "inner-party-conflict" in your review. Was it the reason the module went not as well as it should? If yes, then maybe you should be fair and correct your low rating or mention your team problem in the review.

My rating of this scenario has very little to do with how the party I ran it for faired. My review is based of the design of the story, encounters, investigation, and quality of the writing.


Kyle Baird wrote:
My rating of this scenario has very little to do with how the party I ran it for faired. My review is based of the design of the story, encounters, investigation, and quality of the writing.

Actually, the group composition and playing style can make this adventure terribly easy, if the players find the "antidote" to the common massive problem of the final fights.

Spoiler:

which is "Dispelling" each and everyone who looked like a decently dangerous BBEG. Which the group I ran it for did : Wizard 9th, Oracle (of Lore) 8th, Barbarian 8th, Rogue 8th, Sorcerer ( Boreal) 8th. Experienced players, and they carry a bunch of Pearls of Power for extra spells/slots

I thoroughly agree with your description/evaluation of the silk factory's architecture.

The group liked the Weretiger encounter very much - probably because the tiger-in-the-night theme is so idiosyncratic of India for us - and considered it a highlight of the entire trip (they grew suspicious of the lycanthrope early, and layed out an ambush for him^^).

Contributor, RPG Superstar 2010

Thanks for the review Vikingson, glad your group liked parts of the adventure.

I'm curious about your 'antidote' for the final fights.

Spoiler:
Dispel magic removes one spell so it is hardly a silver bullet for these encounters. If your PCs were repeatedly using it, that's cool, it is a viable tactic. If you were using the 3.5 version of dispel magic which could remove more than one spell, then I can see why you might have had problems. Cult of the Ebon Destroyers was written for PFRPG.

Use of consumables.

Spoiler:
I personally also dislike having monsters and NPCs using all their consumables, just because they 'know' that they are about to fight the PCs. I felt that I had minimised this in the adventure. As a monk, drinking a 50 gp (or 25 gp to make) potion with a 1 hour duration makes sense if you suspect there is trouble coming. It's a better bet than a cure light wounds potion after the fact. Also one of the leaders of the cult is a wizard with Brew Potion as a feat so getting new potions shouldn't be a problem.
Apart from the mage armor potions for the monks, there is extremely little consumable use. The only other one I could find was Deepti drinking a potion of bear's endurance, which can also be manufactured by the wizard. The rest of the opponent's buffs come from spells.

Dark Archive Vendor - Fantasiapelit Tampere

James Jacobs wrote:
Just so folks know... the modules are not designed around the Pathfinder Society at all. My assumption for folks who play them for PFS credit is that they're not trying to race through them in 4 hours, either, since some of the modules are pretty complex.

No kidding. We runned the Crypt of Everflame in 8 hours. on the other hand, pc:s wanted to play couple of days before the event's started. Mask of the Living god was six hours, and City of Golden Deat took two 5-hour gaming sessions. But I still like them more than Society scenarios. Next up is From Shore to Sea, Realm of the Fellnight Queen, Cult of Ebon Destroyers, the Harrowing and Curse of the RIven sky. I love it.

Contributor, RPG Superstar 2014 Top 4, RPG Superstar 2013 Top 32

I just posted a five-star review of this module. Check it out over on the product page. Well done, Mr. Goodall, we had a great time playing this adventure!

Contributor, RPG Superstar 2010

Thanks Mike, glad you and your group enjoyed it and thank you for the nicely detailed report.
Just some thoughts about things you mentioned:

Earrings:
The earrings are in different districts but the PCs should realise that the spell's range won't cover the entire city. Locate object does have a duration, so they could run around the city with it on or cast the spell multiple times. I tend to show the players the city map at this point and let them figure out how they want to do it.

Were tiger:
Paladins are always going to make it hard on the disguised extremely evil weretiger. A pity he couldn't get away and come back and stalk them at night.

The village:
It can either be a roleplaying encounter, or a combat encounter (usually both). It's also meant to be an easy encounter; the hardest bit should be the moral decision of what the PCs do with any captured cultists.

The final boss:
Poor Zaafira is the weakest of the masters, and a caster without her buffs becomes a lot less of a threat. I designed her as the least powerful so that she fell somewhere between a decent one-on-one fight (if the PCs do decide to duel) and still be a small threat to the whole party. Pretty generous to give a surprise round when both parties are fully aware of each other, but a full attack of sneak attacks is always going to hurt. :-)

I do appreciate your thoughts on the pace and components of the adventure. The end may have a little too much combat, dungeon crawls do tend to be that way. I'm also happy to hear that your PCs want to hunt down other cells of Ebon Destroyer cultists. I hoped to make the cult villainous enough that the PCs really want to put them down.

Matt Goodall

Silver Crusade

Whew last message was almost 4 years ago but let's see what I can come up with.

I am running this at a Con in a couple of weekends. Should I expect a full 12-hour run time? Is this closer in execution to The Harrowing or closer to City of Golden Death?

If it is closer to 12 hours what can I expect to spend most of my time on?

101 to 119 of 119 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Paizo / Product Discussion / Pathfinder Module: Cult of the Ebon Destroyers (PFRPG) Print Edition All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.