mordion's page

Bulmahn, Seifter, and Radney-MacFarland announced it at the rules Q&A Thursday. I can't remember a ton of details but there will be 'planar infusions' (story feats that give you associated planar powers, like fire resistance or abilities to manifest flame if you spend time on the elemental plane of fire), new 0 HD races like tiefling/aasimar for law, chaos, and neutrality (I think the chaos one was previously published) and some magic items/rituals that can allow lower level planar travel

there are a few legitimate English and/or Pathfinder rules constructions that get <redacted>. I leave trying to find them as an exercise for the reader.

I remember "world's morphic field" from the Ask James Jacobs thread.

Patrick Renie wrote:

Rob: "Like cookie monster, but with blood instead of cookies."

Adam Daigle wrote:

Rob: It's like Cookie Monster, but with blood.

I'm not sure who to believe anymore. Flumph-man or Llama-man. I am suddenly faced with the soul-crushing realization that the quotes in this thread may not be 100% accurate.

They're actually consistent, just cut in different places.

Rape Jokes That Work

Are you arguing that if you were wearing an amulet of natural armor, and found a simple gold necklace that you would be unable to put that necklace on? Or merely that it would negate the amulet of natural armor?

It's certainly not that I don't believe it, I've read enough posts by people who know what they're talking about to acknowledge that it must be true. I just can't manage to understand it.

So, hypothetically, what if WizKids sold randomized cases, but only to vendors who immediately opened and sorted the figures. If those vendors priced and sold the minis individually, they would...what? Wind up with a bunch of figures no one wants and quickly sell out of the others? And if they tried to adjust prices to fit demand they'd still wind up with a glut of low priced unattractive minis and the prices on the popular ones would be sky-high? Is it fair to say that this business model essentially depends on getting people to buy minis they don't want?

1. Guns very clearly contribute to someones ability to execute lethal attacks. Violent movies or video games probably have little to no effect on whether someone decides to execute such an attack.

2. I think literally everyone that's commented in this thread has expressed an interest in increased mental health care.

3. The violence comes from the criminalization of drugs.

Well, you can always choose to fight. It's just that those choices frequently have a fatal result for the decision maker. Believe me, in this day and age, whatever kind of firearm you possess, it won't be a game-changer.

Even if it's not a game-changer for society, it might be a game-changer for you. In the hypothetical (and, of course, unlikely) jackbooted thugs at the front door scenario, an armed populace at least makes a few less thugs and gives people the choice to die on their feet rather than end up in a camp.

The founding fathers didn't envision an AR-15 when they made that amendment.

They envisioned a weapon that would give a person parity with an infantryman of the time. I think that's a good standard.

S morph

Edit: As in 'world's morphic'

If a druid with a horse animal companion takes a level of cavalier, does he have one animal companion at his character level, or two at his druid level and cavalier level respectively?

I know this has been discussed before, I'm not aware of any official response and James Jacob's response surprised me. Has there been any official response or developer comment on this?

I laughed out loud at

I am so ashamed. :)

It just sounds a like techoadvanced eidolon to me though. :)

I had a synthesist summoner in my Carrion Crown campaign who was 'really' a gnome with a suit of Numerian powered armor.

Major:

Minor:

I don't think Dervish Dance says anything about wielding or using a shield, it says you can't carry one.

If it meant "manufactured weapon," it would say "manufactured weapon" rather than "melee weapon."

In this thread.