Based on the original wording and definitions of "named" gear leaves for different interpretations, one strictly based on the logic of the sentence and the one based on intent. The intent of the proposed rule I fully agree with.
Thus as was pointed out..
Enevhar Aldarion wrote:
So I would propose saying that Named Generic Items can be upgraded, while Named Special Items cannot be. Basically, anything you could duplicate exactly by building it from scratch and have the cost come out the same should be upgradeable.
I completely agree with this, I would define the rule to be Named Special Items... then define "Special Items" as those having specific magical properties that do not have a pricing scheme in the core books.
If that is the proposed rule. 100% in favor of it.
