Star Wars and The Hidden Fortress, another Akira Kurosawa movie So like same/same
In Middle School there was AD&D fizzled out but I got the concept. High School there was Teenage Mutant Turtles from Palladium, also fizzled out. College Sophomore year there was the epic AD&D 2nd edition campaign that lasted both semesters that really got me into gaming and made lifelong friends from. I also read a lot of Vampire the Masquerade 2nd edition (this being 1994-1995) while waiting for my turn. And D6 Star Wars, where we accidently killed Luke Leaving the second Death Star. Junior Year there was GURPS used to play an Angels vs Demons because we were excited for In Nomine but just couldn't wait for it. There was more GURPS and a LARP while camping. Then First Senior Year I pulled back on gaming to focus on trying to graduate, notice I said first senior year. Then 2001 and the invite to Earthdawn where I've had a weekly game pretty much ever since, small gaps weeks nothing more than 2 months I think.
Vampire the Requiem LARP. Vampire the Requiem ttrpg. Hunter the Vigil. Revisting D6 Star Wars ("I Will Blow This Planet Up!!!!!), 4th Edition D&D, Pathfinder, Scion, 2 5th edition games, FFG Star Wars ("I Will Crash This Super Star Destroyer!!!), Kitchen Sink Chronicles of Darkness Round Robin Story Tellers, Vampire the Requiem, PF2, FFG Genesys for a weird west Deadlands game. Hunter the Vigil 2e. By the way I hear there's a stripped down rules lighter version of 3rd edition Exalted called Exalted Essence. Epicness on the Horizon. Trinity Adventure! for a Call of Cthulhu game coming sooon I didn't run all of these, some played. 1988 till now. I know I've left some out.
So is it an iPad baby generation or is it a gold mine? Is it doom prognosticating or is it an actual shift in the way media is consumed? Glad you can define what an actual table top player is. But what happens when they are all dead?
This is a stupid argument. Go Team Whatever Keeps People in the Hobby and Can Bring New People In Too!!!!!!!
Temperans wrote:
But you'd have it at the start of the next level 2 scenario because you got it at the end of the previous level 2 scenario. Or does that level 2 item allowable purchase for a level 2 character not count for the legal level 2 character? You use the +1 rune at level 2 if purchased during the 3 scenarios that comprise level 2. Also from the Organized Play Guide:
Any common equipment in sanctioned Pathfinder content with an item level less than or equal to your character’s level (minimum 2).
Always, not midway through a level. Always. Boom I got enough gold for a +1 rune at the start of level 2. Always.
Mathmuse wrote:
Um a Monk becomes expert in unarmed attacks and simple weapons at level 5 same as Barbarian, same as Ranger for becoming Expert. No early expert with a Monk. A Monk is an expert at Unarmormed Defense but that's another story
I Ate Your Dice wrote: To those that think I'm being too harsh, I'm more critical of the company I work for than I am of Paizo. Don't get me wrong, I like my company just fine, I just think that my staff and our customers deserve the best instead of our best, and am willing to fight for that change. This statement is meaningless. You don't name the company you work for. You also haven't proved you are more critical of it than Paizo by any measurable yardstick. So why even?
And yet AlastarOG wrote:
Not suggests, tells. Your words. Also
AlastarOG wrote: I would kindly tell them to leave my table, or withdraw myself from the table, because I'm too old to put up with petulant drama queens. What makes them petulant drama queens as opposed to you being on overstepping domineering play what I say sort?
Ravingdork wrote: Despite there being only three people in the 10th-level party (a champion, a wizard, and a fighter, the last of whom was unconscious and on his way to being buried by his friends*), nobody died in the fight against the four 9th-level bandits. So that title would have been a lie. As opposed to incendiary like the current title.
AlastarOG wrote: And before you say "well they could have done x and y as of level z" all monks I've seen have been 5 under. Then to be fair you shouldn't AlastarOG wrote: Braggard does have that issue but it's solved by 9, and before that if it's just 1-2 ennemies just don't use a finisher till it's clutch. Or AlastarOG wrote: Gymnast is the trickiest one but also the most team based one as you either help your team out with maneuvers (which are the most potent they can be when you're level 10 and roll twice on every check while you have panache) or you can absolutely destroy anyone who's probed or grabbed, making high teamwork tactics very engaging. Its rather disingenuous to talk about swashy choices at level 9 and 10 and then tell people not to talk about monk choices at higher levels because you've only seen monks 5 and below.
AlastarOG wrote: Teams usually have 2 casters, and at least one of them has a fly spell for just such scenarios. What percentage of all PF2 teams does that usually imply? How many 4 person teams have two casters? Does it differ greatly from 5 player teams with two? And what happens in PFS when you sit down to a table with no casters? So what do you mean by usually? Or is it not useful generalization?
umm...to the no. You jumped in with what you thought was all someone needed and didn't back read to ascertain that didn't fit the parameters of what someone was talking about or asking for. Hush now sweet "I can't back down gracefully or ever" poster. Your work here will most likely go oh and on and on and oh yes on. |