Krazee12's page

If we go on the cull statistics which have only 27% of rings surviving the cull then they were obviously the "hard mode" of the comp.

I did notice a lot of rings had charges (which I think is a fail), so presumably people just converted their wondrous item to a ring with no other change.

Further, based on the stats - shields, staffs and rods were easy mode
as over 50% survived the cull (which averaged 44% survival).

Staves have been a bad category for me. If I read your staff, and you did a good job, you had:

1. A series of related spells.
2. An enhancement bonus
3. A skill bonus.

At this point, you need something else. If all you had was summarized above, it's not a Superstar item. Sorry, you knew it was hard mode.

If you're other power was amazing (and I mean AMAZING) I keep reading. If it was meh, you're still done. I'll take a weapon with a neat power over that. Sorry ;)

If an experienced forumite believes the above is a good design for a staff then no wonder people think they are hard, as for me, the above design would be an automatic fail as too powerful.

I am beginning to see why none of last years top 32 finalist were taken from the voted top 32, and number 80-something made it on to the list. It may be something to do with equating superstarness with magical power.

If I find the items roughly the same worth, I vote for the one with the fewest formatting mistakes. I hate capitalized words, instead of bolding and walls of text make my eyes bleed.

Also if you don't say what it is in the first sentence I stop reading. You might like your description of fire with embedded ice chips capped with molybdenum, but I want to know what sort of weapon/item it is!