Monkey

Kevida's page

Organized Play Member. 503 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS

1 to 50 of 503 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Liberty's Edge

Zepheri wrote:

Jezelda the demon lord of lycanthropy take the moon

Agree to disagree: The moon isn't always about lycanthropy and vice versa.

Liberty's Edge

Masalic wrote:
Kevida wrote:
I suppose that Nethys has taken over Amazen's Areas of Secret Knowledge and Magic but who now has taken over Invention? Also, who has taken over Acavna's Areas of Companionship, Defensive battles, and the Moon? The reason that I ask is because I was considering adding another adventure to the Adventure Path Ruins of Azlant where the player free some Azlanti that were held in stasis because theses individuals are the only ones with the knowledge to stop another planet destroying cataclysm and in order to do so the player's needed to find a way to resurrect these two deities to have them bolster their power. If all of their Areas of concern are already taken then I'll have to rethink my "Part Seven"
Out of the core deities there are none. But there is the Gnome Deity brigh and the Empyreal Lord Bharnarol

It looks like Acavna's areas of concern are still open, then.

Liberty's Edge

I suppose that Nethys has taken over Amazen's Areas of Secret Knowledge and Magic but who now has taken over Invention? Also, who has taken over Acavna's Areas of Companionship, Defensive battles, and the Moon? The reason that I ask is because I was considering adding another adventure to the Adventure Path Ruins of Azlant where the player free some Azlanti that were held in stasis because theses individuals are the only ones with the knowledge to stop another planet destroying cataclysm and in order to do so the player's needed to find a way to resurrect these two deities to have them bolster their power. If all of their Areas of concern are already taken then I'll have to rethink my "Part Seven"

Liberty's Edge

I was wondering if anyone has tried to convert the Cult of the Bloom chapter of the 2E version of Kingmaker to 1E?

Liberty's Edge

ErichAD wrote:
Fastidiousness's recurring cleanliness is the best, shame it's self only. I could see a character making large statues as command word magic items of fastidiousness to improve local health.

That's an interesting. Perhaps an entrepreneurial PC or NPC could create various magic items to create a business like a bath house or laundromat that that has the implements of cleanliness cast that spell.

Liberty's Edge

Has anyone at Paizo considered having "Map Pack Classics" like you have "Flip Mat Classics"? Just a thought.

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
xNellynelx wrote:
Kevida wrote:
Just to be clear, these companions are already in the Bestiary along with everything else and it's second edition only?

They shouldn't be. These companions aren't part of the story, they were part of the Owlcat Video Game version of this story. The Kingmaker AP does not include these characters, but the companion guide gives you guidance, starblocks, quests, items/feats/spells that you can use if you want to incorporate them into your Kingmaker story.

On the second note, yes it's second edition. I don't recall if they made a 5e Companion Guide, but this guide is specific to 2e in terms of rule elements.

As noted below, Mr. Jacobs has made it clear the their stats are the only things that are in the Bestiary. As to your to my second point, I am an old "fuddy duddy" stuck in First Edition. So thnk you for your response it was helpful

James Jacobs wrote:

This is a 128 page expansion to the Adventure Path, and the book is 2nd edition Pathfinder. All the rules you need to incorporate NPC companions into your game (along with new player options they can teach and several new adventures they can unlock) are in this book, along with rules for camping, cooking campfire meals to gain advantages, and some rules for weather in the adventure.

You can really think of this book as an out-and-out expansion for Kingmaker across the board (more adventure, more treasure and rewards, more GM tools).

The bestiaries we did for 1st edition Pathifnder and for 5E include stats for the companions and several of the monsters/NPCs encountered in this book's adventures, but that's it.

It sounds like the rules for camping and what not can be incorporated into PF1E with minimal fuss. Thank you for clarifying!

Liberty's Edge

Just to be clear, these companions are already in the Bestiary along with everything else and it's second edition only?

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Phoebus Alexandros wrote:
What is the name of the rule set? I’d love to check it out!

Here is the link

http://www.jessejackjones.com

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Phoebus Alexandros wrote:
What is the name of the rule set? I’d love to check it out!

When I get home from work, I will give ypu a link.

Liberty's Edge

Correction:
The Flowing classes are included.

Alchemist
Barbarian
Bard
Cavalier
Cleric
Druid
Fighter
Gunslinger
Inquisitor
Magus
Monk
Oracle
Paladin
Ranger
Rogue
Sorcerer
Summoner
Witch
Wizard

In all honesty, I will probably make the rules as follows, "No class level higher than 20. On the other hand, character level has no upper limit."

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Phoebus Alexandros wrote:
Out of curiosity, what rules are you referring to?

It was a fan based Epic rules from the D&D 3.X days

Liberty's Edge

Melkiador wrote:
Ultimate Intrigue was pretty close to the end of new stuff. I guess you are wanting a version for the Shifter?

You are correct, my friend!

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

...the rules stopped at Ultimate Intrigue. Has anyone run into a more updated version. I'll share a link with everyone here who's interested in the one that I have.

Liberty's Edge

captain yesterday wrote:
Kevida wrote:
keftiu wrote:
Why did you post this on an unrelated product from several years ago?

1) I have been on hiatus from gaming for a few years and since this was the last entry into the First Edition Realm (with no interest in Second Edition), I thought that I'd post here.

2) If I broke any rules, then I apologize!
3) If I offended you. then i apologize for that as well!

You didn't break any rules, and I don't think they were offended. I think they were just curious. It's hard to gauge tone on message boards but keftiu doesn't seem like the type to get offended so easily.

Happy gaming, I agree with you on Kingmaker (and I'm also glad it will finally get some pawns!) and it can be hard knowing where to post things so it gets maximum exposure.

Where can we find the news about what future releases are happening?

Liberty's Edge

keftiu wrote:
Why did you post this on an unrelated product from several years ago?

1) I have been on hiatus from gaming for a few years and since this was the last entry into the First Edition Realm (with no interest in Second Edition), I thought that I'd post here.

2) If I broke any rules, then I apologize!
3) If I offended you. then i apologize for that as well!

Liberty's Edge

While I would love to get my mitts on Kingmaker Figures, that's too expensive for me. Instead, I would like to see a Pawn series for Kingmaker. Is there any news on when, or even if, this will happen? I am getting back into gaming after a several year hiatus and, eventually, I want to run a Pathfinder Game. Thanks in advance!

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

It saddens me that Kingmaker hasn't gotten any Pawn Love!

Liberty's Edge

MrCharisma wrote:
Kevida wrote:
The "reskinning" of the Arcanist sounds viable. Perhaps calling the class "Spiritualist" would be in order.

Was that intentional?

SPIRITUALIST

EDIT: I see you've been away a while, and that you're replying to a 5 year old thread, so maybe it was intentional?

Yeah i realize now it is already in the Occult Adventures.

Liberty's Edge

This might be a dumb question but I will ask it anyway. Can this be used for First Edition as well as Second Edition?

Liberty's Edge

The "reskinning" of the Arcanist sounds viable. Perhaps calling the class "Spiritualist" would be in order.

Liberty's Edge

avr wrote:
Archives of Nethys has a list of their sources which should be useful to you.

Thank you but could you point to a specific place, please? I did a search and a gazillion thinks popped up.

Liberty's Edge

Greetings all!

I am looking to finish out my Pathfinder First Edition Collection. Could someone be so kind as to direct me to what was the last of the adventure Paths, Stand Alone Adventures, Campaign Settings, Player Companions, and what not for the first edition? Thank you so very much.

Liberty's Edge

I am getting ready to run this adventure path. I know this might be a silly question but are there any flip mats or map packs that are recommended for this?

Liberty's Edge

Is there a pregenerated for her?

Liberty's Edge

Could you please cancel Order 22073618 as far the the hard cover books? I got a short notice on military orders and I won't be able to take any books with me. Any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated!

Liberty's Edge

Could you please cancel Order 22073618 as far the the hard cover books? I got a short notice on military orders and I won't be able to take any books with me. Any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated!

Liberty's Edge

Could you please cancel Order 22073618 as far the the hard cover books? I got a short notice on military orders and I won't be able to take any books with me. Any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated!

Liberty's Edge

Could you please cancel order 2207361?

Liberty's Edge

I wonder if a "non magic" option will be a possibility?

Liberty's Edge

Bluenose wrote:
Kevida wrote:
IonutRO wrote:
All d20 games are technically compatible.
True but Pathfinder has nuances differing from other D20 products and T20 has some differences as well. I always enjoyed T20's character creation. However, I despised the fact that their technology paradigm didn't allow for other space based sci-fi staples (shields, FTL Communications, et cetera). I'd like to see how those could translate in the Starfinder rules. By the way Paizo, thank you!
You might find QLIs SciFi20 Design Manual provides some of that, although it's not highly detailed. It's the design manual for their T20 rules, SciFi20 Players' Guidebook being the main rulebook. Some of the other Traveller games (MT, T4 and T5) also include some rulebooks with alternative types of technology like warp drive. They're not directly usable with a D20 ruleset but it's not hard to extrapolate from their treatment of conventional Traveller jump drive and other technology to include the alternatives they provide.

I suppose that you have given this a whirl.

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Will there be options for "no magic" space campaigns?

Liberty's Edge

Rockwell555
I too a\enjoyed Traveller's ship design even with T20. However, there wer certain sci-fi staples (shields, FTL Communications, et cetera) that the rules didn't a;;ow for and were difficult to implement. Boy, do I ever get a ton of hate heaped upon me when I asked for suggestions on how to implement these things from "old schoolers". Anyway though I will just get the core rules first and see how it goes.

Liberty's Edge

Drahliana Moonrunner wrote:
Kevida wrote:
I want to breathe new life into some old D20 version of Traveller (aka "T20") material using Starfinder rules. is there anychance of some sort of compatibility?
Probably not... but what's stopping you from using the setting with Starfinder rules?

Nothing is "stopping" me, per se. I just enjoy T20's charater generation and more lethal combat system. I just dont like dealing with T20's lack of Sci-Fi staples (shields, FTL Communications, et cetera) and the system's rules don't allow for such. You are correct, I could use Starfinder's rules "as is" and I probably will. it's just that I like the darker, edgier style of T20. I appreciate your input! :-)

Liberty's Edge

Bluenose wrote:
Kevida wrote:
IonutRO wrote:
All d20 games are technically compatible.
True but Pathfinder has nuances differing from other D20 products and T20 has some differences as well. I always enjoyed T20's character creation. However, I despised the fact that their technology paradigm didn't allow for other space based sci-fi staples (shields, FTL Communications, et cetera). I'd like to see how those could translate in the Starfinder rules. By the way Paizo, thank you!
You might find QLIs SciFi20 Design Manual provides some of that, although it's not highly detailed. It's the design manual for their T20 rules, SciFi20 Players' Guidebook being the main rulebook. Some of the other Traveller games (MT, T4 and T5) also include some rulebooks with alternative types of technology like warp drive. They're not directly usable with a D20 ruleset but it's not hard to extrapolate from their treatment of conventional Traveller jump drive and other technology to include the alternatives they provide.

THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!

I will have to look into that!

Liberty's Edge

IonutRO wrote:
All d20 games are technically compatible.

True but Pathfinder has nuances differing from other D20 products and T20 has some differences as well. I always enjoyed T20's character creation. However, I despised the fact that their technology paradigm didn't allow for other space based sci-fi staples (shields, FTL Communications, et cetera). I'd like to see how those could translate in the Starfinder rules. By the way Paizo, thank you!

Liberty's Edge

I want to breathe new life into some old D20 version of Traveller (aka "T20") material using Starfinder rules. is there anychance of some sort of compatibility?

Liberty's Edge

Theliah Strongarm wrote:
Kevida wrote:
Originally, I was going to create a a PFRPG version of Traveller using some of the T20 Rules. Alas, I scrapped that as I was hoping to incorporate other Sci-Fi staples into it such as shielding, FTL communication, Teleporters, et cetera but the actual T20 rules seemed to not allow for that to be easily added. I look forward to what comes of this and hope to see "sneak peeks" soon! Thank you guys for including this but please make the rules flexible enough that "home grown" campaigns can be easily run with these rules. You see I am a fan of the SyFy show "Dark Matter" and would love to see rules to help me make a Table Top RPG setting. Thank you all!

Yeah, I was trying to do a Star Wars setting for PF but life got in the way.

This will make it a lot easier.
I can wait a year.

Me too, my friend. Me too!

Liberty's Edge

Originally, I was going to create a a PFRPG version of Traveller using some of the T20 Rules. Alas, I scrapped that as I was hoping to incorporate other Sci-Fi staples into it such as shielding, FTL communication, Teleporters, et cetera but the actual T20 rules seemed to not allow for that to be easily added. I look forward to what comes of this and hope to see "sneak peeks" soon! Thank you guys for including this but please make the rules flexible enough that "home grown" campaigns can be easily run with these rules. You see I am a fan of the SyFy show "Dark Matter" and would love to see rules to help me make a Table Top RPG setting. Thank you all!

Liberty's Edge

Cpt_kirstov wrote:
Kevida wrote:

If this is the wrong spot for this,question, then please accept my humble apology.

Anyway, I have a question. Since 3D printers are coming down in price and some companies are offering programs for 3D printers to create scenery for RPGs, is there a possibility of your figures ever having the 3D printing option?

This is a lisensed product, you'd have to ask on e wizkids forums. but as

1) Being prepainted is the draw of these over the reaper minis
2) The quality of work from most 3D printers still not up to even wizkids sculpts
3) The fact that making minis is what wizkids does. it doesn't have a way to desseminate printer files
4)the breakup in rarity scheme would cripple the marketing strategy of the line.

I doubt these will ever be available as 3d printer files

Awesome, thank you for the insight.

Liberty's Edge

If this is the wrong spot for this,question, then please accept my humble apology.
Anyway, I have a question. Since 3D printers are coming down in price and some companies are offering programs for 3D printers to create scenery for RPGs, is there a possibility of your figures ever having the 3D printing option?

Liberty's Edge

IS it me or is Kingmaker not getting any love from Pathfinder Battles?

Liberty's Edge

Vic Wertz wrote:
This doesn't have character dialogue—it's background sound for your campaign.

Oh, I was under the impression that it had dialogue. A thousand pardons!

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

What characters are featured on this?

Liberty's Edge

I want to stray away from "magic" as the aforementioned series that inspired me has no magic in it.

Liberty's Edge

Actually I was going to "mongrelize" PF and T20 as T20 has "Character Classes" but the levels don't give your character any actual power other than skills, hit points, et cetera (no spells though) and combat is lethal at ANY level. Also, T20 gives a prior history. What I don't care for in T20 is how FTL travel is handled neither do I care for lack of shielding and FTL communication rules. I suppose that I could explain those other rules by saying that the shields and FTL communications have a "DEM field" surrounding it (DEM stands for "Deus Ex Machina") which makes everything work. Again this is only the "brain storming" stage.

Liberty's Edge

I have been inspired to create a game based on the SyFy Channel series "Dark Matter". Yes, I realize that there is a WotC game called Dark Matter. If I create said game it will not be called that. With that in mind, would anyone mind giving me pointers?

Liberty's Edge

Rogue Eidolon wrote:
I will simply say, "Don't Despair". I may have more to say soon.

Oh you tease you!

Liberty's Edge

I guess not...

Liberty's Edge

Beopere wrote:

Wouldn't elemental touched races count? I mean Oread, Slyph etc. beastiary 2.

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/bestiary/monster-listings/outsiders/oread

Edit:Totally didn't read the last line of Lincoln's post, my bad

I was talking more "outer plane" (LN, N, CN) as opposed to "elemental plane". However thank you for the help! :-)

1 to 50 of 503 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>