I mean, the big issue is that AMF is called out in the rulebook explicitly as a rare spell, so this should not be a common effect to find, and having it wreck everybody's day thus is appropriate.
It doesn't really wreck anyones day per se. It just makes the fight take 8 million years (hyperbole). The fighter is less dangerous when the magic is turned off... which feels extremely counter-intuitive.
It took me a minute to figure out, but I think I finally got my biggest (personal) reason why I don't like that essentially all of a martial's damage is tied up in his (magic) weapon. It makes my Hollow Knight concept invalid.
To backtrack a bit, I have a few characters that I keep in my campaigns as a sort of recurring thing. They're basically a corrupted kind of einherjar - they can't exactly die, if they do so, they go back to their plane to await being called again. There's a restoration period they have to go, but that's not really important. There are a few of them, Hollow Knight, Silent Knight, Shadow Knight, etc. They all have auras of X on their armor. The Hollow Knight has an anti-magic field centered on his armor. If I were to use this character in 2e, the front liners would be swinging 1d12+str at each other... for 10/12 levels worth of hit points.
So I was playtesting a Fighter alongside my buddy's barbarian... and it was my observation that it felt kind of weak. I was a fighter in fullplate and was more accurate than the barb and dealing extremely similar damage (I was a dwarf, barb was human). That... kind of bothered me and then I came to the forums where I discover that, allegedly, every class was intended to have more or less similar numbers.
Was anyone in PF1 upset that the barbarian outdamaged fighters? I always figured that came with the territory - a fighter has more AC, and the barb deals more raw damage and hopes the other thing stops moving first. So I look around and I do some thinking (as well as finding out that my playtest data was wrong - I thought a large weapon increased the damage die, which it apparently does not). Would it break anything too badly if rage gave another weapon die? It would be strong at level 1 - but so is everything else. Honestly my bard should die if I fail to notice a orc barbarian hiding in a tree with a greataxe above me.
Barbarian as of right now seems to not hit enough and when it does the damage dealt... is just unremarkable. Thoughts?
Mass props for the surveys. Although I would hazard a guess that everyone who throws up the massive wall of negativity on the boards aren't willing to sit through the survey. Only the people who WANT this to really succeed would invest the time. As an aside... Make Dragons Great Again*!
*(By making lesser dragonkin such as wyverns or drakes for them to use as mooks, thereby allowing a dragon encounter have numbers to help combat the action economy advantage players historically have over big solo dragons).
Back. SO I averaged out the critical damage for the strongest attack on every combat CR1 monster in the playtest bestiary. If the monster had a conditional bonus (for example, the wolf getting extra damage on a flank) I averaged the damage between a regular strike and this "empowered" one. I averaged the hit points of the level 1 PC as if they had 16 Con (Note this does not take into consideration that say, elf really has a racial HP of 5 due to a racial penalty, and cannot actually have 16 con).
The average health of a level 1 PC with 16 Con is... 19 even.
I haven't gone further yet, but your proposal would effectively made any critical strike (at least on a CR 1, I'll be doing CR 5 next) a risk for an insta-kill.
Epic Meepo wrote:
Well, my "educated guess" would be that the inspiration for Ranger never succumbed to the Ring, and the Fighter of Fighter (Boromir) most certainly did.
But I highly doubt that is the actual reason. Even though it would make me happy if it was.
I would like to concur with this. I've had a character concept for a long time, based on the first JRPG I ever played. It's essentially a magic swordsman with a talking, flying cat familiar. When I learned from the teaser that I can have a flying cat familiar, I was over the moon. Then I learned about how multi-classing worked. I can make DragonMaster Alex, I thought. But even for roleplaying... I just... can't justify taking the familiar. A flying, talking cat accomplishes absolutely nothing other than flying and talking. Maybe with sorcerer dedication rather than wizard (and by taking the expanded familiar feat) but they need... more. At least 3 choices at base, and expand the Master traits so that they are... useful.
Big Lemon wrote:
Fuzzy animal is for the familiar right? My 5th level gnomish bard is a sea captain, and most certainly has a familiar. And obsessive for Lore Sailing. Which is awesome.
Just had a mental image of two Paladins standing back to back with Halberds doing monk flips over each other covering the others 6, 12, 2, etc. That sounds almost as cool as having two clerics in a party (I am currently running a game with 2 clerics and if I don't drop a player in one round, he will be back to full nearly immediately).
That's apples and oranges. You can't tell me that a guy who has literally survived hundreds of encounters against things far more frightening that some punk with a knife is done in for. Pro athletes IRL are NOTHING close to a level 20 in a tabletop RPG.
Your 3 int Barbarian that is completely untrained in board games wouldn't even be allowed to roll in that example because he's untrained, as in literally knows nothing about the game or it's rules. The proficiency system is set up that way - to gate things behind proficiency so it doesn't matter he would allegedly have a +15? (forget the modifier for 3).
So Merlin would get punked by some kid with a knife if they were in, say, an anti-magic field? I have to 100% disagree with that man. A 20th level wizard would have been in an absolutely ludicrous number of fights. He's not going to be at the mercy of some kid with a knife who's never seen anything more dangerous than a particularly large rat, magic or no.
Green. It was green. Black interrupts attacks and skill checks, Blue uses it's wings as a shield, Red has regular AoOs with his bite, and White sprays freezing blood when injured by piercing or slashing.
I've been a long time lurker on these boards, and spent mindless hours on this during my downtime from my first deployment way back when. But perusing it recently it just... kind of depressing, honestly. So I decided I was going to put a thread saying that I'm a pretty big fan of this new system, as I feel the people who dislike it are much much more vocal.
That isn't to say there aren't people who are offering legitimate criticisms without being over the top vitriolic. But just as a whole, I like how the system seems to highly encourage other actions that just - I get into range and full round, and then continue to stand there whacking each other with sticks until one of us falls down.
There are kinks to work out, but I can have fun playing the game and, as designated DM, there's going to be some learning pains. I expected that. Now it's just down to playing the friggin game to learn the ins and outs of this one too.
"Aw, hell Jim. I could never harm you. You're honest and brave and true. You didn't learn that from me,"
The man who planned a mutiny and was a legitimate pirate, not the caricatures mostly seen, and the only one Billy Bones ever afeared... could not bring himself to shoot Jim, who was going to literally blow the whistle on him.
102. You find a ruins underground, reminiscent of Numeria. One of the chambers is collapsed, and you see these pipes/ cables leading out of it. Upon clearing out the entrance, you find a glass like pod and a red android laying inside, cloaked in a bed of what looks like blonde hair. The purple gem on its forehead pulsates... almost like a heartbeat, and you can faintly see the number 0 etched into the top of the pod.
Absolutely. This to me feels more or less the same way that, until recently, there wasn't ACTUALLY a rule prohibiting NFL players from kicking each other in the head while hurdling each other. You shouldn't have to say it explicitly... but apparently we do.
To answer the thought though... when a LG character needs to do an evil act, that player should probably think long and hard about the concept. In a homebrew setting, I had my PCs draw from the Deck of Many Things, and the Monk ended up Geas'd by a CE dragon goddess to kill 5 powerful dragons of her brother's brood (I split white/black apart from red/blue/green).
The party then proceeded to go slay dragons. The first dragon was evil, and everything was fine. The third was neutral- they had to physically break into it's lair, as it had sealed itself off for the past three centuries. By the time they got to the fourth, some of the players had their doubts about the dragons alignments. The fourth dragon had no hoard, and was actively defending the village that worshipped it.
Point of the story, was one of the more experience players called the monk submissive to evil. Led to an out of game argument until we explained that that wasn't necessarily a bad thing- but for example, a Paladin would've let himself rot before assisting an evil god. The monk's concept was he needed to survive to rebuild his order. An inquisitor would probably see his own survival is more important than (random heretic B). But a Knight style character, follower of (the romantic concept of) chivalry would probably take his death with honor.
If any of this helps.
Legitimately, and I've never been able to have a sea-faring campaign last long enough to do this, but have Zaheer as a "pirate". He's... CN played pretty fantastically, and is a very valid threat to good and evil aligned characters.
Other than that, I have a lot of fun playing seafaring campaigns in general. Remember to make your eventual sea captains have to give safety briefs to their sailors before releasing them for shore liberty, otherwise they're going to get in ~8 or 9 ARIs that you'll have to deal with after liberty is secured.
Archetypes definitely make you more powerful than the base class- in different circumstances. The ranger is forgoing his FE against non-evil outsiders, which is pretty significant. Meaning, he was be a Betrayer level BA against the
I honestly don't think it'll be as bad as you're making it out to be.
If they want to be a graveknight, they need to overcome a few trials first. They need to go to a Northern Continent to save their Kingdom from an eldritch blight, then he must travel with his Dwarf mentor figure to find a lesser artifact sword.
When he pulls the sword from a block of Ice, the ice shatters and strikes his mentor figure, seemingly dead. He is then given a choice between saving the dwarf, or accepting the power of the sword. After this, his alignment will gradually change, until he falls to Evil and he acquires the Graveknight template.
Your last point is what I'm saying. Being a paladin in a no win scenario doesn't excuse you from trying. As long as you tried and didn't "Oh. We must cull the city". And actually agonized over your decision, I wouldn't fall a paladin. Sometimes there isn't a way out irl, though. Why should there always be a way out in the game?
Captain collateral damage wrote:
OK, sure, if a GM was an incredibly mean he might throw this at a paladin and make him fall no matter what he does. But if your GM does that then you should stop playing with him. But if a GM was in any way reasonable he wouldn't have the paladin fall if the sacrificed the few to save the many.
Everyone in this city may, or may not have eaten infected grain that will turn them into ravenous, murderous undead in a matter of hours. To save them from what they will become, and prevent the loss of life- can a paladin kill them all before they turn?
Earth can create deadly areas of difficult terrain that cause reduced blast damage—and special substance effects of course!—to everyone inside everyone (pair with grappling infusion substance to make grasping hands of earth that hold them in place to take damage again and again).
Yeah. My next DMPC is going to be a Dai Li Agent.