Jori Mountainchild's page

The only reason I brought up spellbooks is from this line:

A wizard can use the procedure for learning a spell to reconstruct a lost spellbook. If he already has a particular spell prepared, he can write it directly into a new book at the same cost required to write a spell into a spellbook.

Wizards don't have spells known. But if they somehow have a spell prepared that is on their Class Spell List, it can be added by consuming that prepared slot. That was the major motivation for determining if the spell gained from the feat is actually prepared or not. I Agree now that it is not actually prepared.

I agree that RAW you wouldn't be able to go directly from this feat to a scroll.
Either way the GM rules it, it's still an exceptionally useful feat, especially when I'm trying to build a wizard in a party without a divine caster...

So is the consensus that this feat can be used to create Spell Trigger items/completion items like scrolls and wands?

I know that the item creation rules state that the prepared slot is consumed when crafting a magic item (though not necessarily cast). I guess the question boils down to if the feat text of "you can cast any spell as if it were one of your prepared spells..." actually means that it's prepared, or simply that it can be cast. Can I split those actions: Prepare the spell, but not cast it?

If you could craft a scroll using this ability, would you also be able to use it to add a spell to your spellbook (provided it's on you class list)? You can write prepared spells to your spellbook by consuming the prepared slot.

If both those things are true, this feat offers even greater versatility, because you can use it to expand your spellbook without consuming scrolls or paying the fee to use another wizard's spellbook.