TOZ wrote: I'd appreciate them continuing to work on shipping instead. Rysky wrote: Yeah, we spent time to count and we've calculated that we've shipped 32% of this month's orders means... absolutely nothing. you know they don't have to actually count them? (and it would mean they need two more weeks to ship the rest out) They could simply take a quick look in the data and see x Shipped / x pendingi work in a warehouse that ships a lot each day and we can easily see how much has shipped each day and how much is pending in the data. And i assume Paizo is using a similar system
Calpal wrote:
Paizo is indeed more transparent with their issue and they are overall most forthcoming with a lot of things. Yet i'm relatively new to pathfinder, started with 2e and bought so far everything via pdf. So i have no attachments to b&m stores for this. And given the state of the world for the last year, increased online sales would be Paizos biggest income right now and going forward i guess. As it would saving them the cost for printing, shipping and storage.So i can not agree that b&m are important for their future. Being outside the US and not having any b&m store around for TTRPGs and similar stuff might color my view differently on this.
Paul Watson wrote:
For sure. Yet here we have a delay of two months now, missing two months of sales, which will cost Paizo either way money.
Another delay for the first part of fists of the ruby phoenix? oh come on!
And for me who is a first time subscriber, who hoped to get the pdf version early (as i heared those who sub get them on occasion a few days earlier) it's disappointing as it not only affects me, but my whole playgroup who were so fired up to start with it. vent over I really hope Paizo learns from this and plans a contingency for their customers if something like this happens again in the future
Zapp wrote:
Well, obviously the Players Guide doesn't include rules to build team encounters, as this should be contained in a GM facing product like the AP itself. The Team Building Tables are more to flavor your players party a given way
I wrote it in the other thread but here is my solution to this: Enrif wrote:
With this the Magus can be as accurate (Magus +3 from Str/Dex, +3 from Int, +2 from Proficiency = +8 = Fighter +4 Str/Dex, +4 Proficiency) or even more then a fighter, but not all the time. This would give the Magus the niche of a highly accurate, high damage character, but at the expanse of loosing actions, which the fighter could use to move around, raise a shield, trip, use an item, etc.
I see one big problem with Magus, and others pointed it out. The Magus needs to hit, or rather, crit with their strike when using Striking Spell. This is the bread and butter ability of it afterall. I think there is an easy solution to it: add your Intelligence Modifier to the attack roll made with a weapon or unarmed strike using Striking Spell. (and add your key ability modifier to the spell attack/save DC too.)
Also, Sustaining Steel should double those Temp HP i think. Twice the cantrip level, four times the spellslot level. |