Ludy wrote:
Bluddwolf wrote:
Ludy wrote:
I still don't see how bringing it up ad-nausea is helping. The idea seemed to be fielded and was by appearances shot down. People on one side should be happy but the gloating is not funny or informative. People on the other side are likely reviewing their point of view and seeing what their mistakes were.
In Dancy's blog, it is clear, both sides won.
Griefing will be severely punished. Caravans can be subdued, don't have to kill every one. Bandits can make high rewards from capturing caravans. Merchants can make high rewards if they get their caravans to market.
PFO becomes a dynamic world or conflict, adventure, profit and interaction!!
What kind of a game were you hoping for?
I'm all for that mate.
I don't want where things like "Tyrants such as Andius that feels the devs vision of open world pvp is wrong and every one else is second and third rate citizens compared to him." are said about someone who puts forth an idea they don't like. First it's not true and second why the need to attack someone?
Looks to me like this Dr. Feel Good guy is trying to make one big joke out of that whole situation from the rovagug treaty BS and the crap that followed from that one forum post of andius's.
It is all over said and done, this was most likely an attempt at satyr. More people should try to bring humor to these forums when we have our debates so we keep perspective. Wish you had posted before that nastiness in the treaty thread got so heated, maybe people would have been nicer if they had of gotten a laugh first.
Either way good to have you with us Dr. Feel Good, better luck at your comedy next time.