Barizac's page

So i played with your -3/3/6/9/13 and charted it into a excel i created to play with this and for the most part it sits similar to mine except in the outlier areas of L vs U or L vs T. If your attacker is U and the defender L by your array, then the chance to hit is -55% or a 32+ required to roll. with mine a U can still hit a L but he needs a 26+ or -25 % chance so he needs stats or buffs to achieve it and that's assuming the defender doesn't have buffs. I feel yours has to much distance between the high end and the lower ends turning the few classes with L defense or attack into powerhouses where as classes like barbarian who cap at E would be to far behind.
I also feel as T is the default you have basic training in it should always be lvl or half lvl +0.
I tried to get pictures of the spreadsheet but i don't know how to upload it.

Bardarok It might have started as a 3e 3.5e spin off but i feel like part of pathfinder 2e is to find their own niche and stop being just another D&D copy. and while they use alot of terms that are standardised to the genre of games attunement in relation to items usable and equippable is a 5e specific thing as far as i am aware and alot more of a direct copy paste (which may get them in trouble i dont know the copy right rules).

They could just call it attunement like 5e since most potential new PF players would be coming from 5e anyways. Say you can attune to up to 10 items in a day, attunement takes 10 minutes and is an assumed part of your daily preparations.

I think the problem with calling it attunement is because that's ripping off 5e in a very blatant way.

As for the concept i like the way it sounds and will definitely want to test it if my group finds time.
While i liked the original resonance and thought it filled a good role, this version seems to cover the same role and hopefully sate the naysayers.

I think and i'm still researching so not 100% sure, but i think you needed to have it as a proficiency other than craft to make a weapon etc, so to make a master level katana you would need to be a master of whatever weapon group katana falls into for you as well as a master of craft. I could be wrong but it's how i interpreted it to mean.

I feel like all they need to give us back our options and customization on skills is give a floating signature skill at lvl 1 on top of current signature skills or a feat to make a skill a signature skill as a general and/or skill feat. I think either of these (or preferably both) would let us make fighters that are able to intimidate or stealth or any other uncommon skill combos we currently can't do.