Ashram Tyrilit's page

8 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS


Hopefully all of the previous APs will be added as time permits, and that the addition of non-AP content, such as rulebooks, will continue without much hassle.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Rysky wrote:
Michael Sayre wrote:
Ashram Tyrilit wrote:
All I have to say, is that I'm desperately hoping the automaton ancestry is more "Pathfinder warforged" than a redo of PF1's androids.
Androids are coming out in Lost Omens Ancestry Guide. Automatons will be very different, more like magitek constructs who can modify their bodies by doing things like slotting a sword into their elbow instead of their forearm and hand.
It's okay, you can say Warforged on the forums.

To be fair I'd imagine a dev can't actually say that, because if they said "Oh yeah, this ancestry is totally like this other copyrighted race from a well-established IP" the scary wizard from down the coast might object.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

All I have to say, is that I'm desperately hoping the automaton ancestry is more "Pathfinder warforged" than a redo of PF1's androids.


Set wrote:

Gotta be under a city for maximum carnage when it awakens!

Plot twist. It's laid a couple hundred eggs while sleeping. It's awakening will be preceded by dozens of CR 20-ish mini-spawn...

No, no Tarrasque breeding grounds please. I've already got enough PTSD.

Besides, we should absolutely save the Tarrasque for PF3e. If the Whispering Tyrant coming back was enough to set off a new edition, imagine the Tarrasque coming back and wiping a few nations off the map.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
graystone wrote:
thaX wrote:
scary harpy wrote:
Verzen wrote:

I 100% disagree. Magus and summoner are such that I want them to expand on their unique features. Giving them full casting will make them very bland. Id rather get rid of magic all together for these two and come up with interesting spell like abilities for Magus through focus points and have even better ways than most at restoring focus points during combat. Maybe even a focus spell that allows you to mimic a single target spell to enhance damage, but still costs a focus point.

...

A Magus with no magic and just spell-like abilities...sounds like a Warlock to me.

Maybe just me.

Ssshhhh... We are not allowed to have full class warlocks here...
Just call them kineticists and it'll be ok. ;)

Hey hey. Don't ruin my chances of them bringing back actual kineticists when they inevitably bring back psychic casters. >.>


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Not sure if this has been posted yet, but for a few days now searching "adventure path" to get to the main AP page for PF2 has returned the "Sorry, there's an error, the devs have been notified" page. Any chance this is getting looked at?


So, uh. Just curious. What happened to the SF side not being updated for three months?


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Honestly, I like this approach of having the errata separate. It means errata can be pushed out much faster without having to wait the sometimes literal years between major errata releases due to book printing status, especially for books that don't sell as fast. Reminds me of 3.5.