Argonius's page

This is something that we kept messing up over and over and over in 1st edition artwork of catfolk in particular, but as a general rule, their feet look more animal than human, but they can still wear magic boots.

This is good to know. I'm also hyped for the release of the 2e APG. I've been waiting for more choices to be available before I would get stuck in properly, and the new stuff hinted/confirmed to be in the APG has me excited to play my favorite PF class (Oracle) in the new system.

So I wish to preface this by saying I can't believe I am asking this, but my PF 1e party has gotten into a debate regarding the anatomy of the more animal races (Catfolk, Ratfolk, Kitsune, etc.).

The main question that has been brought up recently is thus:
"Do Catfolk/Ratfolk/Kitsune/etc. have accurate feet to their animal counterpart?"
For example, do Catfolk have cat paws with retractable claws for feet? Do Kitsune have fox paws for feet? Do they actually have more human-like feet? We tried using official art of said races but there's been a notable lack of consistency with them.