| KWScott |
Hi;
I looked around for the answer to this before posting the question, and couldn't find anything specific on it, so forgive me if it's answered somewhere, and I'd appreciate a citation.
Do multiple sources of Precision Damage stack on the same attack?
For example, a Multiclass Samurai Sword Saint/Rogue making an Iaijutsu Strikd... Would he get Both the +1d6 for the Iaijutsu Strike and the Sneak Attack dice from Rogue levels?
Thanks;
| Te'Shen |
. . .
Do multiple sources of Precision Damage stack on the same attack?For example, a Multiclass Samurai Sword Saint/Rogue making an Iaijutsu Strikd... Would he get Both the +1d6 for the Iaijutsu Strike and the Sneak Attack dice from Rogue levels? . . .
I don't know what you need in the vein of rules citation, but if both conditions are met, then both activate.
If you challenge the target and act first such that they are flatfooted and your weapon is sheathed, then yes. I'm sure other combinations would work, but that would probably be the most common.
| Zhayne |
Damage always 'stacks'. Otherwise, if you hit someone with a sword for 8, then for 10, they'll have only taken 10 points of damage. You'd have to wipe out all their HP in a single swing to drop them.
Another way to look at it ... 'precision' is not a bonus type. Therefore, Iajutsu Strike and Sneak Attack are both untyped, and thus stack by standard rules.
| HaraldKlak |
Damage always 'stacks'. Otherwise, if you hit someone with a sword for 8, then for 10, they'll have only taken 10 points of damage. You'd have to wipe out all their HP in a single swing to drop them.
Another way to look at it ... 'precision' is not a bonus type. Therefore, Iajutsu Strike and Sneak Attack are both untyped, and thus stack by standard rules.
While I agree with the latter part, I believe the first comparison is way off. You do not accumulate damage (only non-lethal). Damage is used momentarily, and leads to a reduction in your current hit points.
| Lifat |
I actually don't think that they would stack by raw. Usually when the precision damage stack with other precision damage they mention so, like the assassin prestige class:
Personally speaking though, I would let it stack as long as all the requirements of BOTH types of precision damage is met.
| Orfamay Quest |
I actually don't think that they would stack by raw. Usually when the precision damage stack with other precision damage they mention so, like the assassin prestige class:
I think they generally do that only when the two sources are largely identical (because otherwise one could read bonuses from identical sources don't stack). The assassin's sneak attack is explicitly "exactly like" the rogue's.
Where precision damages arises from two different circumstances, the general rule is that different circumstances stack.
| Thymus Vulgaris |
I actually don't think that they would stack by raw. Usually when the precision damage stack with other precision damage they mention so, like the assassin prestige class:
** spoiler omitted **Personally speaking though, I would let it stack as long as all the requirements of BOTH types of precision damage is met.
Precision damage isn't a bonus, though. The text you quote specifically says that "sneak attack bonuses" from different sources stack. So we are dealing with a sneak attack bonus, and this bonus deals precision damage.
Iaijutsu's bonus precision damage certainly isn't a sneak attack bonus, so they stack.| Lifat |
Lifat wrote:I actually don't think that they would stack by raw. Usually when the precision damage stack with other precision damage they mention so, like the assassin prestige class:
** spoiler omitted **Personally speaking though, I would let it stack as long as all the requirements of BOTH types of precision damage is met.
Precision damage isn't a bonus, though. The text you quote specifically says that "sneak attack bonuses" from different sources stack. So we are dealing with a sneak attack bonus, and this bonus deals precision damage.
Iaijutsu's bonus precision damage certainly isn't a sneak attack bonus, so they stack.
Huh. I guess I see your point. Then again I would always run it that way anyway. Only difference is that I no longer have to state it as a houserule.