Do you show players monster pictures?


Pathfinder First Edition General Discussion


I usually do since in a lot of cases the description doesn't do it justice IMO (a picture is worth a thousand words after all). If they aren't supposed to know what it is yet I'll cover up the statblock though.

Dark Archive

Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I'd imagine that lot of people do show players pictures of monsters, though I assume some people probably prefer them imagining them for whatever reasons. I'm definitely in the "show the monster picture" camp

Shadow Lodge

Back in the early 90s, we played the Dark Sun modules and one of the nice feature of the initial 'flip book' design was the large amount of art the DM could easily share with the players.

Of course, they often ruined this by putting labels on the pictures, some of which were spoilers for the encounter (picture of a horde of undead shambling toward you was great, but the 'Friends???' kinda gave the 'this is not a fight' surprise away).

Another true Dark Sun adventure story:

    DM: Here's a picture of the ruined structure you just found.
  • Me: Alright, lets get exploring, and everyone watch out for the Dwarven Banshee.
  • DM: (Incredulously) How the heck did you know there's a banshee here?
  • Me: It's right there in the picture!

So, pictures are great, but only when done correctly...


I'm way off in the deep end on this; I actually build custom monsters to match models I have or I build custom models that match the monsters I'd like to run (or I'll find a cool model and look for something in the beastiarys that is close enough to mold into it as is or as a reskin.)

This comes mostly from me being a 40k nerd who loves kit-bashing and customizing.

-My harpies? Daemonettes with Tyranid Gargoyle wings green stuffed on em
-Animated trees? these weird Malifaux haunted tree things
-Goblins? Warhammer gobbos!
-Skeletons? older (vampire counts?) Skeleton models and Tomb-kings Skeleton Archers

etc..

It's bad enough I'll build entire sections of the map or entire campaigns to end in a penultimate big-ol-fancy model of some kind.
______

One can certainly get by by simply marking things down or using coins, etc; but I basically only run campaigns because I enjoy building/painting models. When they plop down the players often pick them up and ogle them to good effect.


No. I keep most of my books on the shelf, using d20pfsrd.com to prep my games. I print off the monsters and their stats from the website. I will sometimes go to the book from where the description comes from to look at the picture but most often I just describe it from the text on the printed page. I'm pretty good at that sort of thing and it works well enough with our group.


I strongly prefer it when my GMs do show them. One, some people are better visualizers than others, and some monsters are more easily visualized than others. And some are just better known in mythology. a harpy or hydra? I don't need help, I can imagine it just fine from the myriad representations I've seen before. A ghast? Well...I can kind of imagine a ghoul, but even that is kind of vaguely just "zombie-like" in my mind.
From a realistic perspective, the characters would be able to see the creatures, so it seems fair for the players to as well, unless they actively dislike being shown what they "should" see instead of what they imagine. Once I get the general idea in my head, my brain takes over and fills in the details anyway since I don't have a photographic memory or anything. It just imprints a guide for my imagination to draw from going forward.


DMs avoid showing me pics, due to a legend that I know alL the monster stats by heart and that showing me the picture, letting me know what beast it is, would give me unfair advantage... to be true, that legend was true in AD&D1 but I never renewed the performance for later editions, heck, I only have the 1st MM from 4ed, only the first 3 beastiaries from PF, and not even the 5ed MM.


Another reason I don't do it is because we don't play around a table (sadly). We play my living room, sitting on the couches and chairs available so the distance from me to some players is too great for them to see the picture clearly, anyway. And one of my players Skypes in, so that also doesn't help her.


I show my players pictures whenever available without spoiling anything.

I find it gives the newer players a better sense of what they are up against.


One option is to do a Google Image search and use an alternate image for what you have in mind and throw it up on a tablet or even your phone.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / General Discussion / Do you show players monster pictures? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in General Discussion