Is Seltyiel getting a rewrite?


Round 3: Revised Magus Discussion

1 to 50 of 65 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

Hi,

I'm seeing alot of this iconic in the concept art (even him in the class pdf)

Is he gonna get a proper rewrite- his backstory is currently written for a Eldritch Knight.

Plus he needs some better gear. His ac sucks.

Shadow Lodge

Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I see nothing wrong with his backstory as is, and as for being an eldritch knight I doubt that will change. The magus and elridtch knight kinda go together.

>Stupid typos<


True, but his picture has accompanied the magus class pdf- he currently is not a magus. Wiz/Ftr/EK does not play like a magus.

His backstory is ok but if they market him as a magus then his stat block needs to either be magus 20 or Magus 10/EK10.

Cheers.


Ardenup wrote:

I'm seeing alot of this iconic in the concept art (even him in the class pdf)

Can't you recognize an evil twin when you see one?!


Paizo always does this on early release stuff like modules, the art is probably temporary until it is officially released, and so they will use seltyiel as place holder art.

I for one am hoping the magus is a dwarf.
currently we've got a dwarf lore master, worst waste of space ever.
i know harsk is a dwarf too... but i want to see another dwarf.

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Pendagast wrote:

Paizo always does this on early release stuff like modules, the art is probably temporary until it is officially released, and so they will use seltyiel as place holder art.

I for one am hoping the magus is a dwarf.
currently we've got a dwarf lore master, worst waste of space ever.
i know harsk is a dwarf too... but i want to see another dwarf.

Selytiel IS the iconic Magus, it was confirmed in a couple of places (and the UM cover art).


Gorbacz wrote:
Pendagast wrote:

Paizo always does this on early release stuff like modules, the art is probably temporary until it is officially released, and so they will use seltyiel as place holder art.

I for one am hoping the magus is a dwarf.
currently we've got a dwarf lore master, worst waste of space ever.
i know harsk is a dwarf too... but i want to see another dwarf.

Selytiel IS the iconic Magus, it was confirmed in a couple of places (and the UM cover art).

the iconic magus AND the iconic EK?

possible?

i dunno i havent seen a write up for magus, im lazy.

Paizo Employee Chief Creative Officer, Publisher

Not only possible.... probable!


Erik Mona wrote:
Not only possible.... probable!

OK, Well THERE is an official semi vague answer if IVe ever seen one,

Besides I love seltyiel, he's my favoirite Iconic.

he breaks so many molds (like including a LE character in a party with a paladin in council of theives) yet he's the quintessential half-elf fighter magic-user.

so much better than some lady with a staff and sword riding a magic carpet.


so umm, why go through the trouble of qualifying for EK if you can just start as a Magus?

the difference I see, is that while the EK can wear medium and heavy armor, and has to take feats to cast in armor. the Magus gets light armor only but can cast in it for free.....

anyone more enligtened on this subject and help me out?

why have both classes?

or is MAGUS somehow going to replace EK?

wondering why (if seltyiel is going to stay the same, just have him take levels of magus) seltyiel didnt start life as magus? why go wiz/ftr/ek/magus?

someone help me out i know there is an answer


Pendagast wrote:

so umm, why go through the trouble of qualifying for EK if you can just start as a Magus?

the difference I see, is that while the EK can wear medium and heavy armor, and has to take feats to cast in armor. the Magus gets light armor only but can cast in it for free.....

anyone more enligtened on this subject and help me out?

why play both?

Better BAB maybe? (and a bonus feat at the cost of a caster level...) Yeah, I don't think it's worth it for most builds either, but that's all I'm coming up with.

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

EK = wizard who can melee, to some degree.

Magus = a melee class that can synergize offensive casting with melee attacks. Also, some utility spells.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

There really isn't anything about his published backstory that screams Eldritch Knight over Magus... (or for that matter the other way around)

Remember that things like classes,levels, and such are abstractions for gaming which bear little resemblance as to how the characters think of themselves and others. As Tracy and Hickman learned to do the hard way, they should never get in the way of telling a good story, and if they try to... just toss them aside.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
kyrt-ryder wrote:
Pendagast wrote:

so umm, why go through the trouble of qualifying for EK if you can just start as a Magus?

the difference I see, is that while the EK can wear medium and heavy armor, and has to take feats to cast in armor. the Magus gets light armor only but can cast in it for free.....

anyone more enligtened on this subject and help me out?

why play both?

Better BAB maybe? (and a bonus feat at the cost of a caster level...) Yeah, I don't think it's worth it for most builds either, but that's all I'm coming up with.

An EK is a dilletante who alternates between fighter and wizard and has found some limited way to synergise them. A Magus on the other hand has traded away deep investment in either path to walk a third road which has elements of both but unique elements all it's own.


LazarX wrote:
kyrt-ryder wrote:
Pendagast wrote:

so umm, why go through the trouble of qualifying for EK if you can just start as a Magus?

the difference I see, is that while the EK can wear medium and heavy armor, and has to take feats to cast in armor. the Magus gets light armor only but can cast in it for free.....

anyone more enligtened on this subject and help me out?

why play both?

Better BAB maybe? (and a bonus feat at the cost of a caster level...) Yeah, I don't think it's worth it for most builds either, but that's all I'm coming up with.
An EK is a dilletante who alternates between fighter and wizard and has found some limited way to synergise them. A Magus on the other hand has traded away deep investment in either path to walk a third road which has elements of both but unique elements all it's own.

ok so enlighten me on the trade off...

why for example would seltyiel BE an EK when he can be a magus?

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Pendagast wrote:
LazarX wrote:
kyrt-ryder wrote:
Pendagast wrote:

so umm, why go through the trouble of qualifying for EK if you can just start as a Magus?

the difference I see, is that while the EK can wear medium and heavy armor, and has to take feats to cast in armor. the Magus gets light armor only but can cast in it for free.....

anyone more enligtened on this subject and help me out?

why play both?

Better BAB maybe? (and a bonus feat at the cost of a caster level...) Yeah, I don't think it's worth it for most builds either, but that's all I'm coming up with.
An EK is a dilletante who alternates between fighter and wizard and has found some limited way to synergise them. A Magus on the other hand has traded away deep investment in either path to walk a third road which has elements of both but unique elements all it's own.

ok so enlighten me on the trade off...

why for example would seltyiel BE an EK when he can be a magus?

You're not reading what I'm writing are you? Character's don't make those choices.. the players who design them do. Seltyiel isn't someone who's walking around with the Core Rules or the preview to Ultimate Magic. The choice of class is a choice of the STORYTELLER who is chooseing the best way to describe his story. And who's to say that both aren't viable ways to do it?


LazarX wrote:
Pendagast wrote:
LazarX wrote:
kyrt-ryder wrote:
Pendagast wrote:

so umm, why go through the trouble of qualifying for EK if you can just start as a Magus?

the difference I see, is that while the EK can wear medium and heavy armor, and has to take feats to cast in armor. the Magus gets light armor only but can cast in it for free.....

anyone more enligtened on this subject and help me out?

why play both?

Better BAB maybe? (and a bonus feat at the cost of a caster level...) Yeah, I don't think it's worth it for most builds either, but that's all I'm coming up with.
An EK is a dilletante who alternates between fighter and wizard and has found some limited way to synergise them. A Magus on the other hand has traded away deep investment in either path to walk a third road which has elements of both but unique elements all it's own.

ok so enlighten me on the trade off...

why for example would seltyiel BE an EK when he can be a magus?
You're not reading what I'm writing are you? Character's don't make those choices.. the players who design them do. Seltyiel isn't someone who's walking around with the Core Rules or the preview to Ultimate Magic. The choice of class is a choice of the STORYTELLER who is chooseing the best way to describe his story. And who's to say that both aren't viable ways to do it?

sure there are two ways to do this.

obviously, what am i asking isnt "give me the min maxing options"
what i am saying is i am looking at a character class that at first glance seems to powerful and makes me wonder, why would i ever be something else?
Seltyiel is a person who already is a "fighter/magic-user"
whats the upside to going the EK route, other than access to a borader spell list?

Shadow Lodge

Ardenup wrote:
His backstory is ok but if they market him as a magus then his stat block needs to either be magus 20 or Magus 10/EK10.

He's a fighter/wizard/magus/eldritch knight.

He's the iconic for multi-class, prestige class, and magus.

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

He's also the iconic brooding emo Final Fantasy character, and we love him for that. He's such a bastard that it's cool to have him around, if not for looks then for his snarky one-liners.

He's the cool boy. Unlike, say, that pompous, pretentious git Alain ...


I believe the true question is... Is Seltyiel a placeholder? The only evidence we have of Seltyiel being something other than an EK is his placeholder image on the beta for the new class.
I don't think he's gonna be retconned into a magus. All new classes got their own iconics, Seltyiel is an iconic of two or three things already, and the effort to make a new iconic from scratch requires sort of the least effort involved in making a new class.

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Synapse wrote:

I believe the true question is... Is Seltyiel a placeholder? The only evidence we have of Seltyiel being something other than an EK is his placeholder image on the beta for the new class.

I don't think he's gonna be retconned into a magus. All new classes got their own iconics, Seltyiel is an iconic of two or three things already, and the effort to make a new iconic from scratch requires sort of the least effort involved in making a new class.

James Jacobs says Seltyiel is the iconic magus


Now THAT is a satisfying answer :p Notice how when people just said "they said so" they didn't believe.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Synapse wrote:

I believe the true question is... Is Seltyiel a placeholder? The only evidence we have of Seltyiel being something other than an EK is his placeholder image on the beta for the new class.

I don't think he's gonna be retconned into a magus. All new classes got their own iconics, Seltyiel is an iconic of two or three things already, and the effort to make a new iconic from scratch requires sort of the least effort involved in making a new class.

Actually he's only been the iconic EK. You've seen him listed elsewhere as fighter only because that's all he could have at first level. Now he's the Iconic for both the Magus and the F/W build version of Eldritch Knight.


LazarX wrote:
Synapse wrote:

I believe the true question is... Is Seltyiel a placeholder? The only evidence we have of Seltyiel being something other than an EK is his placeholder image on the beta for the new class.

I don't think he's gonna be retconned into a magus. All new classes got their own iconics, Seltyiel is an iconic of two or three things already, and the effort to make a new iconic from scratch requires sort of the least effort involved in making a new class.
Actually he's only been the iconic EK. You've seen him listed elsewhere as fighter only because that's all he could have at first level. Now he's the Iconic for both the Magus and the F/W build version of Eldritch Knight.

so back to the OPs original question, is seltyiel going to be a magus/ek, now? or a ftr/wizard/magus/ek?

and if so id like to see that build to 20 (just to see how the paizo guys envision it)


LazarX wrote:
Actually he's only been the iconic EK.

Actually, he hasn't. Seltyiel is the iconic multi-class character. Prestige Classes don't get iconics.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Pendagast wrote:


so back to the OPs original question, is seltyiel going to be a magus/ek, now? or a ftr/wizard/magus/ek?

and if so id like to see that build to 20 (just to see how the paizo guys envision it)

You forgot the third possibility... that he might be presented both ways. Although I think the choice is going to be between the original F/W Eldritch Knight and straight Magus.

A 20 level build might be nice to see. But I think the sweet spot for iconics is in the 10-15 range, still within that level area before D20 based play seriously breaks down. If a character does not excite me by level 10, he won't at level 20. And quite frankly I see no point in a Magus taking up ANY of the established prestige classes.


LazarX wrote:
Pendagast wrote:


so back to the OPs original question, is seltyiel going to be a magus/ek, now? or a ftr/wizard/magus/ek?

and if so id like to see that build to 20 (just to see how the paizo guys envision it)

You forgot the third possibility... that he might be presented both ways. Although I think the choice is going to be between the original F/W Eldritch Knight and straight Magus.

A 20 level build might be nice to see. But I think the sweet spot for iconics is in the 10-15 range, still within that level area before D20 based play seriously breaks down. If a character does not excite me by level 10, he won't at level 20. And quite frankly I see no point in a Magus taking up ANY of the established prestige classes.

It breaks down at 7... Sometimes at 1.

Dark Archive

Pathfinder Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber
Zurai wrote:
LazarX wrote:
Actually he's only been the iconic EK.
Actually, he hasn't. Seltyiel is the iconic multi-class character. Prestige Classes don't get iconics.

Well, yes and no. They don't get iconic write-ups, but there are still unamed iconic characters for all the prestige classes


So I have a 5th lev fighter in serpents skull, the original plan was to go wizard next, then ek... so i was tossing fireballs toward the end of serpents skull..

but heres this Magus.

So we all agreed the change my 5th level fighter to a 5th levl magus.

here's how it went...

OUCH i lost my shield (but i picked up shield spell something i planned on doing soon anyway, no biggie)

OUCH i lost hit points! (but it should even out over the course of the game, seeing as wizards have d6)

class skills changed a little.... nothing big.

had to shed my scale mail for a chain shirt (more AC lost)

while i lost feats..i was two weapon fighting with improved shield bash, now im two weapon fighting with a spell int he other hand, more on that later, so in reality i didnt loose anything, feats wise; jut the shield, which i pick up with the shield spell, and tossing a spell is way better than shield bash any day.

im a little wary of wandering into combat and trying to hit things with my sword and cast a spell in their face, are there feats im missing that should help me with this (ive considered skill focus spellcraft and combat casting) but anyone in threat range can get a AoO on me...ewww. help me out with this one.

It sys i can cast a spell for or last but not in the middle of attacks... if i cast a spell first (free hand) then shoot my bow in the other hand (using the free for the arrow) i think this breaks the rules doesnt it...says you need a light or one handed weapon in the other hand, which technically a bow is... but it's not listed that way...
seems like i should be able to shoot a ray and pluck my bow. but maybe not. (probably not)

is that the weakness of the class? (this class's strength being two weapon fighting sword/spell is also its weakness ...ie "bring on a pile of AoOs)?

Playing it last night those are a few of the stumbling blocks i ran into. (that and less hit points combined with less AC)

I was headed for EK anyway, so it will even out eventually, however i can see why one might want to build an EK instead of a MAgus now, they both have their bonuses, and the EK has wider vareity of spells.
but if you are going to play a sword/evoker...seems like magus is the way to go.

also would a magus without any extra feats qualify for two weapon defense?

let me see what else did i run into last night besides alot of (not in the face not in the face!) Oh, never in the history of me playing, have i ever lost a spell because of an AoO i provoked.... so there is a first. (done it as a DM, but not playing)

This class seems to be a "come and get me with your AoOs" as written...maybe the should be a feat or two to help out witht his? Unless Im missing something, it otherwise seems hard to use the class to its fullest without given the baddies tons of free shots.


Enlight_Bystand wrote:
Zurai wrote:
LazarX wrote:
Actually he's only been the iconic EK.
Actually, he hasn't. Seltyiel is the iconic multi-class character. Prestige Classes don't get iconics.
Well, yes and no. They don't get iconic write-ups, but there are still unamed iconic characters for all the prestige classes

No, there aren't. There's art for all the prestige classes, but they aren't iconic characters. They have no name, no background, no stats, and most importantly, no other art. All the iconics are used in other art pieces, for spells, for book covers, etc etc; the prestige class art characters don't.

Also, we were told way back in beta that the Prestige Classes will not have iconics.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Pendagast wrote:
also would a magus without any extra feats qualify for two weapon defense?

No... because while Spell Combat is kinda sorta like two weapon fighting.. it's not two weapon fighting. Also it's not a viable option to go for because while the magus can qualify for two weapon fighting and defense by spending the feats, he would lock himself out of spell combat options while using them. Because no matter what you use. Spell combat requires that one hand be free for the entire combat phase.


LazarX wrote:
Pendagast wrote:
also would a magus without any extra feats qualify for two weapon defense?
No... because while Spell Combat is kinda sorta like two weapon fighting.. it's not two weapon fighting. Also it's not a viable option to go for because while the magus can qualify for two weapon fighting and defense by spending the feats, he would lock himself out of spell combat options while using them. Because no matter what you use. Spell combat requires that one hand be free for the entire combat phase.

yea i kinda figured that, i was just looking for options.

two weapon rend would be kinda fun with sword and say vampiric touch in the other hand.


Well, If they were to redo his stat block.

He currently has access to 7th level spells.
The arcana that lets you spell combat with other classes spells can be taken at magus 6..

So he could be a Magus 6/Wiz 5/EK 9 would net BAB 15, 7th level wiz spells, 2nd level magus spells and a total of 4 Bonus combat feats.

It could be a decent build....


Ardenup wrote:

Well, If they were to redo his stat block.

He currently has access to 7th level spells.
The arcana that lets you spell combat with other classes spells can be taken at magus 6..

So he could be a Magus 6/Wiz 5/EK 9 would net BAB 15, 7th level wiz spells, 2nd level magus spells and a total of 4 Bonus combat feats.

It could be a decent build....

Nice, you just showed me a bonus to why go wiz/ek combo.... i like.


Zurai wrote:
Enlight_Bystand wrote:
Zurai wrote:
LazarX wrote:
Actually he's only been the iconic EK.
Actually, he hasn't. Seltyiel is the iconic multi-class character. Prestige Classes don't get iconics.
Well, yes and no. They don't get iconic write-ups, but there are still unamed iconic characters for all the prestige classes

No, there aren't. There's art for all the prestige classes, but they aren't iconic characters. They have no name, no background, no stats, and most importantly, no other art. All the iconics are used in other art pieces, for spells, for book covers, etc etc; the prestige class art characters don't.

Also, we were told way back in beta that the Prestige Classes will not have iconics.

Yep, EK having the art of Seltyiel is just an horrible coincidence.

Evil twin, as I said.


Technically, wouldn't Seltyiel be the evil twin? He is the only Evil character in the iconics, as I recall (although I still maintain the cavalier is really NE).


Zurai wrote:
I still maintain the cavalier is really NE

Why?


kyrt-ryder wrote:
Zurai wrote:
I still maintain the cavalier is really NE
Why?

order of the cockatrice is he?


Well, perhaps he's just a Magus/EK. Just because the class and UM book are new to us doesn't mean that it's new to them in Golarion. It was a little weird, have a PrC iconic.


kyrt-ryder wrote:
Zurai wrote:
I still maintain the cavalier is really NE
Why?

Look up the Iconics write up for him a few months back. The comment thread for that is full of discussion on that point; I don't want to derail this thread into an Alain thread.


A Magus 10/EK 10 would have 5/5/5/5/5/4 spells casting as a 19th-level caster, count as a 15th-level fighter and 20th-level arcane spellcaster for feats, be able to freely cast in medium armor, have BAB +17, and would have four fighter bonus feats.


see wrote:
A Magus 10/EK 10 would have 5/5/5/5/5/4 spells casting as a 19th-level caster, count as a 15th-level fighter and 20th-level arcane spellcaster for feats, be able to freely cast in medium armor, have BAB +17, and would have four fighter bonus feats.

i like the above version better, some fighter, some wizard, some magus, some ek...gets 7th level spells.

Liberty's Edge

I like him being just a full blown Magus without complicating anything. The class will rock alone and Paizo's done a good job of making each class interesting all the way down.

Let Seltyiel stay just Magus! (just dont ever put him in plate mail >_>)


Give me a few hours- Tonight I'll come up with a Core+APG Seltyiel Magus/Wiz/EK build that is in keeping with his write up and (IMHO) stat block.

Paizo may not do it but I like for the iconics to exist in my home games. If Seltyiel's a Magus, I'll make it so...


Hi,

This was only quick (not the most optimised) but has ravingdorks Spell Perfection- Intensified Maximised Cone of Cold trick. Admixture School makes it quite versatile for damage.

Build: Magus 20
Race: Half-Elf
Favored Class- Magus (hit points)
STR 14
DEX 20
CON 16
WIS 8
INT 23
CHA 10
Traits: Desperate Focus, Magical Knack

1Arcane Pool +1, Cantrips, Spell Combat, Combat Casting, Skill Focus: Diplomacy
2Spellstrike
3Magus Arcana (Arcane Accuracy), Extra Arcana: Concentrate
4Pool Spell
5Arcane Pool +2, Power Attack, Wpn Fcs: Longsword
6Magus Arcana (Broad Study)
7Arcane Bond- Familiar, Admixture School, Scribe Scroll, Intensify Spell
8
9Empower Spell
10
11Maximise Spell
12Critical Focus
13Step up
14
15Spell Perfection (Cone of Cold)
16Blinding Critical
17Following Step
18
19Staggering Critical
20Step up and Strike


Seltyiel is the iconic for multi-class, hes a half elf,who's race is most adept at multi classing, I dont think they are going to make him a straight magus, especially since he exists in so many publications as a ftr/wiz at the beginning of his adventuring career.

although there could be some fudge room with his, seeing as magus is a ftr wizard... but you all dont forget, seltyiel has his bat, dargenti. So his build will use an arcanna to get a familiar, boo hoo to all those trying to optimize him out.


Zurai wrote:
Technically, wouldn't Seltyiel be the evil twin? He is the only Evil character in the iconics, as I recall (although I still maintain the cavalier is really NE).

We all know how evil twins kidnap the good twins and steal their life, job and wife.

The real Seltyiel may even be a LG Paladin, trapped in a tower and wearing an horrible mask. That Evil Seltyiel guy, if that's his real name, seems to have powerful friends in the media, but I don't buy into the propaganda.


With the pregens being removed from the AP products, I'm thinking this is kind of a moot point. For the most part, the iconics exist to make art orders easier, and its pretty much their primary function at this point.

Seltyiel is the iconic pale guy with pointed ears carrying a sword while doing magic stuff.

Although at some point in time it might matter depending on what pregens they update for PFS, and if they expand the classes available.


Ardenup wrote:

Hi,

This was only quick (not the most optimised) but has ravingdorks Spell Perfection- Intensified Maximised Cone of Cold trick. Admixture School makes it quite versatile for damage.

Build: Magus 20
Race: Half-Elf
Favored Class- Magus (hit points)
STR 14
DEX 20
CON 16
WIS 8
INT 23
CHA 10
Traits: Desperate Focus, Magical Knack

1Arcane Pool +1, Cantrips, Spell Combat, Combat Casting, Skill Focus: Diplomacy
2Spellstrike
3Magus Arcana (Arcane Accuracy), Extra Arcana: Concentrate
4Pool Spell
5Arcane Pool +2, Power Attack, Wpn Fcs: Longsword
6Magus Arcana (Broad Study)
7Arcane Bond- Familiar, Admixture School, Scribe Scroll, Intensify Spell
8
9Empower Spell
10
11Maximise Spell
12Critical Focus
13Step up
14
15Spell Perfection (Cone of Cold)
16Blinding Critical
17Following Step
18
19Staggering Critical
20Step up and Strike

Ok this is a magus wizard EK build, but it really should not say Magus 20.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
IkeDoe wrote:
Zurai wrote:
Technically, wouldn't Seltyiel be the evil twin? He is the only Evil character in the iconics, as I recall (although I still maintain the cavalier is really NE).

We all know how evil twins kidnap the good twins and steal their life, job and wife.

The real Seltyiel may even be a LG Paladin, trapped in a tower and wearing an horrible mask. That Evil Seltyiel guy, if that's his real name, seems to have powerful friends in the media, but I don't buy into the propaganda.

Actually they're both evil. The Eldritch Knight is Seltyiel's Eviler Twin. He forces his victims to listen to Wayne Newton records... or that yodeling that makes Martian heads esplode.

1 to 50 of 65 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Archive / Pathfinder / Playtests & Prerelease Discussions / Ultimate Magic Playtest / Round 3: Revised Magus Discussion / Is Seltyiel getting a rewrite? All Messageboards