Any chance we could use background skills? Dang old clerics with their two points ...
Also, what's the status of firearms? Are we doing swords in a modern setting or magic guns?
One last question before I build a character, do you have rules for actual modern firearms or are we sticking with the Mosin-Nagant and the revolver as the "modern" firearms?
I'm deciding between Gunslinger 2/Shieldmarshal 5 (as a USMC Field MP) or a Gunslinger 1/Bard 1/Battle Herald 5 (Squad Leader or Platoon Commander... probably more PltCmdr). If this is now a full recruitment thread, when will recruitment end? I'm not sure how much time this weekend I will have to build either of these.
we'll keep the firearms to what Paizo has published. as found here
this will be a mix of firearms and swords.
for recruitment, i am going to post in a different thread with the official PC creation rules, along with some info and what not.
Background skills: if you can change it to be a reflection of this world, then i may allow it. may
HPs: maxed out. you will need them.
I'm going to go with a druid1/wizard(or sorcerer for fire support)2/mystic theurge 4, I think. I've been wanting to take Herbalism for a spin, and this seems an appropriate occasion.
we'll keep the firearms to what Paizo has published. as found here
So that I understand the exact limits, does that mean we're limiting to early and advanced firearms and no Paizo "modern" firearms? Link to modern firearms page, as per the link on your link :)
I ask because the "modern" firearms are also published by Paizo, they just happen to have their own page.
"Modern" firearms allowed.
Being offended does not make it any less true =P
|
That would be the case if It were a true and unexaggetated statement
But I suppose you are right in that my offense doesn't affect the truth. But see, the reason I am offended is because of a lack of truth in your words and instead simply unfounded exaggeration, but fine here is the reason why I am offended
You couldn't do all of what you said with your complaint
It'd be hard to get most of it
You could get all but two with a unchained monk/bard gestalt kinda weird character, very MAD, requiring every stat but int but still can almost get what you're strawmaning
To be clear I'm not trying to argue that the DM should run Gestalt, just that gestalt does much less "stomping on" things than Mythic which a lot of games include and build for. It's definitely a high power system but you can only get the sort of thing you'd already have at that level. It in no way affects action economy like mythic does, and that the hypothetical character you proposed wouldn't exist given your supposed care for "facts" and I don't want you biasing people who haven't heard of the optional rules system into thinking it's garbage
This is widely off topic. We're not playing gestalt, so could you go discuss it somewhere else?
And there's hardly cause for offense anyway, it's just some person on the internet's opinion.
I take to your statement regarding gestalt as a personal offense
That's like, totally unreasonable.
Alright everyone. Chill. We can tabke this discussion on gestalt and mythic until i get a discussion page up.