Chess Pwn |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Quote:
Any alternate class feature described as altering an
existing class feature otherwise functions as that original
class feature and is considered to be that class feature for
the purpose of meeting any requirements or prerequisites,
even if that feature is renamed to fit a new theme.
Is this new ruling/clarification or has this been known already?
Gisher |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
A expanded citation:
Ultimate Wilderness, p. 34 wrote:
A character with an alternate class feature due to an archetype doesn’t count as having the replaced class feature for the purpose of meeting any requirements or prerequisites.
Any alternate class feature described as altering an existing class feature otherwise functions as that original class feature and is considered to be that class feature for the purpose of meeting any requirements or prerequisites, even if that feature is renamed to fit a new theme.
This seems to say that the big distinction is between replacing and altering rather than renaming versus not renaming.