|4 people marked this as FAQ candidate.|
We just had our first play test of Starfinder, and overall we had a great time! Since our party is primarily ranged we made heavy use of cover, at times it felt like the XCOM tabletop game. Along the way we ran into a few different situations where we needed to figure out the rules, exactly the reason why we play test stuff before we really get into a campaign. Most of it was pretty clear-cut, but we ran into a strange situation I wanted to get the RQ's take on.
A Soldier is exploring a 5ft wide corridor, essentially a ventilation shaft. The corridor is spacious enough that there are no squeezing penalties. He turns a corner and spots an enemy guard searching the ventilation shaft for the cause of a triggered proximity alarm. The guard pulls his gun and takes a shot at the soldier. The battle grid looks like this. Does the soldier have partial cover from the attack? Initially I thought the answer was no, it's a clean shot. But one of my players pointed out there'd been a change in the cover rules from Pathfinder.
Choose a corner of your square. If any line from this corner to any corner of the target’s square passes through a square or border that blocks line of effect or provides cover, or through a square occupied by a creature, the target has cover.
Furthermore, example #2 in the cover illustration seems to cover this.
(...)lines from every corner of her square to all the corners of the ksarik’s square pass through or run along the border of a wall. The ksarik has cover(...)[
I don't see how you could draw a line from any corner without having it run along the border of a wall here, but... Logically it's a clear shot, there shouldn't be any cover penalties in play. Am I misinterpreting this, or is it just a quirk of the system and we should houserule it?
Since you're in a straight 5ft corridor, no lines pass through a wall and not all run along a wall. Not cover.
In the example picture #2 not all corner to corner lines run along a wall. Upper left of the Vesk to Upper left of the Ksarik doesn't run along or through a wall. So why would it have cover if all you need to do is have a single corner to corner line that doesn't run through or along a wall.
The term "run along the border of a wall" never appears in the actual cover rules (any where else in the rule book at all). I find it rather hard to believe the cover rules were meant to be different between the diagram and the plain text.
No worries, I probably could have done a better job explaining what the contradiction seemed to be in the first post. I put together a second image link to better illustrate the problem. I borrowed the cover example from the Starfinder Core Book in the hope that having it on hand makes it easier to put out an errata, assuming we're right and this is indeed an editing mistake.
The second image can be found here.
I'm now picturing some kind of Golarian vs Metric system debate.
All corridors are in increments of 2m wide, because of scientific advancements. Because of the "Golarian system" everyone still stands in 5' squares.
No cover for corridors, because they'll never run down the border of a wall. :)
|The Mighty Khan|
The text in the example image is a bad copy-paste job from the nearly identical Pathfinder example image. It references every corner to every corner, which is the melee attack rule from Pathfinder. This rule does not exist in Starfinder. In Starfinder, the rule for all attacks is a direct copy-paste from the Pathfinder ranged attack rule.
As for the ranged rule, the original Pathfinder image example makes it very clear:
...the rogue does not have cover from [the ogre], as the ogre has reach (so it figures attacks as if attacking with a ranged weapon).
So: In both images, by the Pathfinder ranged rule, (which is now the Starfinder rule for all attacks) the rogue/Obozaya does not have cover from the ogre/the ksarik.