Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game

Starfinder


Pathfinder Society


Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

Vital statistics for non-core playable races


Starfinder General Discussion

Liberty's Edge

Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

The Core Rulebook has a table containing heights, weights, ages of maturity, and maximum ages for all the core races. Can we eventually expect the same for non-core races such as the Pathfinder core races and the ones introduced in First Contact?


Pathfinder Companion, Maps, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber

For the Pathfinder core races, you can use the heights and weights from Pathfinder (as they presumably won't have changed very much). Age data is already given for these races in the Starfinder core rulebook.

I guess we will have to wait for Alien Archive to come out to have any idea about the standard level of detail for the new races introduced there.


David knott 242 wrote:
For the Pathfinder core races, you can use the heights and weights from Pathfinder (as they presumably won't have changed very much).

I wouldn't be quite so quick on that. If we look at Humans between Pathfinder and Starfinder, in Pathfinder they ranged from 4'7" (smallest indicated woman) to 6'6" (tallest indicated man), where in Starfinder they are indicated to range from 5' to 7'. Lashunta, likewise, in Pathfinder it's stated Korasha are generally around 5', while Damaya are around 6', while in Starfinder they now range 5-7' too. So they overall got taller. Meanwhile the Ysoki (Ratfolk) in Pathfinder ranged from 3'6" up to 4'3", but now just range 3' to 4', so their average heights actually decreased (an approximate 14.29% decrease in their shortest at that, or ~5.88% decrease in tallest) through the centuries.


Huh. I wonder if that's just arbitrary shifts in the systems ( possibly as part of a desire to patch the ranges ), or if its an intentional bit of implied fluff? After all, it makes sense that humans would get a bit taller, due to improved nutrition. Maybe Ysoki got smaller, because its really advantageous for a spacer lifestyle?


Shinigami02 wrote:
David knott 242 wrote:
For the Pathfinder core races, you can use the heights and weights from Pathfinder (as they presumably won't have changed very much).
I wouldn't be quite so quick on that. If we look at Humans between Pathfinder and Starfinder, in Pathfinder they ranged from 4'7" (smallest indicated woman) to 6'6" (tallest indicated man), where in Starfinder they are indicated to range from 5' to 7'. Lashunta, likewise, in Pathfinder it's stated Korasha are generally around 5', while Damaya are around 6', while in Starfinder they now range 5-7' too. So they overall got taller. Meanwhile the Ysoki (Ratfolk) in Pathfinder ranged from 3'6" up to 4'3", but now just range 3' to 4', so their average heights actually decreased (an approximate 14.29% decrease in their shortest at that, or ~5.88% decrease in tallest) through the centuries.

Notice that all of the new values are solid foot numbers rather than being in between, and that two of them are the same? They're trying to save wordcount publishing costs again. Also probably something about "simplicity" as well.

Ysoki are supposed to be some Ratfolk subspecies from another planet anyway, which is why they're not called Ratfolk in Starfinder.
That said, the ridiculous time-skip-amnesia cop out Gap means we have no way to know what anything is implying unless they reveal it, so you could be right.


Metaphysician wrote:
Maybe Ysoki got smaller, because its really advantageous for a spacer lifestyle?

Too bad there's no mechanical benefit from being Small in Starfinder. Or detriment. Or anything at all involving size other than space, reach, and pushing off of someone in low gravity, as far as I can see. Your Ysoki can totally pin that Gargantuan Dragon, and it gets no bonus against it. Then again, nobody should ever be doing combat maneuvers in the first place since it's a regular attack roll versus KAC+8.

Being smaller in space is actually a bad thing because it means you can't reach for things as well and you don't have as much limb leverage for shifting yourself around in microgravity environments lacking things to grab.
It would, however, be advantageous for being inside a cramped, closed-in area within a vessel. I want them to add Space Kobolds that have ships made almost entirely of Jefferies Tubes they crawl around in like an underground warren!

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo / Starfinder® / Starfinder General Discussion / Vital statistics for non-core playable races All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

©2002-2017 Paizo Inc.® | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours, Monday through Friday, 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM Pacific time.

Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, Starfinder, the Starfinder logo, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc. The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Legends, Pathfinder Online, Starfinder Adventure Path, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.