Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game

Starfinder


Pathfinder Society


Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

Lost opportunity to consolidate Abiltity Score and Modifier


Starfinder General Discussion

51 to 53 of 53 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

Redelia wrote:
I hope that this doesn't go so far as to mean we can't have bad guys built like PCs with class levels and things.

I asked this at PaizoCon, and they said that you can build characters/creatures normally. I think that this is to condense stat blocks (looking at dragons, here), and to simplify quick monster creation if you're creating a new and unique world.

Also, put me on the side that doesn't like the idea of just stat modifiers for characters. I've played games with those, and it just... doesn't feel right to me.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Ckent83 wrote:
Edit: Your assertion that the other tweaks are less radical than what you're proposing is subjective. A change to mechanics like the one suggested here brings the game closer to a board game.

I actually disagree with these two statements quite strongly.

Firstly since most of the rules of the game just use the ability modifier none of those mechanics will be affected one bit by the disappearence of the score stat.

Secondly The few places where the score is used can very easily modified to use the modifier instead since both numbers track each other so closely, making gameplay either exactly the same as right now or very very close to it.

Removing score and just keeping modifier is a cleanup to character creation, advancement, and the character sheet. It has a small impact to actually playing the game. I don't think this is a subjective thing at all. Adding Stamina points that come back after a breather instead of all damage coming from HP do more to change how the game plays than this!

Heck with the ABP rules from Unchained Paizo is already moving away from the crunchy traditional +1 bumps to score that might or might not lead to a bump in modifier as ABP just gives +2 to score that guarantees a bump to the modifier.

Rolling for stats is pretty easily handled as well. Since rolling is an alternate ruleset meant for a more traditional (crunchy) feel all you'd have to do is.

Roll 3d6 as normal
-10
/2
round down
and write that modifier down. Viola!

In any case it is a big aesthetic change. And that is definitely a subjective preference.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Azih wrote:
Ckent83 wrote:
Edit: Your assertion that the other tweaks are less radical than what you're proposing is subjective. A change to mechanics like the one suggested here brings the game closer to a board game.

I actually disagree with these two statements quite strongly.

Firstly since most of the rules of the game just use the ability modifier none of those mechanics will be affected one bit by the disappearence of the score stat.

Secondly The few places where the score is used can very easily modified to use the modifier instead since both numbers track each other so closely, making gameplay either exactly the same as right now or very very close to it.

Removing score and just keeping modifier is a cleanup to character creation, advancement, and the character sheet. It has a small impact to actually playing the game. I don't think this is a subjective thing at all. Adding Stamina points that come back after a breather instead of all damage coming from HP do more to change how the game plays than this!

Heck with the ABP rules from Unchained Paizo is already moving away from the crunchy traditional +1 bumps to score that might or might not lead to a bump in modifier as ABP just gives +2 to score that guarantees a bump to the modifier.

Rolling for stats is pretty easily handled as well. Since rolling is an alternate ruleset meant for a more traditional (crunchy) feel all you'd have to do is.

Roll 3d6 as normal
-10
/2
round down
and write that modifier down. Viola!

In any case it is a big aesthetic change. And that is definitely a subjective preference.

To avoid division and to match ability buy boundaries neatly, you could even just do 3d3-5, which has a minimum of -2 (equivalent to 6-7 in a score) and a maximum of +4 (equivalent to 18-19 in a score).

51 to 53 of 53 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo / Starfinder® / Starfinder General Discussion / Lost opportunity to consolidate Abiltity Score and Modifier All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

©2002-2017 Paizo Inc.® | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours, Monday through Friday, 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM Pacific time.

Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, Starfinder, the Starfinder logo, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc. The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Legends, Pathfinder Online, Starfinder Adventure Path, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.