Shield Bashing as the Sword and Shield


Rules Questions

Vigilant Seal

I currently have a 4th Level Sacred Shield character with a +1 Heavy Steel Shield. Strength is 18. At 5th level, I plan on taking the Improved Shield Bash feat and enhancing the +1 Heavy Steel Shield with the Bashing property.

1) Is the cost to enhance the shield with Bashing property 3,000 gp?

2) Is the shield slam damage: 1d8+9 (+4 STR and +1 magical enhancement and +4 power attack)?

3) Can I use the shield as a two handed weapon for 1d8+13 (+6 STR and +1 magical enhancement and +6 power attack)?


1) Yes
2) Sounds right
3) RAW yes, but some GMs might homerule otherwise

At option to note would be getting a large sized +1 Bashing Spiked Heavy Shield with Effortless Lace to get 2d6 base damage (3d6 when enlarged) if GM allows it. This would be by default a 2-handed weapon.


1. The cost would be the difference between a +1 shield and a +2 shield, which is 5,000 GP.

2. Your shield slam damage only gets half your strength modifier I believe for being off-hand, per two-weapon fighting. You also only get half the power attack bonus, so it would be 1d8+5.

Consider though that a shield bash when used to sword in board is NOT a light weapon, it is one-handed, so your penalties are as follows, depending on if you have TWF feat:

Circumstances Primary Hand Off Hand
Normal penalties –6 –10
Two-Weapon Fighting feat –4 –4

If you are trying to power attack on top of that, you have a total penalty of -8 -12 or -6 -6.

3. I disagree with Gallant in principle, but he may be right as RAW. But you would have to not have a weapon in your main hand.


Joshua9093 wrote:


2. Your shield slam damage only gets half your strength modifier I believe for being off-hand, per two-weapon fighting. You also only get half the power attack bonus, so it would be 1d8+5.

1. A character can always choose to use a shield as their primary weapon. This is sometimes seen in TWFing sword & board builds with a heavy shield and light weapon.

2. There is nothing stating the character is TWFing. He could be relying solely on his shield as both weapon and armor, or making only iterative attacks with his shield while holding a weapon.


Joshua9093 wrote:

1. The cost would be the difference between a +1 shield and a +2 shield, which is 5,000 GP.

2. Your shield slam damage only gets half your strength modifier I believe for being off-hand, per two-weapon fighting. You also only get half the power attack bonus, so it would be 1d8+5.

Consider though that a shield bash when used to sword in board is NOT a light weapon, it is one-handed, so your penalties are as follows, depending on if you have TWF feat:

Circumstances Primary Hand Off Hand
Normal penalties –6 –10
Two-Weapon Fighting feat –4 –4

If you are trying to power attack on top of that, you have a total penalty of -8 -12 or -6 -6.

3. I disagree with Gallant in principle, but he may be right as RAW. But you would have to not have a weapon in your main hand.

1. A +2 shield is 4,000 GP. A +1 shield is 1,000 GP. To upgrade, you would pay the difference: 4,000 - 1,000 = 3,000 GP

2. A shield is only considered off hand if you attack with another weapon that round. Even then you can choose to make your shield your primary and the other weapon your off hand weapon.

3. I respect your opinion, it is a logical way to see it.


Ah yes, I did use the weapon chart instead of armor, my apologies. I assumed it was sword and board based on the title.


You do not get the +1 to hit/damage. The +1 is to AC only unless you have the feat Shield Master that requires BAB +11 among other things. You must upgrade the shield separately for damage.

Also, you can two hand a heavy shield like you have. A light shield is considered a light weapon and you can't two hand light weapons.


SorrySleeping wrote:

You do not get the +1 to hit/damage. The +1 is to AC only unless you have the feat Shield Master that requires BAB +11 among other things. You must upgrade the shield separately for damage.

Also, you can two hand a heavy shield like you have. A light shield is considered a light weapon and you can't two hand light weapons.

normal damage die is 1d4 so up 2 steps is 1d8 as 1d4->1d6->1d8


Bryan Y wrote:


I currently have a 4th Level Sacred Shield character with a +1 Heavy Steel Shield. Strength is 18. At 5th level, I plan on taking the Improved Shield Bash feat and enhancing the +1 Heavy Steel Shield with the Bashing property.

1) Is the cost to enhance the shield with Bashing property 3,000 gp?

2) Is the shield slam damage: 1d8+9 (+4 STR and +1 magical enhancement and +4 power attack)?

3) Can I use the shield as a two handed weapon for 1d8+13 (+6 STR and +1 magical enhancement and +6 power attack)?

i would suggest using your divine bond at 5th level to get the bashing quality instead that way when you manage to get the shield master feat you wont have wasted an enchantment on bashing

Vigilant Seal

The character fights with a +1 Bastard Sword and carries a +1 Heavy Steel Shield for protection. I have no plans on TWFing, because I only have a 10 DEX. I will fight with the bastard sword, until I suffer heavy damage. In that case on my turn, I will drop the bastard sword as a free action, then swift action to Lay on Hands. Then full round attack with the Heavy Steel Shield as a two handed weapon.

Vigilant Seal

SorrySleeping wrote:

You do not get the +1 to hit/damage. The +1 is to AC only unless you have the feat Shield Master that requires BAB +11 among other things. You must upgrade the shield separately for damage.

Also, you can two hand a heavy shield like you have. A light shield is considered a light weapon and you can't two hand light weapons.

Is the shield considered to be a magical weapon when bashing or do I have to spend 2,000 gp to get the +1 enhancement bonus to attack/damage rolls?


Bryan Y wrote:
SorrySleeping wrote:

You do not get the +1 to hit/damage. The +1 is to AC only unless you have the feat Shield Master that requires BAB +11 among other things. You must upgrade the shield separately for damage.

Also, you can two hand a heavy shield like you have. A light shield is considered a light weapon and you can't two hand light weapons.

Is the shield considered to be a magical weapon when bashing or do I have to spend 2,000 gp to get the +1 enhancement bonus to attack/damage rolls?

You would need to enchant it separately as a weapon for 2000 gp.

Given your build, I would recommend going for a buckler with Unhindering Shield feat instead of a heavy shield. This would allow you to two hand the bastard sword consistently and take a hand off to lay on hands when needed. This would give you the same AC and be able to focus on one weapon at the cost of a feat. You can add in Upsetting Shield Style if you want to be able to shield bash as well (requires 13 Dex).


Brian, you can lay on hands without dropping your sword, perhaps mitigating the need to bash in the first place. Unless you're just doing it for flavor I guess.


Joshua9093 wrote:
Brian, you can lay on hands without dropping your sword, perhaps mitigating the need to bash in the first place. Unless you're just doing it for flavor I guess.

The heavy shield and sword would occupy both hands so he wouldn't be able to lay on hands.

Sovereign Court

Joshua9093 wrote:
Brian, you can lay on hands without dropping your sword, perhaps mitigating the need to bash in the first place. Unless you're just doing it for flavor I guess.
Lay on Hands wrote:
Despite the name of this ability, a paladin only needs one free hand to use this ability.

Also, in reply to your comments upthread, it's actually 6k to upgrade from a 2k +1 weapon to an 8k +2 weapon. Not that it matters now. But now you know.


Illeist wrote:
Joshua9093 wrote:
Brian, you can lay on hands without dropping your sword, perhaps mitigating the need to bash in the first place. Unless you're just doing it for flavor I guess.
Lay on Hands wrote:
Despite the name of this ability, a paladin only needs one free hand to use this ability.
Also, in reply to your comments upthread, it's actually 6k to upgrade from a 2k +1 weapon to an 8k +2 weapon. Not that it matters now. But now you know.

Bashing is an armor special ability.

Sovereign Court

Gallant Armor wrote:
Illeist wrote:
Joshua9093 wrote:
Brian, you can lay on hands without dropping your sword, perhaps mitigating the need to bash in the first place. Unless you're just doing it for flavor I guess.
Lay on Hands wrote:
Despite the name of this ability, a paladin only needs one free hand to use this ability.
Also, in reply to your comments upthread, it's actually 6k to upgrade from a 2k +1 weapon to an 8k +2 weapon. Not that it matters now. But now you know.
Bashing is an armor special ability.

It is. That's why it doesn't matter. Just making sure that someone knows that 8-2 isn't 5.

Vigilant Seal

So using the shield as a weapon, requires maintaining two separate pool costs - one for armor class and the other for offense. Does the shield need to be a masterwork weapon (i.e 300 gp) before it can be enhanced with weapon qualities? Or is the 300 gp masterwork requirement waived for it being a masterwork shield for defense (150 gp)?


Bryan Y wrote:
So using the shield as a weapon, requires maintaining two separate pool costs - one for armor class and the other for offense.

One for armor class + shield special abilities (which includes bashing even though it's offensive) and the other for weapon bonus + weapon special abilities, yes.

Bryan Y wrote:
Does the shield need to be a masterwork weapon (i.e 300 gp) before it can be enhanced with weapon qualities? Or is the 300 gp masterwork requirement waived for it being a masterwork shield for defense (150 gp)?

This has been hotly debated on the boards and there is no consensus. Consult your GM.


Lady-J wrote:
SorrySleeping wrote:

You do not get the +1 to hit/damage. The +1 is to AC only unless you have the feat Shield Master that requires BAB +11 among other things. You must upgrade the shield separately for damage.

Also, you can two hand a heavy shield like you have. A light shield is considered a light weapon and you can't two hand light weapons.

normal damage die is 1d4 so up 2 steps is 1d8 as 1d4->1d6->1d8

I realized the damage after I posted. I'm use to the spiked shield damage.


Gallant Armor wrote:

3) RAW yes, but some GMs might homerule otherwise

At option to note would be getting a large sized +1 Bashing Spiked Heavy Shield with Effortless Lace to get 2d6 base damage (3d6 when enlarged) if GM allows it. This would be by default a 2-handed weapon.

Relevant FAQ says you can use it two-handed regardless, since Shields are not tied to simply being off-hand weapons (and therefore can be two-handed, since they have the same handedness rules as other weaponry).

Also, Bashing and Shield Spikes do not stack. We have two FAQs that say they won't stack.

Main FAQ with PDT post confirming the FAQ applies to the relevant discussion.

Klar FAQ which states the size increases of the Klar wouldn't stack with Bashing or Shield Spikes, making them the same effect and therefore unstackable.


Bryan Y wrote:
So using the shield as a weapon, requires maintaining two separate pool costs - one for armor class and the other for offense. Does the shield need to be a masterwork weapon (i.e 300 gp) before it can be enhanced with weapon qualities? Or is the 300 gp masterwork requirement waived for it being a masterwork shield for defense (150 gp)?
Masterwork wrote:
Even though some types of armor and shields can be used as weapons, you can’t create a masterwork version of such an item that confers an enhancement bonus on attack rolls. Instead, masterwork armor and shields have lessened armor check penalties.


Darksol the Painbringer wrote:
Gallant Armor wrote:

3) RAW yes, but some GMs might homerule otherwise

At option to note would be getting a large sized +1 Bashing Spiked Heavy Shield with Effortless Lace to get 2d6 base damage (3d6 when enlarged) if GM allows it. This would be by default a 2-handed weapon.

Relevant FAQ says you can use it two-handed regardless, since Shields are not tied to simply being off-hand weapons (and therefore can be two-handed, since they have the same handedness rules as other weaponry).

Also, Bashing and Shield Spikes do not stack. We have two FAQs that say they won't stack.

Main FAQ with PDT post confirming the FAQ applies to the relevant discussion.

Klar FAQ which states the size increases of the Klar wouldn't stack with Bashing or Shield Spikes, making them the same effect and therefore unstackable.

As I said, RAW you can two hand a shield - but many find it a logically unsound concept and don't allow it.

You are correct, shield spikes wouldn't add to damage (which is why I didn't include the added size to the listed damage), but they do make the shield a piercing weapon which would qualify it for effortless lace. Having an actual large shield would add to damage and effortless lace negates the penalty for wielding a large weapon.


Quote:
Bashing: A shield with this special ability is designed to perform a shield bash. A bashing shield deals damage as if it were a weapon of two size categories larger (a Medium light shield thus deals 1d6 points of damage and a Medium heavy shield deals 1d8 points of damage). The shield acts as a +1 weapon when used to bash. Only light and heavy shields can have this ability.

Might have been covered already but I didn't see it.

Bashing makes your shield a +1 weapon (for the purpose of attacking, not further enhancements), so you would get a +1 to attack and damage.


Gallant Armor wrote:
As I said, RAW you can two hand a shield - but many find it a logically unsound concept and don't allow it.

Captain America would disagree with that statement.

Also, if you're going to follow that argument to its logical conclusion, making the shield Large-sized would make it more of an unsound concept, because the weapon would be very awkward to use compared to something more appropriately sized for you, and that's something not even the Effortless Lace would fix.


Darksol the Painbringer wrote:
Gallant Armor wrote:
As I said, RAW you can two hand a shield - but many find it a logically unsound concept and don't allow it.

Captain America would disagree with that statement.

Also, if you're going to follow that argument to its logical conclusion, making the shield Large-sized would make it more of an unsound concept, because the weapon would be very awkward to use compared to something more appropriately sized for you, and that's something not even the Effortless Lace would fix.

I'm not arguing against it being allowed, I am simply stating the fact that there are people who don't think it's valid so it's something to run past the GM.

As for the large shield, that is just another option that could be allowed or not allowed, and as effortless lace removes all mechanical penalties, so it is arguably no different than an appropriately sized two handed weapon.


Gallant Armor wrote:
Darksol the Painbringer wrote:
Gallant Armor wrote:
As I said, RAW you can two hand a shield - but many find it a logically unsound concept and don't allow it.

Captain America would disagree with that statement.

Also, if you're going to follow that argument to its logical conclusion, making the shield Large-sized would make it more of an unsound concept, because the weapon would be very awkward to use compared to something more appropriately sized for you, and that's something not even the Effortless Lace would fix.

I'm not arguing against it being allowed, I am simply stating the fact that there are people who don't think it's valid so it's something to run past the GM.

As for the large shield, that is just another option that could be allowed or not allowed, and as effortless lace removes all mechanical penalties, so it is arguably no different than an appropriately sized two handed weapon.

people used to use a shield in two hands for attacking way back when mostly when they lost their main weapon


I'm assuming 2 handed shield is moot given the title of thread.


Gallant Armor wrote:
Darksol the Painbringer wrote:
Gallant Armor wrote:
As I said, RAW you can two hand a shield - but many find it a logically unsound concept and don't allow it.

Captain America would disagree with that statement.

Also, if you're going to follow that argument to its logical conclusion, making the shield Large-sized would make it more of an unsound concept, because the weapon would be very awkward to use compared to something more appropriately sized for you, and that's something not even the Effortless Lace would fix.

I'm not arguing against it being allowed, I am simply stating the fact that there are people who don't think it's valid so it's something to run past the GM.

As for the large shield, that is just another option that could be allowed or not allowed, and as effortless lace removes all mechanical penalties, so it is arguably no different than an appropriately sized two handed weapon.

Effortless Lace calls out weapons not armour so would it remove the mechanical penalties for bashing but leave them for using it as a shield? As a shield is strapped to your arm and gripped with your hand (in Pathfinder) would you need two laces? Not that I can find any rules for using incorrectly sized armour.


CountofUndolpho wrote:
Gallant Armor wrote:
Darksol the Painbringer wrote:
Gallant Armor wrote:
As I said, RAW you can two hand a shield - but many find it a logically unsound concept and don't allow it.

Captain America would disagree with that statement.

Also, if you're going to follow that argument to its logical conclusion, making the shield Large-sized would make it more of an unsound concept, because the weapon would be very awkward to use compared to something more appropriately sized for you, and that's something not even the Effortless Lace would fix.

I'm not arguing against it being allowed, I am simply stating the fact that there are people who don't think it's valid so it's something to run past the GM.

As for the large shield, that is just another option that could be allowed or not allowed, and as effortless lace removes all mechanical penalties, so it is arguably no different than an appropriately sized two handed weapon.

Effortless Lace calls out weapons not armour so would it remove the mechanical penalties for bashing but leave them for using it as a shield? As a shield is strapped to your arm and gripped with your hand (in Pathfinder) would you need two laces? Not that I can find any rules for using incorrectly sized armour.

There are no official rules on how incorrectly sized armor and shield benefits and penalties should work.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Shield Bashing as the Sword and Shield All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.