Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game


Pathfinder Society

Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

Tweaking healing skill?

Suggestions/House Rules/Homebrew

So as the Heal Deadly Wounds skill says,

Heal Deadly WoundsWhen treating deadly wounds, you can restore hit points to a damaged creature. Treating deadly wounds restores 1 hit point per level of the creature. If you exceed the DC by 5 or more, add your Wisdom modifier (if positive) to this amount. A creature can only benefit from its deadly wounds being treated within 24 hours of being injured and never more than once per day.

So assuming a max of +6 Wisdom mod at high levels of play, we're looking at a max of 26 points healed for 20th level, which at this point is a banged knee and since PCs are often not able to spend the time for normal healing, would just burn charges from wands or spend leftover channels before sleeping. So there is little reason to go beyond what is needed to make a First Aid/Stabilization check.

So, a suggestion is that each +5 that the DC is beaten by, another Wisdom mod worth of damage is healed.

Or perhaps lowering the Deadly Wounds DC to 15 so a PC can get more milage out of their wisdom mod?

I rewrite for treat deadly wounds needs to go further. The high Wis mod makes a difference at low levels, when the DC is hard to reach. By the time the DC is easy to reach, the Wis mod makes little difference.

I agree that the base DC should be 15. To encourage the fact that healthy people heal faster, the patient's Con mod might be a nice perk. Characters with high Con need the extra healing anyways. I could come up with a complicated formula for this, but simplicity has its value too.

The issue with the Provide First Aid, Provide Long-term Care, and Treat Deadly Wounds checks is that they're more or less realistic, which, when put next to magic, makes them virtually useless. A "banged knee" is all it was ever intended to heal. A person brought to within an inch of his life is not going to be fine the next day with a day's rest and a single medic patching him up and feeding him root-infused tonics; instead, they'll most likely not get worse, and maybe even BEGIN to heal, but based on WHY they're within an inch of their life, they could take weeks at best to be back to normal. This is reflected realistically enough with the Heal skill, and before you start improving it with + this, or + that, you need to ask yourself how grounded you want to keep the skill before it starts to mimic magic entirely - which the other skills for the most part do not. You could then get into martial/caster disparity territory, but in this case, I think the real culprit is the HP mechanic, which is a necessary evil in most d20 systems.

To actually answer your question: I think lowering the DC isn't a bad idea to make the skill useful at lower levels, where it actually makes a difference. Maybe even make it a scaling DC: 15 + [1/2 HD (minimum 1)] - [Con mod]. Like Ciaran Barnes said, a healthier person should be easier to heal; a truly frail person with a negative modifer in Con is going to be much harder to staunch bleeding for than an olympic-level athlete. Like I said above, adding more numbers is a tricky thing.

If you want to make the Treat Deadly Wounds check truly make a difference and be a valued ability, consider using it as a 1/day/person primer to treat a followup magical heal effect to be Empowered. Now, it has real value (a free Metemagic effect), makes sense within the setting (the Heal check acted as a head-start for the healing magic, making the actual spell more efficient), but doesn't unbalance the game (must be out-of-combat (1 hour action), and once per day).

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

I houserule that with a Heal check, you can maximize magical healing on the patient for the next few minutes while they rest. It aligns with how medical practice interacts with magical healing in my world where proper mundane treatment is vital to ensuring a patient heals correctly.

You could borrow this use from Kirthfinder

First Aid: If a character has lost hit points, you can restore some of them. A successful check, as a fullround action, restores a number of hit points equal to your Heal check results. You can take 20 on this check by spending 2 full minutes. First aid can be performed on a character once per fight in which he or she is injured, to a maximum amount of damage healed equal to the amount sustained in that fight.

There are some good ideas here so far.

Here is a tangent, but another nitpick of mine. If a wizard and a barbarian are both beaten and bloodied within an inch of the their life, it takes twice as much healing (natural or magical) to get the barbarian fully healed.

There was a "fix" I saw in a rewite of the pre-AD&D rules where the dice used for a cure spell was determined by the hit point dice used by the character. Obviously, this is probably ill-fitting for Pathfinder when multi-classing is involved, but I thought it was clever.

I think Treat Deadly Wounds is about right as it is. It's not meant to be a substitute for magical Healing, which is already awesome, and really is just the mundane skill used by commoners when they can't afford a Cleric.

I'd like to see Treat Disease and Treat Poison tweaked though. Rather than a +4 competence bonus to the next save, I'd rather see a stackable +2 bonus (multiple healers being better than one), much like Aid Other. To offset everyone in the party making an attempt, trained or not, anyone failing the Heal check gives a -1 penalty to their save.

Adding to that, instead of a bonus to their next save, a successful Heal check could give an extra save now, rather than a bonus later.

If those aspects of Heal make it too powerful, Treat Deadly Wounds, Treat Poison and and Treat Disease could be available only to those trained in it is, the average peasant, generally untrained in Heal, has a reasonable chance of helping someone with a deadly disease, which I don't think should be the case.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Ciaran Barnes wrote:
There was a "fix" I saw in a rewite of the pre-AD&D rules where the dice used for a cure spell was determined by the hit point dice used by the character. Obviously, this is probably ill-fitting for Pathfinder when multi-classing is involved, but I thought it was clever.

That's a cool idea, but the economics totally fall apart.

You could do a power attack styled adjustment, taking a -1 to your check for a bonus on the effect if successful. For every 4 ranks in Heal, you can accept another -1.

Another answer might simply be to borrow from later DnD editions and allow a heal during a rest up to a limited number a day. In fact if you want limit to a number of dice of healing equal to their level. even better if the dice rolled is HD (even with multiclassing it works just look at the levels taken and thats your pool of healing.

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Suggestions/House Rules/Homebrew / Tweaking healing skill? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

©2002-2017 Paizo Inc.® | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Need help? Email or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours, Monday through Friday, 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM Pacific time.

Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, Starfinder, the Starfinder logo, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc. The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Legends, Pathfinder Online, Starfinder Adventure Path, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.