Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game

Starfinder


Pathfinder Society


Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

Bestiary 7 Wishes List.


Product Discussion

651 to 674 of 674 << first < prev | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | next > last >>

Troops
Low CR ranged troop. Rabble Testudo are pretty limited.
Undead, either their own troop or change how Zombie/Skeleton effects a troop. An skeleton phalanx loses nothing except United Spirit (2 AC and some HP if Elite Troop isn't retained in its entirety, though then why becoming undead loses the bonus of better armor comes up.) yet somehow has their CR almost halved!
More troop specific templates. Should be stackable.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Companion, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I don't like troops, they bring back bad memories of mobs.

Dark Archive

Just as we have numerous "minor" fiendish races, I'd like to see celestials get some love. We have Manasaputras for LG, then perhaps we can expand the Peri into a full grouping for NG. I'm not sure what CG could get but I trust the writers on that.

I would like to see a Protean Lord or a Primal Inevitable get a full write-up (including at least a blurb on their cults, including offered domains).


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Creon Vizcarra wrote:

Just as we have numerous "minor" fiendish races, I'd like to see celestials get some love. We have Manasaputras for LG, then perhaps we can expand the Peri into a full grouping for NG. I'm not sure what CG could get but I trust the writers on that.

I would like to see a Protean Lord or a Primal Inevitable get a full write-up (including at least a blurb on their cults, including offered domains).

Garuda could work very well for a new group of chaotic good outsiders, and I would also like Couatl to continue to be expanded upon (they got another couatl in Hell's Vengeance)

More asura, divs, oni, demodands, and rashaka would be nice, seeing as they haven't had that much expansion since Bestiary 3 (except for the oni, but the ones statted up for Jade Regent haven't found their way into a hard cover bestiary yet).

Dark Archive

Malefactor wrote:
Garuda could work very well for a new group of chaotic good outsiders, and I would also like Couatl to continue to be expanded upon (they got another couatl in Hell's Vengeance)

Ahh, I forgot about the Garuda. That makes sense since it already has an Aasimar variant (as does the Peri, which is why I thought of it).

I would like a 0 hd fey PC race other than the Gathlain. I really think the Faun should have been that race, but my fantasies of playing Mr. Tumnus will have to wait.


Creon Vizcarra wrote:
Malefactor wrote:
Garuda could work very well for a new group of chaotic good outsiders, and I would also like Couatl to continue to be expanded upon (they got another couatl in Hell's Vengeance)

Ahh, I forgot about the Garuda. That makes sense since it already has an Aasimar variant (as does the Peri, which is why I thought of it).

I would like a 0 hd fey PC race other than the Gathlain. I really think the Faun should have been that race, but my fantasies of playing Mr. Tumnus will have to wait.

We do have another fey race, Naiads. They're from Bestiary 6.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Companion, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I would love to change the Peri and Garuda into new celestial groups.

I agree, the Faun should have been a 0HD fey race.

Would love to see new LN, CN, and N outsider groups.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Creon Vizcarra wrote:
I would like to see a Protean Lord or a Prime Inevitable get a full write-up (including at least a blurb on their cults, including offered domains).

Till all are one. ^_~

Dark Archive

Malefactor wrote:
We do have another fey race, Naiads. They're from Bestiary 6.

Crikey, I guess they didn't make much of an impression on me. Looking at them again I think they kind of step on the toes of Undines.

Dragon78 wrote:

would love to change the Peri and Garuda into new celestial groups.

I agree, the Faun should have been a 0HD fey race.

Would love to see new LN, CN, and N outsider groups.

I too want more outsider groups with N moral components, though I know there are many people who strongly dislike Bestiaries (personally I fine with them printing ALL THE MONSTERS, as long as they have cool art). I'm afraid too quick a proliferation of outsider races might cause a backlash from these people, prompting Paizo to scale back the monster/Bestiary production.

Berselius wrote:
Till all are one. ^_~

Do I have to turn in my nerd card because I had to look this up? At first I thought it was a reference to a certain other Primus that I wasn't getting.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Companion, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I got the reference but I am an 80's child:)


Guy St-Amant wrote:
Since Bestiary 6 has been announced and we have some ideas of what will be in it, it's time for us to make a wish list for the next one.

More unique fiends: More Demon lords, Nascent Demon Lords, Daemon Harbingers, Malbranche, Infernal dukes, Oni Damiyo, and so forth.

Also more Empyreal lords.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Companion, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

If they do have more demi-gods in B7 then forget the fiends and empyreal lords lets get some protean lords, primal inevitables, and non-outsider based demi-gods.


Dragon78 wrote:
If they do have more demi-gods in B7 then forget the fiends and empyreal lords lets get some protean lords, prime inevitables, and non-outsider based demi-gods.

I think that's what you meant right (^_~). But yeah, I'd like to see more demigods that they have't used yet: Asura Ranas, Daemon Harbingers, Eldest, Infernal Dukes, Kyton Demagogues, Malebranche, Manasaputra Kumaras, Oni Daimyo, Protean Lords, Psychopomp Ushers, Qlippoth Lords, and Queens of the Night.


Malefactor wrote:
Creon Vizcarra wrote:
i would like more celestials too. how about CG glass critters and dinosaur people.


Malefactor wrote:
sorry about that. i`m new to this and don`t really get it.


I would like a fiend-celestial mix planetouched (hound archon/ glabrezu and lillend/ marilith planetouched using only bestiary 1 outsiders would be cool) and alignment elementals.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Companion, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

A CN half-celestal and half-fiend creature would be interesting.


The Pyrolisk. Don't know if they exist in Pathfinder but we had a party wiped out by a bunch of these flame breathing chickens back during D&D 2nd Ed.


Vorrek wrote:
The Pyrolisk. Don't know if they exist in Pathfinder but we had a party wiped out by a bunch of these flame breathing chickens back during D&D 2nd Ed.

Yeah, the fact that they have a gaze weapon that can cause an adventurer to spontaneously explode in a fiery explosion is definately something to be feared.

Since I loved the Swan Maiden I hope we'll get their more powerful kin "Bird Maidens" (or "Kahinas"). They can shapechange into any bird (even giant owls/eagles) and can cast cleric spells as an 8th level cleric. :D


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Companion, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

The Pyrolisk(or something similar) would be interesting.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Looking over the list of new animals in Ultimate Wilderness, I've come to the conclusion that the area where our roster of animals is most lacking is when it comes to Palaeozoic creatures or at least terrestrial ones. We have a few nice marine creatures from the Palaeozoic (Eurypterids, Helicoprion, Dunkleosteus, Cameroceras), but all I can think of off the top of my head for land creatures are Dimetrodon and now Prionosuchus. Where are all the other stem-mammals? I mean, Gorgonops, Lystrosaurus, Cynognathus, Anteosaurus, Estemmenosuchus, I'd love to see B7 get a section entirely devoted to Stem-Mammals similar to the Dinosaur and Megafauna sections, they're certainly diverse enough to warrant that. In addition, a Paraeiasaur would be cool. as would a couple more big, weird, amphibians. Diplocaulus anyone? And while we're at it, perhaps throwing in some Triassic non-dinos would be cool as well. Particularly, but not limited to, Crurotarsans and other Archosauromorphs. Postosuchus? Desmatosuchus? Erythrosuchus? Tanystropheus would be awesome as well.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Companion, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

It would be nice to see more non-dinosaur/non-megafauna prehistoric animals.

Silver Crusade

Third vote for more pre-historics that aren't megafauna or dinos. (though some megafauna would be fun too)


I'll reassert my suggestion of Cimolestes as a familiar option for dinosaur summoners.

651 to 674 of 674 << first < prev | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | next > last >>
Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Paizo Products / Product Discussion / Bestiary 7 Wishes List. All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Product Discussion

©2002-2017 Paizo Inc.® | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours, Monday through Friday, 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM Pacific time.

Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, Starfinder, the Starfinder logo, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc. The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Legends, Pathfinder Online, Starfinder Adventure Path, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.